Study design
A mixed method, exploratory design was used. The exploratory mixed methods approach involved combination of qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis. This mixed-method approach was used to address the limitations of a single method, thereby enhancing the validity and reliability of the research findings of the use of Igisoro game in occupational therapy rehabilitation.
Study setting
The study was conducted in Rwanda at the following settings namely: Rwanda Military Hospital, Ndera Neuropsychiatric hospital, CARAES Butare, Icyizere psychotherapeutic centre, Kigali University Teaching Hospital, King Faisal Hospital, HVP-Gatagara Nyanza and Gikondo branch, Love with Actions, Partners in Health (Rwinkwavu, Kirehe). The study settings were selected basing on available qualified occupational therapists at the aforementioned settings.
Study population
The study population was comprised of two categories including occupational therapists (OT) practicing in aforementioned study areas and occupational therapy beneficiaries (Ben) from Ndera Neuropsychiatric Hospital (Ben. With mental disorders) and Rwanda Military Hospital (Ben. With physical dysfunctions). Seventeen (17) occupational therapists were from different practicing areas as illustrated in the results section whereas twelve (12) occupational therapy beneficiaries were comprised of four beneficiaries from Rwanda Military Hospital and eight from Ndera Neuropsychiatric Teaching hospital.
Sampling methods and sample size
Convenient sampling methods was used in selection of the study participants (17) practicing occupational therapists working in the aforementioned settings. A purposive sampling was used in the selection of beneficiaries from the selected settings, with suitable characteristics as by researchers’ purpose. Twelve beneficiaries involved in study from Rwanda Military Hospital and Ndera Neuropsychiatric Teaching hospital using purposive sampling to represent the various areas including paediatric, neurological, orthopaedic and mental health. The sample size of twelve study participants were attained based on theme saturation as the researchers analysed the data concurrently the data collection.
Selection criteria for occupational therapists
- Licenced practicing occupational therapist
- At least one year of practicing experience
Selection criteria for beneficiaries
Inclusion criteria
- Being able to verbally communicate
- Have been attended OT services
- Having been exposed/ have information on Igisoro game
Exclusion criteria
- Beneficiaries aged less than 18 years and no caretaker for consenting
- Beneficiaries with no basic information on Igisoro game
- Beneficiaries without verbal communication
Instrumentation
This study used two instruments for data collection. Those instruments are a self-generated semi-structured questionnaire and translated semi-structured interview.
A self-generated semi-structured questionnaire and translated semi-structured interview were developed by the consensus team of the researchers with different background from teaching hospitals, University of Rwanda, Rehabilitation centres and Refugee camps. During the generation of these instruments the researchers referred to literature review and focused discussion before coming up to agreed decision.
A self-generated semi-structured questionnaire is constituted with the different questions regarding to background of occupational therapy practitioner and his/her experience in the use of Igisoro game in occupational therapy rehabilitation.
Furthermore, semi-structured interview consisted of open questions regarding the beneficiaries’ views on the use of Igisoro game in rehabilitation. The in-depth face-to face interview was conducted by three researchers with more than four years of experience in occupational therapy rehabilitation. The interviews were conducted in Kinyarwanda to allow the beneficiaries to freely provide their insights on the research interview questions.
Trustworthiness
Rigor of research was followed during research process which are credibility, dependability, conformability and transferability main to ensure that qualitative data are well incorporated.
Credibility: It is explained as authentic and accurate (27). It is about realistic data. This was achieved through member checking and peer review in order to ensure that the data is representative of the experience of the research participants. This research was conducted by a team of five researchers which was an added advantage to ensure credibility. Transferability: It proposes that results in the present research was the same as results in the same situation and research findings was appropriate for use in future (28). Concept of thick description and appropriate sampling techniques was used to ensure transferability.
Dependability: This refers to the accuracy and consistency of the research process (29).It was achieved through an audit trail with a detailed description of research process and peer review (discussions with colleagues and experienced researchers) by receiving inputs and feedback. Confirmability: Implies that how much others confirm the research findings. The review methods by research participants, colleagues’ reviews, overview of conflicting cases, and careful explanation of details are used to improve (27). It is about having the same findings at various time in a study. During this study, a team of researchers kept organizing meeting for discussions to make sure that this research is conducted well. Mixed methods was used to ensure varieties of research information and inputs from different research participants (both OT practitioners and beneficiaries).
Data collection procedures
After obtaining ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board at UR-CMHS, permissions for data collection were requested and granted by Rwanda Military Hospital (RMH) and Ndera Neuropsychiatric Teaching Hospital (NNPTH).
Researchers reached out to occupational therapists to obtain their active email addresses. Informed consent forms were sent via email, along with a self-generated semi-structured questionnaire through Google Forms. A first reminder was sent after one week, with a final reminder following at the end of three weeks, encouraging the completion of the questionnaire.
For occupational therapy beneficiaries at RMH and NNPTH, researchers visited the facilities and approached potential participants to explain the study's objectives. Informed consent was obtained prior to data collection. Subsequently, in-depth face-to-face interviews were conducted at the beneficiaries' settings, with each interview lasting 20-30 minutes. These interviews were audio-recorded, and key points were noted for further analysis.
Data analysis process
Descriptive analysis was used to measure quantitatively the study objectives. Frequencies and percentages were calculated to measure the reported clients who can benefit Igisoro game and perceived benefits from the occupational therapy practitioner’s perspectives. An inductive thematic analysis and Atlas.ti. version 23 software were employed to analyse qualitative data. The researchers followed these steps: (1) generating transcripts, (2) reading and re-reading transcripts, the transcripts were familiarized, (3) generating codes using Atlas.ti. version 23, (4) searching for theme, involves grouping different codes to make the sub-theme, (5) generating theme, (6) producing constructed report. The researcher’s consensus agreed on the generated themes after consideration of the similarities and differences.
Ethical consideration
The ethical clearance was sought from the Institutional Review Board at the University of Rwanda, College of Medicine and Health Sciences (UR-CMHS) with reference number ( No 235/CMHS IRB/2023), the Ethics Committee of at Rwanda Military Hospital (REF 184/RMH/COMDT/2024) and Ethics committee at Ndera Neuropsychiatric Teaching Hospital (No 005/NNPTHEC/2024). Participation in the study was voluntary, signed consent and/or assent form was obtained from the study participants. The study participants were freely to ask any question or any worries related to the research at any time. They were free to withdraw from the research anytime they want and no further impact associated with his/her withdrawal from the study. The data confidentiality was ensured by using pseudonyms during the data collection and analysis. Furthermore, the research abide to World Medical Association (WMA) declaration of Helsinki – ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects(30).