The patient and her family gave written informed consent for the use of clinical data and biomaterials in accordance with the guidelines of the ethics committee of The First Affiliated Hospital With Nanjing Medical University.
Clinical characteristics and hormonal profiles
The 35-year-old female (karyotype: 46, XX) patient of nonconsanguineous origin was referred to endocrinologists (M.S. and Z.W.) due to infertility for 8 years and hypertension for 20 years. Table 1 summarized the hormone profiles of the patient. The patient was born at term after a normal pregnancy and delivery with normal female external genitalia. The patient reported an early growth cessation, menstruated irregularly (ranging from 10 to 70 days), and had a history of a natural miscarriage and a vulvar adhesion detachment surgery due to trauma. On physical examination, she presented with signs of virilization, including a deep voice, skin hyperpigmentation, facial hirsutism and breast underdevelopment. A relatively short stature of 157 centimeters and overweight (body mass index 25.15 kg/m2) were also observed. Her blood pressure was high-normal (121/80 mmHg at admission) under the treatment of nifedipine (5 mg/d). The pelvic ultrasound revealed a normal uterus. There were bilateral adrenal adenomas (right: 10 mm × 10 mm; left: 32 mm × 19 mm) on computed tomography imaging. The patient displayed an elevated testosterone (5.56 nmol/L), dehydroepiandrosterone (24.6 µmol/L), 17-hydroxyprogesterone (5.31 ng/mL), and a significantly increased concentration of DOC (11392.3 pg/mL). The aldosterone concentration was below the detection limit (< 20 pg/mL) with a low level of renin (0.05 ng/mL/h). Serum sodium and potassium levels were within the reference range. Decreased adrenal reserve was detected by the adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation test (baseline cortisol was 177.8 nmol/L, and 30 min after adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation, it increased to 189.9 nmol/L; after 60 min, it elevated further to 192.7 nmol/L). In contrast, adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulated a significant increase of 17-hydroxyprogesterone (baseline 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 3.43 ng/mL, which increased to 23.69 ng/mL at 30 min and to 28.9 ng/mL at 60 min). In addition, the patient showed a pituitary microadenoma with an approximately 2-fold increase of prolactin (1077.34 mIU/L). The other adrenal, gonadal and pituitary hormones were within the reference ranges except for a slight decrease of estradiol (70.61 pmol/L). The patient was suspected of CAH specifically 11β-OHD based on the clinical manifestations, imaging and laboratory tests.
Table 1
Summary of hormonal profiles of the patient.
Parameter | Baseline | 1 months after treatment | Reference range |
Aldosterone (pg/mL) | < 20 | NA | 32–395 |
Renin (ng/mL/h) | 0.05 | NA | 0.93–6.5 |
Serum K+ (mmol/L) | 4.09 | 4.66 | 3.5–5.5 |
Serum Na+ (mmol/L) | 138.6 | 137.1 | 137–147 |
ACTH 0:00 am (pg/mL) | 40.23 | NA | 7.2–63.3 |
Cortisol 0:00 am (nmol/L) | 184.2 | NA | 170–440 |
ACTH 8:00 am (pg/mL) | 48.2 | 123.3 | 7.2–63.3 |
Cortisol 8:00 am (nmol/L) | 205.7 | 251.2 | 170–440 |
ACTH 4:00 pm (pg/mL) | 30.62 | NA | 7.2–63.3 |
Cortisol 4:00 pm (nmol/L) | 108.9 | NA | 170–440 |
Testosterone (nmol/L) | 5.56 | 1.99 | 0.35–2.6 |
Progesterone (nmol/L) | 2 | 2.03 | 0.64–3.81 (follicular phase) |
17-hydroxyprogesterone (ng/mL) | 5.31 | NA | 0.07–1.53 |
DOC (pg/mL) | 11392.3 | NA | ≤ 180 (follicular phase) |
Estradiol (pmol/L) | 70.61 | 4412 | 99.1-447.7 (follicular phase) |
DHEA (µmol/L) | 24.6 | 3.5 | 0.2–10.6 |
Prolactin (mIU/L) | 1077.34 | 179.15 | 70.8-566.4 (follicular phase) |
ACTH, adrenocorticotropic hormone; DHEA, dehydroepiandrosterone; DOC, 11-deoxycorticosterone; Na+, sodium; NA, not available; K+, potassium. |
Molecular genetic analysis
In order to confirm the diagnosis of CAH, a panel of candidate genes related to adrenal hyperplasia (n = 276, listed in Table 2) by targeted exome next-generation sequencing was performed. Genomic DNA was extracted from the peripheral blood leukocytes using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen). The extracted DNA was segmented and amplified by PCR. The amplification product was purified twice with magnetic beads (Beckman) and captured by a customized panel probe (Illumina). The exon, intron-exon boundaries, and the 5’ and 3′ flanking regions of the panel genes were sequenced by NextSeq500 sequencer (Illumina). Raw data was aligned to the reference human genome hg19/ GRCh38 using the Burrows-Wheeler Aligner, and annotated using the method reported by Zhang [12]. All variants were classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) 2015 classification [13]: pathogenic, likely pathogenic, uncertain significance, likely benign and benign. Sanger sequencing (Biosune) was performed in suspected variations. The sequencing results were analyzed using DNASTAR software (Madison).
