The current study elucidates the epidemiological trends and clinical features of measles in Iraq during a critical resurgence period (January 2023–August 2024). Our analysis reveals a significant increase in measles incidence, accompanied by demographic and clinical pattern shifts that reflect both local challenges and broader global public health trends.
Measles Resurgence Amid Global Disruptions
The substantial rise in measles incidence in Iraq, from 22.1 to 69.3 cases per 100,000 population, mirrors global patterns observed in regions with compromised health systems, especially during and after conflicts or periods of socio-economic instability [13, 14]. Similar increases have been reported in conflict-affected areas like Syria and Yemen, where healthcare infrastructures have been severely affected, limiting the ability to sustain routine immunization programs [15, 16].
The resurgence of measles in Iraq may be attributed to several interconnected factors, including a decline in vaccination coverage, disruptions in healthcare services, and population displacement due to ongoing political and security challenges [17]. The gap in vaccine coverage is critical, as measles outbreaks often cluster in under-immunized populations [18]. Iraq’s suboptimal vaccination rates, particularly the decline in second-dose coverage, significantly increase the risk of widespread transmission. This aligns with findings from other studies emphasizing the need to maintain high coverage of both doses of the measles-containing vaccine (MCV) to prevent outbreaks [19].
Demographic and Immunological Shifts in Measles Cases
A key finding of this study is the changing demographic profile of measles cases. The increase in cases among infants under 9 months, rising from 12–16.7%, is particularly concerning, as these individuals are not yet eligible for routine vaccination. Infants typically rely on maternal antibodies for protection in their early months; however, waning maternal immunity in populations with high vaccine-derived immunity may leave this age group vulnerable [20, 21, 22]. This trend mirrors observations in other regions experiencing measles resurgence, where infants bear the brunt of outbreaks due to lower passive immunity transfer [23].
The concurrent rise in cases among older individuals (> 15 years) further underscores gaps in population immunity. This finding is consistent with global evidence showing that older children and young adults, who may have missed routine vaccinations or have waning immunity, are increasingly affected during outbreaks [24]. The data suggest a need for targeted catch-up vaccination campaigns aimed at adolescents and adults who may not have received full vaccination during childhood or whose immunity may have diminished over time [25].
Decline in Laboratory Confirmation: Implications for Surveillance
The decline in laboratory-confirmed measles cases, from 15.5–5.7%, coincided with a rise in clinically diagnosed cases. This change occurred as a result of the epidemic and aligns with guidelines issued by the Center for Disease Control in Iraq. According to these guidelines, if more than three cases are diagnosed in the same area within a month, any patient presenting with fever and rash is considered clinically infected, even without laboratory analysis [5]. As mentioned earlier, the reduction in discarded cases pertains to areas that have not recorded any laboratory-confirmed cases. In such areas, all cases that meet the standard definition of fever and skin rash are tested in the laboratory. These cases ultimately result in negative [26].
The Role of Vaccination Status and Public Health Interventions
One of the most concerning findings of this study is the increasing proportion of cases with unknown vaccination status (rising from 42.5–50.2%) and the decline in fully vaccinated individuals. These trends highlight systemic issues in Iraq’s health system, including poor record-keeping and inconsistent access to vaccination services, particularly in rural and conflict-affected areas [27]. The rise in unvaccinated or under-vaccinated individuals underscores the urgent need for improved vaccination tracking and outreach to underserved populations.
The observed low vaccination rates in this study cohort are consistent with other reports from the region, where challenges such as vaccine hesitancy, misinformation, and logistical barriers hinder vaccination efforts [28]. Research has shown that sustained high coverage with two doses of MMR vaccine is necessary to achieve the 95% coverage target recommended by the WHO to maintain herd immunity and prevent outbreaks [29, 30].
Geographical Variations in Outbreak Severity
Significant regional differences in measles incidence were noted, with the highest case numbers reported in Baghdad, Babylon, and Wasit. These governorates, which contain densely populated urban areas, may have experienced more intense outbreaks due to lower vaccination coverage and increased population movement, facilitating the rapid spread of the virus [27]. Conversely, regions like Sulaymaniyah and Dahuk, which reported fewer cases, may benefit from stronger local immunization programs and better healthcare access [31].
These geographic disparities emphasize the importance of tailored public health interventions that address local variations in healthcare access and vaccine coverage. Strengthening surveillance and immunization efforts in high-risk areas is critical for controlling the spread of measles and preventing future outbreaks [32, 33].
Study Limitations
This study has several limitations. Its retrospective design may introduce recall bias, particularly concerning vaccination status and symptom reporting, potentially resulting in incomplete or inaccurate data. The high proportion of cases with unknown vaccination status (50.2%) in Table 1 constrains the evaluation of vaccination's impact on disease incidence. Additionally, geographic variability in healthcare access affects the generalizability of the findings. The absence of longitudinal data also limits trend analysis and the assessment of public health interventions. Moreover, factors such as socioeconomic status and healthcare access were not thoroughly examined, which could influence measles incidence and its characteristics. These limitations underscore the need for further research to enhance our understanding of measles epidemiology in Iraq.