Nanoparticle complexation at water-water interfaces
As a proof-of-concept, biomimetic underwater microcapsules were fabricated in ATPSs31 inspired by permeable human cell membranes and water-walking striders (Fig. 1). Water-water interfaces can be generated with aqueous solutions containing DEX and PEG and stabilized in situ by the self-assembled complexes formed by oppositely charged biological nanoparticles, ChNF and CNC (Figure S1), suspended in the polymer solutions (Fig. 1c). The interfacial complexation of ChNF and CNC is driven by electrostatic interactions at the interface between the phases. The electrostatic interactions between the cationic amine groups of ChNF and the anionic half sulfate ester groups of CNCs are enhanced by release of counterions and water (entropic gain, \(\:\varDelta\:S>0\)).38 Considering the ultralow interfacial tension at the water-water interface (limited enthalpic contributions) and the structural features of the oppositely charged nanoparticles, the spontaneous interfacial electrostatic interactions are significantly enhanced by the entropic gain.
Compared with those formed by polymer/polymer and polymer/nanoparticle (Fig. 1c) interactions, the ChNF/CNC complexes bear the characteristics of both, i.e., viscoelasticity and permeability, offering interesting opportunities, given the possibility to tailor the morphology and transport properties by varying pH.
Pendant drop tensiometry was used to investigate the interfacial complexation, where a 10 wt% DEX solution (pH = 3, \(\:\rho\:\) = 1.0471) was slowly introduced into 10 wt% PEG solution (pH = 3, \(\:\rho\:\) = 1.0208) (Table S1). Complexation and pendant droplet stabilization were found for the nanoparticle complexes (ChNF in DEX and CNC in PEG) (Fig. 2a). No complexation was evidenced absent the nanoparticles (Video S1), where the DEX droplet fell due to the ultralow interfacial tension. At higher pH values, the amine groups on the surface of ChNFs are protonated (Fig. 2b),39 giving rise to weaker complexes with CNCs and failing to stabilize the interface (illustration of Fig. 2b). This sensitivity to pH changes is expected to be affected by the non-uniform distribution of amine groups on the surface of ChNFs, due to the random deacetylation process used in their preparation.40
We further investigated the microstructure of ChNF/CNC complexes by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), which showed an interconnected, multi-layered network with voids (Fig. 2c). Considering the structure of the interfacial layer, the permeability of ChNF/CNC complexes was confirmed by exchange of labelled PEG (FITC-PEG, \(\:{M}_{w}\) = 10000) across the microcapsules formed by the ChNF/CNC complex (DEX-in-PEG, Figure S3). By contrast, the chitosan (CS)/sodium alginate (SA) complex prevented FITC-PEG exchange (Figure S4), indicating limited permeability, as previously discussed.31 However, the ChNF/CNC complex layer was effective in blocking particles (50-nm polystyrene spheres, Figure S5), implying size exclusion effects due to the characteristic cells in the network formed at the interface.
As a reference, we evaluated the changes of the DEX pendant droplet in a PEG solution with each phase containing oppositely charged CS and SA. The CS/SA complex underwent rapid shrinkage and surface wrinkling when the pendant DEX droplet was withdrawn, indicative of the elasticity of the interfacial film (Figure S2a). In another referencing combination (PE/NP system), the CS/CNC complexation maintained the droplet shape (no surface deformation or wrinkling) (Figure S2b). Under the same condition, during the retraction of the droplet encapsulated with ChNF/CNC complexes fragmented, the interfacial films crumpled in response to the compressive force as the interfacial area decreased (Fig. 2a). The results indicate that ChNF/CNC complexes display the characteristics of both the PE/PE and PE/NP systems.
