Structural properties
The ZnO:B layer was studied via XRD. The results of the research are shown in Fig. 1.
The predominant crystalline phase in the polycrystalline ZnO film is a hexagonal lattice of zinc oxide with the space group Pnma (62). The most important peaks at 31.8°, 34.4°, 36.2°, 47.5.40°, 56.6°, and 62.9° correspond to the ZnO planes, with the following orientations: (100), (002), (101), (102), and (110) и (103), respectively. The X-ray diffraction results are consistent with the standard database of nonorganic crystal structures of ZnO (ICDD 00-005-0664). Moreover, the high intensity of the (110) band indicates the texture and predominant orientation of the crystallites.
In addition to the zinc oxide phases, weak XRD signals are present in the XRD patterns of the ZnO sample at angles of 50.81° and 54.25°, which can be attributed to the (-129) and (-327) planes, respectively, of the zinc borate phase with a monoclinic crystal structure, which corresponds to the Zn3(B2O6) database (ICDD 00-027-0983).
Surface morphology
Figure 2 shows scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the ZnO:B layer surface.
The sample surface consists of many pyramidal micro-objects with a predominant direction of growth along the (110) direction according to the XRD results in Fig. 1.
The surface of the ZnO:B sample was also studied by atomic force microscopy (AFM). The AFM image is shown in Fig. 3.
As shown in Fig. 3a, the maximum height of the objects on the surface is 494 nm at a scale area of 25x25 mcm2. Generally, the surface is embossed, and the average roughness is Rs = 56 nm at a scale area of 25x25 mcm2 and Rs = 57 nm at areas of 12, 5 х 12, and 5 mcm2 (Fig. 3a). In addition to the AFM technique, the ZnO:B material was studied by SEM, and the cross-sectional image is shown in Fig. 3b. SEM scanning made it possible to measure the film thickness, which was 2 microns.
Optical properties
A study of the optical properties of the films was carried out in the wavelength range 300–1100 nm. Figure 4a shows the optical transmission spectra of a ZnO:B film on glass.
The average transmittance is 66% in the visual range (λ = 380–780 nm), with a total change in value from 3–77%. In the NIR range (λ = 790–1100 nm), the average value is 83%. In general, the film showed high transmission capacity at a thickness of 2 µm in the visible and near-IR regions. For the use of materials in solar cells as transparent conductive electrodes that do not require the creation of a contact grid, a throughput of approximately 66% in the visible region is sufficient.
The inset in Fig. 4a shows a graph for determining the band gap EG using the Tauc and Davis–Mott model [34],[35] where EG was found to be 3.24 eV. This model was chosen because it is suitable for both amorphous and polycrystalline materials. The band gap of undoped zinc oxide films covers a wide range from ~ 3.1 to ~ 3.5 eV [36]. Similarly, the band gap of ZnO:B is somewhat greater than that of titanium oxide TiO2 (3.2 eV) [37], [38].
The PL spectrum of the initial ZnO films (Fig. 4b), measured at room temperature with excitation at a wavelength of 300 nm, consists of a near-band edge emission NBE with a maximum near 380 nm and a half-width of ~ 0.18 eV and a wide emission band through deep levels (deep-level emission DLE) in the region of 500–700 nm. The intensity of both the NBE and DLE emission bands varies somewhat from sample to sample. Since the intensity ratio of the NBE and DLE bands characterizes the concentration of nonradiative recombination centers, the predominance of interband radiation in samples with a high concentration of free carriers may indicate high crystallinity of the ZnO layers.
Electrical properties
Measurements of the electrical characteristics were carried out by the Hall effect method, and the concentration of charge carriers and the mobilities of free electrons in the ZnO:B semiconductor films were determined. The measured characteristics of the ZnO:B film are shown in Table 1.
