Initially, the glucose sample with different concentration are characterized using the canonical model to determine the electric properties of the samples. There are two methodologies for identifying the different solutions with various glucose concentrations levels.
A. First Methodology
The evaluation of various glucose concentrations was performed by simulating a plastic container with a dielectric constant of 2.2, as shown in Fig. 4. The container, cylindrical in shape, was filled with equal amounts of water mixed with varying quantities of glucose to achieve specific concentration levels. It was placed over the proposed sensor, directly above the SRR region, where the electromagnetic field coupling is strongest due to the intense interaction between the magnetic field and the container.
The container has a plastic construction, with an inner diameter of 12 mm, a thickness of 1 mm, and a height of 10 mm. Because the electric and magnetic fields are concentrated within the container, it was positioned over the SRR area to maximize interaction. The electrical properties of different glucose concentrations at 2.45 GHz, based on the Cole-Cole and Debye models, are shown in Table 2.
The reflection coefficient response of the proposed sensor for different glucose concentrations is shown in Fig. 5. Table 3 summarizes the results of the simulated frequency shifts and variations in the magnitude and phase of the reflection coefficient for the proposed sensor when a thin layer of glucose solution is applied in the container.
Table 2: The Electrical Properties of Glucose Levels at 2.45 GHz.
|
Glucose Concentration (mg/dL)
|
\(\:{\varvec{\epsilon\:}}_{\varvec{r}}\)
|
\(\:\varvec{\sigma\:}\)(S/m)
|
0
|
69.8470
|
3.4518
|
100
|
69.8203
|
3.4405
|
150
|
69.8070
|
3.4350
|
350
|
69.7550
|
3.4130
|
B. Second Methodology
The creation of an antenna sensor that could monitor changes in blood glucose concentration from the fingertips is the main goal of this research. To validate the proposed operation, a real human finger is mimicked by a finger phantom model created in a CST environment. Dielectric materials with varied dielectric constants and conductivities are used to simulate the different layers of the finger, including skin, fat, muscle, blood, and bone. The thicknesses of the various layers of the finger phantom together with their respective dielectric constants, which are given in Table 4 based on the Cole-Cole and Debye parameter polynomials.
Variations in a person's blood glucose concentration could be detected when the finger is placed along with the proposed design. Blood and fat are two layers from which glucose levels could be sensed. Nevertheless, fat is preferable because it has higher glucose levels than blood. Differences in shift in the resonance ∆F, phase (degrees), and S11 magnitude, could be attributed to differences in weight or finger size for person under test. The location of the antenna design has the greatest impact on the findings, both in terms of magnitude and phase, as the radiation from the antenna changes with respect to the finger's layers at different points. The buffer's design consists of glass bricks with approximate dimensions 5×2.5 cm2, and thickness equal to 0.1 cm.
To begin examining the effects of the finger, the shape of the human finger is positioned in three different configurations: without a buffer, with a buffer, and rotating the finger's direction relative to the antenna-based sensor. A buffer must be used since the PCB conductivity has an impact on the sensitivity measurement findings when the finger matches with the antenna directly. The human finger placed over the two cell of split ring resonator shaped sensor as shown in Fig. 6. There are two possible configurations along or perpendicular the current pass of the antenna monopole feed line.
The results of both configurations show that there is similar sensor results obtained in reflection coefficient magnitude and phase as shown in Fig. 6 (c) and (d), respectively. This test mean that the effect of human figure ordination is minimal and not it does not affect the blood glucose reading. Figure 7 shows the simulation response of the sensor antenna with human fingertip with different glucose concentration level with different glucose level as 100, 150 and 350 mg/dl. The finger phantom is placed above the radiating element of the proposed sensor, and changes in frequency, S11 magnitude and phase are used to gauge fluctuations in the glucose concentration.
Placing the finger phantom on the radiating element causes a comparable shift in the reflection coefficient's magnitude and phase. As this setup produces a reasonable degree of frequency shift, it is ideal to place the finger phantom close to the top of the radiating element for the purpose of measuring the glucose content. Table 5 shows the unique frequency shifts obtained for various finger phantom positions on the antenna.
Moreover, to guarantee that non-invasive blood glucose monitoring devices are safe, efficient, and comfortable for users as well as to comply with regulatory criteria and optimize device performance simulation and SAR calculation are essential. The body's rate of electromagnetic energy absorption is measured by SAR.
Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) is strictly regulated by organizations such as the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the USA to ensure that electronic devices are safe for human use. Compliance with these limits is essential for devices to receive the necessary approvals. The FCC and ICNIRP set SAR limits at 1.6 W/kg and 2.0 W/kg, averaged over 1 gram and 10 grams of tissue, respectively, with similar regulations in the European Union.
In this study, a finger phantom is placed above the radiating element of the proposed sensor to calculate the absorption power and ensure that the system is safe for human use, as illustrated in Fig. 8. The maximum SAR value is approximately 2.5 W/kg at 6.7 GHz, while the average value over the operating band is around 2 W/kg.
