Chemicals
All chemicals were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and Merck (Merck, Schuchardt, OHG, Germany). Ultrapure water obtained from a Millipore Milli-Q system (Bedford, MA, USA).
Cactus extraction and DPPH inhibition method
Nopal cactus cladodes were collected from the experimental station of Regional Center-INRA Settat, Morocco. They were washed with distilled water, dried at 55 °C in an oven and mechanically milled. The obtained powder was stored in a closed container at room temperature until use. In order to prepare the ethanol extract, a fine dried powder (5 g) was extracted by stirring at room temperature with 100 mL of ethanol /water mixture (70: 30 v/v) for 4 days at 4 °C according to method of Radi et al. [35]. After the solution was filtered, then the solvent was evaporated using a vacuum rotary evaporator (Buchi R-210) at 38 °C. The remained part was lyophilized and stored at 4 °C until used.
Radical scavenging activity (RSA) of ETHEX was measured using the free radical 1,1- diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) as described by [36]. A known amount of the dry ETHEX (0.1 mL) was centrifuged in methanol (2.9 mL) at 5000 rpm for 15 minutes followed by filtration through filter paper (Whatman No.1). Methanolic solution of DPPH (0.5 mL, 100 μM) was added to the tubes including the supernatant of each concentration. After vigorous shaking of the tubes, they were incubated at room temperature for 45 minutes in the darkness. Ascorbic acid and BHT were used as reference compounds. Lower absorbance of the reaction mixture indicated the higher free radical scavenging activity.
The percentage of free radical scavenging activities of the samples were calculated using the following formula [37]:
% RSA = [(AD − AE)/ AD]*100
Where AD and AE is the absorbance of the DPPH blank sample and the absorbance of the test solution, respectively. AE was the difference between the absorbance value of the test solution and its blank.
Total sugar content
The sample (2 g) was extracted with ultrapure water (20 mL) in an ultrasonic bath (Elmasonic, Germany) for 10 minutes at room temperature. Then it was filtered through 0.45 µm PTFE filter.
Total sugar content of sample was determined using a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system (Agilent Technologies, USA) equipped with a refractive index detector (RID). The sugars were separated by NH2 column (Inertsil, 5 μm, 4.6 mm × 250 mm, GL Sciences) maintained at 30°C. The injection volume was 10 μL. The mobile phase was acetonitrile (80%) with the flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1. Standard solutions were injected to get the retention time and standard curve for each sugar. The results were evaluated with the ChemStation Software and expressed as mg g−1 dry weight.
Vitamin content
The sample (1 g) was extracted with ultrapure water (10 mL) in an ultrasonic bath (Elmasonic, Germany) for 10 minutes at room temperature. After, 1 mL of 2 M NaOH and 12.5 mL of 1 M phosphate buffer (pH=5.5) were added and fulfilled to 25 mL with ultrapure water. Then, the sample was filtered through 0.45 µm PTFE filter before injection.
The vitamin content of sample was determined using a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system (Agilent Technologies, USA) equipped with a diode array detector (DAD). The vitamins were separated on ODS column (5 μm, 4.6 mm × 250 mm, Inertsil, GL Sciences) maintained at 30 °C. The injection volume was 10 μL. The mobile phases were the aqueous solution of trifluoroacetic acid (0.025%, v/v), solution A; and acetonitrile, solution B. The elution program was the gradients of Solvent B as following :0.0% solvent B (0-5th min), 25 % solvent B (6-11th minutes), 45% solvent B (11-19th minutes), 40 % solvent B (19-20th minutes), 0% solvent B (20-22nd minutes). Standard solutions of vitamins (Vitamins C, B2, B3, B5, and B9) were injected to get the retention time and standard curve for each vitamin. The results were evaluated with the ChemStation Software and expressed as mg /100 g dry weight.
Mineral content
The digestion of sample was performed on microwave digestion system (CEM MARS5 (USA). Approximately 0.5 g of dry sample was transferred to a PTFE digestion tube containing 6 mL of nitric acid (65 %) and 2 mL of hydrogen peroxide. The operating conditions of microwave oven were as follow: temperature (150-200 °C), ramp (20 min), time (2 min) and the power (100 %) for each step. The digested sample was cooled to room temperature, filtered and the filtrate was diluted by adding 100 mL of ultra-pure water. The mineral concentration was determined by the inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES), (Agilent 5100, USA). The nitrogen content was estimated by the Kjeldahl method according to the Altuntas et al. [38].
