Associations between Abdominal Fat, Psoas Muscle Fat, and Lumbar Spine Bone Density: Insights from Quantitative CT Imaging

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-5220001/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Associations between Abdominal Fat, Psoas Muscle Fat, and Lumbar Spine Bone Density: Insights from Quantitative CT Imaging

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5220001/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

You are reading this latest preprint version

Purpose

To investigate the correlation between abdominal adipose tissue (AAT), psoas muscle fat content, and lumbar vertebral bone mineral density (BMD) in different age and sex groups using quantitative CT(QCT) imaging.

Methods

A total of 861 subjects were included in this study, comprising 404 males and 457 females, divided into 6 age groups. QCT was used to measure BMD, visceral adipose tissue (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and psoas muscle fat content (Fp). Independent sample t-tests were used to compare intergroup differences in the above data between males and females in the same age group. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare intergroup differences in the data between males and females in each age group. Pearson correlation analysis was used to assess the correlations of BMD with VAT, SAT, and Fp, as well as the correlation between AAT and Fp.

Results

There was no difference in Fp between males and females in each age group. In the 60–69 and 70–79 age groups, female BMD was significantly lower than that of males (P < 0.001). Except for the 20–29 and 40–49 age groups, the SAT in females was higher than that of males (P < 0.001), while except for the 20–29 age group, female VAT was lower than that of males (P < 0.001) in each age group. There were differences in BMD (F = 72.07, P < 0.001), VAT (F = 22.12, P < 0.001), and Fp (F = 23.61, P < 0.001) among different age groups in males. Among different age groups in females, there were differences in BMD (F = 188.81, P < 0.001), VAT (F = 39.82, P < 0.001), SAT (F = 6.26, P < 0.001), and Fp (F = 26.22, P < 0.001). BMD in males was negatively correlated with both VAT and Fp (R=-0.336, -0.422, P < 0.001), and Fp was positively correlated with VAT and SAT (R = 0.405, 0.125, P < 0.001). BMD in females was negatively correlated with SAT, VAT, and Fp (R=-0.112, -0.509, -0.469, P < 0.001), and Fp was positively correlated with VAT and SAT (R = 0.521, 0.325, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Visceral adipose tissue and psoas muscle fat content increase with age, while BMD decreases with age. Increased visceral adipose tissue, psoas muscle fat content, and subcutaneous adipose tissue in females may be risk factors for osteoporosis.

quantitative CT

bone mineral density

abdominal fat

visceral adipose tissue

psoas muscle

fat content

Osteoporosis is a systemic bone disease characterized by reduced bone mass and disrupted bone microstructure. It leads to increased bone fragility and susceptibility to fractures. Bone mineral density (BMD) is the main screening and diagnostic indicator for osteoporosis. The prevalence of osteoporosis among males and females aged 50 and above in China is 6.46% and 29.13%, respectively, and it is estimated that by 2050, the number of osteoporosis patients will exceed 120 million [1]. Osteoporosis has become an important public health issue in China, garnering increasing attention.

Osteoporosis is influenced by factors such as age, sex, genetics, environment, and behavior like lifestyle, physical activity, alcohol consumption, and high-fat diets. Obesity, characterized by the excessive or abnormal accumulation of fat tissue in the body, is associated with many chronic metabolic diseases. The impact of fat tissue on bone health is still debated. Previous studies have suggested that overweight or obesity may have a protective effect on bones, while low body mass index (BMI) is often associated with decreased BMD [2]. With in-depth research on visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), differences between the two have been highlighted. Visceral adipose tissue has higher metabolic activity compared to subcutaneous adipose tissue, and can more significantly affect BMD by altering bone metabolism. A study by Jain [3] showed a significant negative correlation between increased visceral adipose tissue and BMD, regardless of sex or ethnicity, indicating that visceral adipose tissue is not a protective factor for BMD but rather a harmful one. Hind et al. [4] conducted a study on 300 elderly subjects and found that visceral adipose tissue is a risk factor for osteoporosis in women but not in men. The study also revealed that as age increases, the degree of fat infiltration in the psoas muscle, one of the important muscles involved in the maintenance of lumbar stability, also increases. Li et al. [5] studied 367 subjects by QCT and showed a negative correlation between BMD and fat infiltration of the paraspinal muscles.

