From April 2019 through May 2020, 947 individuals in 238 households (median 4 people/household, range 1–11) were followed and tested for Pf infection at 6683 scheduled monthly active case detection (ACD) visits and 416 unscheduled passive case detection (PCD) visits where participants presented at study clinics, accumulating 658 person-years of follow-up time (Median: 329 days, IQR:202–342 days) with a mean of 7.5 visits per person (Supplemental Table 1). Due to withdrawals or household inaccessibility, 104 (11%) individuals from 18 households were sampled only once. Children under-5 attended an average of 8.0 visits/child, while males over 15 years of age (over-15) attended the fewest visits (average 5.4 visits/person). Participants had Pf infection detected by qPCR at 23% (1631/7099) of all visits: 22% (1466/6683) of routine visits and 40% (165/416) of PCD visits. Ninety-five percent (1553/1631) of Pf positive samples were tested for gametocytes by RT-qPCR. Of those tested, 36% (560/1553) were positive for gametocytes with a mean of 0.85 gametocyte-positive visits per person-year during the study. Among all visits, 8% (560/7099) were positive for gametocytes and only 1% (85/7099) had high gametocyte density associated with increased risk of transmission ( > = 10 gametocytes/µl) [15] (Table 1).
Gametocyte-containing infections are not evenly distributed in the study population
Gametocyte-positive observations occurred unevenly across the population, with only 23% (216/947) of participants ever having an infection with detectable gametocytes (Table 1; Fig. 2). Among the 216 participants with gametocytes detected, 118/216 (55%) were gametocyte-positive at multiple visits, with a mean of 2.6 gametocyte-positive visits per person, and a maximum of 10 gametocyte-positive observations for any one individual (Fig. 2). Visits with infections containing high gametocyte densities ( > = 10 gametocytes/µl), which are associated with increased risk of transmission [15], occurred in only 6% of the study population (54/947). These high gametocyte density infections were clustered among individuals who had multiple gametocyte-positive visits, with 39% of individuals with multiple gametocyte-positive visits having high-density infections vs 8% of individuals with only a single gametocyte-positive infection (p < 0.001)(Table 1).
We evaluated the proportion of the study population with any gametocyte-positive infections, more than one gametocyte-positive infection, mean gametocyte density, and gametocyte density cutoffs associated with increased likelihood of transmission to mosquitoes, using fixed covariates assessed at enrollment and visit-specific covariates (Table 1). Comparisons by age-group revealed that a higher proportion of school-age children (5–15 year-olds) had at least one gametocyte-positive observation during the study (37%) compared to younger children (under-5) or adults (over-15) (13% and 16%, respectively, p < 0.001). School-age children were also more likely to ever have had a high-density gametocyte infection (23%, p < 0.001) compared to other age groups, although their median gametocyte density over the study was lower than younger children and comparable to adults. Participants living in households with the lowest tertile of socioeconomic status (SES) and living in unfinished houses (as opposed to finished houses) were significantly more likely to have had at least one gametocyte-positive visit (p < 0.01) and to have had
Table 1
Gametocyte detection, median gametocyte density, and proportion with high density gametocytes detected in the study population (N = 947 individuals) by fixed covariates assessed at enrollment (A) and time-varying covariates assessed at each visit (N = 7099 visits) (B). SES: socioeconomic status, HH: household.