Table 1
– Electrical properties of the ZnO:B film
Samole
|
Film thickness, mcm
|
Bulk charge carrier concentration, cm-3
|
Mobility, cm2/V×s
|
Resistivity, Оhm×сm
|
ZnO:В
|
2
|
7.00×1019
|
35
|
2.50×10− 3
|
ZnO:В [39]
|
2.2
|
1.20×1020
|
30
|
1.70×10− 3
|
ITO [40]
|
0.6
|
1.16×1021
|
30
|
1.80×10− 3
|
The test sample has a lower concentration of charge carriers but has a higher mobility and a slightly higher resistivity than the measured parameters [39]: 7×1019 cm− 3 versus 1.20×1020 cm− 3; additionally, the mobility is 35 cm2/V×s, and the resistivity is 2.5×10− 3 Ω × cm versus 30 cm2/V×s and 1.7×10− 3 Ω × cm. The ZnO:B film from the abovementioned reference paper was used in amorphous Si solar cells. The table also contains the parameters of ITO (indium tin oxide) films [40], for which the resistivity is approximately the same as that in the above article and in the sample studied in this work: 1.8×10− 3 Оhm×сm versus 1.7×10− 3 Оhm×сm and 2.5×10− 3 Оhm×сm, respectively. ITO has the same resistivity but is more expensive due to the rarity of indium [41]. The analysis of these works makes it possible to set the required levels of values for application in photovoltaics in terms of the bulk concentration of charge carriers − 1020, mobility – 10 1 and resistivity – 10 − 3. The relatively good electrical parameters of the studied ZnO:B sample allowed it to be used as a TCO substrate.
Making a Perovskite Solar Cell
The ZnO:B layer obtained by LPCVD was 3×3 cm2 in size and was used as a substrate for PSCs. A perovskite solution (СH3NH3PbI3-MAPI) consisting of dimethylformamide (Merck), dimethyl sulfoxide (Merck), methylammonium iodide (Dyesol/Greatcell) and lead iodide (Merck) was deposited on a ZnO:B substrate using a spinner. During the formation of the perovskite film during unwinding, ethyl acetate was added to accelerate the process of crystallization; after deposition, annealing was carried out at 100°C for 10 min. The p-type layer Spiro-OMe-TAD (Merck) was deposited on the spinner from a solution based on chlorobenzene with the addition of a solution of acetonitrile (Merck) and a Li-TFSI salt (Merck). Gold electrodes for the solar cell were obtained by thermal vacuum deposition on an Edwards 306 setup. The results of the study of the phase composition of the samples are shown in Fig. 5.
The main phase corresponds to a perovskite layer of lead methylammonium iodide with an orthorhombic lattice with space group Pnma (62). Additionally, the diffraction patterns show peaks attributed to the substrate of zinc oxides doped with boron. The results of X-ray diffraction analysis of the samples correspond to the standards of the database of inorganic crystal structures CH3NH3PbI3 (ICDD 01-086-6112) and ZnO (ICDD 00-005-0664).
The performance study was carried out through the measurement of the current‒voltage characteristic (I–V curve), which was measured on a solar simulator "Newport Oriel Sol3A" with illumination mode AM 1.5. The measurement results are shown in Fig. 6.
The operating parameters of the IV curve of the perovskite solar cell on the ZnO:B film shown above are presented in Table 2.
Table 2 - Performance parameters of the perovskite solar cells on the ZnO:B film
No
|
Sample
|
Voc,V
|
Jsc, mA/cm2
|
FF, %
|
PCE, %
|
1
|
glass/ZnO:B/MAPI/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au (planar-type)
|
0,51
|
11,22
|
45,41
|
2, 62
|
Here, is a planar sample on a ZnO:B film. This solar cell has a glass/ZnO:B/СH3NH3PbI3/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au structure (Fig. 7).
Considering the planar-type structure, the efficiency of this type of perovskite solar cell is high enough. For example, solar cells in which a layer of ZnO was obtained from nanocoloids [42] demonstrated a maximum efficiency of 4.39%. Similarly, in [8], samples with a complex structure based on ITO and ZnO nanoparticles had an efficiency comparable to ours; an element with the ITO/ZnO/CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite/spiro-OMeTAD/Au architecture was fabricated, and a PCE = 2.9% was obtained at Voc = 0.84 V, Jsc = 7.3 mA/cm2, and FF = 47.6%. In [43], a cell based on ITO and ZnO nanorods had an efficiency of 2.18% at Voc = 0.99 V, Jsc = 5.57 mA/cm2, and FF = 39.58%. In our case, we demonstrate that the ZnO layer can act as both an electron-transport layer and a rear transparent conductive contact. A simple cell design based on ZnO:B without the use of expensive ITO layers holds promise for cost-effective perovskite solar cells.