As described in the Experimental section, in this work, a dual electrochemical immunosensor was prepared for the simultaneous determination of the Crohn´s disease biomarkers IL-12 and IL-23 in clinical samples. The immunosensor preparation involved the covalent immobilization of the specific anti-IL12 and anti-IL23 capture antibodies on the surface of a SPdCE modified with Phe-(MWCNTs/CNC)SPdCE (Fig. 1). The targets were detected using sandwich type immunoassays with the respective biotinylated secondary antibodies and affinity complexation with poly-HRP-strept conjugates. Amperometric detection was performed using H2O2 as the enzymatic substrate and HQ as redox mediator. The measured cathodic current variations at -0.20 V vs Ag pseudo-reference electrode, attributed to HQ-mediated enzymatic reduction of the substrate, were directly proportional to the concentrations of IL-12 and IL-23 cytokines.
Characterization studies
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to characterize the structure of MWCNTs/CNC nanocomposites. Figure 2 compares the image obtained for an aqueous 0.25% wt CNC dispersion (Fig. 2A) with that of 0.125% wt MWCNTs (Fig. 2B) and the mixture of both nanomaterials (Fig. 2C). As it can be seen, CNC appears in
the form of rigid rodlike structures, with 5.1 ± 1.7 nm width and 100–120 nm length. Furthermore, MWCNTs appear as long and continuous tubes with 30 ± 15 nm width and 5–20 µm length. Finally, MWCNTs/CNC dispersion shows nanotubes surrounded by cellulose nanocrystals.These results agree with those reported by Durairaj et al. [18] as well as the dimensions with those claimed by the manufacturers.
HERE FIGURE 2
Electrochemical characterization of the MWCNTs/CNC nanocomposites was performed using cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) with 5 mM Fe(CN)63−/4− solutions in 0.1 mol L− 1PBS of pH 7.4. For comparison, SPCEs were modified by dropping 5 µL of the as prepared dispersions of MWCNTs, CNC or MWCNTs/CNC mixture onto the working electrode surface and allowing drying. Cyclic voltammograms (Fig. 3a) showed the expected anodic and cathodic peaks of the redox probe as well as some appreciable differences in the peak currents, peak potentials, and ΔE values depending on the electrode composition. Unmodified SPCE exhibited similar anodic and cathodic currents (ipa= 22 µA and ipc= 21 µA), with an ipa/ ipc ratio of 1.04. Moreover, ΔE was 320 mV. As it can be seen, slightly higher currents were obtained at the CNC/SPCE (ipa= 30 µA and ipc= 29 µA; ipa/ ipc = 1.03), with a lower peak separation (ΔE = 244 mV). These results can be attributed to the high surface area of the CNC and its porous structure, which allows ion transport and greater accessibility of the redox probe. [12]. Regarding the electrodes modified with MWCNTs, lower peak separation (ΔE = 175 mV) for both MWCNTs/SPCE and MWCNTs/CNC/SPCE, and higher peak currents, were observed, which was attributed to the high electrical conductivity of carbon nanotubes. However, it is worth noting the slight decrease in peak currents at the MWCNTs/CNC/SPCE ((ipa= 32 µA and ipc= 31 µA; ipa/ ipc = 1.03) compared to the MWCNTs/SPCE (ipa= 35 µA and ipc= 33 µA; ipa/ ipc = 1.06) probably due to the small decrease in conductivity when using the composite nanomaterial [20].
Similar conclusions arise by using EIS at the same experimental conditions (Fig. 3b). Nyquist spectra exhibited significantly lower charge transfer resistance (RCT) for the electrodes modified with MWCNTs or MWCNTs/CNC (RCT= 984 Ω and 1063 Ω, respectively) than that measured at the bare SPCE, RCT = 2161 Ω, and at the CNC modified electrode, 1823 Ω. This behaviour can be attributed to a better conductivity of carbon nanotubes which slightly decreases in the presence of CNC.
HERE FIGURE 3
Optimization of the variables involved in the preparation of the immunosensors
The variables involved in the preparation and functioning of the dual immunosensor were optimized by testing individually their effect on the amperometric response for each target biomarker. The selection criterion for the variables was the values of the specific-to-unspecific current (S/N) ratios. The optimization results for IL-12 are described below, whereas those for the individual determination of IL-23 are detailed in Supplementary Information (Figures S2–S4). Table 1 summarizes the experimental variables selected for the simultaneous determination of both biomarkers with the developed immunoplatform.