Population | N Total | N (%) ever positive for gametocytes | N (%) w/ > 1 gametocyte positive visit | Median (IQR) density gametocytes/µl | N (%) with > = 1 gametocytes/µl | N (%) with > = 10 gametocytes/µl |
A. Enrollment Characteristics | 947 | 216 (22.8) | 118 (12.5) | 0.9 (0.2, 4.7) | 131 (13.8) | 54 (5.7) |
Age Group | | *** | *** | | *** | *** |
Under 5 | 177 | 23 (13) | 14 (7.9) | 3.6 (0.9, 10.6) | 18 (10.2) | 11 (6.2) |
5–15 | 337 | 124 (36.8) | 75 (22.3) | 0.8 (0.2, 4.8) | 79 (23.4) | 35 (10.4) |
Over 15 | 433 | 69 (15.9) | 29 (6.7) | 0.6 (0.1, 2.2) | 34 (7.9) | 8 (1.8) |
Sex | | ** | * | | | |
Female | 558 | 108 (19.4) | 57 (10.2) | 1.3 (0.2, 5.3) | 67 (12) | 29 (5.2) |
Male | 389 | 108 (27.8) | 61 (15.7) | 0.7 (0.2, 3.5) | 64 (16.5) | 25 (6.4) |
Site | | | ** | | | |
Namanolo (lower elevation) | 437 | 109 (24.9) | 49 (11.2) | 1.2 (0.3, 6.4) | 69 (15.8) | 29 (6.6) |
Ntaja (higher elevation) | 510 | 107 (21) | 69 (13.5) | 0.6 (0.2, 3.4) | 62 (12.2) | 25 (4.9) |
HH head education# (N = 774) | | | | | | |
None | 195 | 53 (27.2) | 31 (15.9) | 0.7 (0.2, 5.2) | 32 (16.4) | 14 (7.2) |
Primary only | 296 | 73 (24.7) | 37 (12.5) | 1.1 (0.2, 4.3) | 43 (14.5) | 18 (6.1) |
Some secondary or higher | 283 | 59 (20.8) | 31 (11) | 0.8 (0.2, 4.1) | 40 (14.1) | 17 (6) |
SES Index# | | ** | | | | |
Low | 222 | 60 (27) | 29 (13.1) | 1.1 (0.2, 5.4) | 38 (17.1) | 17 (7.7) |
Medium | 489 | 121 (24.7) | 69 (14.1) | 0.7 (0.2, 3.7) | 73 (14.9) | 32 (6.5) |
High | 128 | 17 (13.3) | 10 (7.8) | 0.9 (0.1, 5.4) | 13 (10.2) | 4 (3.1) |
HH Construction# | | * | *** | | | |
Unfinished | 530 | 137 (25.8) | 84 (15.8) | 0.8 (0.2, 4.1) | 87 (16.4) | 39 (7.4) |
Finished | 309 | 61 (19.7) | 24 (7.8) | 1.1 (0.2, 5.3) | 37 (12) | 14 (4.5) |
B. Visit specific characteristics | N Total | N (%) positive for gametocytes | | Median (IQR) density gametocyte/ul | N (%) with > = 1 gametocyte/ul | N (%) with > = 10 gametocyte/ul |
Total Observations | 7099 | 560 (7.9) | | 0.9 (0.2, 4.7) | 269 (3.8) | 85 (1.2) |
Visit Type | | | | | | |
Routine | 6683 | 525 (7.9) | | 0.9 (0.2, 4.7) | 256 (3.8) | 82 (1.2) |
Passive case detection | 416 | 35 (8.4) | | 0.4 (0.2, 2.8) | 13 (3.1) | 3 (0.7) |
Fever status | | | | | | |
Fever | 836 | 61 (7.3) | | 0.8 (0.3, 5.7) | 28 (3.3) | 9 (1.1) |
No Fever | 6263 | 499 (8) | | 0.9 (0.2, 4.3) | 241 (3.8) | 76 (1.2) |
Net Use previous night# | | ** | | | | |
No net used | 1597 | 155 (9.7) | | 0.9 (0.2, 4.6) | 75 (4.7) | 26 (1.6) |
Net used | 5070 | 369 (7.3) | | 0.9 (0.2, 5.1) | 180 (3.6) | 56 (1.1) |
Season | | | | | * | |
Dry | 3492 | 259 (7.4) | | 0.6 (0.2, 3.7) | 113 (3.2) | 38 (1.1) |
Rainy | 3607 | 301 (8.3) | | 1.1 (0.3, 5.2) | 156 (4.3) | 47 (1.3) |
Proportions of participants with each of the outcomes were compared based on enrollment characteristics using two-sided chi-squared tests. Gametocyte density was compared between enrollment characteristics using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. #missing data - HH head education level (173), SES (108), Household construction (108), Net use (432 – not collected at passive case detection visits [416] and missing in routine visits [16]) p-value ***< 0.001, ** < 0.01, * < 0.05 |
gametocytes detected during multiple visits (p < 0.001), respectively (Table 1). Among covariates that were measured at each follow-up visit, gametocytes were more likely to be detected when participants reported they did not sleep under a bed net the night prior to the visit (p < 0.01). Furthermore, visits with higher gametocyte densities were more likely to occur during the rainy season compared to the dry season (p < 0.05 for gametocyte densities > 1 gametocyte/ul) (Table 1).