Table 2
The panel of candidate genes related to adrenal hyperplasia.
A2ML1 | AAAS | AARS2 | ABCD1 | AIP | AIRE | AKRIC2 | AKR1C4 |
AMH | AMHR2 | ANOS1 | APC | AQP2 | AR | ARL6 | ARMC5 |
ARNT2 | ARX | ATRX | AURKC | AVP | AVPR2 | BBS1 | BBS10 |
BBS12 | BBS2 | BBS4 | BBS5 | BBS7 | BBS9 | BMP15 | BMP4 |
BMPRIB | BRAF | BSND | BTK | CASR | CATSPER1 | CBX2 | CCDC28B |
CD96 | CDKNIB | CDKNIC | CDON | CEP19 | CEP290 | CFTR | CHD7 |
CHEK2 | CHRM3 | CLCNKA | CLCNKB | CLPP | CYB5A | CYP11A1 | CYP11B1 |
CYP11B2 | CYP17A1 | CYP19A1 | CYP21A2 | DAZL | DCAF17 | DHCR7 | DHH |
DIAPH2 | DISP1 | DMRT1 | DPY19L2 | DUSP6 | ERCC6 | ERCC8 | ESR1 |
FEZF1 | FGD1 | FGF17 | FGF8 | FGFR1 | FGFR2 | FIGLA | FLRT3 |
FMR1 | FOXL2 | FSHB | FSHR | GATA4 | GDNF | GH1 | GH2 |
GHR | GHRH | GHRHR | GHSR | GK | GK2 | GLCCI1 | GLI2 |
GLI3 | GNAI2 | GNAS | GNRH1 | GOPC | GPR101 | GNRHR | H19 |
H6PD | HARS2 | HCCS | HDAC8 | HESX1 | HFE | HFM1 | HGF |
HOXA13 | HS6ST1 | HSD11B1 | HSD11B2 | HSD17B3 | HSD17B4 | HSD3B2 | IARS2 |
ICK | IGSF1 | IL17RD | INSL3 | INSR | IRF6 | KCNJ1 | KCNJ5 |
KCNQ1OT1 | KDM6A | KIF1B | KISSI | KISSIR | KLHL10 | KMT2D | KRAS |
LARS2 | LEPR | LHB | LHCGR | LHX3 | LHX4 | LZTFL1 | MAMLD1 |
MAP2K1 | MAP2K2 | MAP3K1 | MAX | MC2R | MCM4 | MCM9 | MED12 |
MENI | MID1 | MKKS | MKRN3 | MKS1 | MRAP | MYH8 | NAA10 |
NANOS1 | NF1 | NFKB2 | NNT | NOBOX | NROB1 | NR3C1 | NR5A1 |
NRAS | NSDHL | NSMF | ORC1 | OTX2 | PAX6 | PCNT | PCSK1 |
PDE11A | PDE8B | PEX1 | PEX10 | PEX12 | PEX13 | PEX14 | PEX19 |
PEX2 | PEX26 | PEX3 | PEX5 | PEX6 | PHF6 | PLAU | POF1B |
POLR3A | POLR3B | POMC | POR | POU1F1 | PRKACA | PRKAR1A | PRKCA |
PROK2 | PROKR2 | PROP1 | PSMC3IP | PTCH1 | PTPN11 | RAB23 | RAB3GAP2 |
RAFl | RASA2 | RBM28 | REN | RET | RIPK4 | RIT1 | RNF216 |
ROR2 | RSPO1 | RXFP2 | RXRA | RXRB | SDCCAG8 | SDHB | SDHC |
SDHD | SEMA3A | SEMA3E | SHH | SHOC2 | SIX3 | SLC12A1 | SLC26A8 |
SOS1 | SOX10 | SOX2 | SOX3 | SOX9 | SPATA16 | SPRY4 | SRD5A2 |
SRY | STAG3 | STAR | STAT5B | SYCP3 | TAC3 | TACR3 | TAF4B |
TBX19 | TGIF1 | THRA | THRB | TMEM127 | TMEM67 | TP53 | TRH |
TRHR | TRIM3 | TSPYL1 | TTC8 | TWNK | TXNRD2 | USP9Y | UTY |
VHL | WDPCP | WDR11 | WNK1 | WNK4 | WNT3 | WNT3 | WNT5A |
WT1 | ZFPM2 | ZIC2 | ZMYND15 | | | | |
The targeted exome next-generation sequencing confirmed that the patient carried a compound heterozygous mutation in CYP11B1 (NM_000497): c.946G > A (p.V316M) and c.784_792del (p.C262_F264del). Sanger sequencing analysis of CYP11B1 exon 4 and 5 in the patient’s parents revealed the paternal origin of the mutation c.946G > A (p.V316M) and the maternal origin of the mutation c.784_792del (p.C262_F264del) (Fig. 1A and 1B). The CYP11B1 V316M has been previously reported in a patient with 11β-OHD without functional validation [14], while CYP11B1 C262_F264del was a novel mutant to the best of our knowledge. Unexpectedly, the patient also carried a heterozygous POR (NM_001395413) c.1609G > A (p.G537S) mutation that has been reported in a patient with cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase deficiency but was classified as uncertain significance according to ACMG [15]. Her additional heterozygous POR mutation was unlikely to be responsible for the cause of CAH due to its autosomal recessive transmission trait.
