Chemicals and reagents
The following reagents were obtained from Merck (Brazil): AChE enzyme from Electrophorus electricus (200–1,000 units/mg protein), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (≥ 99%), phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.3), bovine serum albumin (BSA) (pH 7, ≥ 98%), anhydrous sodium sulfate (Na2SO4), 5,5′-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB) (≥ 99%), acetylthiocholine iodide (AChI) (≥ 99%), n-alkane series (C8–C30) (Supelco), α-cypermethrin (PESTANAL®, analytical standard), 2’,7’-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) (≥ 95%), 2’,7’-dichlorofluorescein (DCF) (≥ 90%), hexane (HPLC) (≥ 99%), ethyl acetate (HPLC) (99.9%), (E)-nerolidol (99%), and methanol (HPLC) (99.9%).
Plant material
The collection of the P. brachypetiolatum was authorized by the Sistema de Autorização e Informação em Biodiversidade (No. 78372/1) and registered in the e Sistema Nacional de Gestão do Patrimonio Genético e do Conhecimento Tradicional Associado (No. AE3F373). The plant was collected in the city of Manaus, in the state of Amazonas, Brazil (latitude 2°92'68"S and longitude 59°97'77"W). The collected material was authenticated and deposited in the Herbarium of the Universidade Federal do Amazonas, under the registration HUAM No. 12102. The leaves were removed from the branches, dried at room temperature (28 ± 6 °C), ground using a knife mill, and stored in a glass recipient until the extraction of the EO (De Oliveira et al. 2020).
Extraction and chromatograph analyses
For the extraction of the EO, 200 g of pulverized leaves of P. brachypetiolatum were subjected to hydrodistillation using a Clevenger apparatus. The collected EO was dried with anhydrous sodium sulfate (Na2SO4) and stored at 4 °C until chromatographic analyses. The extraction, conducted in triplicate over 3 hours, had its yield calculated using the equation: EO (%) = (volume of EO / weight of the sample) × 100 (Girard et al. 2007).
For the Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS) and Gas Chromatography-Flame Ionization Detection (GC-FID) analyses, 1 mg of the EO was diluted in 1 mL of ethyl acetate, following the methodology previously reported by Oliveira et al. (2022b). Compound identification was based on mass spectra and retention indices (RI), compared with values from the literature (Adams, 2017). The RI was determined using a series of n-alkanes (C8-C30) and the Van Den Dool and Kratz equation (1963).
Mosquito rearing
The rearing conditions were controlled at the Laboratório de Controle Biológico e Biotecnologia da Malária e da Dengue of the Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, under temperature of 28 ± 2 °C, relative humidity of 80 ± 5%, and a photoperiod of 12 hours light to 12 hours dark, following the methodology described by de Oliveira et al. (2020). A. aegypti eggs were deposited on filter paper and immersed in running water for hatching. Larvae were fed a mixture of rodent and feline food in a 1:1 ratio until reaching the fourth instar. Subsequently, pupae were collected and transferred to entomological cages (30 cm x 30 cm x 30 cm). Adults were fed with a 10% sucrose solution, and females were provided with blood meals from Mesocricetus auratus (Cricetidae) hamsters under authorization from the Ethics Committee on Animal Use (No. 011/2022 - SEI-01280.000601/2022-08) (Beserra et al. 2010).
Larvicidal assay
The larvicidal activity assessment of the EO from P. brachypetiolatum and (E)-nerolidol against A. aegypti was conducted according to the World Health Organization Guidelines for Laboratory and Field Testing of Mosquito Larvicides, with some adaptations (WHO, 2005). Groups of 20 third instar larvae (n = 500) were transferred to containers holding 199 mL of distilled water and concentrations ranging from 5 to 30 ppm of EO oil from P. brachypetiolatum and (E)-nerolidol, previously diluted in 1 mL of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The synthetic insecticide α-cypermethrin was used as a positive control at concentrations ranging from 0.13 to 0.65 ppm, while DMSO was tested at concentrations ranging from 5 to 30 ppm was used as a negative control. The tests were conducted in quintuplicate with three replicates under controlled conditions of relative humidity (80 ± 5%) and temperature (28 ± 2 °C). The percentage of mortality at each concentration was calculated using the equation: Total dead larvae / total treated larvae x 100.
Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibition assay
The AChE inhibition test was conducted following the colorimetric method described by Ellman et al. (1961), with adaptations by de Oliveira et al. (2020). Neostigmine (1 mg) and AChE (10 μL) were prepared in 1 mL of 0.1 M phosphate buffer at pH 8, while the EO from P. brachypetiolatum and (E)-nerolidol, both at 1 mg, were dissolved in MeOH at 1 mL and evaluated at concentrations ranging from 10 to 100 ppm. The experiment was performed in triplicate using a 96-well microplate, incubated in a light-protected environment. Neostigmine (0.07 to 10 ppm) was used as a positive control and MeOH as a negative control. Absorbance readings were taken over 30 minutes with 5-minute intervals, using a wavelength of 405 nm on a microplate reader (ELx800, Biotek, USA). The percentage inhibition at each concentration was calculated using the formula: Inhibition (%) = A2 – (A1 – A3) x 100 / A2, where A1 is the absorbance of samples with enzyme, A2 is the absorbance of enzyme without sample, and A3 is the absorbance of sample without enzyme.
Preparation of the supernatant for oxidative stress indicator assay
After 24 hours of exposure, A. aegypti larvae treated with EO from P. brachypetiolatum (30 ppm), (E)-nerolidol (30 ppm), α-cypermethrin (0.65 ppm), and DMSO (130 ppm) (De Oliveira et al. 2024) were homogenized in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.3) at a ratio of 1 mg of larvae per 10 mL of buffer. The homogenates were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 5 minutes, and the resulting supernatants were stored in eppendorf tubes at – 4 °C for oxidative stress analysis, assessing reactive RONS levels (Janner et al. 2021; Johnson et al. 2021). Protein content was quantified using bovine serum albumin (BSA, 1 mg/mL) as a standard (Lowry et al. 1951).
Measurement of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS)
To measure RONS, 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein (DCFH) was employed as an oxidative stress marker, following the methodology outlined by Perez-Severiano et al. (2004). Each supernatant (diluted 1:10) was combined with 5 µL DCFH, 40 µL distilled water, and 150 µL potassium buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.4) in a 96-well microplate, then incubated for 60 minutes at 37 °C. Fluorescence intensity was monitored for 10 minutes at 30-second intervals using a SpectraMax plate reader (Molecular Devices, USA), with excitation set at 488 nm and emission at 525 nm. DMSO and α-cypermethrin served as control groups. Each treatment was tested in triplicate, and the rate of DCF formation was expressed as a percentage relative to the control groups.
Assessment of toxicity in non-target animals
The study assessed the toxicity of the EO from P. brachypetiolatum and (E)-nerolidol on non-target aquatic animals T. haemorrhoidalis, A. bouvieri and D. indicus, following the methodology described by Sivagnaname and Kalyanasundaram (2004). The animals were collected at the Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia and identified using the taxonomic key by Hamada et al. (2014). After 48 hours of acclimatization, the animals were transferred to containers containing 499 mL of natural habitat water and exposed to concentrations of 228 and 239 ppm of the EO from P. brachypetiolatum and (E)-nerolidol, prepared in 1 mL of DMSO. These concentrations were calculated by multiplying the CL90 values of the EO from P. brachypetiolatum and (E)-nerolidol by 10. DMSO at 239 ppm was used as a negative control, while the positive control α-cypermethrin was tested at 0.39 ppm. The assays were conducted in five replicates with n = 25 for each non-target animals, under controlled conditions of relative humidity (80 ± 5%) and temperature (28 ± 2 °C), over a 30-day treatment period.
Statistical analyses
The LC50 and LC90 values from the larvicidal test, along with Chi-square, slope ± standard error, and degrees of freedom, were determined using Probit analysis with IBM® SPSS® Statistics software. Kaplan-Meier analysis (p ≤ 0.05) was used to calculate the survival curve of non-target animals (Kishore et al. 2010). For the AChE assay, absorbances were logarithmically transformed, normalized, and analysed using nonlinear regression to determine the IC50. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism® 9 software. Furthermore, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey's post-hoc test (p ≤ 0.05), was conducted to compare treatments in the oxidative stress assay.