This study examined the z-axis stability of the one-piece IOLs DIB00V and XY-1 and the three-piece IOL NX70s under air or SF6 gas tamponade. In phacovitrectomy, three-piece IOLs and large-diameter IOLs are generally preferred due to their intracapsular stability and better fundus visibility through the IOL[13, 14]. However, in recent years, the insertion of premium IOLs has been attempted in cases of epiretinal membrane[15, 16]. Given the importance of refractive correction in phacovitrectomy, there is a growing need for one-piece IOLs.
Previous studies have shown that when IOL optics were pushed in the z-axis from the posterior side, the stability of NS60YG (NIDEK Co., LTD, Japan), YP2.2 (KOWA Co., LTD, Japan), and ZCB00V (Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc., USA ) was higher than that of SN60WF (Alcon Laboratories Inc, USA ), XY-1, 255 (HOYA Surgical Optics Co., Japan ), XY-1, and 255[12]. Additionally, NS60YG demonstrated superior stability compared to X70 (Santen Pharmaceutical Co., LTD, Japan ), a large aperture three-piece lens[11]. In our clinical study, DIB00V exhibited greater ACD and IOL position values at 100% gas or air than XY-1. From the results of the validation experiments, DIB00V was more resistant to IOL displacement forces than XY-1 and NX70s.
DIB00V has the same lens design as ZCB00V (TECNIS series, Johnson & Johnson), which has been reported to be more stable than XY-1 against pressure loading from behind the IOL (in the z-axis direction) in an experimental system[12], as in this study. This indicates that the TECNIS series lens design has excellent z-axial stability.
For the one-piece lenses, the IOL position progressively shifted backward, and the IOL position value increased as the pressure load decreased due to the decrease in gas or air; however, the NX70s group showed no significant change from 50–0%. The ACD at 0% in the NX70s was significantly smaller than that of the DIB00V. The value of the IOL position was previously reported as approximately 0.35–0.36 for cataract surgery alone[8]. In our study, the IOL position for DIB00V at 0% was 0.35, indicating that, even with phacovitrectomy with tamponade, DIB00V returned the IOL to the same position with cataract surgery alone once the tamponade material disappeared. Conversely, for the NX70s, the IOL positions were more anterior than those reported for cataract surgery alone, with no change in ACD or IOL positions from 50–0%. Validation experiments showed that 48 h of loading caused IOL deformation, particularly in the NX70s, which showed the greatest deformation.
It is suggested that in the NX70s group, loading from backward by the air or gas in the z-axis direction caused IOL deformation, resulting in the IOL position remaining fixed anteriorly after the tamponade material disappeared. Although there were no significant differences in refractive error among the three groups, the median values showed a shift toward hyperopia in DIB00V and myopia for NX70s, suggesting an effect of the IOL position. However, this study could not identify the factors influencing the reversibility of the lens position. The stability of IOLs depends on the haptic junction area[12], number of haptics, and shape[17]. The shape and material of the haptics may also influence IOL reversibility.
This study has several limitations, including a small sample size, multiple surgeons, and the use of two tamponade materials. However, in our study, continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis provided complete coverage of the IOL optics in all surgeries, and the ratio of air to SF6 gas did not significantly differ among the three groups. The degree of peripheral vitreous shaving likely varies depending on the underlying disease. Careful vitreous dissection may have been performed, particularly in cases where NX70s were selected. When the most peripheral vitreous is shaved, the IOL should be shifted posteriorly due to the vulnerability of the ligament of Zinn[18]. This study showed that the NX70s group was more anteriorly positioned than other IOL groups. Therefore, even if the NX70s group included more eyes with careful vitreous shaving, the ACD depth may have been underestimated; however, this would have had minimal impact on the study’s results.
The clinical data in this study were obtained approximately 30 days postoperatively. The experimental data also evaluated lens shape recovery after 48 h and immediately after the release of compression. Therefore, long-term changes in IOL shape after the loss of air or gas could not be assessed. Additionally, postoperative positioning and resting periods may differ depending on the causative disease, and the degree of backward pressure on the IOL may differ depending on the postoperative positioning. However, this effect was not considered in the present study. Future studies are needed which unify gas types and postoperative positional restrictions.