3.1.1 Descriptive Analysis
This section offers a descriptive analysis of the studies reviewed. Key aspects such as the number of scientific publications produced each year, the most cited papers, and the contributions of different countries and journals, among others, were highlighted to track the publication trends in the field. Overview analysis from R-Biblioshiny indicated that 88 authors were involved in the publications – of which four are single-authored. There were 2.66 authors per document. The international co-authorship was 31.43%. There were 22 sources for the publications. The papers span 14 years from 2010 to 2024.
3.1.2 Highly Cited Papers
For an article to be selected for inclusion in this study, it had to have a minimum average of ten citations per year, except for 2024 published publications, which required at least five citations. The authors, publication year, and average number of citations are presented in Figure 2. Notably, Huston (2010) achieved the highest average yearly citation count, with a total of 68 citations (40). Following closely are Kumar et al. (2023) with 39, and Xiao and Porto (2017) with 28 average yearly citations (41,42).
3.1.3 Yearly Scholarly Output
The R-Biblioshiny diagram in figure 3 illustrates the annual scientific output of the articles included in the study. Significantly, the field experienced a pronounced increase in the number of relevant articles published in 2019, with only one article published in each of 2010, 2013, and 2018, the field experienced a significant increase in the number of relevant articles published in 2019. From one article in 2018 to five each in 2019, 2020, and 2021. Although the number of relevant articles published declined in 2022, the count rose again to four in 2023, with 2024 indicating a promise of a similar number of publications. This noteworthy growth reflects the growing attention of researchers and academics in the study area.
3.1.4 Contributions of various countries to the study
Furthermore, the contributions of various countries to the study were analyzed; the United States (USA) contributed the most documents (17) to the field with a total link strength of 1459. India and China follow with 7 documents, 1232 total link strength, and 5 documents, 730 total link strength, respectively. The most impactful studies have, thus, been conducted outside South America and Africa. Table 1 below, developed from the authors’ analysis from VOSviewer displays the top 19 countries actively participating in the research on the impact of financial literacy on financial well-being.
Table 1. Contributions of various countries to the study
Number
|
Country
|
Documents
|
Citations
|
Total Link Strength
|
1
|
USA
|
17
|
2526
|
1459
|
2
|
India
|
7
|
336
|
1232
|
3
|
China
|
5
|
637
|
730
|
4
|
Malaysia
|
2
|
21
|
571
|
5
|
UAE
|
2
|
50
|
637
|
6
|
UK
|
2
|
95
|
548
|
7
|
Turkey
|
2
|
133
|
249
|
8
|
South korea
|
1
|
13
|
96
|
9
|
France
|
1
|
64
|
199
|
10
|
Australia
|
1
|
31
|
188
|
11
|
Canada
|
1
|
31
|
188
|
12
|
Netherlands
|
1
|
124
|
173
|
13
|
Estonia
|
1
|
85
|
142
|
14
|
Italy
|
1
|
72
|
162
|
15
|
Lebanon
|
1
|
58
|
146
|
16
|
Switzerland
|
1
|
44
|
106
|
17
|
Latvia
|
1
|
23
|
84
|
18
|
Greece
|
1
|
91
|
67
|
19
|
Russian Federation
|
1
|
31
|
65
|
Source: Author’s analysis from VOSviewer
3.1.5 Most influential scholars in the field
Figure 4 illustrates the strength of the contributions made by various scholars to the research area; this aids in identifying the influential writers in the field and acknowledges their legacy (43). Lusardi Annamaria is the most influential author in the field with a total link strength of 3,184 and 196 citations (see Appendix 2). She is followed by Mitchell O. S. with 1,995 and 95 total link strength and citations respectively, and Xiao J. J. with 1,811 and 83 total link strength and citations respectively. Researchers in this field will find it useful to pay attention to the authors above – among the others mentioned in developing various aspects of the study.
3.1.6 Most Relevant Sources
Emerald Publishing’s journal “International Journal of Bank Marketing” leads in the publishing of articles in the field with eight documents; they are followed by Springer’s Social Indicators Research with four articles, and two each by Wiley’s International Journal of Consumer Studies and Journal of Consumer Affairs, and Taylor and Francis’ European Journal of Finance. Figure 5 below displays the most productive journals in the field.
