4.1 Evolution of External Oxide on Haynes 282
The oxide phase formed on Haynes 282 exposed to air at temperatures ranging from 800 to 950°C for 12 hours was characterized as rhombohedral-Cr2O3 using θ-2θ XRD analysis. The standard Gibbs free energy of formation per mole O2, ΔGf0, for several binary oxides potentially forming on Haynes 282 are listed in Table 3 [28]. Although Al2O3 has the most negative ΔGf0, suggesting a strong preference for formation, it was not detected in the XRD results. This absence is attributed to the low Al content (〜3 at%) in Haynes 282, insufficient for forming detectable ceramic crystal volumes using the in-house XRD method. In contrast, the high Cr content (〜21 at%) facilitates the formation of chromia, which has the second most negative ΔGf0, enabling its identification in the short-term oxidized Haynes 282 at various temperatures. Rutile-TiO2, with the third lowest ΔGf0, was characterized in the oxidized Haynes 282 after 48 hours using XRD, despite the low Ti content (〜2 at%), possibly due to the high affinity between Ti and oxygen.
Cross-sectional EDS mapping indicated that Ni predominantly appears on the outermost surface of the external oxide layer at 800, 850, and 900°C, suggesting the formation of a thin NiO layer that dissipates at 950°C. This implies that NiO is thermodynamically unfavorable, consistent with its least negative ΔGf0. Despite the high Ni composition and higher diffusivity of Ni in chromia compared to Cr [29], NiO is unstable relative to other thermodynamically favorable oxides like chromia and TiO2, making it unobservable at higher oxidation temperatures.
The evolution of the oxide's crystalline structure, identified by XRD, with respect to oxidation temperature and exposure time, is consistent with the compositional distribution observed in EDS mapping. EDS analysis consistently found Mn distribution aligning with Cr distribution under all conditions, and XRD patterns of mid-term or long-term oxidized specimens showed diffraction peaks corresponding to the spinel-MnCr2O4 structure, despite the low Mn content (0.06 at%). MnCr2O4 can be formed through the reaction:
$$\:\text{M}\text{n}\text{O}+{{\text{C}\text{r}}_{2}\text{O}}_{3}\to\:\text{M}\text{n}{\text{C}\text{r}}_{2}{\text{O}}_{4}$$
MnCr2O4 is thermodynamically more stable than Cr2O3, as indicated by its more negative ΔGf0 [30]. Moreover, Lobnig et al. found that Mn ions have higher diffusivity than Cr ions in Cr2O3 [29], enabling rapid Mn diffusion in the external oxide layer and accounting for the Mn content on the oxide surface. The formation of spinel in the external oxide layer increases steadily with exposure time or temperature. However, the low Mn content in as-received Haynes 282 and the time required for MnCr2O4 accumulation to allow detectable XRD diffraction peaks are responsible for the inconsistent results between XRD and EDS for short-term oxidized specimens. It is noted that cubic-CoO diffraction peaks were not observed, possibly due to the weaker thermodynamic preference for forming CoO compared to NiO, as the Gibbs formation free energy of CoO is slightly lower than that of NiO. However, CoTiO3 formation was found in XRD results (Fig. 6). In the Co-Ti-O system, perovskite-type CoTiO3 can thermodynamically exist below 1413K [31], and its ΔGf0 is more negative than that of NiO and CoO [28]. CoTiO3 can be produced through the reaction:
$$\:\text{C}\text{o}\text{O}+{\text{T}\text{i}\text{O}}_{2}\to\:\text{C}\text{o}\text{T}\text{i}{\text{O}}_{3}$$
The structure of CoTiO3 corresponds to the observed Co distribution across the oxide thickness in the cross-section of Haynes 282 oxidized long-term at 950°C.