IV. Sensor Measurement Results
The multi band monopole antenna sensor is fabricated as shown in Figure 9 to validate the design results of the MSRRMA sensor. This sensor is fabricated in the Microstrip Dept., of the Electronics Research Institute by using photographic technique to fabricate the printed circuit board (PCB). The MSRRMA sensor is measured on air, then SAR is measured at different resonant frequency and the two technologies are applied as plastic container with different glucose concentration and human fingertip.
A. Sensor Fabrication and Measurement in Air
Printed circuit boards (PCBs) are utilized in the fabrication of the proposed multi-band monopole antenna sensor. To evaluate the design performance, a low-cost FR4 substrate is used in a precise photolithography technique, as shown in Figure 9. The sensor is fabricated in the Microstrip section of the Electronics Research Institute. The reflection coefficient of the proposed sensor is measured in air using the Rohde & Schwarz ZVA 67 Vector Network Analyzer.
There is good agreement between the simulated and measured results; however, some variations are inevitable. Understanding and accounting for these differences can help refine the design and testing processes. The discrepancies may be due to the idealized conditions in simulations compared to real-world factors. Enhancements in soldering techniques, accurate material characterization, manufacturing processes, and regular calibration can significantly reduce the gap between simulated and measured outcomes.
B. SAR Measurement
SAR measurements are essential for ensuring the security of wireless devices since they quantify the exposure to electromagnetic fields. Manufacturers may verify that their devices are safe and reliable in real-world environments by following standard operating procedures and using calibrated equipment, as illustrated in Figure 10 at the Electronics Research Institute, central Lab. The proposed sensor's observed SAR values at 1.5, 3 GHz and 5.2 GHz are displayed in Tables 6. According to Table 6, the SAR values obtained for the suggested sensor at different power levels fall within the accepted safe limits as stated by the IEEE standard, which is 1.6 W/kg. As demonstrated in, the SAR is measured at various resonance frequencies and input powers. The SAR is measured at different resonant frequencies and input power as shown in Table 6.
C. Characterization of Glucose
The glucose concentration was prepared by dissolving the prescribed amounts of glucose in distilled water to yield concentrations of 50 mg/dl, 100 mg/dl, 200 mg/dl, and 350 mg/dl. Then, we entered the various concentrations into a DAK device to measure the properties of the glucose concentration, such as permittivity real value and loss tangent over the operating band as shown in Figure 10.
First, an inverse relationship between the magnitude of the dielectric constant, and the value of glucose level are discovered. When the value of glucose concentration level is large as 350 mg/dl, the real value of the dielectric constant is less than the value of the low glucose level as 0 mg/dl. As well as the variation of the permittivity within the operating band from 3 to 4 GHz and from 5 to 6 GHz are larger than other measured operating bands. Second, on the contrary, the imaginary part of glucose concentration level increased with the value glucose level.
D. Measurements with Glucose
This part contains comparable methodologies to the simulation using the human finger and a container. The container was employed at specific concentration levels during characterization. that a glucometer was used to measure this concentration.
i Measurements with Glucose Solutions with Container
A recommended reflection sensor's performance is measured and given. A dielectric container is attached to the prototype sensor's top in order to release the liquid into the sensing area. A plastic container with a er=2.2 component is placed symmetrically over the sensor region using a Rohde & Schwarz VNA, as seen in Figure11(a). The container's base measures 12.57× 2 × 1 mm3. Using a pipette, various concentrations of glucose (0,100, 150, and 350 mg/dL) are administered; the same amount is used for each concentration. The results of different concentrations of the transmission and reflection coefficients are shown in Figure 11. By analysing the shifts in the frequency, magnitude, and phase of the S-parameter, as shown in Figure 11, The difference between the glucose concentration in the container are determined by measurements the difference of S-parameters, the highest shift in frequency, magnitude and phase at 350 Mg/dL concentration.
ii Measurements with Finger
In the second case, using finger tips in measurements are validated. According to recent research, finger measurements might be a useful technique for determining how various blood levels interact with one another. Its appendages are meant to be used by humans. Approval from an Ethical Perspective NILES-EC-CU 24/1/2, issued on August 2024 has been obtained. The measuring process requires participants (healthy & diabetic participants) to fast for six hours prior to the test. After checking their glucose levels, the participants are re-tested after two hours of eating as a second round of testing. Glucose levels of participants are expected to reach higher values compared to prior status while fasting. Before the test began, the participants washed their hands to remove any contaminants, and they are given around fifteen minutes to relax until their bodies stabilized.
In order to get two normal blood glucose levels one for each of the two male and female cases and one for the diabetic case the glucose concentration is measured using the Nano VNA during fasting and after eating for a total of four cases. the concentration of glucose in the blood is initially measured using glucometer as well as the Nano VNA after calibration as shown in Figure 12. The magnitude and phase of S-parameters are recorded at the four cases and presented in Figure 12. The amount of glucose in the blood is first measured with a glucometer as shown in Table 7.
As shown in Figure 12, after measuring the four distinct cases and comparing the results after and before fasting, we can detect the difference between the measurement made after and before fasting by examining the shift and frequency changes. Next section, will be discussed these differences of results.