In-situ interfacial shear rheology was performed by using a magnetic probe to quantitatively assess the mechanical properties of the interfacial layer (Fig. 2d and Video S2). Figure S6, as a control, shows a good correlation between the probe and the trap position during the test, validating the methodology reliability. The results shown in Fig. 2e correspond to the time evolution of the storage (G’) and loss (G’’) moduli for the interfacial complexes (ChNF/CNC and CS/CNC) at the water-water interface (Fig. 2e). The CS/SA interfacial complex was not studied due to the rapid and dense association between CS and SA. Both the ChNF/CNC and CS/CNC complexes had a high G’, e.g., solid-like behavior. Notably, although ChNF/CNC complexes had a slightly lower G’, its loss factor value was significantly higher than that of the CS/CNC complex. This indicates that the ChNF/CNC system formed a tough, yet flexible interfacial layer. The observed moduli differences can be explained by the interaction and arrangement of rod-like, rigid CNCs in the complex.41,42 In the CS/CNC complex, the CS chains facilitated strong binding and orderly arrangement with CNCs in the complex, endowing rather the rigidity features. The high aspect ratio (Figure S1) and random distribution of surface charges of ChNF led to much less ordered complex, contributing to the formation of a flexible film. TEM also supports the loose ordering of the nanoparticles in the complex layer (Fig. 2c). Overall, complexation of ChNFs and CNCs at the interface stabilized the shapes of the ATPSs and the permeable complexes with rigidity and deformability, while maintaining the structure when the external environment changed, e.g., osmotic stress.
Osmotic stress balance between the two aqueous phases
Osmotic stress can modulate the direction of water flow across the water-water interface in ATPSs (Fig. 3a), a simple route to adjust the properties of all-aqueous constructs.31 As such, water transport occurs between the interior of the pendant droplet and the external phase, under the influence of osmotic pressure gradients. A microcapsule and a pendant drop encapsulated with the ChNF/CNC complexes are subjected to three different regimes of osmotic stress, \(\:\varPi\:\), between the internal (DEX) and external (PEG) phases (Fig. 3 and Table S1), namely \(\:{\varPi\:}_{PEG}\) \(\:<\) \(\:{\varPi\:}_{DEX}\), \(\:{\varPi\:}_{PEG}\) \(\:=\) \(\:{\varPi\:}_{DEX}\), and \(\:{\varPi\:}_{PEG}\) \(\:>\) \(\:{\varPi\:}_{DEX}\). The osmotic pressure of each phase was adjusted by the concentrations of DEX and PEG, while keeping the nanoparticle loading the same (1.0 wt% in each phase). Initially, ChNF in DEX and CNC in PEG met at the interface and formed an interfacial layer by electrostatic interactions. No apparent wrinkling was observed on the droplet surface (Fig. 3b). With time, the interfacial complex equilibrated, affecting both convective flow and permeability (Fig. 3b).
At \(\:{\varPi\:}_{PEG}\) \(\:<\) \(\:{\varPi\:}_{DEX}\), a pendant DEX droplet gradually expanded due to continuous influx of water from the PEG solution (Fig. 3a and 3b). Fluorescence and optical microscopy (Fig. 3c and Figure S7 in the case of a microcapsule) clearly showed the formation of small PEG-in-DEX emulsion droplets inside the larger droplet stabilized by the ChNF/CNC complex layer. The mechanical resistance of the latter accommodated slow deformation due to the water flow. However, the encapsulated components in the droplet gradually leaked out, e.g., following failure of the ChNF/CNC complex layer (see dashed circle in Fig. 3b, upper panel). Similar to the PE/PE system, a CS/SA complex layer expanded (flexibility), with no droplet breakage (Figure S8), while the CS/CNC complex layer burst soon after fluid influx (Figure S9). Consequently, the ChNF/CNC system bears characteristics of the other two complexes.