Table 3
The standard Gibbs free energy of formation (∆Gf) for various oxides observed in nickel-based superalloys, with values given in kilojoules per mole of oxygen (kJ/mol O2) from 1000 K to 1300 K in increments of 100 K [22]. The oxides included in the table are NiO, Cr2O3, Rutile-TiO2, Rhombohedral-Al2O3, and CoO.
Standard Gibbs free energy of formation \(\:{\varDelta\:\mathbf{G}}_{\mathbf{f}}\) (kJ / mol O2)
|
T (K)
|
Cr2O3
|
NiO
|
CoO
|
Rutile-TiO2
|
Rhombohedral-Al2O3
|
1000
|
584.2
|
-298.4
|
-327.0
|
-762.5
|
-907.5
|
1100
|
567.4
|
-281.4
|
-313.2
|
-744.9
|
-885.4
|
1200
|
550.7
|
-264.4
|
-299.4
|
-727.2
|
-863.4
|
1300
|
-534
|
-247.4
|
-285.4
|
-709.4
|
-841.3
|
*Note: The original value of the standard Gibbs free energy of formation (∆Gf) for one mole compound from Barin’s book [22] is the ∆Gf of the formation of one mole compound. The ∆Gf values in this table are calculated per mole oxygen used in the formation of the compounds.
4.2 Evolution of Internal Oxide on Haynes 282
An internal oxide region, comprising TiO2 and α-Al2O3, was observed beneath the external oxide layer in the cross-sectional EDS mapping results (Fig. 9). Unlike the continuous external oxide layer, alumina is located along grain boundaries close to the external oxide/matrix interface in all oxidized specimens. Titanium oxide is observed near alumina in most oxidized specimens, except those at 800°C. Prior research [32] indicated that these oxide phases are TiO2 and Al2O3, constituting the internal oxide layer within superalloys. Rapp [33] reported four criteria for specific elements to form internal oxides in alloys:
- The Gibbs free energy of formation of the internal oxide is more negative than that of the principal phase of the external oxide layer.
- The Gibbs free energy of the internal oxidation reaction is negative.
- The concentration of the alloying element is below the critical concentration for forming an external oxide layer.
- The external oxide layer cannot prevent oxygen from diffusing into the alloy's matrix.
In Haynes 282, with chromia as the predominant external oxide phase, α- Al2O3 formation Gibbs free energy is more negative than that of Cr2O3, indicating that internal alumina is thermodynamically more stable than external chromia. The critical concentration of Al in the alloy,\(\:\:{N}_{Al}^{\left(O\right)}\)
$$\:{N}_{Al}^{\left(O\right)}\ge\:{\left[\frac{\pi\:{g}^{*}}{2V}{N}_{O}^{\left(s\right)}\frac{{D}_{O}{V}_{m}}{{D}_{Al}{V}_{OX}}\right]}^{1/2}$$
where represent the atomic fraction of oxygen in the alloy, the diffusivity of oxygen in the alloy, Al diffusivity in the alloy, molar volume of alumina, molar volume of the alloy, and the ratio of Al to O volume (\(\:V=1.5\) for Al2O3), respectively. Wagner's theory suggests that the transition from internal to external scale formation is governed by the volume fraction of oxide reaching a critical value, \(\:g=f\left({V}_{OX}/{V}_{m}\right)\), reaches a critical value, \(\:{g}^{*}\). According to Zhao [34], the critical aluminum concentration, \(\:{N}_{Al}^{\left(O\right)}\), necessary for the formation of a continuous external Al2O3 layer in Ni-based alloys falls within the range of 0.1 to 0.16 atomic fraction. In wrought Haynes 282, the Al content is reported to be 3.22 atomic percent [35], which is substantially lower than the critical concentration required for the development of a continuous external Al2O3 layer. The predominant presence of internal alumina along grain boundaries indicates that the nucleation of Al2O3is heterogeneous in nature.
