3.1. Morphological and structural analysis
The morphology and structure of ZnS particles were studied by the HR-TEM analysis and XRD. The TEM images of the heat-treated samples in Fig. 2 (b-e) displayed an aggregated ZnS nanoparticles with almost uniform shape and size. It can be observed that the particles are close to the spherical shape, which in turn confirms the new hexagonal phase formation as determined from x-ray diffraction data. At a higher magnification, the lattice spacing of the hexagonal ZnS can be observed for the heat-treated samples, whereas the unannealed sample image (Fig. 2a) shows an aggregated plate-like morphology [23].
There are two widely accessible phases of zinc sulphide (ZnS): a zinc blend (ZB) phase and a wurtzite (WZ) phase. In both structures, Zn and S atoms have 4:4 arrangements and are tetrahedrally bonded, but they differ only in the stacking sequence [24]. In zinc blende, the S forms cubic close packing with Zn in the ABCABCA… arrangement, while in the wurtzite phase, the sulphide ions have a hexagonal close packing of ABABAB…... [22]. The cubic phase is the stable one at low temperatures and crystallizes in the face-centered cubic space group F-4 3 m. The Rietveld refinement of the XRD data for the pure phase confirms this cubic structure for the unannealed zinc sulphide, as shown in Fig. 4 (a, b).
The results of the X-ray diffraction data show that the unannealed ZnS sample (blank) crystallized in a cubic phase structure with a lattice parameter of 5.3486 (13) (Å). The XRD peaks of the cubic phase are broadened due to the nanocrystalline nature of the synthesized sample. The unannealed sample average grain size was calculated using Scherrer Eq. (1), taking into consideration the instrumental contribution [25], and was found to be 187.2 (7) nm.
$$\:L=\:\frac{k\:\lambda\:}{\beta\:\:\text{cos}\left(\theta\:\right)}$$
1
Where L is the crystallite size, λ is the wavelength used, β is the integral breadth after correcting the instrument peak broadening (β expressed in radians), and the constant k is a function of the crystallite shape.
It can be observed from the x-ray diffraction data that there are observable additional peaks as well as a change in those peaks’ intensities upon heat treatment. There is an observed peak found at 26.9ο that corresponds to the (100) peak of the hexagonal phase (Fig. 3). The XRD data shows that the hexagonal phase percentage tends to decrease as the heat treatment period increases from two to eight hours, as seen in Fig. 3 inset. The area percentage for the hexagonal peaks decreases from 12.6% for the 2 hrs annealed sample to 8.2% for the 8 hrs annealed samples. However, the hexagonal phase shows no significant decrease for samples treated for four and six hours, and the hexagonal peak area percentages were 11.6% and 11%, respectively.
3.2. Thermal treatment effect
Zinc sulphide (ZnS) powder samples were synthesized and subjected to thermal treatments to increase their TL sensitivity. The powder samples had four different thermal treatments for two, four, six, and eight hours at 500oC. Zinc sulphide powder TL glow curves for all four thermal treatments and for the powder without any heat treatment (blank sample) are shown in Fig. 4 (a). Regarding the four different heat treatments, it was noticed that the low TL intensity of the light curve was untreated, and up until the fifth one, TL behaved like it was growing up, then decreased again in the fifth treatment. This indicates that the mixture of both phases increased the luminescence properties, and the best TL intensity was for the 8.2% hexagonal and 91.8% cubic phase, as presented in Fig. 4(b). For every thermal treatment, the total area beneath the produced glow curves is shown in Fig. 5(b). Samples of zinc sulphide (ZnS) powder without heat treatment had the lowest behaviour progressively improving towards the third treatment. According to the figure, the fourth thermal treatment had the highest intensity. For in-depth examinations of the TL characteristics and evaluations of the kinetic parameters, samples of powder zinc sulphide that underwent all thermal treatments will be chosen.