3.2 Themes identification from influential papers
Following Braun and Clarke (2012) and Fitz-Koch et al.’s (2018) studies, six themes were developed in answering the research questions (32–35). Table 2 provides a summary of the elements under each category. The detailed findings of these six developed themes utilized in these significant articles follows.
3.2.1 Financial Literacy and its determinants
Definition and Measurement of Financial Literacy
The existing body of literature underscores the ongoing discourse concerning the definition and measurement of financial literacy (44). Huston (2010) endeavored to develop a standardized metric for assessing financial literacy and explained financial literacy as an assessment of an individual’s comprehension and application of information pertaining to personal finance (40). Zhao and Zhang (2020) adopted Remund's (2010) definition, which highlights the comprehension of essential financial principles and the competency to oversee personal finances effectively (45,46). Lyons and Kass-Hanna (2021) further expanded this framework by incorporating the importance of digital literacy. The research indicates that financial literacy encompasses not only knowledge but also the skills and confidence necessary for managing financial resources effectively (47).
Shapers of Financial Literacy
Numerous studies have investigated the factors that affect the financial literacy of individuals over time. Gilenko and Chernova's (2021) study on the impact of financial literacy on the savings behavior of Russian high school students identified a number of variables, such as parental influence, educational resources, and socioeconomic background, that impact teenagers' degree of financial literacy. They found the greater a mother's educational level, the higher the chance of her adolescent being financially literate. This positive role of the parent’s education and influence confirms Philippas and Avdoulas (2020) earlier studies, where they found Greek university students whose fathers have upper high school degrees, BS degrees, or MS/PhD degrees have 3.5 times, 3.1 times, or 2.2 times, respectively, higher possibility of being financially literate than those whose fathers have no education (48,49).
Karakurum-Ozdemir et al. (2019) in their investigation to understand financial literacy and its variations among diverse demographic and socioeconomic cohorts in five developing countries found an individual’s level of education to be a significant determinant of financial literacy - with higher educational attainment linked to greater financial literacy (50). Their findings were confirmed by Mavlutova et al.’s (2022) investigation which discovered those with greater levels of education also have the highest levels of financial literacy and investment inclination in their research that aimed to investigate how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected Latvians' inclination to invest in assets that satisfy environmental, social, and governance (ESG) standards as well as variables affecting investors' decisions based on their level of financial literacy (51). Gilenko and Chernova (2021) further confirmed a strong positive correlation between higher academic achievement and financial literacy (48).
Additionally, Ward and Lynch (2019) examined how the division of financial responsibilities among romantic partners affects individual financial literacy over time. They found that in early-stage relationships, financial responsibility and financial literacy are unrelated; rather, it is influenced by factors such as free time availability, non-financial contributions to the relationship, and relative expertise in non-financial domains. As relationships progress, individuals with higher financial responsibility tend to increase their financial literacy, while those with lower responsibility do not experience similar growth. This suggests that individuals learn about finances on a "need-to-know" basis (52).
Meier and Sprenger (2013) also found a person's desire to pursue financial literacy is significantly influenced by their time preferences. This suggests that those who discount the future heavily are less inclined to invest in their financial education, with those who place a greater value on future rewards (those with a higher discount factor) likely to participate in financial education programs (53).
Karakurum-Ozdemir et al. (2019) also found a lack of proficiency in the official language to be a significant barrier to achieving financial literacy (50).
Gilenko and Chernova’s (2021) studies further found better performance at school, the use of digital tools such as ATMs, online wallet, knowledge of financial fraud, and access to mobile bank, and perceived financial literacy to significantly and positively relate to financial literacy. They as well found having a part-time job to significantly influence financial literacy (48).
Zhao and Zhang’s (2020 study demonstrated that parental financial socialization had stronger influences on the financial skills and financial self-efficacy aspects of financial literacy than financial knowledge suggesting that more attention should be paid to the practical and psychological dimensions of financial literacy when assessing the effectiveness of financial literacy programs (46).
