The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of ZnO and CuO show definite line broadening of the diffraction peaks, indicating that the green-synthesized particles are in the nanoscale range, as shown in Fig. 1a. The XRD peaks for ZnO are located at 31.81°, 34.49°, 36.25°, 47.59°, 56.58°, 62.84°, 66.36°, 67.92°, and 69.09°, corresponding to the (100), (002), (101), (102), (110), (103), (200), and (112) planes, respectively [17, 30]. The crystalline diffraction peaks have been indexed to the hexagonal phase of ZnO, with a high degree of crystallinity, according to JCPDS card number 36-1451. Similarly, the diffraction peaks for CuO are located at 32.51°, 35.44°, 38.76°, 48.12°, 53.62°, 58.31°, 61.63°, 66.14°, 68.04°, 72.39°, and 75.13°, corresponding to the (110), (002), (111), (202), (020), (127), (113), (022), (220), (222), and (313) planes. These diffraction peaks confirm that the prepared CuO has a monoclinic structure, matching well with JCPDS card number 89-5895[33, 35]. Furthermore, the diffraction peaks revealed that all the characteristic peaks correspond to ZnO and CuO NPs. Additionally, no extra peaks appeared in the ZnO and CuO NPs, indicating that there are no impurities present in the ZnO and CuO NPs. The particle diameters of the ZnO and CuO crystallites were calculated using the Debye-Scherrer formula. Based on Bragg's diffraction angle (θ) and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the more intense ZnO peaks corresponding to the (101) planes located at 36.25°, the crystalline size is 24 nm, while the average crystalline size is around 35.16 nm. Similarly, for the CuO NPs, the most intense peaks correspond to the (002) planes at 35.44°, with a crystalline size of 62.8 nm and an average size of around 68.54 nm. The obtained indexing confirms the standard hexagonal wurtzite structure (JCPDS file no. 00-036-1451) for ZnO NPs and the monoclinic structure (JCPDS card number 89-5895) for CuO NPs, as previously reported in other studies.
Furthermore, the surface functional groups of macadamia nut shell extract (Mac) and Mac-stabilized ZnO and CuO NPs were characterized by FTIR analysis, as shown in Fig. 1b. The broad peak observed at 3350 cm− 1 is attributed to -OH functional groups, indicating the presence of polyphenols, flavonoids, reducing sugars, alkaloids, and tannins in the Mac extract[31]. Additionally, the band at 1628 cm− 1 is attributed to N-H bending in amines (alkaloids) or C = O stretching in polyphenols and flavonoids. These functional groups play a crucial role in the formation of ZnO and CuO NPs. Moreover, a metal-oxygen bond vibration was observed at 598 cm− 1, indicating their participation in the formation of the nanoparticles (Fig. 3b) [36]. Specifically, the metal-oxygen bond vibrations were observed at 605 cm− 1 for Zn-O and 674 cm− 1 for Cu-O, respectively, further confirming the formation of ZnO and CuO NPs.
The surface morphology of the as-prepared ZnO and CuO NPs is shown in Fig. 2a and 3a. Figure 2 shows SEM images of pure ZnO NPs. It was observed that the particles in pure ZnO exhibit a spherical-like shape with diameters in the range of 50 to 72 nm. Similarly, in Fig. 3a, the SEM images of pure CuO NPs show a spherical shape with sizes ranging from 40 to 65 nm [37]. The elemental mapping images of ZnO NPs reveal that Zn, O, C, and N elements exist and are uniformly dispersed in the matrix (Fig. 2b-f). Furthermore, Fig. 3(b-f) shows the elemental mapping analysis of CuO NPs, indicating that Cu, O, C, and N elements are evenly distributed in the matrix. Additionally, the ZnO and CuO NPs were confirmed by elemental dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) analysis, with the corresponding images shown in Fig. 4(a-b), respectively. In Fig. 4a, it is revealed that the prepared ZnO NPs contain 68.25%, 18.17%, 0.6%, and 13.52% of Zn, O, N, and C elements, respectively. Similarly, Fig. 4b shows that the prepared CuO NPs contain 65.46%, 18.66%, 0.11%, and 15.78% of Cu, O, N, and C elements, respectively. These experimental results confirm that the ZnO and CuO NPs were successfully formed.