3.3. Glow curve analysis and kinetic parameters
The activation energies of each of the distinct peaks and their supplemental frequency factors were derived from the deconvolution analysis executed on the TL-glow curves using the newly TL software given by El-Kinawy et al. [20]. The CGCD method is based on the general-order kinetics model, The following is the glow curve deconvolution equation:
$$\:I\left(T\right)={I}_{M}\text{exp}\left(\frac{E}{k\:T}\left(\frac{T-{T}_{M}}{{T}_{M}}\right)\right)\times\:{\left[1+\frac{E\left(b-1\right)\left(F\left(T,E\right)-F\left({T}_{M},E\right)\right)}{k\:{T}_{M}^{2}\:b\text{exp}\left(\frac{-E}{k\:{T}_{M}}\right)}\right]}^{\frac{-b}{b-1}}$$
2
Here, the parameters IM and TM refer to the maximum intensity of the glow peak and the corresponding temperature, respectively. The optimization parameter E (eV) represents the thermal activation energy of the corresponding carrier trap, b is the order of kinetics, T (K) is the absolute temperature, and k (J/K) is the Boltzmann constant (8.617E-5 eV/K).
The two functions \(\:\text{F}\left(\text{T},\text{E}\right)\) and \(\:\text{F}\left({\text{T}}_{\text{M}},\text{E}\right)\) are given by,
$$\:F\left(T,E\right)=T\text{exp}\left(\frac{-E}{k\:T}\right)+\:\frac{E}{k}\left(Ei\left(\frac{-E}{k\:T}\right)\right)$$
3
$$\:F\left({T}_{M},E\right)=T\text{exp}\left(\frac{-E}{k\:{T}_{M}}\right)+\:\frac{E}{k}\left(Ei\left(\frac{-E}{k\:{T}_{M}}\right)\right)$$
4
Such that, Ei(-x), with x > 0, is the exponential integral function [26]
The frequency factor (s) be computed after that using the equation below:
$$\:s=\:\left(\frac{E\:\beta\:}{{k\:T}_{M}^{2}}\right)\frac{1}{1+(b-1)\left(\frac{2\:k\:{T}_{M}}{E}\right)}\text{exp}\left(\frac{E}{k\:{T}_{M}}\right)$$
5
The figure of merit (FOM) that Eddy and Balian created [27]:
|
\(\:FOM=\sum\:_{{j}_{i}}^{{j}_{f}}\frac{100\:({y}_{j}-y({k}_{f}\left)\right)}{A}\)
|
(6)
|
The following channels represent the region of interest: ji for the first channel, jf for the final, yj for the information for the content of channel j, y(kf) for the fitting function in channel j, and A for the integral in the interest region of the fitted glow curve.
The zinc sulphide sample produced without thermal treatment (blank) and the sample that received a fourth thermal treatment after being subjected to 1.0 KGy had their TL glow curves deconvoluted using the CGCD method. The sample that was not heat-treated showed six overlapping peaks, as shown in Fig. 5(a). After undergoing the first and second thermal treatments, the resulting zinc sulphide sample was exhibited in Fig. 5(b, c) with seven overlapping peaks. For the third and fourth treatments, the number of peaks climbed to eight overlapping peaks, as seen in Fig. 5(d, e). Table 1 provided the average values of the kinetic parameters, E (eV), TM (K), s (s− 1), and b for the sample without the thermal treatment and for all the fourth thermal treatments. A radiative transition occurs when a trapped charge carrier is liberated from the matching trap, and we refer to this energy as the activation energy (E). The frequency factor called the attempt-to-escape factor (s) is linked to the possibility of the trapped charge carriers being thermally freed. The first, second, or general-order behaviour of the trapping center is indicated by the order of kinetics (b).