3.2.2 Financial Well-Being and its predictors
Development of Concept: Financial Well-Being
Various studies have explored the concept of financial well-being. Mahendru (2020) proposed a comprehensive framework that integrates both objective and subjective dimensions of financial well-being. He explained financial well-being as an individual's capability to meet immediate monetary obligations and future needs (financial security), combined with their sense of financial autonomy (financial freedom) (54).
Collins and Urban (2021) found that financial well-being generally improves with age and income; however, it varies significantly across different demographic groups. They highlighted that negative financial events detrimentally impact well-being, while positive behaviors can enhance it (55).
Predictors of Financial Well-Being
The relationship between financial literacy and financial well-being has been a focal point in various studies. French and McKillop (2016), for instance, examined the role of money management skills and numeracy—key components of financial literacy—in influencing wealth disparities among low-income households. Their findings indicated that effective money management is a crucial determinant of consumer debt behavior and household net worth. Interesting, they noted that numeracy had a negligible influence on these outcomes. This relationship was especially strong after restricting the sample to individuals who are involved in household financial decision-making while accounting for potential endogeneity (56). In contrast to the negligible influence of numeracy on consumer debt behavior and household net worth found in French and McKillop’s (2016) research, Cole et al.’s (2016) research which focused on high school students found that more mathematics instruction promotes improved credit management, higher involvement in the financial markets, and high investment income (57). This divergence in outcomes indicates that more research is required to explore the underlying causes of this contradiction.
Chu et al.’s (2017) studies analyzed how financial literacy influences household portfolio selection and investment returns, which are critical measures of financial well-being. By categorizing financial literacy into basic and advanced levels as established in previous studies, (58,59), they found that households with higher levels of financial literacy, especially advanced literacy, had a greater propensity to invest in mutual funds. Conversely, households exhibiting overconfidence were more likely to invest solely in stocks rather than diversifying their portfolios with mutual funds. Notably, higher financial literacy was associated with a greater likelihood of positive investment returns (60).
In a different context, Philippas and Avdoulas (2020) explored the factors influencing financial well-being, financial fragility, and financial literacy among university students in Greece. They found male students, students who maintain comprehensive expense records, and those whose fathers possess a high level of education tend to exhibit a greater degree of financial literacy, and so demonstrate superior capacity to manage unexpected financial disruptions, highlighting its crucial role as a determinant of the financial well-being for university students (49).
Thomas and Gupta (2021) further researched how social theories and financial literacy could improve the financial well-being of workers. Their work emphasized the moderating effect of knowledge sharing, underscoring the crucial role that financial literacy plays in enhancing the overall financial wellness of employees (61).
Expanding on this theme, Sconti (2024) initially examined the influence of financial literacy on the capacity of households to effectively manage their financial obligations in Italy and subsequently investigated any differential impacts of financial literacy on female-headed households. The research found a strong correlation between higher financial literacy and an increased likelihood of meeting one's needs with ease. While the effect of financial literacy on financial stability was similar for both men and women, female homeowners were found to be approximately 10% less likely than their male counterparts to attain financial stability (62).
Additionally, Lone and Bhat (2024) researched the influence of financial literacy on the financial well-being of faculty members within business schools. They highlighted the mediating role of financial self-efficacy which was explained as the confidence of an individual to make informed financial decisions (63). Notably, they opted for subjective metrics for all constructs instead of objective metrics, due to the recognition of the intrinsic limitations associated with objective measures in capturing personal experiences. Their findings indicated that financial awareness exerted the most significant influence on financial self-efficacy among the three dimensions of financial literacy: financial awareness, financial experience, and financial skill. Furthermore, they discovered that financial self-efficacy explained 68% of the variance in financial well-being. This relationship suggests that while there is a direct link between financial literacy and financial well-being, it is partially mediated by financial self-efficacy (64).
In Mahdzan et al.’s (2022) investigation into the determinants of subjective financial well-being among low-income Malaysian households, they found that financial behavior had the largest effect compared to financial stress, financial literacy, and locus of control. This confirmed Zhao and Zhang’s (2020) earlier studies in which they found financial behavior had the strongest direct impact on an individual’s financial well-being in the USA (46). Surprisingly, while the impact of locus of control was minimal, they found an adverse correlation between financial literacy and subjective financial well-being, although the size of the effect was small. The researchers explained that for low-income individuals, higher knowledge about finances possibly might lead to more worry and dissatisfaction about their financial situation (65).