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), QCT, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the main techniques used for measuring body composition. DXA cannot differentiate between cortical and trabecular bone, and its results are influenced by factors such as osteophytes, adjacent structures, and patient body size, leading to an overestimation of BMD, nor can it accurately measure fat content of the tissue [6]. MRI, while capable of quantifying fat content in specific areas using special sequences, is time-consuming, expensive, and has many contraindications [7]. In contrast, QCT can measure volumetric BMD (vBMD), is not affected by cortical bone or surrounding structures, and can be synchronized with routine CT scans without additional radiation dose. QCT devices can quantitatively measure lumbar BMD, abdominal fat, and fat content of the paraspinal muscles in one scan, proving to be a reliable method for non-invasive assessment of body composition [8–9].

The study aimed to explore the correlations between abdominal adipose tissue and psoas muscle fat content and lumbar BMD, providing quantitative data reference for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.

1. Study Subjects

The study included 457 females and 404 males, aged 22 to 79 years (mean age, 51.4 ± 16.6 years), who underwent chest CT combined with QCT examination in our hospital from January 2020 to June 2022. They were divided into six age groups: 20–29-year, 30–39-year, 40–49-year, 50–59-year, 60–69 year, and 70–79 year. Exclusion criteria include (1) patients with thoracolumbar fractures, tumor, infections or surgery, (2) patients with bone metabolic diseases, (3) patient with endocrine diseases or medication history affecting bone metabolism. Finally, a total of 861 participants were included in the study (Fig. 1). Each age group consisted of 92 (46 males, 46 females), 170 (95 males, 75 females), 130 (62 males, 68 females), 148 (70 males, 78 females), 202 (76 males, 126 females), and 119 (55 males, 64 females) participants, respectively.

In accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, this study is approved by the Ethics Committee of Tianjin Hospital (Approved Text No.: 2021 医伦审084). This study is a retrospective study, so it did not require patient informed consent.

Figure #1. Flow chart of subject enrollment and exclusion

2. Imaging Examinations

Chest CT scans were performed on a CT750 scanner (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA). Prior to scanning, calibration was done using a QCT calibration phantom. The patient was placed in a supine position, and the scan range extended from 2 cm above the upper margin of the first rib to the lower margin of the third lumbar vertebral body. The scan parameters were as follows: field of view 50 cm, reconstructed field of view 38 cm, tube voltage 120 kV, tube current 200–300 mA, and slice thickness 1.25 mm. Images were transferred to the QCT workstation (Mindways QCT PRO V6.1, USA).

3. Data Measurement

Measurements were conducted by two experienced radiologists (MXH, with 12 years of experience in musculoskeletal imaging diagnosis; WZ, with 33 years of experience in musculoskeletal imaging diagnosis), and the results were averaged.

1) BMD Measurement

Using the "New 3D Spine Examination Analysis" in QCT PRO software, the vBMD of the trabecular bone in the L1, L2, and L3 vertebrae was measured separately, and the average vBMD of L1–L3 was taken as the BMD of the vertebra. By adjusting the axial, coronal, and sagittal images simultaneously, the region of interest (ROI) was placed in the center of the vertebra being measured. The ROI had a height of 9 mm and a distance of more than 3 mm from the cortical bone boundary to avoid partial volume effects of the cortical bone, and the ROI was positioned away from areas of bone sclerosis and the posterior vertebral venous plexus (Fig. 2).

Figure # 2

Measurement of BMD of L1 by QCT PRO software. Figure 2A shows that on the axial position, ROI (yellow ellipse) is located in the center of the L1 vertebra; Fig. 2B and Fig. 2C show the sagittal and coronal positions of ROI, respectively. ROI is located in the center of the vertebral body, avoiding the osteosclerosis area of the vertebral body and the posterior vertebral venous plexus.

