Characterization
FESEM analysis
The impact of sonication on activated carbon can be observed through Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) analysis. This technique enables the observation of surface morphology and structural features of materials. Upon sonication, the resulting activated carbon nanosheets (Fig. 1b) are expected to exhibit distinct surface morphology compared to untreated activated carbon (Fig. 1a). In the synthesis of carbon nanosheets from activated carbon, sonication is employed to break down the activated carbon particles into smaller sizes and disperse them in the liquid medium [21]. This process can lead to carbon nanosheets with a larger surface area being formed, which can potentially be applied in the domain of energy storage and conversion, catalysis, and water treatment. The FESEM analysis results for activated carbon show that the particle size ranges from 100–150 nm. Additionally, the size of carbon nanosheets ranges from 80–100 nm.
TEM analysis
Activated carbon and carbon nanosheets are two types of carbon materials that have unique features in their structures and properties. TEM analysis, which is a powerful technique, can provide valuable insights into their morphologies and structures at the nanoscale level. Activated carbon is considered among the most porous materials that has a large surface area, which makes it an excellent choice for adsorption and purification applications. TEM analysis has revealed that activated carbon (Fig. 2a) has an amorphous structure with irregularly shaped pores and a disordered arrangement of carbon atoms [22], which is responsible for its excellent adsorption properties. In contrast, carbon nanosheets are thin layers of graphene that are only a few nanometers thick. They have a well-defined two-dimensional structure with a significant aspect ratio and outstanding mechanical, electrical, and thermal features. The TEM analysis of carbon nanosheets (Fig. 2b) shows a flat and regular structure with a hexagonal arrangement of carbon atoms [23]. This unique arrangement of carbon atoms gives carbon nanosheets their exceptional properties, making them ideal for a large number of use cases, such as energy storage, catalysis, and electronics.
Effect of contact time on adsorption
The contact time denotes the duration for which the adsorbate directly interacts with the adsorbent. The impact of contact time on the adsorption of methylene blue on activated carbon (Fig. 3a) and carbon nanosheets (Fig. 3b) can be studied by monitoring the quantity of dye adsorbed at various time intervals (25, 45, 65, 85, 105, and 120 min). Typically, the adsorption of methylene blue on activated carbon follows moderate uplift and reached a peak at 120 min, which removed 63% of the dye. Furthermore, as is shown in Fig. 3b the removal followed by a gradual decrease using carbon nanosheets can be the result of a lack of available adsorption spots on the surface of the adsorbent.
Effect of temperature on adsorption
Temperature is regarded as a significant factor that can significantly affect the adsorption of methylene blue on activated carbon and carbon nanosheets. The adsorption capacity of activated carbon and carbon nanosheets for methylene blue is usually affected by the temperature of the system. Following Fig. 4, removing of methylene blue by activated carbon and carbon nanosheets declined by increasing temperature which is 27% and 40% at 55ºC respectively.
Effect of pH on adsorption
The supplied graphs in Fig. 5, depict that range of pH (3, 5, 7, and 10) has a significant effect on methylene blue adsorption on activated carbon and carbon nanosheets. By increasing pH, removing of methylene blue by activated carbon and carbon nanosheets escalated and reached the vertex at pH = 10.
Effect of initial dye concentration on adsorption
The preliminary concentration of methylene blue in a solution can have a striking impact on the adsorption of methylene blue on activated carbon and carbon nanosheets. In general, the higher the initial concentration of methylene blue, the lower adsorption capacity of the adsorbent. The reason is that at high initial concentrations, the available adsorption sites on the adsorbent become saturated more quickly, leaving fewer sites available for further adsorption. As a result, the adsorption capacity of the adsorbent decreases as the initial concentration of dye increases. The effect of initial dye concentration ranges from 20, 50, 100, 150, and 200 ppm has been determined. As is observed in Fig. 6, the removal of methylene blue with both adsorbents has moderately declined by increasing methylene blue concentration.
Effect of adsorbent dose on adsorption
The adsorbent dose is regarded as a salient factor in the adsorption process and can affect the efficiency with which methylene blue is adsorbed by activated carbon and carbon nanosheets. An increase in the adsorbent dose can improve the adsorption capacity of activated carbon for methylene blue. However, beyond a certain point, the adsorption capacity may reach a plateau or even decrease due to pore blockage, reducing the available surface area for adsorption. Similarly, carbon nanosheets have shown excellent adsorption properties for dyes due to their unique structural features. The adsorption capacity of carbon nanosheets for methylene blue can also grow by increasing the adsorbent dose. Figure 7 gives data about the rising removal of methylene blue by increasing adsorbent dose also, the adsorption capacity has an upward tendency.
Isotherm studies
Adsorption isotherms describe the relationship that is present in the concentration of a pollutant in a solution and the amount of adsorbent required to remove it. Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin, and Dubinin-Radushkevich isotherm models were studied for methylene blue removal (Table 2) with activated carbon and carbon nanosheets collected from olive stone. The linear equation of isotherms is mentioned in Table 1.