These findings contrast with the distribution of total parasitemia in the population, where a majority (72%: 678/947) of all participants had at least one Pf infection detected during the study (Supplemental Table 2). Among individuals who ever had Pf infections, 32% had gametocyte-containing infections. School-age children were both significantly more likely to have Pf infections (p < 0.001) and, among individuals with Pf infections, were twice as likely to have gametocyte-containing infections than other age groups (p < 0.001). While the type of visit (routine ACD vs. PCD) was not a significant predictor for gametocyte detection, participants were significantly more likely to have Pf parasites detected, and to have higher parasite densities at PCD visits compared to routine visits. Despite this, among visits with Pf infections detected, routine visits were significantly more likely to have gametocytes detected than PCD visits (Supplemental Table 2). These findings indicate that transmissible, gametocyte-containing, infections are not a random subset of all Pf infections.
Incidence of infections containing gametocytes is higher in school-age children
Longitudinal follow-up allowed us to calculate the incidence rate of Pf infections, gametocyte-containing infections, and infections with high-density gametocytes over time. We estimated the importance of predictors for the incidence rate of each outcome, accounting for individual follow-up time, using negative binomial models (Fig. 3; Supplemental Tables 3–5). School-age children had significantly higher incidence of infections containing gametocytes than other age groups, with a rate ratio (RtR) of 2.59 (95% CI 1.6–4.2) compared to under-5s, and this relationship was more pronounced when compared to the incidence any Pf infection (RtR 1.62 [95% CI 1.34, 1.96] comparing school-age children to under-5s). While school-age children had more frequent high-density gametocyte infections than children under 5, this relationship was not statistically significant. Reported net use at enrollment and higher SES were both significantly associated with lower rates of any gametocytes or high-density gametocytes. Overall, the predictors of the incidence rate of infections containing any gametocytes or high-density gametocytes were similar to predictors of the rate of any Pf infection; however, the magnitude of association, the incidence rate ratio, was larger for predicting gametocytes than Pf infection across all predictors (Fig. 3). Incidence rates, rate ratios and confidence intervals for all three outcomes are reported in Supplemental Tables 3–5.
Visit-specific longitudinal analyses showed increased odds of gametocyte-containing infections at PCD visits and visits with fever (Supplemental Table 6). However, visits with fever and PCD visits were rare (12% and 6%, respectively), limiting their contribution to the population-level transmission reservoir.
Gametocyte-containing infections cluster at the individual and household levels
To quantify the clustering of gametocyte-containing infections among certain individuals over time (Fig. 2), we examined the association of previous Pf infection or gametocyte detection on subsequent gametocyte carriage, accounting for repeated observations among individuals and clustering by household. Analyses were restricted to the 843 individuals with at least two visits with laboratory results, resulting in 6,152 observations where we could assess previous parasite or gametocyte detection (Table 2). Overall, neither ever having any prior Pf infection nor having Pf infection at the previous visit were associated with having a gametocyte-containing infection at the current visit. However, having any prior infections containing gametocytes was strongly associated with having gametocytes at the current visit (OR: 3.82, 95% CI: 1.75, 8.33), confirming clustering of gametocyte-containing infections among a subset of individuals.
