2.1 Culture conditions
The MRSE strains were stored at a temperature of -80℃ in Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) supplemented with 20% (vol/vol) glycerol. Before each experiment, approximately 20 µL aliquots of the frozen cultures were transferred to tubes containing 5 mL of TSB and incubated overnight at 37℃. Subsequently, the cultures were inoculated onto Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA) and stored at 4℃ until they were needed for further experimentation
2.2 The Antibacterial Activity of Emilia Sonchifolia In Vitro
2.2.1 Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)
According to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute of the United States of America, the MIC of Emilia sonchifolia was determined using the broth dilution method. In brief, a bacterial suspension cultured to the logarithmic phase was diluted to a concentration of 1×106 colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL). Then, 100 µL of the adjusted inoculum (1×106 CFU/mL) was added to each well of a 96-well Microtiter plate. Subsequently, 100 µL of serial twofold dilutions of Emilia sonchifolia with tryptic soy broth (TSB) were dispensed in the wells, ranging from a concentration of 80 mg/mL to 0.0195 mg/mL. After incubation for 18 hours at 37℃, the MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of luteo.
2.2.2 Determination of Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC)
The dilution in broth method was employed to determine the MBC for emilia sonchifolia[30]. The culture suspensions (100 L) of MRSE treated with emilia sonchifolia at concentrations of 5 and 40 mg/mL, where no bacterial growth was observed, were evenly spread on tryptic soy agar (TSA) plates and incubated at 37℃ for 18 hours. The surviving colonies were subsequently observed. The MBC was defined as the lowest concentration of antimicrobial agent capable of inactivating more than 99.99% of the bacterial population (<10 CFU/mL). The assay was performed in triplicate.
2.3 The Antibacterial Activity of Emilia Sonchifolia In Vivo
2.3.1 Animals conditioning
The mice were assigned to individual cages in a pathogen-free facility, with a maximum occupancy of six mice per cage. Prior to their utilization, the mice were subjected to a 12-hour light-dark cycle at a temperature of 22 ± 2°C for a duration of one week. Additionally, they were provided unrestricted access to both food and water.
2.3.2 Establishment of mouse immunosuppressive models
Based on the existing literature, a mouse immunosuppressive model was established through intraperitoneal injection of CP doses at 120 mg/kg of body weight for a duration of 4 days. Control mice were administered PBS. Subsequently, the thymus and spleen were extracted from both the immunosuppressive and control mice, and the thymus and spleen index was computed.
2.3.3 Treatment of Emilia Sonchifolia against MRSE-induced BSIs
The animals were randomly assigned to different groups prior to the experiment, including the immunosuppressive group, bloodstream infection group, Emilia sonchifolia group, and blank group. In the Emilia sonchifolia group, Emilia sonchifolia was administered orally at a dosage of 8g/kg, 7 days prior to infection. The other three groups received an equal volume of PBS.
The immunosuppression model was implemented three days prior to infection, following the aforementioned method, in the immunosuppressive group, bloodstream infection group, and Emilia Sonchifolia group, and the blank group were dealt with PBS. Furthermore, bloodstream infection group, Emilia sonchifolia group were infected at 7 d after Emilia sonchifoli oral administration by tail vein injection with 1× 108cfu/mL MRSE, and the immunosuppressive group,blank group were dealt with PBS. The way of tail veins were consistent with the procedure outlined in Liu et al[31].After that, at 12 h post infection (pi), blood samples were collected from tail veins in all groups. Meanwhile the above mouse were euthanized by 100mg/kg Pentobarbitol Sodium (IP). Subsequently, the aforementioned samples underwent serial dilution in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and were subsequently plated on tryptic soy broth (TSB) agar plates for a duration of 24 hours at a temperature of 37◦C. Ultimately, the enumeration of clones was conducted to assess the efficacy of the mouse bloodstream infection (BSI) models[32].
The aforementioned mouse experiments were authorized by the University Committee on Use and Care of Animals at the Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, in accordance with the Laboratory Animal – Guideline for Ethical Review of Animal Welfare (GB/T 35892—2018). We confirming that all experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
2.4 Proteomics Study
TMT-based quantitative proteomics analyses were implemented as Liu described[23]. Three biological replicates were prepared for water extract , ethanol extract and control group, which were sent to LC-BIO Technologies Co., Ltd. (Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China) for proteomics analysis. Detailed protein extraction, purification, peptide tagging and reverse-phase chromatography and mass spectrometry were provided in Supporting Information 2. Protein identification, quantification, classification and interaction prediction were analyzed[23]. The raw files generated by AQ Exactive Plus were converted using Proteome Discoverer 2.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and the files were sent to OmicStudio tools (Lc-bio Technologies Co., Ltd.) for analysis[33]. Differentially expressed proteins were defined as those with a fold change (FC) ≥1.2 or ≤1/1.2 -fold and a P-value<0.05. The differentially expressed proteins were functionally classified by Gene Ontology (GO) terms (http://www.omicsbean.com). In addition, the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway of altered proteins was categorized utilizing the same resource.