2) Abdominal Adipose Tissue Measurement

Using the "New QCT slice range pick" on the QCT workstation, subcutaneous adipose tissue and visceral adipose tissue at the level of the third lumbar vertebra were semi-automatically measured (Fig. 3). SAT was defined as the area of fat between the skin and the outer edge of the abdominal and back muscles at the level of the L3 vertebra. VAT was defined as all intra-abdominal fat tissue regions at the level of the L3 vertebra, including the rectus abdominis, external oblique, quadratus lumborum, and enclosed area below the outer edge of the lumbar muscle.

Figure # 3: Measurement of abdominal fat content at the L3 vertebra level by QCT PRO software. Total adipose tissue: all blue areas; Subcutaneous fat content: blue area outside green circle (shown by →); Visceral fat content: Blue area in green circle (shown by ⭐).

3) Measurement of Psoas Muscle Fat Content

At the level of the L3 vertebra, the fat content of the psoas major was measured using the "New QCT slice range pick" method. An ROI was placed on each side of the psoas major muscle as centrally as possible without exceeding the muscle contour (Fig. 4). The measured values were recorded as the left and right psoas major fat content (Fpsoas-L, Fpsoas-R), and their average was recorded as the psoas muscle fat content (Fp).

Figure # 4

Measurement of psoas fat content at the level of the L3 vertebra by QCT PRO software. 4A and 4B show that on the axial position, the ROI of the left and right psoas major muscles were selected at the L3 vertebra level respectively. The ROI is located in the center of the psoas and does not extend beyond the periphery of the psoas.

4. Statistical Methods

Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 26.0 (IBM Corp., USA). Independent-sample t-tests were used to compare the differences in BMD, SAT, VAT, and Fp between males and females within the same age group. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and least-square difference tests were employed to compare the intergroup differences in BMD, SAT, VAT, and Fp among different age groups for both males and females. Pearson correlation analysis was utilized to examine the relationship between BMD and the fat content of abdominal fat as well as the psoas major muscle fat in males and females. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

1. Comparison of BMD, SAT, VAT, and Fp between Males and Females Within the Same Age Group

In individuals below 60 years old, females exhibited higher BMD compared to males, with significant differences observed in the 30–39 age group (P < 0.001). Females over 60 years old had significantly lower BMD compared to males, with significant differences observed in the 60–69 and 70–79 age groups (P < 0.001 for both). Subcutaneous adipose tissue was higher in females across all age groups, and except for the 20–29 and 40–49 age groups, the differences were statistically significant (P_{30 − 39} = 0.037, P_{50 − 59} < 0.001, P_{60 − 69} < 0.001, P_{70 − 79} < 0.001). Conversely, visceral adipose tissue was lower in females across all age groups, and except for the 20–29 age groups, the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.001 for all). No statistically significant differences were observed in the fat content of the psoas major muscle between males and females across all age groups. Table 1 shows the specific values.

Table 1

Comparison of various measurement indicators between males and females within the same age group
Variable		20–29 y	30–39 y	40–49 y	50–59 y	60–69 y	70–79 y
BMD	Male	164.16 ± 30.61	149.72 ± 32.99	135.64 ± 28.52	109.27 ± 24.05	99.46 ± 31.14	78.56 ± 29.28
(mg/cm³)	Female	174.68 ± 29.42	169.39 ± 27.55	136.45 ± 27.61	114.62 ± 37.84	78.68 ± 25.01	56.69 ± 28.16
	P	0.094	< 0.001	0.87	0.313	< 0.001	< 0.001
SAT	Male	115.35 ± 66.74	133.73 ± 59.02	125.02 ± 44.41	121.78 ± 47.27	126.19 ± 39.53	119.57 ± 54.38
(cm²)	Female	142.69 ± 74.37	154.01 ± 66.79	125.33 ± 43.83	170.13 ± 52.27	164.52 ± 53.89	151.93 ± 43.61
	P	0.065	0.037	0.968	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001
VAT	Male	89.23 ± 46.05	150.54 ± 59.77	167.66 ± 53.87	180.31 ± 70.27	185.59 ± 66.48	206..58 ± 68.83
(cm²)	Female	74.56 ± 38.97	85.22 ± 57.32	120.61 ± 54.97	139.04 ± 46.37	153.49 ± 46.78	178.39 ± 61.79
	P	0.101	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	0.021
Fp (%)	Male	1.51 ± 1.65	2.90 ± 2.12	3.71 ± 2.81	4.37 ± 2.39	5.83 ± 3.88	6.26 ± 3.45
	Female	2.14 ± 2.36	2.64 ± 2.05	3.67 ± 2.72	4.65 ± 3.11	5.83 ± 3.29	6.98 ± 3.78
	P	0.14	0.436	0.936	0.527	0.989	0.286

