3.1 UC model mouse established successfully
The commonly used evaluation index to determine the success of establishing a UC animal model is to conduct histopathological examination and analysis, observe the colon structure under an optical microscope, and evaluate the modeling effect. Under the microscope, the morphology of the intestinal mucosa in the blank control group was intact and the structure was clear. No clear abnormalities were found in the submucosal layer, muscular layer, and serosal layer. Compared with the blank control group, the structure and boundaries of each layer of the intestinal wall in the model group were unclear, and some intestinal walls were completely necrotic with purulent inflammation and fibrous granulation tissue proliferation (Fig. 1). Based on the above results, it can be concluded that the UC model was successfully established.
3.2 HE and blood results after intervention in UC model mice
After 14 days of gastric lavage in each group of rats, the colon tissue of each group was observed under a microscope. In the Fig. 2, the blank group had intact intestinal mucosa morphology, clear structure, and no clear abnormalities were found in the submucosal, muscular, and serosal layers; The model group had severe necrosis of the entire intestinal wall, with unclear structures and boundaries of each layer. Most of the mucosal glands and lamina propria were damaged or missing, and a large number of neutrophils infiltrated the submucosal, muscular, and serosal layers. Abscesses formed in some areas, and some interstitial edema accompanied by granulation tissue proliferation; Compared with the model group, the degree of intestinal mucosal ulcer was significantly reduced in both the BTWS group and the SASP group, and the number of neutrophils in the intestinal wall was significantly reduced. The glandular structure and morphology of the intestinal mucosa were better in both groups; There was no significant difference in intestinal mucosal lesions between the BTWS group and the SASP group, indicating that both BTWS and SASP have therapeutic effects on ulcerative colitis.
Table 1
Analysis of the content of various indicators in the serum of each group()
Group
|
TNF-α(pg/ml)
|
IL-6(pg/ml)
|
IL-17A(pg/ml)
|
Blank group
|
6.653 ± 2.282
|
22.625 ± 3.753
|
3.253 ± 1.090
|
UC group
|
23.984 ± 6.340△
|
107.902 ± 20.827△
|
16.100 ± 3.629△
|
SASP group
|
10.846 ± 1.644△▲
|
37.205 ± 20.860▲
|
8.170 ± 2.003△▲
|
BTWS group
|
12.257 ± 2.414△▲
|
49.254 ± 17.699▲
|
9.786 ± 2.272△▲
|
Note: △, P < 0.05;▲, P < 0.05. |
Related studies have shown that the immune regulatory effect of BTWS on cytokines in ulcerative colitis mainly involves pro-inflammatory cytokine regulation [16]. In order to investigate the immunomodulatory effect of BTWS on cytokines in ulcerative colitis, ELISA was used to detect some cytokines in the serum of SD rats on the 14th day of gastric lavage TNF-α、IL-6、IL-17A levels. As shown in the figure, the serum TNF-α of rats in each intervention group (Table 1). The average levels of IL-6 and IL-17A in water were significantly lower than those in the model group, and the levels of BTWS were also lower than those in the intervention group with SASP. These data indicate that both BTWS and SASP can reduce TNF-α、The expression of IL-6 and IL-17A can alleviate the immune inflammatory response in ulcerative colitis (Fig. 3).
Table 2
Analysis table of gene expression levels in each group of tissues ()
Group
|
TLR4
|
NF-κB p65
|
Blank group
|
1.012 ± 0.164
|
1.005 ± 0.114
|
UC group
|
1.718 ± 0.189△
|
1.600 ± 0.237△
|
SASP group
|
1.170 ± 0.204▲
|
1.141 ± 0.177▲
|
BTWS group
|
1.282 ± 0.128△▲
|
1.253 ± 0.158△▲
|
Note: △, P < 0.05;▲, P < 0.05. |
Recent studies have shown that BTWS may by inhibit TLR4/NF-κB Expression of signaling pathway, thereby reducing TNF-α Wait for release to promote the repair of intestinal mucosa and alleviate colonic inflammatory response. Therefore, in this study, the gene expression level was detected by RT-qPCR, and the effects of BTWS on TLR4 and NF-κB p65 in colon tissue cells of UC rats were studied (Table 2).
As shown in Fig. 4, RT-qPCR is used to detect TLR4 and NF-κB p65 after treatment with SASP or BTWS The expression of. Compared with the model group, the mRNA TLR4 and NF-κB p65 in the treatment group treated with BTWS or SASP were significantly higher.
Western blot analysis showed that TLR4 and p-NF-κB p65 in the experimental group The protein level of p-NF-κB p65 was downregulated compared to the model group (Fig. 5), but NF-κB p65 The level of protein did not change significantly, indicating that BTWS or SASP did not participate in the regulation of NF-κB p65. These results indicate that treatment with BTWS or SASP can effectively inhibit the expression of TLR4 and p-NF-κB p65 in colon tissue cells of UC rats with intestinal microbiota.
In recent years, UC has attracted the attention of medical researchers due to its recurrent onset. Although SASP tablets are indicated for use in ulcerative colitis, there are many adverse reactions [9]. As a traditional Chinese medicine ingredient, BTWS has been widely used in UC patients for a long time with minimal side effects. Scholars at home and abroad have conducted extensive research on the regulatory effect of BTWS on cytokines in the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Studies have shown that BTWS has a regulatory effect on pro-inflammatory cytokines, and studies suggest that it inhibits the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Restoring immune dynamic balance may be one of the mechanisms by which BTWS treats ulcerative colitis.
TLR4/NF-κB The inflammatory response involved in the signaling pathway affects various stages of UC occurrence and development. TLR4 is the main receptor associated with immunity and inflammation, which can be activated through multiple pathways. This study selected TNF-α、 IL-6 and IL-17A were used as inflammatory cytokine detection indicators and were found to be associated with TLR4 and NF-κB The decrease in of TLR4 and p-NF-κB p65 protein expression leads to a decrease in the inflammatory factor in the treatment group of rats TNF-α、 IL-6 and IL-17A levels, as well as TLR4 and NF-κB The expression of showed statistically significant differences compared to the model group rats (P < 0.05).