As reported by Sabino et al. [36], the inward diffusion path of oxygen in polycrystalline Cr2O3 is along the grain boundaries. The presence of internal alumina suggests that oxygen atoms can penetrate through the chromia layer and into the metal matrix. The Ti content in the alloy, at 2.67 atomic percent, is slightly lower than that of Al. Furthermore, the formation Gibbs free energy of rutile-TiO2 is more negative compared to that of Cr2O3, which is consistent with Rapp's criteria. Interestingly, TiO2 is also detected at the outermost portion of the external oxide layer. It is hypothesized that the presence of TiO2, rather than Al2O3, at the outermost portion may be attributed to the differing diffusivities of Ti and Al in chromia, although specific data on their diffusivities in chromia are not available. It is well-established that ionic diffusion in ceramic solids is related to the concentration of corresponding defects, which include both intrinsic and extrinsic defects, as described by the Kröger-Vink notation. The substitution of the cation lattice in chromia by doping with TiO2 and Al2O3 can be represented as follows:
$$\:3\text{T}\text{i}{\text{O}}_{2}\underset{\iff\:}{{\text{C}\text{r}}_{2}{\text{O}}_{3}}3{{\text{T}\text{i}}_{\text{C}\text{r}}}^{\bullet\:}+6{{\text{O}}_{\text{O}}}^{\times\:}+{{\text{V}}_{\text{C}\text{r}}}^{{\prime\:}{\prime\:}{\prime\:}}$$
$$\:{\text{A}\text{l}}_{2}{\text{O}}_{3}\underset{\iff\:}{{\text{C}\text{r}}_{2}{\text{O}}_{3}}2{{\text{A}\text{l}}_{\text{C}\text{r}}}^{\times\:}+3{{\text{O}}_{\text{O}}}^{\times\:}$$
The provided formulas indicate that the incorporation of three TiO2 molecules into the Cr2O3 lattice can result in the creation of a chromium cation vacancy, leading to an increase in the defect concentration within the ceramic. This increased defect concentration may contribute to a higher diffusivity of Ti4+ ions compared to Al3+ ions in chromia, assuming that these cations diffuse through the lattice. The presence of an Al accumulation region beneath the matrix/chromia interface may serve as evidence for the lower diffusivity of Al in comparison to Ti. This accumulation suggests that Al atoms are unable to diffuse as readily as Ti atoms through the chromia layer.
Kofstad [37, 38] reported that the formation of rutile-TiO2 is governed by the inward diffusion of oxygen ions at temperatures below approximately 900°C. However, when the oxidation temperature surpasses 900°C, the dominant mechanism may transition to the outward diffusion of titanium cations. This shift in the dominant diffusion mechanism enables Ti atoms to diffuse through the chromia layer to the outermost position of the external oxide layer, where they can form the TiO2 layer. Simultaneously, Ti atoms can also react with inwardly diffusing oxygen to form internal TiO2 precipitates within the alloy matrix. The combination of outward titanium cation diffusion and inward oxygen ion diffusion contributes to the formation of both external and internal TiO2 phases in the oxidized alloy.
4.3 Oxidation Kinetics of Haynes 282
Based on Wagner’s theory of oxidation kinetics, the rate of oxidation for protective oxides in Haynes 282 superalloys follows the parabolic law. This behavior can be described by the following equation:
$$\:\frac{\varDelta\:\text{M}}{\text{A}}=\sqrt{2{\text{K}}_{\text{P}}\text{t}}$$
1
Here, ∆M/A represents the mass gain per unit surface area, t is the oxidation time, and Kp is the parabolic rate constant. Figure 11 illustrates ∆M/A as a function of t0.5, with a regression line fitted using Eq. (1). The parabolic rate constant can be expressed using the Arrhenius equation:
$$\:{\text{K}}_{\text{P}}={\text{K}}_{0}\text{e}\text{x}\text{p}\left(-\frac{\text{Q}}{\text{R}\text{T}}\right)$$
2
In this equation, K0 is the pre-exponential constant, Q represents the activation energy of oxidation, R is the gas constant (8.314 J mol− 1 K− 1), and T denotes the oxidation temperature. The activation energy, Q, can be derived by taking the natural logarithm of both sides of Eq. (2), resulting in:
$$\:\text{l}\text{n}\left({\text{K}}_{\text{P}}\right)={\text{l}\text{n}(\text{K}}_{0})+(\frac{-\text{Q}}{\text{R}})\frac{1}{\text{T}}$$
3
By plotting ln(KP) versus 1/T, the slope and intercept of the linear regression represent (-Q)/R and ln(K0), respectively. Therefore, the value of Q is calculated by multiplying the slope by R, and K0 is determined through the exponential of the intercept.