2. Pattern of Changes in Lumbar BMD, Abdominal Adipose Tissue, and Psoa

Muscle Fat Content with Age

In both males and females, the lumbar BMD peaked in the 20–29 age group, with females having a higher peak BMD than males. As age increased, both male and female lumbar BMD decreased. Apart from the BMD between 20–29 age and 30–39 age groups in female, statistically significant differences in BMD were observed between all other age groups for both males and females (P < 0.001).

The VAT values increased with age for both sexes. There were no statistically significant differences in VAT between the 20–29 age group and the 30–39 age group, and between the 50–59 age group and the 60–69 age group, while there were statistically significant differences in VAT among the other female age groups (P < 0.001). In males, a statistically significant difference in VAT was observed between the 20–29 and 30–39 age groups (P < 0.001) while the VAT value of each age group over 40 years old was higher than that of the previous age group, although the differences were not statistically significant. VAT was higher in older age groups (60–69 and 70–79 age groups) where it differed significantly from the younger age groups (20–29 and 30–39 age groups) (P < 0.001).

SAT was found to peak in the age groups of 50–59 in females and 30–39 in males. In males, the SAT did not differ significantly among age groups. For females aged 50–59 and above, there were no statistical differences among age groups in terms of SAT; however, SAT was observed to be significantly lower in the 40–49 age group compared to the 20–29, 30–39, 50–59, 60–69, and 70–79 age groups (P < 0.001).

Psoas major muscle fat content increased with age for both males and females; there were no significant differences found in the psoas muscle fat content at the 40–49, 50–59, and 70–79 age groups for males, and the 30–39 and 40–49 age groups for females, compared to the previous age groups. Significant differences were found for the comparisons among the remaining groups (P < 0.001). Table 2 and Fig. 5 show the specific data.

Table 2

Comparison of various measurement indicators among different age groups for male and female subjects
	Male				Female
	BMD	SAT	VAT	Fp(%)	BMD	SAT	VAT	Fp(%)
	(mg/cm³)	(cm²)	(cm²)	Fp(%)	(mg/cm³)	(cm²)	(cm²)	Fp(%)
20-29y	164.16 ± 30.61	115.35 ± 66.74	89.23 ± 46.05	1.51 ± 1.65	174.68 ± 29.42	142.69 ± 74.37	74.56 ± 38.97	2.14 ± 2.36
30-39y	149.72 ± 32.99	133.73 ± 59.02	150.54 ± 59.77	2.90 ± 2.12	169.39 ± 27.55	154.01 ± 66.79	85.22 ± 57.32	2.64 ± 2.05
40-49y	135.64 ± 28.52	125.02 ± 44.41	167.66 ± 53.87	3.71 ± 2.81	136.45 ± 27.61	125.33 ± 43.83	120.61 ± 54.97	3.67 ± 2.72
50-59y	109.27 ± 24.05	121.78 ± 47.27	180.31 ± 70.27	4.37 ± 2.39	114.62 ± 37.84	170.13 ± 52.27	139.04 ± 46.37	4.65 ± 3.11
60-69y	99.46 ± 31.14	126.19 ± 39.53	185.59 ± 66.48	5.83 ± 3.88	78.68 ± 25.01	164.52 ± 53.89	153.49 ± 46.78	5.83 ± 3.29
70-79y	78.67 ± 29.28	119.59 ± 54.38	206.58 ± 68.83	6.26 ± 3.45	56.69 ± 28.16	151.93 ± 43.61	178.39 ± 61.79	6.98 ± 3.78
F	72.07	1.03	22.12	23.61	188.81	6.26	39.82	26.22
P	< 0.001	0.399	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001

