Comparison of the C. lentillifera basic nutrient compositions
The basic nutrient compositions of C. lentillifera from different regions are shown in Table 2. The C. lentillifera moisture contents were extremely high, close to 95%, and there was no significant difference between the populations (P > 0.05). The ash determination results revealed that the Nha Trang population had the highest ash content (65.50%), the Shanwei population had the lowest content (22.83%), and the ash contents of the Beihai, Dongshan and Nha Trang C. lentillifera populations were significantly greater than those of the three Guangdong populations (P < 0.05). In terms of crude protein content, the Dapeng population had the highest (18.70%), the Nha Trang population had the lowest (12.53%), and the populations followed the order Dapeng Bay > Daya Bay > Shanwei > Dongshan > Beihai > Nha Trang; additionally, the crude protein contents of the C. lentillifera samples from Dapeng Bay and Daya Bay were significantly greater than the samples from the Beihai, Dongshan and Nha Trang populations (P < 0.05). It was also revealed that the Daya Bay population had the highest crude liquid content (5.10%), and the Shanwei population had the lowest content (3.83%). The crude liquid content of the Daya Bay population was significantly greater than that of the Beihai, Dongshan and Nha Trang populations (P < 0.05). Moreover, the Shanwei population presented the highest total sugar content (32.87%), the Nha Trang population presented the lowest content (18.13%), and the Daya Bay and Shanwei populations presented relatively high total sugar contents, which were significantly greater than those of the other four populations (P < 0.05). The mannitol determination results revealed that the DongShan population presented the highest mannitol content (7.47%), the Dapeng Bay population presented the lowest content (5.30%), and the Shanwei and DongShan populations presented significantly greater mannitol contents than the Dapeng Bay population (P < 0.05). Finally, the iodine content of the Nha Trang C. lentillifera population was significantly greater than that of the other populations (P < 0.05). Among the six C. lentillifera populations, the Guangdong population presented a greater content of basic nutrients and was considered to be better quality than the other three regional populations.
Table 2
Nutritional components of C. lentillifera cultivated in different areas as mean percent ± standard deviations (n = 3, dry weight, %)
Cultivation area | Guangdong Province | Guangxi Province | Fujian Province | Vietnam |
Dapeng Bay | Daya Bay | Shanwei | North Sea | Dongshan | Nha Trang |
Moisture* | 94.47 ± 0.51 | 94.83 ± 0.23 | 94.73 ± 0.81 | 94.87 ± 0.32 | 94.97 ± 0.35 | 94.57 ± 0.58 |
Ash | 34.07 ± 1.34b | 25.80 ± 0.70bc | 22.83 ± 0.21c | 57.90 ± 8.84a | 59.60 ± 5.99a | 65.50 ± 7.11a |
Crude protein | 18.70 ± 0.36a | 18.57 ± 1.59a | 17.20 ± 1.49ab | 13.57 ± 3.33bc | 14.17 ± 2.75bc | 12.53 ± 1.16c |
Crude liquid | 4.57 ± 0.47ab | 5.10 ± 0.36a | 3.83 ± 0.81b | 4.67 ± 0.25ab | 3.93 ± 0.35b | 4.27 ± 0.40ab |
Total sugar | 24.00 ± 3.38b | 32.50 ± 4.22a | 32.87 ± 2.59a | 19.93 ± 1.93bc | 20.00 ± 2.01bc | 18.13 ± 2.50c |