The slope, R-squared value, and KP for each fitting curve are listed in Table 4. The Arrhenius plot for Haynes 282 after oxidation at temperatures ranging from 800 to 950°C is depicted in Fig. 12. The calculated activation energy Q for long-term oxidation is 210.05 ± 23.30 kJ mol− 1, and K0 is 4.78 × 106 mg cm− 2 h− 0.5. It is noteworthy that all R-squared values in Table 5 surpass 0.96, suggesting a strong linear correlation with the square root of oxidation time. However, the exponent n value at 950°C appears to deviate from the typical range of 0.4–0.6 for the parabolic rate law.
According to Wagner's theory, the parabolic rate law is applicable when the oxide layer functions as a diffusion barrier and the oxidation reaction proceeds at a significantly faster rate than the diffusion of ions. Consequently, the oxidation behavior is considered to be governed by the diffusion of ions within the oxide scale. Under the assumption that all mass gain is a result of oxygen molecules reacting with chromium, and considering negligible mass loss due to oxide volatilization during the oxidation process, the relationship between ∆M/A of Haynes 282 and the external oxide thickness (δ) is expected to adhere to the following formula:
$$\:\frac{\varDelta\:\text{M}}{\text{A}}=0.1\:{\delta\:}\:{{\rho\:}}_{{\text{C}\text{r}}_{2}{\text{O}}_{3}}\:\frac{3\:{\text{M}}_{\text{O}}}{{\text{M}}_{{\text{C}\text{r}}_{2}{\text{O}}_{3}}}$$
4
Here, \(\:{{\rho\:}}_{{\text{C}\text{r}}_{2}{\text{O}}_{3}}\)is the density of Cr2O3 (5.22 g/cm3 [39]), M represents the molar mass in g/mol, and 0.1 is a unit conversion constant. Using values from the literature in Eq. (4), it simplifies to:
$$\:\frac{\varDelta\:\text{M}}{\text{A}}\:\left(\text{m}\text{g}\:{\text{c}\text{m}}^{-2}\right)=0.165\:{\delta\:}\:\left({\mu\:}\text{m}\right)$$
5
The linear relationship between ∆M/A and δ, as depicted in Fig. 8, is presented in Fig. 13. The slope and R-squared values for each fitting curve are provided in Table 5. It is observed that the average slope of ∆M/A versus δ in Fig. 13 is 0.164 ± 0.010 mg cm− 2 µm− 1, which closely aligns with the predicted value of 0.165 in Eq. (5). This finding lends support to the conclusion that the oxidation kinetics of Haynes 282 within the 720-hour timeframe is primarily governed by the oxidation of a single oxide phase, namely rhombohedral-Cr2O3.