2.5 Transcriptomics Study
Transcriptome sequencing was performed as Cheng described[34] . Three biological replicates were prepared for water extract , ethanol extract and control group, which were sent to LC-BIO Technologies Co., Ltd. (Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China) for transcriptome sequencing analysis. Detailed RNA isolation, purification, quantification and cDNA Library Construction were provided in Supporting Information 1.
After estimating the expression levels of all transcripts and analyzing expression levels for mRNAs, the differentially expressed mRNAs were selected with fold change >2 or fold change <0.5 with p value < 0.05 by DESeq2, Go and KEGG enrichment to the differentially activated pathways were analyzed.
2.6 Transcriptomic and proteomic integrative analysis methods
The transcriptomic and proteomic analyses were carried out to identify the expressions of genes, potential antibacterial mechanism of Emilia Sonchifolia against MRSE.
2.7 Effect of Emilia Sonchifolia on purine metabolism
The activities of IMP,GPM and AMP were evaluated in MRSE under emilia sonchifolia stress. MRSE in the logarithmic growth phase was introduced to Emilia sonchifolia at a concentration of 1 minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Subsequently, the mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 4 hours. A negative control was also prepared, consisting of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) instead of emilia sonchifolia. The mixtures were then subjected to centrifugation at 12000 revolutions per minute for 5 minutes at 4°C, and the resulting supernatant was discarded. The cells were subsequently washed and suspended in PBS. Subsequently, the samples were subjected to ultrasonication at a concentration of 30% for a duration of 30 minutes (with an interval of 5 seconds) and then centrifuged at a speed of 12000 revolutions per minute for 5 minutes at a temperature of 4℃. Ultimately,the supernatant was divided into aliquots and used for the IMP,GPM and AMP assays by kits from Beijing APPLYGEN Gene Technology Co., LTD.
2.8 Effect of Emilia Sonchifolia on Antioxidant system
The activities of CAT and SOD were evaluated in MRSE under emilia sonchifolia stress. MRSE in the logarithmic growth phase was introduced to emilia sonchifolia at a concentration of 1 minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Subsequently, the mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 4 hours. A negative control was also prepared, consisting of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) instead of emilia sonchifolia. The mixtures were then subjected to centrifugation at 12000 revolutions per minute for 5 minutes at 4°C, and the resulting supernatant was discarded. The cells were subsequently washed and suspended in PBS. Subsequently, the samples were subjected to ultrasonication at a concentration of 30% for a duration of 30 minutes (with an interval of 5 seconds) and then centrifuged at a speed of 12000 revolutions per minute for 5 minutes at a temperature of 4℃. Ultimately,the supernatant was divided into aliquots and used for the CAT and SOD assays by kits from Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co.,Ltd..
2.9 Effect of Emilia sonchifolia on morphological characterizations of MRSE
Morphological characterizations of MRSE treated with emilia sonchifolia were explored using Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM).
The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was conducted using a modified method that had been previously employed. In summary, Emilia sonchifolia (1 MIC) was introduced to a logarithmic phase bacterial suspension. The control group received an equal volume of phosphate buffer saline (PBS). All groups were incubated at 37℃ for a duration of 4 hours. Subsequently, the treated bacterial cells were harvested, washed, and subsequently fixed in a 3% glutaraldehyde solution overnight at 4℃. Next, the bacterial cells underwent dehydration through the application of ethanol with varying concentrations, followed by replacement with tertiary butyl alcohol. Subsequently, the samples were subjected to freeze-drying, sputter coated with gold, and examined through microscopic observations utilizing a scanning electron microscope. For the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis, the MRSE were treated in a manner consistent with the SEM procedure. As per the report, the specimens were affixed to a fibrous carbon film and observed using TEM [35].
3.0 Statistical analysis
The values were reported as means ± standard deviations (SDs). To assess the statistical differences among the various groups, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted. Significant differences between means were determined using Tukey's Honest Significant Difference test, with a significance level set at p < 0.05.