Table 1 shows the demographics of the study participants. According to descriptive statistics, the mean age of the population was 70.00 ± 9.10 years where the minimum age was 57 years and maximum was 85 years. The frequency of males was n = 119 (55.6%), and females were n = 95 (44.5%). The mean HbA1c, BSR, and BSF were 10.88 ± 1.37 mmol/mol, 326.43 ± 84.71 mg/dl, and 181.00 ± 42.13 mg/dl respectively.
Table 1
Demographics of post-stroke diabetic patients
Characteristics | Mean ± SD or n (%) |
Age | 70.00 ± 9.10 years |
Gender | Male | 119 (55.6) |
Female | 95 (44.5) |
BMI | Underweight | 2 (9) |
Normal | 18 (8.4) |
Overweight | 139 (65) |
Obese | 55 (25.7) |
Mean HbA1c | 10.88 ± 1.37 mmol/mol |
Mean BSR | 326.43 ± 84.71 mg/dl |
Mean BSF | 181.00 ± 42.13 mg/dl |
Legends: BMI: Body mass index, Classification of BMI as underweight: <18.5, normal: 18.5–24.9, overweight: 25-29.9, obese: ≥ 30. HbA1c: Glycated hemoglobin, BSR: blood sugar random, BSF: blood sugar fasting.
Table 2 shows a positive and significant correlation between glycemic control and psychological health except for BSR with stress. A moderate relationship was observed between variables of glycemic control and psychological health except BSF and depression showing a negligible relationship. This can be interpreted as poor glycemic control may negatively affect psychological health.
Table 2
Correlation analysis between glycemic control, psychological health, and lower extremity functional impairments
Variables | p-value | r-value |
Depression | HbA1c | < 0.01 | 0.40 |
BSR | < 0.01 | 0.40 |
BSF | < 0.01 | 0.23 |
Anxiety | HbA1c | < 0.01 | 0.41 |
BSR | < 0.01 | 0.30 |
BSF | < 0.01 | 0.34 |
Stress | HbA1c | < 0.01 | 0.34 |
BSR | 0.78 | 0.19 |
BSF | < 0.01 | 0.40 |
Motor function | HbA1c | < 0.01 | -0.44 |
BSR | < 0.01 | -0.54 |
BSF | < 0.01 | -0.20 |
Sensation | HbA1c | < 0.01 | -0.80 |
BSR | < 0.01 | -0.81 |
BSF | < 0.01 | -0.08 |
PJM | HbA1c | < 0.01 | -0.50 |
BSR | < 0.01 | -0.14 |
BSF | < 0.01 | -0.23 |
Joint pain | HbA1c | < 0.01 | -0.33 |
BSR | < 0.01 | -0.33 |
BSF | < 0.01 | -0.21 |
Depression | Motor function | < 0.01 | -0.31 |
Sensation | < 0.01 | -0.32 |
PJM | < 0.01 | -0.23 |
Joint pain | < 0.01 | -0.60 |
Anxiety | Motor function | < 0.01 | -0.50 |
Sensation | 0.43 | -0.05 |
PJM | 0.27 | -0.08 |
Joint pain | < 0.01 | -0.50 |
Stress | Motor function | 0.22 | -0.10 |
Sensation | 0.05 | -0.13 |
PJM | < 0.01 | -0.40 |
Joint pain | < 0.01 | -0.22 |
Legends: HbA1c: Glycated hemoglobin, BSR: blood sugar random, BSF: blood sugar fasting. PJM: Passive Joint Motion. p < 0.05 is statistically significant. Significant values are shown in bold. |
Similarly, a negative and significant correlation was found between glycemic control and lower extremity functionality except for BSF with sensation. A strong relationship was observed between HbA1c, and BSR with sensation. HbA1c also showed a moderate relationship with motor function, passive joint motion, and joint pain while BSR depicted a moderate relationship with motor function and joint pain only. This concludes that poor glycemic control will contribute to lower extremity impairments.
Lastly, the correlation between glycemic control and lower extremity functionality showed a negative and significant relationship except for anxiety with sensation and passive joint motion and stress with motor function in Table 2. A moderate relationship was seen between depression and motor function, sensation, and joint pain. Similarly, a moderate relationship was also seen between anxiety with motor function and joint pain and stress with passive joint motion. This indicates lower extremity impairments can lead to poor psychological health.