Table 4
The slope of the straight line with the R2 of each fitting curve and the value of \(\:{K}_{P}\) of Haynes 282 for oxidation at the temperature range of 800 to 950°C
T (°C)
|
Slope (mg cm− 2 h− 0.5)
|
R2
|
\(\:{\varvec{K}}_{\varvec{P}}\) (mg cm− 2 h− 0.5)
|
800
|
0.0222 ± 0.0009
|
0.990
|
0.00025
|
850
|
0.0426 ± 0.0028
|
0.974
|
0.00091
|
900
|
0.0723 ± 0.0033
|
0.988
|
0.00262
|
950
|
0.1036 ± 0.0042
|
0.987
|
0.00537
|
Table 5
The slope of the \(\:\frac{\varDelta\:M}{A}\) versus δ straight line with the R2 of each fitting curve of Haynes 282 for long term oxidation at the temperature range of 800 to 950°C
T (°C)
|
Slope (mg cm− 2 µm− 1)
|
R2
|
800
|
0.153 ± 0.012
|
0.9777
|
850
|
0.167 ± 0.011
|
0.9721
|
900
|
0.177 ± 0.015
|
0.9605
|
950
|
0.160 ± 0.013
|
0.9639
|
4.4 Generation and Relaxation of Intrinsic Stress in the Oxide Layer on Haynes 282
It is assumed that σAXS represents the total residual stress in the chromia. The total residual stress, σtotal, measured at room temperature (RT), was the sum of the thermal stress, σth, and the intrinsic stress, σin, and could be expressed by the equation:
$$\:{{\sigma\:}}_{\text{t}\text{o}\text{t}\text{a}\text{l}}=\:{{\sigma\:}}_{\text{t}\text{h}}+\:{{\sigma\:}}_{\text{i}\text{n}}$$
6
The origin of the thermal stress was attributed to the difference in the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) between the external oxide layer and the substrate. This discrepancy resulted in compressive strain in the Cr2O3 and tensile strain in the substrate during the cooling process from the oxidation temperature to RT. The thermal stress in Cr2O3 could be estimated using the equation:
$$\:{{\sigma\:}}_{\text{t}\text{h}}=\frac{{\text{E}}_{{\text{C}\text{r}}_{2}{\text{O}}_{3}}}{1-{{\nu\:}}_{{\text{C}\text{r}}_{2}{\text{O}}_{3}}}({{\alpha\:}}_{{\text{C}\text{r}}_{2}{\text{O}}_{3}}-{{\alpha\:}}_{\text{s}\text{u}\text{b}\text{s}\text{t}\text{r}\text{a}\text{t}\text{e}})\varDelta\:\text{T}$$
7
where \(\:{{\alpha\:}}_{{\text{C}\text{r}}_{2}{\text{O}}_{3}}\) and \(\:{{\alpha\:}}_{\text{s}\text{u}\text{b}\text{s}\text{t}\text{r}\text{a}\text{t}\text{e}}\)were the linear expansion coefficients of Cr2O3 (\(\:{{\alpha\:}}_{{\text{C}\text{r}}_{2}{\text{O}}_{3}}=9.55\times\:{10}^{-6}\) K−1 [40]) and Haynes 282, respectively. \(\:\varDelta\:\text{T}\) was the temperature difference between the oxidation temperature and the RT, i.e., \(\:\varDelta\:\text{T}={\text{T}}_{\text{o}\text{x}\text{i}\text{d}\text{a}\text{t}\text{i}\text{o}\text{n}}-{\text{T}}_{\text{R}\text{T}}\). The mean value of linear CTE of Haynes 282 [41], \(\:{{\alpha\:}}_{\text{H}\text{a}\text{y}\text{n}\text{e}\text{s}\:282}\), was utilized as the required \(\:{{\alpha\:}}_{\text{s}\text{u}\text{b}\text{s}\text{t}\text{r}\text{a}\text{t}\text{e}}\) for calculating the thermal stress of the chromia. The thermal stress of the oxide layer \(\:{\text{C}\text{r}}_{2}{\text{O}}_{3}\) at 800 and 950°C are − 807 ± 1 and − 1233 ± 1 MPa, respectively. Given that the thickness of the external oxide layer formed at 950°C constituted only 1.6% of the substrate's thickness, the thermal stress gradient across the external oxide was neglected, and a uniform thermal stress throughout the external oxide layer was presumed. The intrinsic stress, σin, was determined by subtracting the thermal stresses, σth, from the total residual stresses, σtotal, at the corresponding oxidation temperatures. Figure 14 illustrates the relationship between the intrinsic stresses of Cr2O3 and the exposure times at 800 and 950°C.