Mannitol | 5.30 ± 1.15b | 6.17 ± 1.46ab | 7.17 ± 0.49a | 6.57 ± 0.40ab | 7.47 ± 0.25a | 6.07 ± 0.25ab |
Iodine | 0.05 ± 0.02ab | 0.03 ± 0.01c | 0.04 ± 0.01bc | 0.04 ± 0.00bc | 0.05 ± 0.01abc | 0.07 ± 0.00a |
Notes: values with different letters indicate significant differences within groups (P < 0.05); * indicates fresh weight. |
Analysis of the amino acid composition of C. lentillifera
The amino acid compositions and mass fractions of the different populations of C. lentillifera are shown in Table 3. A total of 17 amino acids were detected in the C. lentillifera samples; notably, tryptophan was not detected. The TAA content of C. lentillifera ranged from 7.05–12.37%, the EAA content ranged from 2.89–4.65%, the nonessential amino acid (NEAA) content ranged from 4.15–7.87%, and the flavor amino acid (DAA) content ranged from 3.52%-5.31%. The most abundant NEAA was aspartic acid (Asp, ranging from 0.80%-1.32%), followed by glutamic acid (Glu, ranging from 0.85%-1.21%). There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) among the TAA, EAA and NEAA contents of the three populations of long-stemmed grape ferns in Guangdong, although the TAA and DAA contents in the Daya Bay and Shanwei populations were significantly greater than those in the Beihai, Dongshan and Nha Trang populations (P < 0.05). Additionally, the EAA contents in the Dapeng Bay and Shanwei samples were significantly greater than those in the Beihai, Dongshan and Nha Trang samples (P < 0.05), while the NEAA contents in the Dapeng Bay, Daya Bay and Shanwei samples were significantly greater than those in the Beihai, Dongshan and Nha Trang samples (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the EAA/TAA ratios of the six populations of long-stemmed grape ferns ranged from 35.87%-41.03%, the EAA/NEAA ratio ranged from 55.93%-69.63%, and the DAA/TAA ratio ranged from 41.00%-50.13%. The EAA/TAA, EAA/NEAA and DAA/TAA ratios of C. lentillifera from Beihai, Dongshan and Nha Trang were approximately 40%, 70% and 50%, respectively, with no significant differences among these three regions (P > 0.05) but all were significantly greater than the corresponding ratios from the Guangdong population (P < 0.05).
Table 3
Amino acid composition of C. lentillifera cultivated in different areas as mean percent ± standard deviations (n = 3, dry weight, %)
Amino acid | Guangdong Province | Guangxi province | Fujian province | Vietnam |
Dapeng Bay | Daya Bay | Shanwei | North Sea | Dongshan | Nha Trang |
Thr* | 0.77 ± 0.11a | 0.82 ± 0.11a | 0.81 ± 0.05a | 0.44 ± 0.07b | 0.40 ± 0.16b | 0.49 ± 0.11b |
Val* | 0.57 ± 0.09ab | 0.57 ± 0.11ab | 0.68 ± 0.05a | 0.49 ± 0.07ab | 0.45 ± 0.15b | 0.54 ± 0.12ab |
Met | 0.12 ± 0.06 | 0.15 ± 0.03 | 0.08 ± 0.04 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 0.12 ± 0.04 | 0.12 ± 0.03 |
Ile* | 0.47 ± 0.10 | 0.41 ± 0.08 | 0.51 ± 0.04 | 0.36 ± 0.06 | 0.35 ± 0.12 | 0.42 ± 0.10 |
Leu* | 0.82 ± 0.20 | 0.78 ± 0.12 | 0.84 ± 0.06 | 0.62 ± 0.09 | 0.58 ± 0.20 | 0.70 ± 0.16 |
Phe*# | 0.70 ± 0.12ab | 0.71 ± 0.09ab | 0.73 ± 0.04a | 0.48 ± 0.08c | 0.44 ± 0.16c | 0.52 ± 0.12bc |
Lys* | 0.59 ± 0.07ab | 0.66 ± 0.10a | 0.63 ± 0.05ab | 0.49 ± 0.08ab | 0.43 ± 0.15b | 0.53 ± 0.14ab |