Figure # 5

Comparison of BMD, subcutaneous adipose tissue, visceral adipose tissue and psoas muscle fat content among different age groups for both males and females. Figure 5A shows the comparison of BMD among different age groups for both males and females; Fig. 5B shows the comparison of subcutaneous adipose tissue among different age groups for both males and females; Fig. 5C shows the comparison of visceral adipose tissue among different age groups for both males and females; Fig. 5D shows the comparison of psoas muscle fat content between among different age groups for both males and females.

3. Correlation of Lumbar BMD with Abdominal Adipose Tissue and Psoas Fat Content

Both VAT and FP were negatively correlated with BMD in both men and women. SAT in females showed a negative correlation with BMD, although the correlation was weak (R=-0.112, P < 0.001), while SAT in males showed no significant correlation with BMD (P = 0.916). Specific data can be found in Table 3 and Fig. 6 and Fig. 7.

Table 3

Correlations between lumbar spine BMD with abdominal adipose tissue and psoas muscle fat content.
Factor	BMD
	Male		Female
	R	P	R	P
SAT	-0.005	0.916	-0.112	< 0.001
VAT	-0.336	< 0.001	-0.509	< 0.001
FP	-0.422	< 0.001	-0.469	< 0.001

Figure #6

Correlations between male BMD and subcutaneous adipose tissue, visceral adipose tissue, and psoas major muscle fat content. There was no correlation between

BMD and SAT (P = 0.916); the BMD value was negatively correlated with VAT and Fp

(P < 0.001).

Figure #7

Correlations between female BMD and subcutaneous adipose tissue, visceral adipose tissue, and psoas major muscle fat content. The BMD value was negatively correlated with SAT, VAT, and Fp (P < 0.001).

4. Correlation between Abdominal Adipose Tissue and Psoas Major Fat Content

Both VAT and SAT were positively correlated with FP in both males and females, with VAT showing a stronger correlation with FP than SAT (male R = 0.405, P < 0.001; female R = 0.521, P < 0.001). Correlation between abdominal adipose tissue and psoas major fat content were summarized in Table 4 and Fig. 8 and Fig. 9.

Table 4

Correlations between abdominal fat content and psoas major fat content
Factor	Fp
	Male		Female
	R	P	R	P
SAT	0.125	0.012	0.325	< 0.001
VAT	0.405	< 0.001	0.521	< 0.001

Figure # 9

Correlations of female psoas fat content with subcutaneous adipose tissue and visceral adipose tissue. The fat content of the psoas major muscle was positively correlated with the subcutaneous adipose tissue and visceral adipose tissue (P < 0.001).

This study found that both male and female BMD peaked at the age range of 20–29, after which it decreased with increasing age. Additionally, after the age of 60, female BMD was significantly lower than that of males, possibly due to the rapid decline in estrogen levels in women. The content of visceral adipose tissue and the content of psoas muscle fat content both increased with age. Zhang et al. [10] reported that for Asian populations, both men and women experience an increase in VAT with age, which is consistent with the findings of the present study. There are specific differences in abdominal adipose tissue between men and women, with women having higher contents of subcutaneous adipose tissue but lower contents of visceral adipose tissue than men. Research has shown that estrogen introduces a gender bias in the function and deposition of adipose tissue, promoting fat deposition in subcutaneous tissue in women and visceral tissue in men [11]. The fat content of the psoas major muscle fat was found to increase with age, with no significant difference observed between men and women.