According to the ACMG classification, both CYP11B1 variants (V316M and C262_F264del) were classified as uncertain significance. We further performed homology alignment and pathogenicity-prediction algorithms to understand if the detected CYP11B1 mutations can cause changes in enzyme structure. Homology alignments indicated that CYP11B1 V316 and C262_F264 residues were highly conserved among different species (Fig. 1C). Pathogenicity-prediction algorithms by SIFT (http://sift.jcvi.org/) and PolyPhen-2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2) both predicted a pathogenic effect of the CYP11B1 V316M mutation. The impact of CYP11B1 C262_F264del mutation using the same pathogenicity-prediction algorithms was unknown, while this non-frameshift mutation was very likely to cause functional change due to the deletion of an amino acid and the shortening of the protein.
Fertility treatment
After 11β-OHD diagnosis was confirmed, the patient was prescribed hydrocortisone (20–30 mg/d) and labetalol (100 mg/d), as well as hormone replacement therapy composed of estradiol and progesterone. Bromocriptine (2.5 mg/d) was also given due to the high level of prolactin. At one month after the treatment, the patient’s testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone and prolactin fell to normal ranges (1.99 nmol/L, 3.5 µmol/L, and 179.15 mIU/L, respectively) (Table 1). Blood pressure was controlled under 140/90 mmHg.
Before in vitro fertilization management, the patient was referred to preconception genetic counseling (W.W.) that recommended a genetic analysis on her husband. It showed that her husband unexpectedly harbored a previously reported heterozygous POR c.551T > C (p.M184T) mutation [16] that was classified as uncertain significance according to ACMG. Considering the couple both presented with a heterozygous POR mutation with uncertain pathogenic effect, preimplantation genetic testing was not suggested and a regular in vitro fertilization was performed (W.W.). Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol was used for ovarian stimulation. A total of 11 oocytes were retrieved. After fertilization and culture, we obtained 4 blastocyst stage (D5) embryos. All embryos were frozen because of the high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. The patient underwent hormone replacement therapy for frozen-thawed embryo. Clinical pregnancy was diagnosed 14 days after embryo transfer with positive human chorionic gonadotropin level and confirmed 3 weeks later by transvaginal ultrasonography. She received routine follow-up management in Department of Obstetrics and Department of Obstetrics Endocrinology after pregnancy. Hydrocortisone was maintained during the whole treatment phase.