The effect of the capture antibody loading (anti-IL12) over the 5 to 30 µg mL− 1 range, and of its incubation time for immobilization onto grafted MWCNTs/CNC/ SPCEs, between 15 to 60 min, were tested in the absence (N) and in the presence (S) of 2 ng mL− 1 IL-12. Figure 4a shows as a larger S/N ratio was obtained for 25 µg mL− 1 antibody. Smaller concentrations gave rise to lower specific amperometric currents probably because of the insufficient antibody loading. Moreover, practically constant nonspecific currents were observed, thus providing lower S/N ratios. Furthermore, antibody loadings larger than 25 µg mL− 1 provoked also a decrease in the S/N ratio probably due to the hindered recognition of the target biomarker. Regarding the incubation time, the results of Fig. 4b led us to select 15 min for further work. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used as the blocking agent to minimize unspecific adsorptions onto the modified anti-IL12-MWCNTs/CNC/SPCEs electrode. The effect of the blocker concentration was tested over 2 and 10% and the results were compared with those achieved by using a commercial blocking buffer (BB) consisting of 2% casein. As Fig. 4c shows, an 8% BSA allowed obtaining a larger S/N ratio. Furthermore, a blocking time of 30 min provided also a better S/N ratio (Fig. 4d). The effect of the incubation time of IL-12 antigen on the amperometric responses was evaluated over the 15 to 45 min. Figure 4e shows that although the specific response is somewhat higher for 30 min, the increase in the non-specific currentwhen increasing the immobilization time provoked a worse S/N ratio compared with that achieved incubating for 15 min, which has been chosen for further work.
HERE FIGURE 4
Figure 5a shows as the specific responses increased with the biotinylated antibody loading due to the higher amount of biotin to form the affinity link with the poly-HRP-Strep conjugate for detection. Since a higher S/N ratio was obtained for 0.5 µg mL− 1, this concentration was selected for further work. Regarding the incubation time for Biotin-anti-IL12 (Fig. 5b) 30 min were chosen according to the same criterion. With the aim of obtaining higher specific currents and a better S/N ratio, a signal amplification strategy involving poly-HRP-Strept instead of the usual HRP-Strept conjugate was implemented. The effect of the polymer dilution on the immunosensor responses was studied over the 1/250 to 1/2000 range with the results shown in Fig. 5c. Both specific and non-specific currents gradually decreased as the dilution increased, probably due to the lower number of detector labels on the biotinylated antibodies. However, a better S/N ratio was obtained for a 1/1000 dilution, so this value was chosen for subsequent studies. To further reduce nonspecific responses, the aqueous solutions of poly-enzyme conjugate were prepared in the presence of an optimized amount of BSA. As Fig. 5d shows, a larger S/N ratio was achieved for 2% BSA. Finally, the effect of the incubation time of poly-HRP-Strept prepared under the previous conditions was checked (Fig. 5e), 20 min being selected for further work.
HERE FIGURE 5
In addition to these variables, the loading of MWCNTs/CNC composite on the SPCE surface was optimized by measuring the variation of the immunosensor responses over the range of 3 to 7 µL suspension. A volume of 5 µL provided a larger specific signal and a better S/N ratio. Other experimental conditions, such as the composition of the H2O2/HQ system, as well as the potential and pH for the detection, were optimized in previous works [21, 22].
Table 1
Experimental variables tested and values selected for the simultaneous determination of IL-12 and IL-23 with the developed immunosensors.