Table 2
Association among individuals with at least 2 observations (N = 843) from 6,152 observations between having any gametocytes detected and visit-specific predictor variables from mixed effect logistic regression accounting for repeated measures and clustering by household
Visit-Specific Characteristics | Number of Observations, (% of total observations) (N = 6152) | OR of gametocyte-positive infection (95% CI) |
Previously detected Pf parasitemia | | |
Never previously having Pf detected | 2735 (44.5%) | Ref |
Any Previous Pf detected | 3417 (55.5%) | 1.42 (0.91, 2.24) |
No Pf detected at previous visit | 4770 (77.5%) | Ref |
Pf detected at previous visit | 1382 (22.5%) | 0.96 (0.69, 1.34) |
Previously detected gametocytes (restricted to all observations from 843 individuals with at least 2 observations) | | |
Never previously had gametocytes | 5055 (82.2%) | Ref |
Previously had any gametocytes | 1097 (17.8%) | 3.82 (1.75, 8.33) |
No Gametocytes detected at previous visit | 5675 (92.2%) | Ref |
Gametocytes detected at previous visit | 477 (7.8%) | 0.77 (0.54, 1.11) |
We assessed whether increased incidence of gametocyte-positive visits within certain individuals was explained by clustering at the household level and found that most gametocyte-containing infections clustered within a few households (Fig. 4). After restricting analysis to households with at least 2 follow-up visits (nhousehold=220, nindividual=890), we found that only 16% (34/220) of households had gametocytes detected at multiple time points among multiple members. These 34 ‘high-gametocyte’ households contained 22% (195/890) of the study population and 63% (349/557) of gametocyte-positive visits (Table 3). This was significantly different (p < 0.001) than the corresponding distribution of Pf infections in the population, with 25% of all Pf infections occurring in households where there were no gametocytes detected at any time during follow-up.
Table 3
Distribution of households, individuals, P. falciparum infections, and gametocyte-containing infections by household types among all households with at least two completed study visits. Households defined as ‘high gametocyte’ (at least two individuals with at least two gametocyte-positive visits), ‘low gametocyte’, and ‘no gametocyte’. Examples shown in Fig. 3. SES: socioeconomic status, Pf: Plasmodium falciparum, Gam: gametocytes
| Household Type | | |
Household Characteristics (row %) | High Gametocyte Households | Low Gametocyte Households | No Gametocyte Households | Chi square p-value | Total Population |
Number of Households | 34 (15.5%) | 73 (33.2%) | 113 (51.4%) | | 220 |
Household SES (missing = 21) | | | | | |
Low | 9 (15.0%) | 20 (33.3%) | 31 (51.7%) | 0.48 | 60 |
Medium | 20 (18.5%) | 38 (35.2%) | 50 (46.3%) | 108 |
High | 2 (6.5%) | 10 (32.3%) | 19 (61.3%) | 31 |
N individuals in households | 195 (21.9%) | 293 (32.9%) | 402 (45.2%) | | 890 |
Age Group | | | | | |
Children under 5 | 41 (25.0%) | 42 (25.6%) | 81 (49.4%) | 0.01 | 164 |
School-aged (5–15) | 80 (24.9%) | 116 (36.1%) | 125 (38.9%) | 321 |
Adults over 15 | 74 (18.3%) | 135 (33.3%) | 196 (48.4%) | 405 |
Site | | | | | |
Namanolo | 79 (19.1%) | 168 (40.7%) | 166 (40.2%) | < 0.001 | 413 |
Ntaja | 116 (24.3%) | 125 (26.2%) | 236 (49.5%) | 477 |
N Pf + infections | 614 (38.2%) | 592 (36.8%) | 403 (25.0%) | < 0.001 | 1609 |
N Gam + infections | 349 (62.7%) | 208 (37.3%) | 0 (0%) | 557 |
To examine the drivers of household-level clustering of gametocyte containing infections, we created a continuous variable for ‘household level of gametocyte detection’ which accounted for the number of people in a household, the number of visits each person contributed, and the density of gametocyte-containing infections detected. In adjusted linear regression models accounting for household Pf infection levels, neither household SES nor site were associated with household level of gametocyte detection. However, increasing proportion of school-age children in the household remained highly predictive of increasing household level of gametocyte detection, even after adjustment for Pf infection levels (p < 0.01). This suggests that school-age children drive household-level gametocyte clustering, independent of Pf infections in the household. However, model residuals were not normally distributed, and distributions of both gametocyte levels and Pf infection levels (Fig. 5) showed strong evidence of spatial autocorrelation of infections in households by Moran’s I (p < 0.001). To account for this spatial autocorrelation, spatial lag models which adjusted for Pf infection levels were created. After accounting for spatial autocorrelation, increasing proportion of school-age children in the household was still significantly correlated with increasing household gametocyte levels (p = 0.04), but the magnitude of association was greatly decreased (0.15 vs 2.24) compared to models not accounting for spatial autocorrelating (Supplemental Table 7), suggesting unmeasured genetic or environmental features are also important drivers of household gametocyte levels. In contrast to household gametocyte levels, models examining predictors of household Pf levels showed that the proportion of school-age children did not predict household Pf infection levels after accounting for spatial autocorrelation (p = 0.9).
