There are various reports on the prediction of distant metastasis; however, the recurrence site in these reports differs depending on the subtype, and tumor size and lymph node metastasis are common risk factors [2, 25-27]. In addition, young age [2], histopathological grade, and lymphovascular invasion have been reported as risk factors [2, 26], although there are reports suggesting otherwise, as well. In this study, a combination of “BCT and radiation therapy” as post-operative procedures was found to be predictive factor for distant metastasis. The predictive factor status may be attributed to the fact that “BCT and radiation therapy” group was significantly younger, and had larger tumor diameter and higher Ki67 compared to the “mastectomy” group. They are the risk factors listed above. Although each parameter alone was not a predictor, they were found to turn into a predictor when combined.
For the prediction of distant metastasis, some research groups have examined the molecular pathological features of cancer cells; for example, co-expression of α6β4 integrin and neuroepithelioma transforming gene 1 (Net1) [28], expression of YKL-39 (a kind of chitinase-like protein) [29], and overexpression of phosphorylated PLC-gamma-1 (one of the phosphoinositides) were reported in this regard [30]. These expression levels have been shown to promote invasion and metastasis of cancer cells both in vivo and in vitro; hence, these studies retrospectively examined the use of clinical samples as a predictors of distant metastases. There have also been reports that examined the molecular characteristics of cancer cells with respect to the circulating tumor cells (CTCs) that are deeply involved in distant metastasis [31, 32]. One such report suggested that CTCs may be indicators of the therapeutic effect of chemotherapy or endocrine therapy [33], while other studies reported them to be predictors of distant metastatic recurrence of breast cancer based on clinical data [34, 35]. A few publications have even reported the prediction of distant metastasis using genetic assays [36]. Mutations in p53, a gene involved in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) repair, are involved in recurrence; Narod reported p53 accumulation to be a strong predictor of recurrence [37]. Filipits et al. predicted distant metastasis using RNA-based multigene score [38]. A genomic evaluation study showed a higher mutation burden to accompany recurrence than primary tumor [39]. These results together suggest gene mutations to potentially cause local or host immune tolerance at the distant metastatic site [1].
Formation of distant metastases in cancer generally follows the concept of “seed and soil.” While we have discussed the “seed” until now [40], TME corresponds to the “soil” as per this concept [8, 9]. TILs are also included in the cells that constitute the TME. In breast cancer, TILs have been reported to vary by subtype. In particular, HER2-enriched breast cancer and TNBC have been reported to show significantly higher TIL density than HR+/HER2- breast cancer, and TILs have been proven to predict the therapeutic effect of chemotherapy [13, 41-43]. In contrast, there are very few reports examining the correlation between TILs and clinicopathological factors or therapeutic effects in HR+/HER2- breast cancer.
In this study, we excluded patients who had undergone neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy based on three reasons. First, chemotherapy affects the immune microenvironment, including TILs, in preoperative chemotherapy study, and related changes may affect prognosis [44]. TILs are also predictors of the therapeutic effect of adjuvant chemotherapy; therefore, adjuvant chemotherapy may also affect the tumor immune microenvironment. Secondly, axillary lymph node metastasis before adjuvant chemotherapy was diagnosed based on image only, and therefore, the diagnosis was not accurate. Lastly, different chemotherapy regimens are known to have different effects, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy causes more local recurrence than adjuvant therapy [45].
There are some reports on the relationship between recurrence sites and TILs. Park et al. reported patients with TILs >10% in early-stage TNBC to show significantly more locoregional recurrence than those with lower TILs [46]. In cervical squamous cell carcinoma, low TILs are also likely to cause distant metastasis [47]. Moreover, distant metastasis is reportedly predicted from pathological features, including lymphocytes of lymph nodes in breast cancer with lymph node metastasis, although not from the density of lymphocytes around the tumor [48]. Bidwell et al. have shown innate immune escape to promote bone metastasis, based on clinical data and experiments in mice [49]. Some studies using breast cancer cell lines in vivo also reported that immunosuppression in the tumor immune environment increased the risk of lung metastasis [50, 51]. In this study, TIL density was suggested to possibly be a distant metastatic predictor, although not an independent factor. We previously reported that TILs may also be involved in lymph node metastasis in HR+/HER2- breast cancer [52]. In this study, TILs were considered to be strongly correlated with lymph node metastasis, and were involved in distant metastasis prediction as well as prognosis after recurrence.
The greatest limitation of this study was that very few cases of recurrence were examined. Another limitation was that the patients received different types of adjuvant endocrine therapy. Moreover, younger and lymphovascular invasion, which were previously reported as risk factors, were not found to be predictors in this study. TILs may also be involved in venous invasion. Furthermore, considering that the TIL subtypes have different functions, detailed studies are necessary to identify the organs that are prone to metastasis. Nevertheless, TILs can be easily evaluated using needle biopsy specimens for the diagnosis of breast cancer and are highly useful. Filipits et al. predicted distant metastases using a combination of the above-mentioned predictors [38] and TILs may be considered to be an additional predictor. Currently, postoperative follow-up involves patient interview, palpation, and mammography. Whole-body imaging for asymptomatic breast cancer patients post resection surgery is not recommended [4-6]. However, late diagnosis of distant metastasis, that is, after emergence of detectable symptoms, leads to impairment of the patient’s quality of life. Moreover, the risk of reduced treatment options, owing to the deterioration in the general condition as a result of recurrence, prevails. Therefore, it is important to identify and diagnose breast cancer that is prone to distant metastasis.