Target biomarker | Variable | Tested range | Selected value |
IL12 | Anti-IL12 loading, µg mL− 1 Anti-IL12 incubation time, min BSA concentration, % BSA blocking time, min IL12 incubation time, min Biotin-anti-IL12 loading, µg mL− 1 Biotin-anti-IL12 incubation time, min Poly-HRP-Strept dilution BSA in poly-HRP-Strept, % Poly-HRP-Strept incubation time, min | 5–30 15–60 2–10 15–45 15–45 0.1–0.75 15–45 1//2000–1/250 0–5 15–30 | 25 15 8 30 15 0.5 30 1/1000 2 20 |
IL-23 | Anti-IL23 loading, µg mL− 1 Anti-IL23 incubation time, min BSA concentration, % BSA blocking time, min IL23 incubation time, min Biotin-anti-IL23 loading, µg mL− 1 Biotin-anti-IL23 incubation time, min Poly-HRP-Strept dilution BSA in poly-HRP-Strept, % Poly-HRP-Strept incubation time, min | 20–50 15–45 5–10 15–45 15–45 0.05–0.75 5–45 1/1000–1/250 0–2 10–30 | 40 20 8 30 15 0.25 15 1/500 1 20 |
All the steps involved in the preparation of the dual immunosensor were monitored by CV and EIS using 5 mM Fe(CN)63−/4− as the redox probe in 0.1 M PBS of pH 7.4. Similar results were obtained for both biomarkers and, therefore, only those obtained for IL-23 have been displayed in Fig. 6. Voltammograms for the bare SPCE and MWCNTs/CNC/SPCE (Fig. 6A curves 1 and 2) already shown in Fig. 3 were included for comparison purposes. Grafting with p-ABA (curve 3) caused a strong decrease in the peak currents which is most likely due to the electrostatic repulsion between the redox probe and the dissociated carboxyl groups on the electrode surface at the working pH. Activation with EDC/sulfo-NHS (curve 4) provoked an increase of peak currents because of the neutralization of the anionic charges. Surprisingly, conjugation with anti-IL23 capture antibody (curve 5) resulted in higher peak currents, which is contradictory to the non-conducting properties of the biomolecule. A possible explanation for this behaviour relies in the isoelectric point of the antibody, 9.3 [23], which means it is positively charged at the working pH thus reinforcing the current magnitude by electrostatic attraction of the redox probe. Thereafter, Fig. 6B shows that the current decreased dramatically after blocking with BSA (curve 6) while successive incorporation of the other immunoreagents (curves 7 to 9) provoked slight variations in the CVs towards a less reversible behaviour, because of the presence of insulating layers with increasing thickness on the electrode surface.
Similar results were obtained by EIS (Fig. 6C, D). Apart from the large decrease in the electron transfer resistance produced by modification of SPCE with MWCNTs/CNC (Fig. 6C, curves 1 and 2) it can be seen as grafting with p-ABA (curve 3) provoked the expected increase in the RCT value up to 4512 Ω, which then showed a further decrease to 1753 Ω after neutralization by activation with EDC/sulfo-NHS (curve 4). In addition, conjugation with anti-IL23 capture antibody (curve 5) gave rise to a lower RCT value of 1003 Ω, probably due to the reason explained above to justify the behaviour in CV [23]. Thereafter, blocking of the remaining unreacted sites with BSA produced a larger RCT value of 3276 Ω (Fig. 6D, curve 6) in agreement with the expected decrease in the electrode conductivity at a quasi-passivated surface. The subsequent incorporation of IL-23 antigen, Biotin-anti-IL23 detection antibody and poly-HRP/Strept (curves 7 to 9) led the charge transfer resistance to values similar than that measured before the blocking. Interestingly, the presence of the biomolecules at the electrode surface provoked also the appearance of two semicircles in the EIS spectra. These results led to define the obtained Nyquist plots by two different equivalent circuits as shown in Fig. 6. Curves 1–4 fitted well to a Randles R1(C2[R3W1]) circuit, whereas curves 5–9 should be explained by the more complex equivalent circuit depicted on the right, with at least two RC semicircuits, reflecting that some parts of the electrode are coated by the biomolecules while others remain exposed to the solution. The parallel RC circuits mean that there is a film with defects such as pinholes or a non-uniform thickness throughout the substrate [24].
HERE FIGURE 6
Analytical characteristics of the dual immunosensor for the simultaneous determination of IL-12 and IL-23 biomarkers
The calibration plots constructed with the dual immunosensor for the determination of the Crohn´s disease biomarkers using the optimized working conditions are illustrated in Fig. 7 which also shows some of the amperograms registered to obtain the corresponding data. As expected, according to the sandwich-type configuration of the immunoassays, the recorded currents were directly proportional to the concentration of each target cytokine. Semilogarithmic plots with wide linear regions between 0.3 and 1000 ng mL− 1 were obtained for both interleukins. The analytical parameters of the corresponding calibration plots are summarized in Table 2.