Table 3 shows multiple regression analyses between glycemic control as an independent variable and psychological health as a dependent variable, where a positive and significant association was observed between all the variables except for HbA1c with depression and BSR with anxiety. A strong correlation between anxiety and stress with glycemic control was observed while depression showed a moderate relationship with glycemic control.
Table 3
Multiple regression analysis between glycemic control, psychological health, and lower extremity functional impairments
Dependent Variables | Independent Variables | Values |
β-coefficient | t-value | p-value | R-square | F-value | R-value |
Depression | HbA1c | 0.05 | 1.00 | 0.35 | 0.30 | 26.50 | 0.52 |
BSR | 0.01 | 6.50 | < 0.01 |
BSF | 0.01 | 8.20 | < 0.01 |
Anxiety | HbA1c | 0.24 | 4.50 | < 0.01 | 0.50 | 66.50 | 0.70 |
BSR | 0.00 | 1.60 | 0.11 |
BSF | 0.01 | 6.40 | < 0.01 |
Stress | HbA1c | 1.04 | 16.60 | < 0.01 | 0.60 | 95.30 | 0.80 |
BSR | 0.02 | 14.14 | < 0.01 |
BSF | 0.01 | 3.60 | < 0.01 |
Motor Function | HbA1c | -0.06 | -0.85 | 0.40 | 0.32 | 33.50 | 0.60 |
BSR | -0.01 | -6.02 | < 0.01 |
BSF | -0.01 | -6.00 | < 0.01 |
Sensation | HbA1c | -0.10 | -1.04 | 0.30 | 0.50 | 62.10 | 0.70 |
BSR | -0.01 | -7.53 | < 0.01 |
BSF | -0.01 | -5.50 | < 0.01 |
PJM | HbA1c | -1.13 | -9.20 | < 0.01 | 0.30 | 30.30 | 0.60 |
BSR | -0.01 | -6.40 | < 0.01 |
BSF | 0.00 | -1.35 | 0.20 |
Joint Pain | HbA1c | -0.60 | -0.60 | 0.60 | 0.20 | 15.13 | 0.42 |
BSR | -0.01 | -5.00 | < 0.01 |
BSF | -0.01 | -3.45 | < 0.01 |
Depression | MF | -0.10 | -2.03 | 0.04 | 0.50 | 45.20 | 0.70 |
Sensation | -0.10 | -3.20 | < 0.01 |
PJM | -0.40 | -10.53 | < 0.01 |
Joint Pain | -0.40 | -10.73 | < 0.01 |
Anxiety | MF | -0.22 | -4.00 | < 0.01 | 0.32 | 24.80 | 0.60 |
Sensation | -0.03 | -1.00 | 0.44 |
PJM | -0.04 | -1.21 | 0.23 |
Joint Pain | -0.30 | -8.00 | < 0.01 |
Stress | MF | -0.04 | -0.52 | 0.60 | 0.20 | 12.41 | 0.44 |
Sensation | -0.06 | -1.20 | 0.25 |
PJM | -0.42 | -5.40 | < 0.01 |
Joint Pain | -0.30 | -4.60 | < 0.01 |
Legends: HbA1c: Glycated hemoglobin, BSR: blood sugar random, BSF: blood sugar fasting, PJM: Passive joint motion, MF: Motor Function. p < 0.05 is statistically significant. Significant values are shown in bold. |
In addition, multiple regression was run between glycemic control as an independent variable and lower extremity as a dependent variable. A negative association was seen between BSR and BSF with motor function, sensation, and joint pain, and between HbA1c and BSR with passive joint motion. A strong correlation between sensation and glycemic control was observed while motor function and passive joint motion showed a moderate relationship with glycemic control.
Lastly, Table 3 shows multiple regression performed between lower extremity functionality as an independent variable and psychological health as a dependent variable. A negatively significant association was seen with all the variables except sensation and passive joint motion with anxiety and motor function and sensation with stress. A strong correlation between lower extremity functionality and depression was observed while anxiety and stress showed a moderate relationship with lower extremity functionality.