During the past few years, the pandemic of COVID-19 has caused destructive strike to human health, especially to those with immunosuppressive status. Kidney transplant recipients, as one common population that need to take immunosuppressive medication, suffered from COVID-19 and have more serious symptoms and higher mortality rate due to their immunosuppressive status. Azvudine, as the first dual-target nucleoside analogue to interfere severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) multiplication, has been proved to be effective in treating COVID-19. However, whether Azvudine can still be effective in renal transplant COVID-19 patients is still unknown due to special immunosuppressive status of these patients. Here, we proposed an Azvudine-centered therapy for treating renal transplant COVID-19 patients and reported the preliminary results in 20 kidney transplant COVID-19 recipients.
Some studies had proved the efficacy and safety of Azvudine in treating COVID-19 patients. Zhigang Ren and his colleagues proved the preliminary clinical results that Azvudine could shorten the time of nucleic acid negativity conversion by an average 4.5 days after treatment with Azvudine compared with standard antiviral treatment [7]. Similarly, Yuming Sun and his colleagues conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study and proved that Azvudine could lower the crude incidence rate of composite disease progression[11]. In our study, we firstly proved that Azvudine may be effective in treating kidney transplanted recipients. Our results showed that after the administration of Azvudine, all patients got symptom relieved with a mean nucleic acid negativity conversion time of 13.22 days. Compared to the results of Zhigang Ren, out results showed a delayed mean nucleic acid conversion time that may be caused by immunosuppressed status in kidney transplantation recipients.
Transplanted kidney function is the main focus during the whole process of Azvudine-centered antiCOVID-19 therapy. Our results showed that patients renal function indicators (eGFR and serum creatinine) significantly improved after mean administration days. Paxlovid is commonly used agents for COVID-19 treatment[12]. However, drug-drug interaction has been reported for those preference drugs, which needs renal dose adjustment when applying [13]. As far as we concerned, this is the first study that showed the effectiveness of Azvudine in treating COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients. In our study, Azvudine showed a well tolerance with immunosuppressants and the 1-year follow-up results showed a well-preserved transplanted kidney function after Azvudine administration. Because nirmatrelvir booster (ritonavir) is a strong cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor and a P-glycoprotein inhibitor, it may increase blood concentrations of immunosuppressants and increase the potential for serious drug toxicity. Unlike Paxlovid, Azvudine is the first dual-target nucleoside analogue to interfere SARS-CoV-2 multiplication. Due to different pharmacological effects between Paxlovid and Azvudine, Azvudine showed better tolerance with immunosuppressants. Besides, activated Azvudine will concentrate in thymus [14], which can promote the expression of interleukin (IL)-4, IL-10, IL-13 and suppress the expression of IL-1β, interferon (INF)-γ, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and IL-6. Azvudine suppressed cytokines are critical for COVID-19 related cytokine storm. And Azvudine promoted cytokines can booster the function of T cells, which will accelerate the clearance of COVID-19. Susan Hartzell and his colleges observed significantly fewer total lymphocytes in 19 subjects[15]. Our results were similar to previously reported ones. According to our results, the count and percentage of lymphocyte decreased with the progression of COVID-19 and increased after the administration of Azvudine. Therefore, we suggested that lymphocyte count and proportion may be a predictor for kidney transplantation recipients’ condition after COVID-19 infection.
Electrolytes balance can reflect patients’ kidney function and is also important for patients’ cardiac function. Our results showed that hypomagnesemia (19/20, 95%), hypocalcemia (18/20, 90%), metabolic alkalosis (13/20, 65%), metabolic acidosis (10/20, 50%), hyponatremia (10/20, 50%), hypokalemia (5/20, 25%) are common electrolytic imbalance that may happen in renal transplant COVID-19 patients. The phenomenon that most patients suffered from electrolytic imbalance after COVID-19 infection suggested that although blood creatine and eGFR improved with Azvudine administration, but transplanted kidney tubular function may be injured by COVID-19. What’s more, imbalance of potassium, calcium and magnesium suggested that patients’ cardiac function should be tightly monitored during Azvudine-centered therapy.
Compared to Paxlovid and other antiCOVID-19 agents, one of the biggest advantages of Azvudine is the better cost-effectiveness. According to the study of Dan Liu and her colleagues [16], they found that Paxlovid was not cost-effective in most patients using a Markov model by cost-effectiveness analysis. In our study, the maximum drug only cost of Azvudine was 342.78 RMB. And the cost of Paxlovid for full-course treatment is 1800RMB (drug only), which is five times higher than the maximum cost of using Azvudine in our research and four times higher than theoretical maximum cost of Azvudine according to our scheme (first day dose of 3mg, followed by a matintenace dose of 5mg for 14days). The advantage of lower cost of using Azvudine may improve the availability of COVID-19 treatment in developing areas for poor population.
Our study has several limitations. Firstly, the absence of a control group in our research design significantly undermines the reliability of the efficacy assessment for the intervention group. This limitation arose due to the circumstances at the time, as the Chinese government had recently adjusted COVID-19 epidemic prevention policies, resulting in a surge of new infections and a temporary shortage of first-line treatment drugs, which precluded the inclusion of a positive control group. Secondly, the small sample size of our study may introduce sampling errors, potentially leading to false-positive results. To address these issues, further investigation into the efficacy and safety of the Azvudine-centered anti-COVID-19 treatment is warranted through larger-scale and more rigorously designed randomized controlled trials.
To be concluded, we first figured out the effectiveness and safety of Azvudine-centered therapy for COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients. Our study indicated that in areas with poor availability to recommended first-line antiCOVID-19 agents Azvudine may be an effective alternative for treating COVID-19 in this special immunosuppressed population.