The droplet was stable when \(\:{\varPi\:}_{PEG}\) \(\:=\) \(\:{\varPi\:}_{DEX}\) (see contour in Fig. 3b, middle panel). Although a slight degree of phase separation occurred, no leakage or thickening of the complex layer was observed under this condition (Fig. 3c and Figure S10), suggesting long-term stability. For \(\:{\varPi\:}_{PEG}\) \(\:>\) \(\:{\varPi\:}_{DEX}\), the droplet retained its original shape with a layered hierarchical structure forming on the outer edge of the interface (Fig. 3a and 3b), which was further confirmed by fluorescence and optical microscopy observations of the microcapsules (Fig. 3c and Figure S11). This was caused by a thickening of the ChNF/CNC complex layer, similar to destabilized emulsions or plasmolysis in plant cells. Water transport occurred from the DEX phase to the PEG phase due to the osmotic stress imbalance (Fig. 3d), providing a driving force for ChNF diffusion that led to its detachment. Meanwhile, as the volume of DEX phase was gradually reduced, PEG penetrated the droplet, forcing CNC to diffuse to the interface. As a result, more ChNF and CNC engaged in electrostatic interactions, increasing the thickness of the complex layer, while maintaining a high permeability. From these results, it is evident that the ChNF/CNC complex can be adjusted to tailor mass exchange (Fig. 1d).
The assembly of CNC and ChNF at the microcapsule surface contributed to the rigidity of the complex layer to balance of osmotic stress. For all osmotic gradients, extinction was observed parallel to and perpendicular to the polarization direction using polarized optical microscopy for the ChNF/CNC complex, which indicates that the ChNFs and CNCs were oriented parallel to the interface (Fig. 3c). Layer thickening at \(\:{\varPi\:}_{PEG}\) \(\:>\) \(\:{\varPi\:}_{DEX}\) strengthened the complex assembly (Fig. 3d); however, owing to the morphology of ChNF and CNC, a different ordering behavior may occur than that found for the interfacial polymer/CNC complex (Figure S9c). The assembly of ChNF and CNC at the interface was further explored by changing their distribution in ATPS (Figure S12). A droplet was stabilized when suspending ChNF (1 wt%) in PEG and CNC (1 wt%) in DEX (Figure S12a), where osmotic stress transferred water from the internal DEX phase to the external PEG phase, gradually reducing the droplet volume. However, thickening of the complex did not occur, and the CNC/ChNF complex layer wrinkled (Figure S12b). The extinctions parallel to and perpendicular to the polar was not observed (Figure S12c), suggesting a strong partitioning of CNC to the DEX phase.43 The density of the DEX phase increased with a reduction in the water content and, due to the permeability and poor mechanical strength of the ChNF/CNC complex layer, eventually led to a phase separation at the bottom of the droplet (Figure S12a).
Selective transfer across ChNF/CNC complex layer
Ionic fluorescent probes were added to different phases across the complex layer44 (Fig. 4a). Negatively charged fluorescein (sodium salt, FSS) in the PEG phase immediately diffused into a microcapsule (DEX phase) and interacted with the ChNF/CNC complex by electrostatic interactions between FSS and ChNF (Figure S13). Similarly, positively charged Nile blue A (NBA) in the DEX phase was excluded from the microcapsule and the thickened ChNF/CNC complex layer (Figure S14), due to the negatively charged CNC in the external PEG phase and the complex. The permeability of the ChNF/CNC complex layer and the asymmetric diffusion of oppositely charged molecules suggest the possibility for separation, purification, and compartmentalized serial reaction systems. Separation of the mixed ionic dyes took place when dissolving FSS and NBA in either PEG or DEX solutions, soon after forming the microcapsule; no effect was noted for the initial location of the mixture in the PEG (Fig. 4b) and DEX (Figure S15) phases. At equilibrium, the NBA was preferentially located in the PEG phase, while FSS was present in the DEX phase. This was demonstrated by the time-dependent FSS and NBA fluorescence intensity in the given phases and at a given position (dashed lines in Fig. 4b) (Fig. 4c). FSS diffused across the boundaries when a microcapsule containing FSS was placed next to two unloaded microcapsules (Fig. 4d). This transfer was preferential to the neighboring microcapsules but not to the surrounding PEG solution, which was confirmed by time-dependent fluorescent intensity measurements of FSS at given positions (dashed line in the Fig. 4d) (Fig. 4e). Furthermore, no bridging between the microcapsules was observed upon contact (Video S3), implying that the FSS transferred across the non-coalescent complex layers. Moreover, thickening of the complex continuously occurred, in contrast to the observation for polymer/nanoparticle complexes.31
Magnetic nanoparticles whose movement is controlled by an external field can be used to enable dynamic transport by producing a gateway for transport. We demonstrated movement of the microcapsule under a magnetic field by incorporating 1 wt% Fe3O4 nanoparticles, that was used to control the contact and separation distance between microcapsule (Video S4). Since control over the transport is achieved by adding foreign, synthetic nanoparticles, exploration of self-driven locomotion for the microcapsule would better benefit its development on multifunctional applications.