Animals, semen collection and processing
Five Boujaâd mature rams (weight: 80-85 kg, aged between 3 and 4 years) were used as semen donors. They were maintained at the station of animal Reproduction Biology at the Research Regional Center, Settat INRA-Morocco. A total number of 50 ejaculates were collected from the rams using an artificial vagina, during the breeding season (July to September) and then the semen was pooled to minimize individual variation. After semen collection, the semen (10 µL) was placed in a glass slide without coverslip and the wave motion of semen evaluated (0–5 scale) after judging five different microscopic fields. The sperm concentration was determined by a spectrophotometer. Ejaculates, which met the following criteria, volume of 0.5–2 mL; good wave motion (≥3 on a 0–5 scale), ≥2.5 × 109 spermatozoa/mL and ≥70 % motile sperm were evaluated and used for the next step. All ejaculates were pooled in order to eliminate individual differences and diluted with a skim milk (SM) as the base extender. It was prepared by diluting skim milk (11 g) in distilled water (100 mL) and then heated at 95 °C for 10 minutes. Penicillin and streptomycin (0.05 mg/mL) were added to the extender. The semen was diluted with the base extenders at 37 °C, containing 0 (control), 1, 2, 4 and 8 % of ETHEX to reach a final concentration of approximately 0.8 × 109 sperm/mL (single step dilution).
The semen samples were then cooled from 37 to 5 °C. Sperm total motility, progressive motility, viability, abnormality, membrane integrity and lipid peroxidation were determined at 8, 24, 48 and 72 h. The combination extender × antioxidant concentration giving the best protective effects on sperm progressive motility was selected to assess DNA fragmentation at 8, 24, 48 and 72 h using tunnel technique.
Evaluation of semen characteristics
Sperm total and progressive motility were assessed by a computer-assisted sperm analysis system (ISAS, version 1.0.17, Proiser, Valencia, Spain). The semen was diluted with PBS-BSA to reach 20 × 106 sperm/mL at 37 °C. The sperm motility was assessed using a 10× negative phase contrast objective on a UB203 microscope (UOP/Proiser, Paterna, Valencia, Spain).
For viability assessment, eosin-Y (1.67 g), nigrosin (10 g), sodium citrate (2.9 g), dissolved in distilled water (100 mL) and then nigrosin–eosin stain (10 µL ) and sperm dilution (5 µL) were mixed together on glass slide [39]. The mixture was smeared and examined with bright-field microscopy (400x). A total number of 200 spermatozoa were counted. Sperm showing partial or complete purple heads were considered non-viable or dead and only sperm showing strict exclusion of the stain were considered alive [40].
The hypoosmotic swelling test (HOST) was used to evaluate the functional integrity of the sperm plasma membrane according to Jeyendran et al. [41]. Solution for HOST assay consisted of fructose (9 g), sodium citrate (4.9 g) per liter of distilled water. For sperm tail assessment, semen (30 µL) was mixed with hypoosmotic solution (300 µL, 100 mOsM) and incubated for 50-60 minutes at 37 °C. After incubation, 10 µL of the mixture was spread with a coverslip on a warm slide. A total number of 200 spermatozoa were counted at least using five different microscopic fields at 400x. The percentage of spermatozoa with swollen and curved tails was recorded [42].
The morphology of sperm was evaluated using the Diff-Quik kit (Diagnostic Systems S.L. Barcelona, Spain). Briefly, 3 µL of diluted semen was smeared on a glass slide and allowed to air-dry. The slide was then dipped into a fixative solution for 1 min and into first and second solutions seven to ten times. Between the fixing step and each of the staining steps, the excess solutions were dried from the slides by placing them vertically on absorbent paper. At least 200 sperms were evaluated under light microscopy at 1000× magnification using UB203 microscope (UOP/Proiser, Paterna, Valencia, Spain).
Measurement of lipid peroxidation
Malondialdehyde (MDA) concentrations, as an indice of lipid peroxidation (LPO) in the semen samples, were measured using the thiobarbituric acid reaction [43]. The thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) were measured in the semen spontaneous LPO or after incubation with 0.24 mM of FeSO4 at 37 °C in a water bath for 60 minutes (iron catalyzed LPO). The TBARS concentration was determined by comparing the sample’s absorbance at 532 nm with a standard curve prepared using MDA. The results were expressed in nmol TBARS/108 sperm.
Assessment of DNA fragmentation
For the Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) technique, the in Situ Cell Death Detection Kit with fluorescein (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) has been used according to Nur et al. [44]. Briefly, different aliquots of semen samples were diluted with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and centrifuged at 400 x g for 10 minutes. One drop of re-suspended spermatozoa was smeared on a glass slide and fixed with 10 % formaldehyde for 30 minutes at room temperature.
The slides were washed three times with PBS (5 minutes each), treated in a humidified chamber with proteinase K for10 minutes, washed with PBS, treated with 3 % H2O2 in distilled water for 10 minutes at room temperature and washed again with PBS. The slide was permeabilized with 0.1 % Triton X-100 for 5 minutes on ice. The slides were incubated in dark at 37 °C for one hour with the TUNEL reaction mixture. After labeling, samples were washed with PBS and analyzed immediately using fluorescence microscopy (Zeiss eurostar, Germany 100×). The percentage of TUNEL positive sperm was determined by the evaluation of at least 100 sperm.
Statistical methods
Data were analyzed statistically using JMP15.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cory, NC, USA) program. All dependent variables were submitted to the Shapiro–Wilk test normality and homogeneity analysis. Dependent variables with normal distribution were evaluated using variance analysis with the comparison of means using Tukey’s test. Results were expressed as the mean ± SEM (standard error meaning). Differences with values of P< 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.