The majority of gametocytes are detected in school-age children
Finally, we estimated the distribution of gametocytes in the population over the total study period, accounting for density of infection, frequency of infection, frequency of follow-up visits, and probability of enrolling in the study. Overall, 82% of people counted in our census of the study area were enrolled in the study. However, the probability of being enrolled in the study differed significantly by age, which our results showed was highly associated with gametocyte carriage. Individuals over 15 years of age were the least likely age group to enroll in the study (24% not enrolled). After accounting for age-specific probability of enrollment, tree maps of total gametocyte abundance by population characteristics were produced (Fig. 6).
Of the total detected gametocyte abundance (sum of gametocyte densities) determined from routine ACD visits, and after adjusting for age-related enrollment bias, 53% of gametocytes were detected among school-age children who made up only 33% of the census population. In addition, 40% of gametocytes were detected among under-5 children who represented 18% of the census population, with the remaining 7% of gametocytes being detected in adults (49% of population) (Fig. 6a).
Among school-age children and adults, most gametocytes were detected during the rainy season, however among younger children, more gametocytes were detected in the dry season. This suggests that clearing all infections from school-age children during the rainy season would lead to a 67% decrease in the total gametocyte abundance in the population at that time, compared to similarly treating all under-5 children during the rainy season, which would decrease total gametocyte abundance by only 25%.
Figure 6a. Distribution of total gametocyte abundance in the population by characteristic, restricted to routine visit observations with reported net use (missing = 15), and reported SES (missing = 376 visits from 108 individuals), weighted for age-distribution in the census. N = 6,292 visits. *Among young children during the rainy season, reported net use was sufficiently common that the number of gametocytes among non-net users was negligible (0.2% of total) and cannot be seen.
Because we did not inquire about net use at PCD visits, we constructed separate tree maps to examine the difference in total gametocyte abundance between routine ACD and unscheduled PCD visits (Fig. 6b). PCD visits comprised only 6% of gametocyte positive visits. Furthermore, gametocyte densities were low at these health center visits, thus gametocytes detected during PCD visits made up a negligible fraction of all gametocytes in the population.
Figure 6b. Distribution of total gametocyte abundance in the population by characteristic including PCD (passive case/health center visit) vs ACD (routine visit), restricted to observations with reported SES (missing = 399 visits from 108 individuals), weighted for age-distribution in the census. N = 6,700.
We compared the distribution of gametocytes to the distribution of total Pf abundance using total Pf parasite density. At routine visits 84% of all Pf parasites were detected among school-age children, with only 7% detected among adults, and 10% among under 5 children (Fig. 6c). While the number of both gametocytes and total parasites was highest in school-age children, when comparing the treemaps for gametocytes and all Pf infection, the distribution of total parasite distribution by age group were significantly different than the distribution of gametocytes in the population (p < 0.0001). Among school-age children, most parasites were detected during the dry season, in contrast to the distribution of gametocytes.
When PCD visits were included (Fig. 7d), most Pf parasites in the population were still detected in school-age children. In contrast to gametocyte abundance, nearly half of all parasites among school-age children, and more than half of all parasites found in other age groups, were detected at PCD visits (Fig. 6d). While clearing parasites among school-age children at PCD visits alone would clear 61% of the total parasite abundance, it would decrease only 1% of the total gametocyte abundance in the population.