As a result, it was established that only six locations of the produced zinc sulphide sample without thermal treatment for TL components were 358.5, 376.2, 405.3, 431.7, 513.3, and 547.8 K. After undergoing the first thermal treatment, the peak position from one to six exhibits a shift toward the low temperature and appears to peak at 529.9 K. The second treatment's impact was a change in the peak position to the side with lower temperatures and still seven positions. In addition to creating eight peak locations in the third thermal treatment, additional thermal treatment resulted in the peak site migrating to a lower temperature, with peak eight emerging at 545.7 K. The fourth thermal treatment results in the eight peak positions appearing as well, with significant effort shifting in the peak locations to be 356.1, 364.4, 389.4, 420.7, 448.6, 478.7, 508. 5, and 528.9 K.
Table 1
Kinetic parameters of the prepared zinc sulphide samples from the CGCD method before thermal treatment and for all the fourth thermal treatment.
|
|
P1
|
P2
|
P3
|
P4
|
P5
|
P6
|
P7
|
P8
|
before thermal treatment
|
Tm (K)
|
358.5
|
376.2
|
405.3
|
431.7
|
513.3
|
547.8
|
|
|
E (eV)
|
0.98
|
1.04
|
1.17
|
1.31
|
1.34
|
1.46
|
|
|
s (s− 1) * 1014
|
0.283
|
0.312
|
0.0792
|
8.3
|
4.2
|
1.23
|
|
|
b
|
1.53
|
1.69
|
1.72
|
1.71
|
1.55
|
1.44
|
|
|
1st thermal treatment
|
Tm (K)
|
358.2
|
375.3
|
403.3
|
430.9
|
460.1
|
502.9
|
529.9
|
|
E (eV)
|
1.00
|
1.05
|
1.19
|
1.30
|
1.36
|
1.44
|
1.55
|
|
s (s− 1) * 1014
|
2.6
|
0.559
|
2.29
|
2.25
|
0.465
|
10.01
|
1.87
|
|
b
|
1.42
|
1.62
|
1.82
|
1.59
|
1.36
|
1.51
|
1.40
|
|
2nd thermal treatment
|
Tm (K)
|
357.5
|
373.7
|
402.4
|
424.7
|
455.6
|
489.8
|
516.2
|
|
E (eV)
|
1.02
|
1.04
|
1.17
|
1.29
|
1.31
|
1.47
|
1.54
|
|
s (s− 1) * 1014
|
0.855
|
0.683
|
1.67
|
2.59
|
2.42
|
20.42
|
3.19
|
|
b
|
1.51
|
1.63
|
1.84
|
1.57
|
1.37
|
1.52
|
1.42
|
|
3rd thermal treatment
|
Tm (K)
|
357.2
|
370.94
|
390.1
|
422.7
|
451.0
|
480.5
|
489.7
|
545.7
|
E (eV)
|
0.99
|
1.01
|
1.16
|
1.29
|
1.31
|
1.41
|
1.49
|
1.57
|
s (s− 1) * 1014
|
0.446
|
3.28
|
4.04
|
4.07
|
5.94
|
10.03
|
7.82
|
0.237
|
b
|
1.52
|
1.59
|
1.84
|
1.59
|
1.31
|
1.51
|
1.40
|
1.41
|
4th thermal treatment
|
Tm (K)
|
356.1
|
364.4
|
389.4
|
420.7
|
448.6
|
478.7
|
508.5
|
528.9
|
E (eV)
|
0.95
|
1.01
|
1.14
|
1.31
|
1.36
|
1.42
|
1.51
|
1.56
|
s (s− 1) * 1014
|
0.0534
|
0.191
|
2.11
|
20.28
|
7.41
|
2.90
|
3.11
|
6.37
|
b
|
1.55
|
1.70
|
1.79
|
1.00
|
1.38
|
1.65
|
1.37
|
1.46
|
Using thermally treated zinc sulphide samples, it was observed that there was a slight shift in locations from peak one to peak three and a significant shift in positions from peak four to peak eight. Finally, heat treatment produced a trap by shifting the trap position to the side with a lower temperature.