Functional validation
We further performed functional validation of the detected CYP11B1 mutations. A detailed description of materials and methods is available in the Data Supplement. The cDNA encoding human wild-type CYP11B1 or CYP11B1 mutants (V316M, C262_F264del and V316M; C262_F264del) was prepared by CloneEZ Seamless cloning in the pcDNA3.1+-3*Flag plasmid (Public Protein/Plasmid Library). Human adrenocortical cell (HAC15, ATCC CRL-3301, RRID:CVCL_S898) transfection was performed as previously described [17]. HAC15 cells were cultured with starvation medium (DMEM [Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium]-F12 [1:1] supplemented with 0.1% calf serum) at 72 hours after transfection for another 24 hours. Cells and supernatant were then harvested for transcriptional analysis and steroid measurement, respectively. Steroid DOC and corticosterone were measured by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. The CYP11B1 activity of the mutants was expressed as a percentage of substrate conversion in nanogram per deciliter of fold change of gene expression, defining CYP11B1 wild-type activity as 100%.
Transient transfection induced a high expression of CYP11B1 in HAC15 cells expressing wild-type CYP11B1 (570-fold change), CYP11B1 V316M (916-fold change), CYP11B1 C262_F264del (261-fold change) or CYP11B1 V316M; C262_F264del (676-fold change) compared with cells transfected with empty vector (Fig. 2A). All mutations caused a residual activity of 7%-16% of CYP11B1 wild-type activity (V316M: 11.5% ± 2.4% (mean ± SD); C262_F264del: 7.8% ± 2.9%; V316M; C262_F264del: 16.5% ± 0.6%), quantified by measuring the conversion of DOC to corticosterone (Fig. 2B).
Literature search
We searched the PubMed database using terms for medical subject headings and/or text words associated with 11β-OHD and pregnancy. A summary of patients with genetically confirmed 11β-OHD with successful pregnancy was shown in Table 3 [14, 18–22]. It appeared that the 11β-OHD case we presented here was the first to achieve successful conception by in vitro fertilization and frozen-thawed embryo transfer.
Table 3
Summary of pregnant cases in 46,XX female with genetically confirmed 11β-OHD.
Number of cases | Country | Mutation | Clinical manifestation | Fertility therapy | Fertility outcome | Reference |
1 | Australia | DS + 2; p. G444D | Ambiguous genitalia, hypertensive, insulin resistance | Dexamethasone 0.75 to 2 mg/day, clomiphene 50 mg from day 5 to 10 of each menstrual cycle | Gestational hypertension with normal outcome | Simm PJ et al [18] |
2 | German | Homo p. P159L | Premature pubarche; regular periods | Prednisolone (unknown dose) | 4 uncomplicated pregnancies with normal outcomes | Parajes S et al [19] |
3 | Italy | p. R143W; p. A306V | Facial acne | Prednisolone (unknown dose) | 1 uncomplicated pregnancy with normal outcome | Menabo S et al [20] |
4 | South East Asian origin | Homo p. R143W | Secondary amenorrhoea, hirsutism | Prednisolone, cyproterone acetate (unknown dose) | 4 uncomplicated pregnancies with normal outcomes and 1 miscarriage | Mooij CF et al [21] |
5 | Bulgaria | p. V316M; p. D480Tfs*2 | Normal female external genitalia, primary infertility, hirsutism, severe hypertension | Dexamethasone (unknown dose) | 1 uncomplicated pregnancy with normal outcome | Zacharieva S et al [14] |
6 | Brasilia | Homo c.799G > A | Precocious pubarche, genital ambiguity, hypertension | NA | 3 uncomplicated pregnancies with normal outcomes | Valadares LP et al [22] |
Homo, homozygous; NA, not available. |