Also, Zhu and Xiao (2022) investigated the relationship between financial education and ownership of high-risk financial assets, while examining mediating factors. They determined that the quantity of high-risk financial assets possessed by a household exhibited a positive correlation with financial education. Moreover, they found this association was mediated by factors such as financial literacy, the pursuit of economic and financial knowledge, and risk tolerance (66).
Going on to another facet of financial well-being, Gilenko and Chernova’s study (2021) which examined the relationship between financial literacy and the saving behaviors of Russian high school students – a component of financial well-being revealed that neither student’s gender nor family income had a significant impact on savings; age, however, had a negative impact on saving (the univariate probit-model showed this effect to be significant at the 10% level). They also highlighted that a mother’s educational attainment positively influenced her teen's likelihood of being financially literate, which subsequently affected the teen's likelihood of saving money. Working a part-time job was statistically significant for the promotion of saving habits among students. The study, however, found higher academic achievement strongly correlated positively with financial literacy but did not directly impact saving behavior. The researchers concluded that being financially literate had a large positive and statistically significant impact on making savings - particularly when correcting for endogeneity effects (48).
3.2.3 Influence of Financial Socialization on Financial Well-Being
The influence of financial socialization on individuals’ financial well-being is another significant theme identified in the study. Drever and colleagues (2015) conducted a comprehensive review of the literature on key moments in human development where avenues of influence are likely to be most impactful on people’s financial well-being. They ascertained that enhancing executive function, notwithstanding its seemingly restricted financial scope, in early childhood; highlighting the development of financial attitudes through dual-generation financial modeling and educational initiatives for elementary and middle school children and their guardians; and teaching practical problem-solving skills and financial competencies in the later stages of adolescence and beyond were crucial moments of for effective financial socialization (67).
Utkarsh et al.’s (2020) study also investigated the influence of financial socialization – particularly, parental socialization, financial literacy, and attitudes towards monetary matters on the financial well-being of young adults with a mean age of 22 years in India. Their research indicated that parental discussions during childhood positively affect young adults' financial well-being. However, they found that the correlation between financial literacy and financial well-being is not statistically significant within this age group (68).
According to Zhao and Zhang's research from 2020, financial socialization from parents can greatly improve a person's financial well-being over the course of their lifetime. The results of the study demonstrated that parental financial socialization had a greater impact on financial self-efficacy and financial competence. The practical and psychological aspects of financial literacy were found to be significant predictors of people's financial behavior and financial well-being. They also discovered that standardized parameter estimates of financial skills and financial self-efficacy on financial behavior and financial well-being were higher than those of financial knowledge. Furthermore, they discovered that parental financial socialization might be greatly impacted by parents' educational attainment (46).
The positive impact of parental influence has also been confirmed by Philippas and Avdoulas (2020). They discovered that Greek university students with fathers who hold a BS degree or an MS/PhD degree have a 1 and 3 times, higher chance of having higher levels of financial well-being, respectively, compared to students whose fathers have no formal education (49).
3.2.4 Financial Literacy, Psychology, and Behavioral Economics
Another interesting area developing in the literature is the interplay of psychology, behavioral economics, and financial literacy. Aydin and Akben Selcuk’s (2019) study incorporated behavioral dynamics into the framework of financial literacy. Their studies revealed that individuals with higher financial knowledge tend to exhibit better financial attitudes and commendable financial behaviors. Additionally, they found individuals with a present-oriented mindset typically possess less favorable financial attitudes compared to their counterparts who prioritize future-oriented considerations. They also identified a strong negative link between people's feelings about money and their financial actions, suggesting that emotional perceptions can significantly influence financial decision-making (69).
The research by Utkarsh et al. (2020) connotes similar findings. The significance of psychological factors in financial outcomes is highlighted by their explanation of how an individual's attitude toward money, which they explain as the propensity of the individual to manage expenses and save money, serves as a strong predictor of financial well-being (68).