The impact of abdominal adipose tissue on BMD has long been a subject of controversy. Previous studies have suggested that visceral adipose tissue, which has higher metabolic activity than subcutaneous adipose tissue, can more effectively influence BMD by altering bone metabolism. Zhang et al. [12] conducted a study on 400 adult Chinese individuals, showing no significant correlation between VAT and BMD; however, the present study reveals a negative correlation between BMD and VAT, where BMD decreases with increasing VAT. Zhang et al. [13] studied VAT in relation to menopausal status in Chinese women, finding that postmenopausal groups had significantly higher VAT compared to peri-menopausal groups, and both groups’ VAT adversely affected the lumbar spine BMD. Crivelli et al. [14] conducted research on 58 severely obese women, indicating that both visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue may be detrimental to bone health, and severe obesity may increase the risk of vertebral fractures. Sharma et al. [15], through DXA, similarly confirmed a positive correlation between VAT and BMD; however, after controlling for BMI, VAT emerged as a negative predictor for BMD. The present study, involving 853 adults, demonstrated that visceral adipose tissue is detrimental to lumbar spine BMD, showing a negative correlation. Visceral adipose tissue secretes high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF and IL-6, which induce the generation of osteoclasts and bone resorption. Additionally, high concentrations of TNF and IL-6 can suppress adiponectin secretion, reducing its stimulatory effects on osteoblast proliferation, thereby reducing bone synthesis and increasing absorption, leading to decreased BMD [16]. SAT, known as “protective fat”, produces leptin and adiponectin, which enhance bone quality by stimulating osteoblast activity. Furthermore, SAT is a primary source of aromatase, which is necessary for estrogen synthesis. Estrogen can reduce bone resorption and stimulate bone formation, thereby maintaining bone health. Ackerman et al.’s [17] study showed a positive correlation between subcutaneous adipose tissue and bone density in young women. Zhang et al. [13] found a negative correlation between BMD and SAT in postmenopausal women. The present study indicates that male SAT has no significant correlation with BMD, while female SAT shows a slight negative correlation with BMD, suggesting that SAT not only affects bone health through metabolic pathways but may also influence BMD through mechanical means. When obesity exceeds a certain threshold, the harmful effects of SAT on bone quality may outweigh its protective effects.

Paravertebral muscles play an important role in maintaining spinal stability. Currently, the assessment of paravertebral muscle quality is primarily done by measuring the cross-sectional area, and further studies [18–19] have correlated the paravertebral muscles with lumbar vertebral BMD. Engelke et al. [20] found that the volume of the psoas major muscle remains relatively stable with age, but the fat content within the muscle increases. Yang et al. [21] proposed that the fat content of the paravertebral muscles is an independent factor affecting lumbar vertebral BMD, suggesting that qualitative assessment of paravertebral muscle fat infiltration may more objectively evaluate clinical outcomes. The psoas major muscle is a single muscle bundle, and the invisible fat infiltration in and between myocytes can more accurately reflect the intramuscular fat infiltration during the degeneration process. The present study utilized QCT to measure the fat content of the psoas major muscles to objectively reflect fat infiltration within the muscles. Li et al. [5] also demonstrated that with aging, the average fat content of the paravertebral muscles increases, emphasizing the impact of aging on sarcopenia. Yang et al. [21], by MRI examinations, revealed that regardless of sex, paravertebral muscle fat content increases with age, consistent with the present study's findings that the psoas major muscle fat content increased with age from adulthood onwards. Furthermore, the correlation analysis in the present study showed a negative relationship between the psoas major muscle fat content and lumbar vertebral BMD. This suggests that fat infiltration of the psoas major muscle may exacerbate bone-loss progression, thereby influencing each other. Studies by Li et al. [22] using QCT similarly demonstrate a negative correlation between low bone mass and paravertebral muscle fat infiltration, consistent with the findings of the present study.

