Based on the provided data, this study compared the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients who were readmitted to the hospital and those who were not. The study suggests that readmitted patients had worse outcomes at discharge and post-discharge.
Demographics, Clinical Characteristics, Readmission and Readmission Outcomes
Our study found that hospitalized patients who were readmitted had a higher average age than those not readmitted, though this difference wasn't statistically significant. Although our study found an equal number of men and women in the readmitted group, previous research has shown conflicting results regarding gender and readmission rates. While one study reported a higher incidence of readmission among male patients,15 another study found slightly more women being readmitted.16 This inconsistency may be due to differences in patient populations, study designs, or statistical methods. Nonetheless, the finding of an equal gender distribution in the readmitted group in this study suggests that gender may not be a significant factor for hospital readmission risk in this specific patient population. Further research is needed to clarify the relationship between gender and hospital readmission risk in different patient populations. The finding of a higher mean age in the readmitted cohort, consistent with Bjerkreim et al's report,17 may be attributed to the fact that older age is often accompanied by comorbidities, which can make the management of sICH more challenging.
Short-term readmissions (<1 week to 4 weeks) accounted for 39.9% of cases, indicating that many patients in our study potentially experienced complications soon after discharge. The mortality rate is concentrated in the first six months post-readmission, with 85.8% of deaths occurring within that timeframe. This suggests that early follow-up care and monitoring could be crucial for improving outcomes. Although some studies have shown mixed results regarding the link between diabetes and readmission rates,18,19 our study found a significant association between diabetes and readmission status. Interestingly, our results showed that Diabetes Mellitus was the only statistically significant factor associated with readmission, which aligns with a previous study that found higher frequencies of Diabetes in patients with late readmissions beyond 30 days.17 This finding could be explained by the well-known macrovascular and microvascular complications of diabetes, particularly vascular dysfunction, which can increase the risk of complications and readmission in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.20 Also, while a low GCS score at presentation showed no association with readmission risk in our study (p=0.082), this finding is similar to the findings of Liotta et al., who found no significant relationship between a low GCS score and readmission status.9 It is possible that we noted a low GCS score in our readmission cohort because patients with lower GCS scores might undergo more aggressive treatments, including surgeries or intensive medical interventions.21 These treatments could raise the likelihood of complications, thereby increasing the possibility of readmission. The significant difference in LKN timeframe between readmitted and non-readmitted patients in our study highlights the importance of considering the time course of neurological decline in managing patients with ICH. This might primarily be because a shorter LKN timeframe might indicate a more rapid progression of the ICH, potentially leading to a higher risk of complications requiring readmission.22 Another possible explanation is the fact that these patients presented to the hospital early hence why we recorded a shorter LKN timeframe. The most notable finding is the significant difference in functional outcomes at discharge and follow-up between readmitted and non-readmitted patients. Readmitted patients had worse functional outcomes at discharge after their first admission and remained significantly worse at 1- and 3-months post-discharge. Liotta et al.'s study supports our findings, as we also identified mRS as a statistically significant factor.9 This could be mainly because patients with higher mRS scores might require closer monitoring and additional support, which could lead to increased healthcare utilization and hospital readmissions.
Limitations and Future Recommendations
This retrospective study, the first of its kind in Ghana focusing solely on sICH readmission factors, has limitations due to its single-center design. Findings may not be generalizable to all institutions, as other centers might observe unique associations related to their patient acuity and specific circumstances. Like many other African nations and lower-middle-income regions, our hospital encounters substantial resource shortages that significantly affect patient outcomes.23,24 The shortage of specialized neurosurgery staff and insufficient ICU beds hampers our ability to provide timely and optimal care for patients requiring intensive monitoring and post-operative interventions.23,25 These constraints can lead to inadequate management of complications, resulting in higher readmission rates. Additionally, many patients are lost to follow up after discharge and this affects the quality of post stroke rehabilitation care they can receive. This situation is further worsened by the lack of dedicated care givers in assist some families care for patients with low MRS scores.
The study's retrospective design may have compromised the quality of evidence and introduced bias, particularly in the reporting of complications due to potential underreporting. The data's dependence on clinical and procedural records, which may not have been consistently collected according to strict criteria, could also affect the results. Challenges arose from incomplete or inaccurate records despite the data being obtained from an electronic medical record system. Additionally, the absence of control over the original data collection introduced inconsistencies and the potential impact of unmeasured confounding variables. While the sample size is substantial for a single-center study, it is smaller than those used in larger-scale ischemic stroke readmission studies, potentially limiting the detection of smaller effect sizes. This reflects a balance between sample size, data detail, patient classification accuracy, and the identification of clinically significant associations.
By addressing these challenges—such as enhancing staff training, increasing ICU capacity, and improving overall healthcare delivery—we can mitigate the factors contributing to elevated readmission rates. Ultimately, improving access to quality care is essential for enhancing patient survival and reducing the burden of readmissions in our healthcare system. Nonetheless, we believe our cohort, representing several years of ICH admissions at a major medical center, is large enough to identify clinically meaningful associations for developing targeted interventions to reduce readmissions at the institutional level. Future research using larger administrative databases is needed to identify smaller epidemiologic associations between sICH and hospital readmission.