The findings of Tahir et al.’s (2021) studies built on the foregoing studies. They found that non-impulsive future-oriented behavior demonstrated a positive moderating effect on both financial literacy and financial well-being (70). Similarly, Kumar et al.’s (2023) study which explored behavioral characteristics affecting financial decision-making revealed impulsiveness weakens the connection between financial capability and making good financial decisions (71).
In another insightful study, Xia et al. (2014), examined the relationship between financial literacy overconfidence and participation in the stock market by incorporating psychological constructs. Measuring overconfidence by the discrepancy between the subjective and objective financial literacy scores of individuals, they found financial literacy overconfidence to be positively correlated with stock market participation, corroborating Chu et al.’s (2017) findings (72). This suggests that individuals who overestimate their financial literacy are more likely to engage in stock market activities.
Additionally, Riitsalu and Murakas (2019) studied how subjective and objective knowledge of finance, behavior in managing personal finances, and socioeconomic status affect financial well-being in Estonia. Their studies revealed that compared to objective information, subjective knowledge has a stronger correlation with financial well-being; income level and financial behavior score are related to overall financial well-being – later corroborated in Collins and Urban’s (2021) study; a higher knowledge score has little bearing on one's financial well-being; and a higher salary is associated with a better degree of financial well-being (73). Their findings on the impact of financial behavior were corroborated by Zhao and Zhang (2020), who found financial behavior to have the strongest direct impact on individuals in the United States’ financial well-being among the variables they examined (46)
3.2.5 Digital Financial Literacy in Contemporary Contexts
As digital platforms are becoming more necessary for managing finances (47), researchers have begun to explore innovative ways to improve their use for consumers’ financial well-being. Bayuk and Altobello (2019), for instance, investigated the role of gamification in motivating savings. Their research revealed that adding game-like features to financial applications significantly improves users’ motivation and overall financial well-being by fostering greater engagement with these tools (74).
Riitsalu and Murakas’s (2019) study added to the field by underscoring the importance of user experience with digital platforms. They noted that subjective knowledge – how individuals feel about their financial understanding - often has a stronger correlation to financial well-being than objective knowledge. This suggests that how we perceive and interact with digital tools can influence our financial well-being.
Expanding on this concept, Lyons and Kass-Hanna’s (2021) study highlighted that digital financial literacy is an essential catalyst for enhancing access to and engagement with digital financial products and services. When people feel confident in their digital financial skills, they are more likely to manage their finances effectively and make informed decisions (47). Choung et al.’s (2023) research further confirmed the positive impact of digital financial literacy on overall financial well-being. Their study revealed that, among the adult population in Korea aged 25 to 59, digital financial literacy has a positive relationship with financial well-being than traditional knowledge (75).
Additionally, Mahdzan et al. (2022) contributed to this research area by examining the moderating effect of the usage of digital financial services (DFS) on financial behavior and financial stress on subjective financial well-being. Their study found the two metrics of digital financial services’ usage, DFSApps and DFSUse,(especially that which focusses on e-payment systems) weaken the correlation between financial behavior and subjective financial well-being in Malaysian low-income households. DFS usage also lessened the negative effect of financial stress on subjective financial well-being (65).
3.2.6 Emerging Trends
The institutional context of financial well-being is another area of study explored in the literature. This is important for understanding how societal frameworks, infrastructure, and policies influence financial well-being. Fu (2020) explores this relationship by establishing a connection between financial well-being and institutional determinants. His empirical research underscores that, the possession of sufficient financial literacy by individuals notwithstanding, the structural and institutional characteristics inherent to financial sectors may either obstruct or facilitate financial well-being (76).
Alattar et al. (2018) offered a noteworthy summary of the Understanding America Study (UAS) - a valuable resource for panel data accessible in the US. Their study outlines the UAS methodology and offers guidance to researchers on how to adapt their surveys for incorporation into the UAS panel. This initiative aims to expand research on the interplay between financial literacy, personality traits, cognitive abilities, and other factors that shape financial behavior. Furthermore, it highlights the potential for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to test financial education interventions (77).
Table 2. Themes and their relevant studies