Autonomous mobility of microcapsules
Insect mobility using capillary forces has been shown for climbing or descending along a meniscus formed between water and a solid.45 An upward (positive) meniscus forms and distorts the liquid surface with a contact angle (\(\:\alpha\:\)), where a lateral force between the floating object positioned at a distance (\(\:x\)) from a wall can be expressed by:46
$$\:F\left(x\right)=-{F}_{\text{V}}cot\theta\:{\text{e}}^{-\frac{x}{{l}_{c}}}=-\gamma\:C\text{c}\text{o}\text{s}\alpha\:\:\text{c}\text{o}\text{t}\theta\:{\text{e}}^{-\frac{x}{{l}_{c}}}$$
where \(\:{F}_{\text{V}}\) represents the vertical net force, \(\:\gamma\:\) is the surface tension, \(\:C\) is the contact line length, \(\:\theta\:\) is the contact angle, and \(\:{l}_{c}\) is the capillary length. As shown in Fig. 5a,47 a positive meniscus (\(\:{F}_{\text{V}}\) \(\:>\) 0 or \(\:\text{c}\text{o}\text{s}\alpha\:\:\text{c}\text{o}\text{t}\theta\:\) \(\:>\) 0) draws a floating object towards the wall, up the meniscus, provided \(\:F\left(x\right)\) is sufficiently large. For a negative meniscus (\(\:{F}_{\text{V}}\) \(\:<\) 0 or \(\:\text{c}\text{o}\text{s}\alpha\:\:\text{c}\text{o}\text{t}\theta\:\) \(\:<\) 0), the object is repelled from the wall. This was tested for ChNF/CNC microcapsules subjected to imbalances of osmotic pressure, an effective strategy for achieving directional migration (for example, by manipulating \(\:\alpha\:\) of liquid surface deformation by the density of the microcapsule and the external phase). By leveraging density-gradient to drive migration (Table S1), a hanging microcapsule experienced a repulsive force from the container wall and migrated toward the center when 10 wt% DEX (1.0 wt% ChNF, \(\:\rho\:\) = 1.0520) was dropped into 10 wt% PEG (1.0 wt% CNC, \(\:\rho\:\) = 1.0372) (Fig. 5b, upper panel). Meanwhile, a floating microcapsule climbed a meniscus toward the container when 10 wt% PEG (1.0 wt% CNC) was dropped into 10 wt% DEX (1.0 wt% ChNF) (Fig. 5b, bottom panel). The effect of lateral forces on microcapsules surrounded by the four walls of a rectangular container were observed visually (Figure S16a and Video S5) and by optical microscopy (Figure S16b and Video S6): two microcapsules that were placed at arbitrary positions across the liquid surface migrated toward the center of the container. This one-way microcapsule migration can be used for microreactors, when combined with the selective cross-membrane transfer shown in the previous section.