The size and morphology of the ZnO and CuO nanoparticles (NPs) derived from macadamia extract were analyzed using HRTEM, as shown in Fig. 5a and Fig. 5c, respectively, with the corresponding SAED patterns displayed in Fig. 5b and Fig. 5d. The ZnO nanoparticles in Fig. 5a exhibit an average size of approximately 28.34 nm, as indicated by the scale measurement. The particles appear aggregated but maintain a distinguishable shape, suggesting that the synthesized ZnO NPs possess good crystallinity and nanoscale dimensions. The slight agglomeration is typical of ZnO due to its high surface energy. In contrast, Fig. 5c shows that the CuO NPs have a larger average size of about 78.2 nm. The CuO particles display a distinct spherical morphology with more uniform dispersion compared to the ZnO sample. Additionally, the label "ME" likely refers to the macadamia extract, which helps stabilize the ZnO and CuO NPs. The SAED pattern of ZnO, shown in Fig. 5b, displays distinct diffraction rings, confirming the crystalline nature of the ZnO NPs. The sharp and clear diffraction spots suggest a high degree of crystallinity, consistent with the aggregated nanoparticle structure observed in the TEM image. Similarly, the SAED pattern of CuO (Fig. 5d) reveals well-defined diffraction rings, indicating a polycrystalline structure. The pattern is characteristic of CuO's monoclinic phase, suggesting that the synthesized CuO particles maintain a robust crystal structure.
The diffuse reflectance UV-Vis (DRS UV) spectra presented in the image compare the optical properties of ZnO and CuO, highlighting their distinct absorbance behaviors and band gap energies (Fig. 6a). In Fig. 5a, the ZnO absorbance sharply drops around the UV region, corresponding to a steep cutoff near 370 nm. This suggests that ZnO primarily absorbs UV light while allowing visible light to pass through, making it an efficient UV-blocking material. The corresponding Tauc plot (Fig. 6b) indicates a direct optical band gap of approximately 2.72 eV for ZnO, which is consistent with previous literature for bulk ZnO, typically in the 3.2 eV range [38]. This slightly lower value may suggest some degree of defect states or a slight reduction in crystallinity. Additionally, in Fig. 6c, shows the absorbance spectrum of CuO, exhibits broader absorbance extending into the visible region, which is characteristic of materials with narrower band gaps. The CuO NPs shows a more significant absorption over a broader wavelength range, including both UV and visible regions. The Tauc plot analysis for CuO reveals an optical band gap of 1.32 eV, which aligns with the known semiconductor properties of CuO (Fig. 6c). This lower band gap compared to ZnO indicates that CuO can absorb lower-energy visible light, making it suitable for applications like solar energy harvesting and photocatalysis in the visible spectrum.
The photocatalytic activities of ZnO NPs and CuO NPs were evaluated for the degradation of tetracycline (TC) under visible light, with the corresponding results illustrated in Fig. 7a. The UV-Vis absorption spectrum of methylene blue (MB) displayed a strong peak at 663 nm. Upon exposure to visible light in the presence of the catalysts, the absorbance of the MB solution decreased progressively over time, indicating successful photodegradation. When comparing the photocatalytic performances of ZnO and CuO NPs, ZnO NPs demonstrated superior efficiency, attributed to its higher electron mobility, better stability, and lower charge carrier recombination rates (Fig. 7b). The rate constants (k) derived from the linear fits of ln(Ct/C0) vs. time (Fig. 7c) were 0.0311 min⁻¹ for ZnO NPs and 0.0162 min⁻¹ for CuO NPs, respectively [39]. As shown in Fig. 7d, the photocatalytic degradation efficiencies of ZnO NPs and CuO NPs were 98.13% and 74.23%, respectively. The photocatalytic efficiency of the ZnO NPs shows better catalytic activity than that of CuO NPs. As indicated by the TEM results, the smaller size of ZnO NPs compared to CuO NPs contributes to the enhanced photocatalytic performance.
To better understand the active radicals involved in the photodegradation process, benzoquinone (BQ), isopropanol (IPA), and ammonium oxalate (AO) were introduced into the system as radical scavengers (Fig. 8a). These scavengers were employed to specifically target ˙O₂⁻, ˙OH, and h⁺ radicals, respectively. Following the addition of BQ, IPA, and AO, the degradation efficiency of MB by ZnO decreased to 20.3%, 67.4%, and 86.8%, respectively. This indicates that the ˙O₂⁻ radical is the primary active species in the photodegradation process, while ˙OH and h⁺ species play secondary, yet significant, roles.