His* | 0.30 ± 0.12a | 0.31 ± 0.03a | 0.35 ± 0.01a | 0.15 ± 0.03b | 0.12 ± 0.05b | 0.16 ± 0.05b |
Asp# | 1.21 ± 0.15ab | 1.31 ± 0.19a | 1.32 ± 0.07a | 0.86 ± 0.13c | 0.80 ± 0.30c | 0.96 ± 0.18bc |
Ser | 0.48 ± 0.07ab | 0.55 ± 0.07a | 0.51 ± 0.03a | 0.30 ± 0.05c | 0.29 ± 0.12c | 0.34 ± 0.09bc |
Glu# | 1.10 ± 0.15ab | 1.18 ± 0.13ab | 1.21 ± 0.06a | 0.94 ± 0.16ab | 0.85 ± 0.28b | 1.05 ± 0.20ab |
Gly# | 0.90 ± 0.19abc | 1.16 ± 0.19a | 1.07 ± 0.07ab | 0.81 ± 0.09bc | 0.67 ± 0.24c | 0.79 ± 0.14bc |
Ala# | 0.29 ± 0.19b | 0.59 ± 0.11a | 0.60 ± 0.05a | 0.49 ± 0.07ab | 0.45 ± 0.15ab | 0.56 ± 0.12a |
Cys | 0.26 ± 0.10a | 0.27 ± 0.04a | 0.23 ± 0.01a | 0.09 ± 0.01b | 0.08 ± 0.02b | 0.08 ± 0.01b |
Tyr# | 0.37 ± 0.11 | 0.37 ± 0.05 | 0.30 ± 0.02 | 0.33 ± 0.05 | 0.31 ± 0.10 | 0.35 ± 0.09 |
Arg | 0.46 ± 0.06ab | 0.58 ± 0.06a | 0.58 ± 0.03a | 0.44 ± 0.06ab | 0.38 ± 0.14b | 0.46 ± 0.09ab |
Pro | 1.78 ± 0.21a | 1.86 ± 0.19a | 1.91 ± 0.14a | 0.38 ± 0.06b | 0.33 ± 0.11b | 0.40 ± 0.09b |
TAA | 11.18 ± 1.68ab | 12.27 ± 1.66a | 12.37 ± 0.72a | 7.77 ± 1.15c | 7.05 ± 2.48bc | 8.44 ± 1.75c |
EAA | 4.34 ± 0.84ab | 4.41 ± 0.65ab | 4.65 ± 0.32a | 3.15 ± 0.49bc | 2.89 ± 1.02c | 3.47 ± 0.80abc |
NEAA | 6.84 ± 0.84a | 7.87 ± 1.01a | 7.73 ± 0.39a | 4.63 ± 0.67b | 4.15 ± 1.45b | 4.99 ± 0.98b |
DAA | 4.57 ± 0.53ab | 5.31 ± 0.75a | 5.24 ± 0.25a | 3.90 ± 0.57ab | 3.52 ± 1.21b | 4.23 ± 0.83ab |
EAA/TAA | 38.63 ± 1.63b | 35.87 ± 0.51c | 37.57 ± 0.45b | 40.50 ± 0.27a | 41.03 ± 0.21a | 40.87 ± 0.91a |
EAA/NEAA | 63.00 ± 4.37b | 55.93 ± 1.29c | 60.10 ± 1.15b | 68.10 ± 0.72a | 69.63 ± 0.57a | 69.23 ± 2.61a |
DAA/TAA | 41.00 ± 1.45c | 43.23 ± 0.42b | 42.30 ± 0.62bc | 50.13 ± 0.15a | 49.93 ± 0.29a | 50.10 ± 0.82a |
Notes: * Essential amino acids; # flavor amino acids. The values with different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). |
A comprehensive assessment of the amino acid profile in C. lentillifera
The nutritional quality of the C. lentillifera cultivated in six different areas was evaluated according to the EAA evaluation criteria proposed by the FAO/WHO, and the results are shown in Table 4. The AASs revealed that the first C. lentillifera limiting amino acid was methionine (Met) + cystine (Cys), and the second limiting amino acid was isoleucine (Ile); moreover, and the amino acid with the highest score among the six different samples was phenylalanine (Phe) + tyrosine (Tyr). Additionally, the chemical score data revealed that the first limiting amino acid of C. lentillifera from all populations was Met + Cys, while the second limiting amino acid varied among the six regions. The second limiting amino acid of the Daya Bay and Beihai populations was Ile, which was in agreement with the AASs, but the second limiting amino acid of the other four populations was lysine (Lys). The amino acid with the highest chemical score differed among the six regions, as threonine (Thr) gave the highest chemical score in the Guangdong region while Phe + Tyr gave the highest scores in the other three region, which is consistent with the AASs. The highest EAAI was found in the Nha Trang, Vietnam, population among the six regions, while the lowest EAAI was found in Dongshan, Fujian, population.