HERE FIGURE 7
The comparison of the analytical characteristics provided by the dual immunosensor with those claimed for the ELISA kits involving the same immunoreagents allowed us to deduce some advantages when using the immunosensor. In the case of IL-12. the dynamic linear range is much wider, covering from 0.3 to 1000 ng mL− 1 whereas the ELISA kit [Human IL-12 DuoSet ELISA from R&D Systems (Cat. No. DY1270-05)] provides a non-linear semilogarithmic calibration from 0.031 to 2.0 ng mL− 1. In addition, the ELISA method takes more than 4 hours compared to the 1h 35 min required with the immunosensor counting in both cases from the incubation of the capture antibody. Regarding IL-23, the developed method also provides a linear semi-logarithmic calibration plot ranging between 0.3 and 1000 ng mL− 1 instead of the non-linear semilogarithmic plot provided by the ELISA kit [Human IL-23 DuoSet ELISA from R&D Systems (Cat. No. DY1290-05)] covering from 0.125 to 8.0 ng mL− 1, which requires more than 4h 40 min instead of 1h 20 min needed for the use of the immunosensor. Obviously, the greatest advantage is that the developed dual platform allows the simultaneous determination of both biomarkers in less than 2 hours, which is approximately a quarter of the time that would be required if the two ELISA kits were used separately.
Table 2
Analytical characteristics of the calibration plots for IL-12 and IL-23 constructed with the developed dual immunosensor
Parameter | IL-12 | IL-23 |
Slope | 2.31 ± 0.04 µA/conc decade (ng mL− 1) | 1.14 ± 0.03 µA/conc decade (ng mL− 1) |
Intercept | 1.41 ± 0.07 µA | 0.81 ± 0.05 nA |
Linear range | 0.3–1000 ng mL− 1 | 0.3–1000 ng mL− 1 |
R2 | 0.996 | 0.993 |
LOD | 0.25 ng mL− 1 | 0.22 ng mL− 1 |
LOQ | 0.26 ng mL− 1 | 0.29 ng mL− 1 |
RSD % (n = 10) (intra-day) | 6.2 (0 ng mL− 1) 4.1 (10 ng mL− 1) | 4.1 (0 ng mL− 1) 2.7 (10 ng mL− 1) |
RSD % (n = 10) (inter-day) | 2.8 (0 ng mL− 1) 5.4 (10 ng mL− 1) | 4.7 (0 ng mL− 1) 3.8 (10 ng mL− 1) |
Regarding the achieved LOD and LOQ values, it should be noted that the ELISA kits involving the same reagents report in their protocols only the lowest concentrations of the calibrations: 31.3 pg mL− 1 (IL-12) and 125 pg mL− 1 (IL-23). These values are somewhat lower or similar, respectively, to the LOQ values achieved with the developed method. There is no information about the relative standard deviation obtained with the ELISA kits, which in the case of the dual immunosensor ranged approximately between 3 and 6%. Finally, it should be noted that the sample volume required, 5 µL for both biomarkers, is twenty times smaller than that needed for one target using the ELISA test.
The good analytical performance achieved is probably due to the properties of CNC, mainly its biocompatibility and hydrophilicity, as well as the high surface area and open-pore structure which facilitates the penetration of electroactive species resulting in high sensitivity and fast response [25]. These characteristics together with the electrochemical properties of carbon nanotubes provide an excellent composite nanomaterial for the immobilization of biomolecules onto the transducer surface as well as for the amperometric detection. In addition, the dual immunosensor exhibited good reproducibility and excellent stability, suggesting that it could be used for the determination of the target biomarkers in clinical samples from patients of Crohn´s disease or other IBDs.
Storage stability
With the aim of evaluating the storage stability of the dual immunosensor for the determination of IL-12 and IL-23 biomarkers, different immunoplatforms were prepared on the same day, stored in PBS pH 7.4 at 4 ºC, and employed to measure simultaneously both targets on different days after incubation with 10 ng mL− 1 of each target according to the procedure described in the Experimental section. The obtained results (Figure S5) indicated that the anti-IL12-MWCNTs/CNC/SPCE and anti-IL-23-MWCNTs/CNC/SPCE bioelectrodes were stable for at least 71 days (the longest storage time tested) since the current responses remained inside the \(\:\stackrel{-}{x}\) ± 3s limits, where s was the standard deviation of the measurements (n = 10) carried out on the first day. Therefore, at least during this period it is feasible to prepare the immunosensors from the stored bioconjugates, allowing the determination of IL-12 and IL-23 after incubation of the cytokines, the detection antibodies and the peroxidase conjugate, in around 60 min. This long-term stability is attributable most likely to the CNC properties, especially its biocompatibility and hydrophilicity, as well as its robustness to slight variations in pH, ionic strength or temperature [25].