Additionally, the stability, activity, and reusability of the photocatalyst are crucial factors for its potential in industrial applications, such as in the dyeing industry, ceramic antioxidants, and natural-origin antioxidants, among others. For the recycling experiments, the photocatalyst was subjected to five consecutive cycles under the same conditions. Before each cycle, the ZnO and CuO particles were washed with deionized water and methanol, then dried for reuse. As shown in Fig. 8b, c, the results indicate that even after multiple uses, the free radical scavenging capacity remained similar. However, a significant decrease in activity was observed for ZnO, with a drop from 97.12–90% and from 74–50% over the cycles. The recycling efficiency results reveal that ZnO NPs exhibit better catalytic and recycling efficiency compared to CuO NPs.
3.1 Antibacterial and antifungal activity
The antibacterial activity of green synthesized ZnO-ME and CuO-ME was evaluated against Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and Escherichia coli (E. coli) using the agar diffusion method, as illustrated in the provided in Fig. 9. From In the tests involving ZnO (Fig. 9a-b), a clear zone of inhibition is visible around the ZnO discs, indicating significant antibacterial activity[40]. In Fig. 9a shows the results for S. aureus, where ZnO exhibits effective inhibition at concentrations of 50 µg/mL, 100 µg/mL, and 250 µg/mL. Similarly, Fig. 9b demonstrates ZnO's antibacterial effects against E. coli, with evident inhibition zones at the same concentrations. The presence of inhibition zones suggests that ZnO effectively disrupts bacterial growth through mechanisms such as the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the release of Zn2+ ions, which damage bacterial cell walls and interfere with vital cellular functions.
Conversely, CuO NPs (Fig. 9c-d) also displays notable antibacterial properties. In Fig. c shows the impact of CuO NPs on S. aureus, with discernible inhibition zones at concentrations of 50 µg/mL, 100 µg/mL, and 250 µg/mL. Figure 9d presents the results for E. coli, revealing similar inhibitory effects. The antibacterial activity of CuO NPs can be attributed to the release of Cu2+ ions and ROS production, which cause oxidative stress, damage cellular structures, and ultimately lead to bacterial cell death. Additionally, the macrostructures of CuO may enhance its interaction with bacterial cells, thereby improving its antibacterial efficacy. Comparatively, both ZnO and CuO NPs demonstrate strong antibacterial activities, with clear inhibition zones indicating effective bacterial suppression. The results underscore the potential application of these materials in antimicrobial coatings, water treatment, and medical devices to prevent bacterial infections and promote hygiene. In summary, the antibacterial activity of ZnO and CuO NPs against S. aureus and E. coli is evident from the significant inhibition zones observed in the agar diffusion assays. These findings highlight the effectiveness of ZnO and CuO NPs as potent antibacterial agents, offering promising prospects for various applications requiring antimicrobial properties.
3.2 Antifungal Activity of ZnO NPs (a-b) and CuO NPs (c-d)
ZnO NPs shows significant antifungal activity, as evidenced by the clear zones of inhibition around the discs in the agar plates. In Fig. 10a, displays the results for A. niger, where ZnO NPs effectively inhibits fungal growth at concentrations of 50 µg/mL, 100 µg/mL, and 250 µg/mL. Figure 10b demonstrates similar antifungal effects against C. albicans, with visible inhibition zones at the same concentrations. The antifungal activity of ZnO NPs can be attributed to several mechanisms, including the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which cause oxidative damage to fungal cells, and the release of Zn2+ ions, which disrupt cellular functions and integrity. The macrostructure of ZnO enhances its surface area, providing more active sites for interaction with fungal cells, thereby improving its efficacy.
CuO NPs also exhibits strong antifungal properties. Figure 10c shows the inhibition of A. niger by CuO NPs, with clear zones of inhibition at concentrations of 50 µg/mL, 100 µg/mL, and 250 µg/mL. Similarly, Fig. 10d presents the results for C. albicans, indicating effective fungal suppression at the same concentrations. The antifungal activity of CuO NPs is primarily due to the release of Cu2+ ions, which penetrate the fungal cell membranes, causing structural damage and interfering with enzymatic processes. Additionally, the generation of ROS by CuO NPs induces oxidative stress, leading to cell death. The macrostructure of CuO provides a larger surface area for interaction, enhancing its antifungal performance. The efficiency of the both ZnO and CuO NPs demonstrate substantial antifungal activities, as indicated by the inhibition zones. The size of these zones suggests the materials are effective at relatively low concentrations. While both materials rely on ion release and ROS generation, their structural differences and elemental compositions might influence their specific interactions with fungal cells.