Table 4
Amino acid scores of C. lentillifera cultivated in different areas
Evaluation method | Amino acid | Reference proteins | Guangdong province | Guangxi province | Fujian province | Vietnam |
Dapeng Bay | Daya Bay | Shanwei | North Sea | Dongshan | Nha Trang |
AAS | Thr | 250 | 257.35 | 276.03 | 295.53 | 202.70 | 177.93 | 242.70 |
Val | 310 | 190.51 | 192.99 | 248.29 | 225.74 | 197.07 | 269.28 |
Met + Cys | 220 | 127.24 | 142.49 | 115.19 | 96.74 | 86.03 | 99.24 |
Ile | 250 | 155.98 | 139.13 | 185.32 | 167.37 | 152.96 | 207.80 |
Leu | 440 | 272.96 | 262.57 | 306.43 | 287.15 | 257.34 | 347.42 |
Phe + Tyr | 380 | 431.15 | 458.95 | 496.58 | 446.87 | 385.28 | 523.61 |
Lys | 340 | 198.30 | 221.06 | 230.12 | 224.22 | 191.16 | 264.30 |
CS | Thr | 292 | 88.13 | 94.53 | 101.21 | 69.42 | 60.93 | 83.12 |
Val | 411 | 46.35 | 46.96 | 60.41 | 54.92 | 47.95 | 65.52 |
Met + Cys | 386 | 32.96 | 36.92 | 29.84 | 25.06 | 22.29 | 25.71 |
Ile | 331 | 47.12 | 42.03 | 55.99 | 50.56 | 46.21 | 62.78 |
Leu | 534 | 51.12 | 49.17 | 57.38 | 53.77 | 48.19 | 65.06 |
Phe + Tyr | 565 | 76.31 | 81.23 | 87.89 | 79.09 | 68.19 | 92.67 |
Lys | 441 | 44.96 | 50.13 | 52.18 | 50.84 | 43.35 | 59.93 |
EAAI | | 100 | 52.59 | 54.23 | 59.65 | 52.12 | 45.89 | 61.09 |
Analysis of the fatty acid composition of C. lentillifera
The fatty acid compositions and mass fractions of different populations of C. lentillifera are shown in Table 5. A total of 13 fatty acids were detected in C. lentillifera, including four saturated fatty acids (SFAs), three monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs), and six polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs). The total fatty acid (TFA), SFA, MUFA, and PUFA contents of the Daya Bay population were significantly different from those of the Shanwei, Beihai, Nha Trang, and Dongshan populations (P < 0.05). Among the 13 fatty acids detected, palmitic acid (ranging from 0.494%-1.068%) and linoleic acid (0.264%-0.392%) had the highest contents, and the contents of these fatty acids were significantly greater in the Daya population than in the other populations (P < 0.05). The ratios of UFAs to TFAs ranged from 42.58%-46.11%, with the highest ratios in the Beihai population and the lowest in the Shanwei population.