Selectivity
The effect of potential interfering compounds that may be present together with the target biomarkers in biological samples on the electrochemical responses obtained with the dual immunosensor was checked. The compounds tested were proteins related to inflammation disorders such as those associated with Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis and other IBDs, as well as others usually present in human serum. Their influence was evaluated at concentration levels that correspond approximately to the normal physiological level found in healthy individuals: 5 mg mL− 1 haemoglobin (HB), 50 mg mL− 1 human serum albumin (HSA); 1 mg mL− 1 human immunoglobulin (hIgG); 100 pg mL− 1 interleukin 6 (IL-6); 200 pg mL− 1 tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and 100 pg mL− 1 interferon gamma (INF-γ). In addition, the possible cross-interference of each biomarker in the determination of the other was evaluated at concentration levels of 2 ng mL− 1.
The results in Fig. 8 show as no significantly different responses were obtained in all cases since all the mean steady state current values remained within the ± 3 × standard deviation range of the current values measured in the absence of potential interferent. This excellent selectivity can be attributed to the practical specificity of the capture antibodies towards the target cytokines.
Determination of IL-12 and IL-23 in human serum and faeces
The simultaneous determination of the CD biomarkers was accomplished in human serum of a healthy individual (Bio Hub Ref.100468118) and in faeces of a volunteer. In the case of serum, the procedure described in the Experimental section was applied to the determination of the two biomarkers using 5 µL aliquots of undiluted sample. For faeces, an Eiken OC-Auto Sampling Bottle3 (Ref. V-PZ25) [https://www.eiken.co.jp/uploads/IFU/340026A-G_en_20220401.pdf] was used for sample collection and dispersion in the appropriate medium. Specifically, 10 mg of faeces were collected each time and dispersed in 2 mL of HEPES buffer included in the container. As indicated above, all the experiments involved in samples manipulation and analysis were performed accomplishing all the ethical issues and relevant guidelines and regulations of the implied institutions.
Firstly, the matrix effects from the sample solutions were evaluated by applying the Student’s t-test to compare the slope values of the calibration plots for the target standards constructed in buffer solutions with those obtained by applying the standard additions method. The results for the direct analysis of both undiluted serum and stool solution provided texp values larger than that tabulated t (ttab = 2.365), indicating that apparent matrix effects occurred in the determination of IL-12 and IL-23 under the mentioned conditions. Therefore, the standard additions method was applied for the determination of the biomarkers. This method also avoids possible variabilities in the slope value of the calibration plots constructed from serum or faeces collected from different individuals. Using this protocol, the obtained results are summarized in Table 3. Excellent recoveries ranging between 97 ± 4% and 103 ± 6% were found in spiked serum and between 96 ± 5% and 102 ± 6% in faeces, for IL-12 and IL-23, respectively.
Table 3
Determination of IL-12 and IL-23 in raw serum and faeces with the dual immunosensor.
SAMPLE | IL-12, ng mL− 1 | IL-23, ng mL− 1 |
| Added | Found* | Recovery, % | Added | Found* | Recovery, % |
Serum | 0.3 | 0.31 ± 0.02 | 103 | 0.3 | 0.30 ± 0.01 | 99 |
| 0.5 | 0.50 ± 0.03 | 100 | 0.5 | 0.49 ± 0.02 | 97 |
| 1.0 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 102 | 1.0 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 99 |
| 1.5 | 1.48 ± 0.06 | 99 | 1.5 | 1.51 ± 0.05 | 101 |
| 0.3 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 99 | 0.3 | 0.29 ± 0.05 | 97 |
Faeces | 0.5 | 0.51 ± 0.03 | 102 | 0.5 | 0.48 ± 0.04 | 97 |
| 1.0 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 102 | 1.0 | 0.96 ± 0.05 | 96 |
| 1.5 | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 99 | 1.5 | 1.5 ± 0.2 | 102 |
* Mean value ± 2s, n = 3