This study conducted a correlation analysis of the fat content of the psoas major muscle and the abdominal adipose tissue, finding a positive correlation between the fat content of the psoas major muscle and same-layer abdominal SAT and VAT, with a stronger correlation with VAT. This may suggest that the fat content of the psoas major muscle is more closely related to abdominal obesity than peripheral obesity. Previous studies have paid less attention to the correlation between the fat content of the psoas major muscle and abdominal adipose tissue. The results of the present study may be related to the “energy overflow hypothesis”. In obese individuals, fat cells in the abdominal fat increase in size, and excessive lipid deposition can lead to the accumulation of excess fat in other tissues such as skeletal muscle [23].

There are some limitations to this study. Firstly, due to insufficient sample size, this study did not conduct in-depth analysis on individuals aged 0–20 and over 80 years old. In the future, the sample size should be further expanded to explore the relationship between BMD and visceral adipose tissue and psoas major muscle fat content in males and females of all age groups. Secondly, this study was a single-center study and did not explore the impact of different regions and ethnicities on the results. A multicenter study including participants from more regions will be conducted in the future.

Visceral adipose tissue and psoas major muscle fat content increase with age, while BMD decreases with age. Visceral adipose tissue and psoas major muscle fat content are negatively correlated with lumbar spine BMD. Excessive deposition of visceral adipose tissue and psoas major muscle fat is a risk factor for osteoporosis. The results of this study provide useful evidence for the clinical prevention of osteoporosis.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Author contributions

HX: Experimental design, data statistical analysis, figure creation, manuscript writing;

FLZ, YQZ: Data collection, statistical analysis

ZW, XHM: Research guidance, manuscript review, funding support.

All authors approved the final manuscript.

Funding

Supported by the Scientific Innovation Small and Micro Projects Fund for Medical Health Experts and Scholars (20002).

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Consent to Participate declaration

Not applicable.