Table 5
Comparative analysis of the fatty acid contents of C. lentillifera cultivated in different areas as mean percent ± standard deviations (n = 3, dry weight, %)
Fatty acid | Guangdong Province | Guangxi Province | Fujian Province | Vietnam |
Dapeng Bay | Daya Bay | Shanwei | North Sea | Dongshan | Nha Trang |
Myristic acids C14:0 | 0.022 ± 0.003b | 0.042 ± 0.004a | 0.036 ± 0.015a | 0.006 ± 0.002c | 0.009 ± 0.002c | 0.009 ± 0.004c |
Palmitic acids C16:0 | 0.886 ± 0.097b | 1.068 ± 0.029a | 0.853 ± 0.203b | 0.661 ± 0.055c | 0.537 ± 0.050c | 0.494 ± 0.041c |
Docosanoic acids C22:0 | 0.049 ± 0.005a | 0.050 ± 0.007a | 0.035 ± 0.006b | 0.028 ± 0.002bc | 0.020 ± 0.004c | 0.019 ± 0.004c |
Lignoceric acids C24:0 | 0.189 ± 0.019a | 0.192 ± 0.023a | 0.141 ± 0.026b | 0.117 ± 0.011b | 0.082 ± 0.013c | 0.082 ± 0.009c |
ΣSatuurated fatty acids SFA | 1.146 ± 0.123ab | 1.325 ± 0.055a | 1.065 ± 0.238b | 0.813 ± 0.069c | 0.648 ± 0.069c | 0.604 ± 0.050c |
Oleic acids (C18:1),n-9* | 0.069 ± 0.002a | 0.068 ± 0.004a | 0.071 ± 0.009a | 0.033 ± 0.004b | 0.025 ± 0.003bc | 0.023 ± 0.005c |
Erucic acids (C22:1),n-9* | 0.103 ± 0.014a | 0.096 ± 0.034a | 0.075 ± 0.010ab | 0.032 ± 0.009c | 0.021 ± 0.007c | 0.027 ± 0.012c |
ΣMonounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) | 0.079 ± 0.007ab | 0.084 ± 0.002a | 0.063 ± 0.020bc | 0.054 ± 0.006cd | 0.043 ± 0.005d | 0.051 ± 0.003cd |
Linoleic acids (C18:2),n-6** | 0.264 ± 0.024b | 0.329 ± 0.011a | 0.256 ± 0.067b | 0.260 ± 0.037b | 0.194 ± 0.017c | 0.155 ± 0.014c |
Cis-8,11,14-eicosatrienoic acids (C20:3),n-6** | 0.009 ± 0.001b | 0.013 ± 0.000a | 0.007 ± 0.002c | 0.006 ± 0.001c | 0.004 ± 0.001d | 0.005 ± 0.000d |
Arachidonic acids (C20:4),n-6** | 0.075 ± 0.005b | 0.105 ± 0.002a | 0.067 ± 0.017b | 0.055 ± 0.007bc | 0.040 ± 0.003c | 0.038 ± 0.003c |
Cis-11,14,17-eicosatrienoic acids (C20:3),n-3** | 0.007 ± 0.001d | 0.008 ± 0.000cd | 0.008 ± 0.001cd | 0.020 ± 0.003a | 0.012 ± 0.003b | 0.011 ± 0.002bc |
Eicosapentaenoic acids (C20:5; EPA),n-3** | 0.055 ± 0.004a | 0.049 ± 0.001a | 0.037 ± 0.012b | 0.025 ± 0.003c | 0.017 ± 0.001c | 0.017 ± 0.001c |
Alpha linolenic acids (C18:3),n-3** | 0.265 ± 0.029ab | 0.296 ± 0.007a | 0.206 ± 0.060bc | 0.210 ± 0.036bc | 0.153 ± 0.014cd | 0.133 ± 0.017d |
ΣPolyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) | 0.846 ± 0.057ab | 0.964 ± 0.053a | 0.727 ± 0.159bc | 0.641 ± 0.089cd | 0.466 ± 0.041d | 0.407 ± 0.037d |
TFA | 2.072 ± 0.180ab | 2.400 ± 0.097a | 1.855 ± 0.413bc | 1.507 ± 0.160cd | 1.156 ± 0.115de | 1.062 ± 0.089e |
UFA/TFA | 44.64% | 43.66% | 42.58% | 46.11% | 44.03% | 43.13% |
Notes: * Monounsaturated fatty acids; ** Polyunsaturated fatty acids; Values with different letters indicate a significant difference (P < 0.05). |