1. Colon cancer cell lines and clinical samples
The human colon cancer cell line LoVo and the 293T cell line were obtained from authenticated sources; LoVo from the Fudan University Cell Bank, and 293T from the Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% penicillin-streptomycin, and maintained in a humidified incubator at 37°C with 5% CO2. Clinical samples were collected from colorectal cancer patients following pathological confirmation, under protocols approved by the Ethics Committee of Jiaxing First Hospital (Approval No:2024-KY-377), ensuring compliance with the ethical guidelines outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.
2. RNA extraction and qRT PCR
Total RNA was extracted from clinical specimens using Trizol reagent according to the manufacturer's protocol, followed by measurement of RNA concentration and quality assessment via agarose gel electrophoresis. Reverse transcription was carried out using the ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Kit (Toyobo) to synthesize cDNA from 1 µg of total RNA. Subsequently, RT-qPCR was performed using SYBR Green Master Mix. The primer sequences were as follows: PLOD2-F 5'-TCCAAAAGGCAAACCACAAAG-3', PLOD2-R 5'-AGATAGCGTTTCCCAATGTGC-3'; 18S-F 5'-GGCCCTGTAATTGGAATGAGTC-3', 18S-R 5'-CCAAGATCCAACTACGAGTT-3'. Data were analyzed using the comparative Ct method (∆∆Ct) to determine relative gene expression, normalized to the endogenous control 18S rRNA.
3. Western blotting
Protein was extracted using RIPA lysate containing a mixture of protease and phosphatase inhibitors. Protein quantification was performed using a BCA protein quantification kit. Gel electrophoresis was carried out with a 10% gel, after which proteins were transferred onto a PVDF membrane and blocked with a quick-blocking solution for 20 minutes. Primary antibodies (β-Actin 1:50000, mTOR 1:10000, PI3K 1:500, PLOD2 1:2000, p-AKT 1:10000, AKT 1:10000) (Proteintech) were incubated overnight at 4°C. Secondary antibodies (HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse and anti-rabbit 1:50,000) (Affinity Biosciences) were incubated at room temperature for 1 hour, followed by development with ECL luminescent reagent.
4. Cell transfection
After 293T cells were prepared, lentiviral liquid containing PLOD2 knockout gene, purinomycin resistance gene and luciferase gene was prepared using lipofectamine 3000 kit. Colon cancer cell line LoVo was selected and added with chronic disease venom. After 8h, puromycin was screened by 2µL/ml (Sigma, USA). The transfection efficiency was detected by immunofluorescence microscopy and RT-qPCR.
5. Cell biological function
Transwell Invasion Assays: A 3 × 104 cell suspension in serum-free DMEM was added to the upper chamber of each Transwell plate (300 µL/well), and 600 µL of DMEM with 20% FBS was added to the lower chamber. After incubation, cells in the upper chamber were washed, dried, and photographed; Cell Migration Assay: Cells were seeded to near-confluence (about 100%) in a hole plate. A scratch perpendicular to the well's horizontal axis was made using a 100 µL pipette tip. The wound closure rates were observed and photographed under a microscope at 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours after scratching; Cell Proliferation Assay: Cells were plated in 96-well plates with four replicates per condition. CCK-8 reagent was added to each well on days 1, 2, 3, and 4 after 24-hour culturing to assess cell proliferation.
6. Molecular docking
PyMol 2.4 software was used to add hydrogen atoms to LH2 protein (PLOD2) and delete water molecules and redundant ligands. AutoDock Vina 1.1.2 software was used to perform semi-flexible docking between small molecular compounds and PLOD2 to form stable complexes. The docking conformation with the lowest binding energy and the highest clustering frequency is considered to be the most potential binding mode between ligands and proteins. PLIP and Pymol v.2.4 software was used to visualize the docking results.
7. Bioinformatics analysis
Clinical information data and RNA-Seq data were acquired from TCGA database (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/), and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repository (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). The survival difference between the subgroups was tested by the Kaplan–Meier (KM) and log‐rank methods with the functions Survfit and Survdiff in the survival package for R (v 3.1.12). GSEA was performed on RNA measurements for samples using the clusterProfiler package (v4.10.1) with R.
8. statistical analysis
Image J, PLIP and Pymol v.2.4 software was used to process and analyze the images. R4.0.0 software was used for statistical analysis of the data. The quantitative data between the two groups was compared by independent t test, χ2 to compare the correlation between PLOD2 expression and clinicopathologic features of colorectal cancer patients. The statistical data were represented by percentage (%), and P < 0.05 indicated that the difference was statistically significant. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.