The intrinsic stress in chromia was initially tensile at 800°C. As the exposure time increased, the intrinsic tensile stress gradually decreased and eventually transformed into a compressive stress after 48 hours of oxidation. This compressive stress continued to intensify with prolonged oxidation time, but the rate of increase slowed down over time. After 720 hours of oxidation at 800°C, the intrinsic stress stabilized at approximately − 150 MPa. In contrast to the observations at 800°C, where the intrinsic stress transitioned from tensile to compressive, all intrinsic stresses measured at 950°C were tensile. However, the rate of increase in intrinsic tensile stress at 950°C also diminish ed over time, reaching approximately 761 MPa after 720 hours of oxidation.
It has been suggested that the tensile stress observed during the initial stages of polycrystalline film growth can be attributed to the process of crystallite coalescence [42, 43]. According to this model, which is based on thermodynamic principles, the free energy of the growing film is reduced through the coalescence of crystallites, subsequently leading to the development of intrinsic tensile stresses within the film. This decrease in Gibbs free energy favors the stabilization of the crystalline structure. The presence of tensile stress in the oxide is considered essential for the stabilization of polycrystalline film growth, as it facilitates the reduction of Gibbs free energy. Similar patterns of intrinsic tensile stress were observed by Tung and Stubbins during their analyses of residual stress in Cr2O3 formed on nickel-based superalloys, Inconel 617 and Haynes 230, during the early stages of oxidation within 6 h at elevated temperatures below 1000°C.[44, 45].
On the other hand, an alternative model [46] proposes that the initial stress in Cr2O3 is expected to be compressive, due to the fact that the Pilling-Bedworth ratio (PBR) of Cr2O3 is greater than 1. This high PBR indicates that the oxidation process is accompanied by volumetric expansion, which may induce compressive stress when subjected to the constraints of plastic deformation. Moreover, as demonstrated in a previous study [47], the diffusion of oxygen along grain boundaries in α-alumina scale may also contribute to the development of slight compressive stress within the oxide scale, especially when the oxidation mechanism is primarily governed by anionic diffusion at lower temperatures.
In the current study, it has been noted that the surface morphology of the oxides grown at 800°C and 950°C exhibits significant differences, as illustrated in Fig. 15. The oxides grown at 800°C displayed a relatively dense and smooth surface compared to those grown at 950°C. It is plausible that the relatively compact oxide layer, primarily composed of Cr2O3, may contribute to the development of compressive stress, where the Pilling-Bedworth mechanism plays a dominant role. Conversely, for the alloy exposed to 950°C, where severe oxidation occurs, the surface oxide exhibits a rugged morphology consisting of small crystals. This observation suggests that the process of crystallite coalescence was underway and subsequently dominated the development of tensile stress in the current study.
Another possible explanation for the greater residual tensile stress observed in the alloy exposed at 950°C is the significantly higher Ti content on the surface of the external oxide layer compared to that at 800°C. This suggests enhanced outward diffusion of Ti through chromia at 950°C. As mentioned in the Kröger-Vink notation section, the outward diffusion of Ti cations through the chromia lattice may induce tensile stress. Given the larger ionic radius of Cr3+ compared to Ti4+ [48], the substitution of Cr3+ by Ti4+ may cause lattice distortion in Cr2O3, leading to tensile stress. Furthermore, Kofstad's study [37, 38] indicates that the oxidation mechanism of TiO2 at temperatures above 900°C is dominated by the outward diffusion of Ti4+, supporting increased Ti4+ diffusion at 950°C and introducing tensile stress into the chromia.