Table 1
Equation of isotherm models
| Isotherm model | Linear equation | parameters |
---|
1 | Langmuir [26] | \(\:\frac{{C}_{e}}{{q}_{e}}=\frac{1}{{K}_{L}{Q}_{m}}+\frac{{C}_{e}}{{Q}_{m}}\) | where Qm (mg/g or mol/g) and Ce (mol/L) are the maximum adsorption capacity and the concentration at equilibrium, in that order, and KL is the Langmuir constant, which stands for the energy of adsorption or the equilibrium constant of adsorbate-absorbent equilibrium (L/g or L/mol which is dependent on the unit of Qm and Ce). |
2 | Freundlich [26] | \(\:\text{log}\left({q}_{e}\right)=log{K}_{F}+\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)log{C}_{e}\) | where Ce is the equilibrium concentration of the adsorbate (mol/L). KF and 1/n are the Freundlich constants that are representative of the adsorption capacity and the intensity of adsorption, respectively. |
3 | Temkin [27] | \(\:{q}_{e}=\frac{RT}{{b}_{T}}ln{A}_{T}+\left(\frac{RT}{{b}_{T}}\right)ln{C}_{e}\) | By plotting qe vs. ln (Ce), both AT and bT constants are determined |
4 | Dubinin-Radushkevich [27] | \(\:ln{q}_{e}={q}_{s}-{K}_{D-R}{Ɛ}^{2}\) | Where is Dubinin-Radushkevich adsorption constant and qs is lnQm (Qm is adsorption capacity) |
Table 2
Correlation coefficient of isotherm models
Isotherm models | Langmuir | Freundlich | Temkin | Dubinin-Radushkevich |
---|
parameters | Activated carbon | R2 = 0.92 | R2 = 0.49 | R2 = 0.44 | R2 = 0.70 |
Carbon nanosheets | R2 = 0.99 | R2 = 0.61 | R2 = 0.56 | R2 = 0.57 |
The results of Table 4 show that the correlation coefficient (R2) for the Langmuir isotherm model for activated carbon and carbon nanosheets were 0.92 and 0.99 respectively which is just beyond than other three models. As the results show in Figs. 8 and 9, the Langmuir isotherm proved to be a better fit for the data for both of the adsorbents. The Langmuir isotherm model is extensively applied for the description of the adsorption of molecules onto a solid surface. This model forms the basis of a simple theoretical framework for understanding the behavior of adsorbates on surfaces. The Langmuir isotherm model describes the adsorption of molecules onto a solid surface by assuming a monolayer coverage. It is based on the following assumptions [27, 28]:
-
Adsorption occurs on a homogeneous surface with a fixed number of identical adsorption sites.
-
The adsorption process is reversible, meaning molecules can both adsorb and desorb from the surface.
-
No cross interaction is observed between adsorbed molecules.
-
The adsorption process reaches equilibrium at a constant temperature.
Adsorption kinetics
Pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetic models are mathematical representations that are implemented to describe the rate of chemical reactions. These models are often applied in the field of chemical kinetics to analyze and predict the behavior of reactions, particularly in the context of adsorption processes (Fig. 10).
The adsorption kinetics of methylene blue onto activated carbon and carbon nanosheets were investigated in optimum conditions using two kinetic models. the Lagergren pseudo-first order and pseudo-second order models whose equations are mentioned below [29]:
Pseudo-first order:
$$\:Ln\:\left({q}_{e}-{q}_{t}\right)=Ln{q}_{e}-{k}_{1}t$$
2
Pseudo-second order:
\(\:\frac{t}{{q}_{t}}=\frac{1}{{k}_{2}{q}_{e}^{2}}+\frac{1}{{q}_{e}}t\) | (3) |
where qt (mg g− 1) is the adsorption at time t (min); qe (mg g− 1) is the adsorption capacity at adsorption equilibrium; and k1 (min− 1) and k2 (g mg− 1 min− 1) are the kinetic rate constants for the pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order models, respectively.
Based on Table 3 information, the adsorption of methylene blue onto activated carbon may be well illustrated by pseudo-second-order as the correlation coefficient is just over than pseudo-first-order. Moreover, for carbon nanosheets pseudo-second-order with a higher correlation coefficient (0.98) was found to supply a better fit for the data.
Table 3
Kinetic models correlation coefficients
Type of kinetic models | pseudo-first-order | pseudo-second-order |
---|
Activated carbon | R2 = 0.61 | R2 = 0.98 |
Carbon nanosheets | R2 = 0.61 | R2 = 0.98 |
Thermodynamic study
The effect of temperature on the adsorption of methylene blue on activated carbon and carbon nanosheets can be explained by the thermodynamics of the adsorption process. The adsorption of methylene blue on the adsorbent is a spontaneous process which includes transferring methylene blue ions from the solution phase to the adsorbent surface. The energy required for this process is made possible through the difference in free energy between the two phases. The thermodynamic parameters that describe the adsorption process consist of the Gibbs free energy (∆G°), enthalpy (∆H°), and entropy (∆S°) [30]. The adsorption of methylene blue on activated carbon and carbon nanosheets is generally a physisorption process, which means that the energy of adsorption is low and the adsorbent-adsorbate interaction is mostly the result of the Van der Waals forces. The enthalpy of adsorption (∆H°) onto activated carbon and carbon nanosheets was negative, indicating that the adsorption process is exothermic also the entropy of adsorption (∆S°) for both adsorbents was negative, representing the emergence of order (Fig. 11).
\(\:K=\frac{{C}_{s}}{{C}_{e}}\) | (4) |
---|
\(\:\varDelta\:G={\varDelta\:G}^{○}+RTlnK\) | (5) |
\(\:\varDelta\:G={\varDelta\:G}^{○}+RTlnK\) | (6) |
Table 4
parameters | ∆H° | ∆S° |
---|
adsorbents | Activated carbon | -21841 | -88 |
Carbon nanosheets | -36748 | -119 |