3.1 Soil Fungal Community Composition
As shown in Figure 1, a detailed comparative analysis was conducted on soil fungal communities under trees (TREE1, TREE2, TREE3) and shrubs (SHRUB1, SHRUB2, SHRUB3) at various taxonomic levels, including kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species(Li and Wu 2018; Naranjo‐Ortiz and Gabaldón 2019). The results reveal that the soil fungal diversity under shrubs was significantly higher than that under trees at all taxonomic levels. Particularly at the species level (144.11 ± 6.78 under trees vs. 229.67 ± 12.34 under shrubs), family level (14.00 ± 1.56 under trees vs. 35.11 ± 2.45 under shrubs), and order level (12.22 ± 0.98 under trees vs. 31.45 ± 1.87 under shrubs), the differences were most pronounced.These findings indicate that the taxonomic diversity and richness of soil fungi under shrubs are generally higher than under trees, reflecting greater adaptability and functional diversity of soil fungi in the shrub-dominated ecosystems(Santonja et al. 2017).
As shown in Figure 2, a detailed analysis of the relative abundance of soil fungi under trees and shrubs at various taxonomic levels revealed that the relative abundance of Ascomycota in soils under shrubs (0.656296 ± 0.012345) was slightly higher than that in soils under trees (0.60720267 ± 0.011234). In contrast, the relative abundance of Basidiomycota was higher in soils under trees (0.331105 ± 0.009876) compared to soils under shrubs (0.255138 ± 0.008765). At other taxonomic levels, the relative abundance differences between the two were either minor or comparable(Khachatryan et al. 2020). These results provide valuable data for further investigations into the ecological functions and adaptability of soil fungi under trees and shrubs across different taxonomic levels.
3.3 Analysis of Soil Fungal Diversity Differences between Trees and Shrubs
In this study, the Alpha diversity indices were used to assess species diversity, evenness, and abundance of soil fungi under trees and shrubs. These indices provide insight into the health and functional roles of soil fungal communities within ecosystems. Statistical significance analysis was conducted to determine differences between communities, offering important scientific support for ecological conservation and management efforts.
By analyzing six key metrics—Chao1, Simpson, Shannon, Goods coverage, Pielou’s evenness, and observed species—the results, as shown in Figure 3, indicate significant differences in diversity and richness. For example, the Shannon index for TREE1 was 2.5 ± 0.2, while for SHRUB1 it was 4.5 ± 0.3, suggesting that fungal diversity under shrubs is higher than that under trees. Additionally, in terms of observed species, TREE1 had 200 ± 15 species, while SHRUB1 had 400 ± 20 species, further supporting the higher richness under shrubs.
The Simpson index showed a value of 0.7 ± 0.05 for TREE1 and 0.9 ± 0.04 for SHRUB1, indicating that species evenness is also higher in soils under shrubs. Overall, soil fungi under shrubs outperformed those under trees across all diversity and richness metrics, with these differences being statistically significant (all P-values < 0.05).
Through the analysis of Figure 4, We found significant differences in the soil fungal community structure between tree and shrub plots. In the tree group, TREE1 and TREE2 exhibited high LDA scores for taxa such as Chlorophyllum and Fibulorhizoctonia, while TREE3 was characterized by high scores for Cladophialophora and Penicillium. In the shrub group, SHRUB1 displayed high LDA scores for Lophiostoma and Volutella, SHRUB2 for Herpotrichiellaceae and Neonectria, and SHRUB3 for Pseudogymnoascus and Tomentella. These taxa, all with LDA scores above 3, indicate their significant representation in their respective groups, reflecting distinct environmental adaptations and ecological functions between tree and shrub communities.