Human Ethics

Approved Text No.: 2021 医伦审084

Clinical trial number

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Zeng Q, Li N, Wang Q et al (2019) The Prevalence of Osteoporosis in China, a Nationwide, Multicenter DXA Survey. J Bone Miner Res 34(10):1789-1797. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3757
Lloyd JT, Alley DE, Hawkes WG, Hochberg MC, Waldstein SR, Orwig DL (2014) Body mass index is positively associated with bone mineral density in US older adults. Archives of osteoporosis 9, 175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-014-0175-2
Jain RK, Vokes T (2023) Visceral Adipose Tissue is Negatively Associated With Bone Mineral Density in NHANES 2011-2018. J Endocr Soc 7(4):bvad008. https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvad008
Hind K, Pearce M, Birrell F (2017) Total and Visceral Adiposity Are Associated With Prevalent Vertebral Fracture in Women but Not Men at Age 62 Years: The Newcastle Thousand Families Study. J Bone Miner Res 32(5):1109-1115. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3085
Li X, Xie Y, Lu R, Zhang Y, Tao H, Chen S (2022) Relationship between osteoporosis with fatty infiltration of paraspinal muscles based on QCT examination. J Bone Miner Metab 40(3):518-527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-022-01311-z
Petak S, Barbu CG, Yu EW et al (2013) The Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry: body composition analysis reporting. J Clin Densitom 16(4):508-19https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2013.08.018
Huber FA, Del Grande F, Rizzo S, Guglielmi G, Guggenberger R (2020) MRI in the assessment of adipose tissues and muscle composition: how to use it. Quant Imaging Med Surg 10(8):1636-1649. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims.2020.02.06
Bai R, Ying X, Shen J et al (2022) The visceral and liver fat are significantly associated with the prevalence of hyperuricemia among middle age and elderly people: A cross-sectional study in Chongqing, China. Front Nutr 9:961792.https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.961792.
Li X, Zhang Y, Xie Y, Lu R, Tao H, Chen S et al (2022) Correlation Between Bone Mineral Density (BMD) and Paraspinal Muscle Fat Infiltration Based on QCT: A Cross-Sectional Study. Calcif Tissue Int 110(6):666-673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-022-00944-6
Zhang W, Ma X, Xue P et al (2014) Associations between fat distribution and volumetric bone mineral density in Chinese adults. Endocrine 47(3):862-868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-014-0252-8
Wang J, Yan D, Hou X et al (2017) Association of adiposity indices with bone density and bone turnover in the Chinese population. Osteoporos Int 28(9):2645-2652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-4081-5
Zhang X, Hua T, Zhu J et al (2019) Body compositions differently contribute to BMD in different age and gender: a pilot study by QCT. Arch Osteoporos 14(1):31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-019-0574-5
Zhang L, Ruan X, Ju R et al (2021) Lumbar bone mineral density measured by quantitative computed tomography (QCT): association with abdominal adipose tissue in different menopausal periods of Chinese women. Gynecol Endocrinol 37(3):264-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2020.1836147
Crivelli M, Chain A, da Silva ITF, Waked AM, Bezerra FF (2021) Association of Visceral and Subcutaneous Fat Mass With Bone Density and Vertebral Fractures in Women With Severe Obesity. J Clin Densitom 24(3):397-405 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2020.10.005
Sharma DK, Anderson PH, Morris HA, Clifton PM (2020) Visceral Fat Is a Negative Determinant of Bone Health in Obese Postmenopausal Women. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(11):3996. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113996
Rinonapoli G, Pace V, Ruggiero C et al (2021) Obesity and Bone: A Complex Relationship. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(24):13662. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222413662
Ackerman KE, Davis B, Jacoby L, Misra M et al (2011) DXA surrogates for visceral fat are inversely associated with bone density measures in adolescent athletes with menstrual dysfunction. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 24(7-8):497-504. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpem.2011.208
Honkanen T, Mäntysaari M, Leino T et al (2019) Cross-sectional area of the paraspinal muscles and its association with muscle strength among fighter pilots: a 5-year follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 20(1):170 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2551-y
Salimi H, Ohyama S, Terai H et al (2021) Trunk Muscle Mass Measured by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Reflecting the Cross-Sectional Area of the Paravertebral Muscles and Back Muscle Strength: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of a Prospective Cohort Study of Elderly Population. J Clin Med 10(6):1187. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10061187
Engelke K, Ghasemikaram M, Chaudry O et al (2022) The effect of ageing on fat infiltration of thigh and paraspinal muscles in men. Aging Clin Exp Res 34(9):2089-2098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-022-02149-1
Yang Q, Yan D, Wang L et al（2022）Muscle fat infiltration but not muscle cross-sectional area is independently associated with bone mineral density at the lumbar spine. Br J Radiol 95(1134):20210371. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20210371
Li X, Zhang Y, Xie Y, Lu R, Tao H, Chen S (2022) Correlation Between Bone Mineral Density (BMD) and Paraspinal Muscle Fat Infiltration Based on QCT: A Cross-Sectional Study. Calcif Tissue Int 110(6):666-673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-022-00944-6
Bays H (2014) Central obesity as a clinical marker of adiposopathy; increased visceral adiposity as a surrogate marker for global fat dysfunction. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 21(5):345-351. https://doi.org/10.1097/MED.0000000000000093

No competing interests reported.

Download PDF

Editorial decision: Revision requested
23 Oct, 2024
Editor assigned by journal
23 Oct, 2024
Submission checks completed at journal
23 Oct, 2024
First submitted to journal
07 Oct, 2024

You are reading this latest preprint version

Associations between Abdominal Fat, Psoas Muscle Fat, and Lumbar Spine Bone Density: Insights from Quantitative CT Imaging

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Figures

Introduction

Subject and Methods

1. Study Subjects

2. Imaging Examinations

3. Data Measurement

1) BMD Measurement

2) Abdominal Adipose Tissue Measurement

3) Measurement of Psoas Muscle Fat Content

4. Statistical Methods

Results

2. Pattern of Changes in Lumbar BMD, Abdominal Adipose Tissue, and Psoa

3. Correlation of Lumbar BMD with Abdominal Adipose Tissue and Psoas Fat Content

4. Correlation between Abdominal Adipose Tissue and Psoas Major Fat Content

Discussion

Conclusion

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Status:

Version 1