Enhanced material transport can further leverage microcapsule permeability, along with mass transport of the ChNF/CNC complex. To demonstrate autonomous shuttle/transport, microcapsules consisting of 10 wt% DEX (1 wt% ChNF and 0.001 wt% FSS) and 25 wt% DEX (1 wt% ChNF) were placed in a container (20 × 20 × 20 mm3) filled with 35 wt% PEG (0.5 wt% CNC) solution. As shown in Table S1, compared to the 35 wt% PEG (0.5 wt% CNC, \(\:\rho\:\) = 1.0746), the 25 wt% DEX (1 wt% ChNF) droplet of higher density (\(\:\rho\:\) = 1.1010) generated a microcapsule located in the center of the container. By contrast, the 10 wt% DEX (1 wt% ChNF) droplet with a lower density (\(\:\rho\:\) = 1.0520) initially formed a microcapsule that migrated toward the inner wall of the container. As shown in Fig. 5d and Video S7, S8, the microcapsule climbed the meniscus and landed at the container’s inner wall within 2 min. Thereafter, it remained attached to the wall for 3 min. After this time, the microcapsule moved down the meniscus, back to the center of the container, and eventually contacted with the hanging microcapsule. A mechanism that explains the autonomous microcapsule movement and material shuttle/transport is described in Fig. 5c. The one-way migration is driven by the difference of initial densities between the two phases, making the microcapsule climb up the meniscus. After landing at the wall, with the osmotic pressure gradient between the two phases and the permeability of the ChNF/CNC complex layer, PEG and water flow to and from the interior of the microcapsule, leading to a balanced density between the two phases. With the gradually increased density of the DEX phase, the microcapsule returns to the center of the container. Finally, transfer across the interfacial layer of the initial microcapsule takes place. Using the inherent properties of the ChNF/CNC complex, the diffusion-induced cyclic and autonomous microcapsule migration is associated with dynamic transfer without the need for external stimuli.
We investigated the switchable nature of the meniscus-climbing microcapsule. The cyclic movement of microcapsules formed by 10 wt% DEX and different ChNF concentrations, in the presence of 35 wt% PEG and varying CNC concentrations, was followed in rectangular containers (10 × 10 × 45 mm3 and 20 × 20 × 20 mm3). At 1 wt% ChNF and varied CNC concentrations, the microcapsules successfully landed on the container wall (10 × 10 × 45 mm3), but no return was observed upon increasing the CNC concentration over 1.4 wt% (Figure S17). For the larger container (20 × 20 × 20 mm3), the microcapsules could only return to the center when the CNC concentration was 0.5 wt% (Figure S18). At a CNC concentration over 0.5 wt%, the microcapsules could only move close to the center or remain stagnant at the landing site. However, for a CNC concentration of 0.5 wt%, the microcapsules formed by 0.5 wt% ChNF sank during return (for both containers). In the small container, other microcapsules completed the entire cycle (Figure S19), and at 1.0 wt% ChNF, the microcapsule could return to the center of the large container (Figure S20).
The microcapsules that were able to return to the center of the container relied on the differences of density (Fig. 5e1 and 5e2). The meniscus climbing was driven by the initial difference in densities between the DEX and PEG phases; however, the return process was predominantly ruled by exchange across the interface induced by the osmotic pressure difference, which was affected by the difference in initial densities (Table S1). The system viscosity increased with increasing CNC concentration in the PEG phase (Figure S21), which hindered microcapsule movement. At an increased ChNF concentration in the microcapsule, the difference of density and osmotic pressure between the two phases were both reduced (Table S1), where only a small amount of exchange was required to enable transition from a floating microcapsule to a hanging one. As a result, the driving force during the return process was reduced, halting microcapsule movement at some distance from the container center, particularly for the larger container (Figure S22).
The most crucial prerequisite for microcapsule movement is the effective formation of the ChNF/CNC complex at the interface (Figure S25), which prevents rupture and resists deformation caused by shearing and mass exchange. The complex formed by interfacial assembly with different nanoparticle concentrations was verified by injecting DEX solution into the PEG solution (Fig. 2b, S23 and S24). When the concentration of both the CNC and ChNF were 0.5 wt%, the nanoparticles failed to form a strong complex layer. So, as the internal density of the microcapsule gradually increased, the complex held the entire structure causing the sinking (Figure S19 and S20). We further verified this observation by dropping 10 wt% DEX (1 wt% CNC) into 35 wt% PEG (0.5 wt% ChNF). The cyclic movement of the microcapsule was confirmed in small and large containers. As expected, both microcapsules completed the movement to the center of the container (Figure S26 and S27). There was a reduction of microcapsule volume by mass exchange during the return, which decreased the buoyancy. Overall, the microcapsule that is encapsulated by ChNF/CNC complexes is easily tailored for self-driven motility.