NONO directs PKM2-mediated H3T11ph to promote triple-negative breast cancer metastasis by activating SERPINE1 expression

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-5280141/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

NONO directs PKM2-mediated H3T11ph to promote triple-negative breast cancer metastasis by activating SERPINE1 expression

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5280141/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background

Emerging evidence has revealed that PKM2 has oncogenic functions independent of its canonical pyruvate kinase activity, serving as a protein kinase that regulates gene expression. However, the mechanism by which PKM2, as a histone kinase, regulates the transcription of genes involved in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) metastasis remains poorly understood.

Methods

We integrated cellular analysis, including cell viability, proliferation, colony formation, and migration assays; biochemical assays, including protein interaction studies and ChIP; clinical sample analysis; RNA-Seq and CUT&Tag data; and xenograft or mammary-specific gene knockout mouse models, to investigate the epigenetic modulation of TNBC metastasis via NONO-dependent interactions with nuclear PKM2.

Results

We report that the transcription factor NONO directly interacts with nuclear PKM2 and directs PKM2-mediated phosphorylation of histone H3 at threonine 11 (H3T11ph) to promote TNBC metastasis. We show that H3T11ph cooperates with TIP60-mediated acetylation of histone H3 at lysine 27 (H3K27ac) to activate SERPINE1 expression and to increase the proliferative, migratory, and invasive abilities of TNBC cells in a NONO-dependent manner. Conditional mammary loss of NONO or PKM2 markedly suppressed SERPINE1 expression and attenuated the malignant progression of spontaneous mammary tumors in mice. Importantly, elevated expression of NONO or PKM2 in TNBC patients is positively correlated with SERPINE1 expression, enhanced invasiveness, and poor clinical outcomes.

Conclusion

These findings revealed that the NONO-dependent interaction with nuclear PKM2 is key for the epigenetic modulation of TNBC metastasis, suggesting a novel intervention strategy for treating TNBC.

Transcription

Epigenomics

H3T11ph

NONO

PKM2

Triple-negative breast cancer

Metastasis

The latest international cancer survey report shows that there are approximately 20 million new cancer cases and 9.7 million cancer deaths worldwide in the year 2022, among which breast cancer ranks second for approximately 2.3 million new cases and fourth for approximately 0.67 million deaths [1]. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a type of breast cancer that lacks the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and has high malignancy, easy metastasis, and poor prognosis [2]. Currently, owing to the lack of specific and effective therapeutic targets, treatments for TNBC are limited, resulting in a shorter survival time for patients with TNBC. The mortality rate within five years of diagnosis for TNBC is as high as 40%, seriously threatening the physical and mental health of women [3]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to explore the pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies of TNBC.

Transcriptional dysregulation has been recognized as a hallmark of cancer, where abnormal gene expression leads to tumor initiation and malignant progression [4, 5]. The aberrant interplay between transcription factors and epigenetic regulators is key to cancer pathogenesis [6]. The multifunctional nuclear protein NONO (also known as P54nrb) was initially defined as a non-POU domain-containing octamer-binding protein belonging to the Drosophila behavior/human splicing (DBHS) family [7, 8]. The protein structure of NONO contains RNA and DNA-binding domains, allowing it to participate in important biological processes such as precursor mRNA splicing, transcriptional regulation, nuclear retention of defective RNA, and DNA damage repair [9]. Our recent study revealed that the interaction between the transcription factors NONO and SOX6 synergistically silences γ-globin gene transcription in human erythroid cells [10]. The C-terminus of NONO has a nuclear localization sequence that assists in its distribution mainly in the nucleus and serves as an important component of paraspeckles [11]. However, NONO rarely functions alone and often interacts with other effector proteins to exert its biological effects [12].

In fact, as a binding protein of the TNBC subtype-specific and highly expressed membrane spike protein Moesin (MSN), NONO plays an important role in guiding the localization of MSN to nuclei and subsequent CREB phosphorylation activation to regulate TNBC progression [13]. Additionally, NONO can bind to EGFR in the nucleus to increase its stability and recruit CBP/P300 to enhance the transcriptional activity of EGFR, thereby enhancing nuclear EGFR-mediated tumorigenesis of TNBC [14]. NONO can also bind to IGFBP3 to activate PARP-dependent DNA damage repair, thereby increasing TNBC chemotherapy tolerance [15]. These studies clearly indicate that NONO is crucial for the development of TNBC. However, little is known about whether and how NONO, as a transcription factor, promotes malignant progression or metastasis of TNBC.

Pyruvate kinase (PK), a rate-limiting enzyme in glycolysis, catalyzes the transfer of a phosphate group from phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) to yield pyruvate and ATP [16]. In the mammalian genome, the PKM1 and PKM2 isoforms are alternatively spliced products of the PKM gene by mutually exclusive use of exon 9 or exon 10, respectively. PKM1 is distributed in many normal differentiated tissues, whereas PKM2 is mainly expressed in most proliferating cells, including fetal and cancerous cells [17, 18]. PKM2 has been characterized as a unique biomarker in cancer and has been shown to promote cancer cell proliferation and metastasis by driving the Warburg effect. However, its role in tumorigenesis in different cancers is controversial [17, 18]. Importantly, in addition to its canonical metabolic enzyme function, PKM2 can translocate into the nucleus and function as a protein kinase and transcriptional co-activator [19, 20]. PKM2 phosphorylates histone H3 at threonine 11 (H3T11ph), which is implicated in transcriptional activation [21]. However, the molecular mechanisms by which PKM2 is recruited to participate in gene transcriptional regulation and is precisely enriched across the genome within the nucleus are poorly understood.

In this study, we found that NONO and PKM2 are important regulatory molecules involved in TNBC metastasis. We showed that NONO can specifically recruit PKM2 to coordinate the phosphorylation of threonine 11 of histone H3 (H3T11ph) and the acetylation of lysine 27 of histone H3 (H3K27ac), activating the transcription of multiple key genes, such as SERPINE1 (serine protease inhibitor family E member 1, encoding the PAI-1 protein) [22, 23], thus promoting the migration and metastasis of TNBC cells. PAI-1 facilitates tumor cell detachment from the matrix and promotes tumor dissemination and metastasis and has been recommended as a promising biomarker for poor prognosis in primary breast cancer patients by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) clinical operation guidelines [22, 23]. Our study revealed that NONO-dependent PKM2 coordinates histone H3 phosphorylation and acetylation to promote gene transcription and metastasis in TNBC cells.

Cell culture

Human embryonic kidney (HEK293T) cells and two human TNBC cell lines (MDA-MB-231 and BT-549) were obtained from Shanghai Institute of Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). MDA-MB-231 and HEK293T cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Gibco), and BT-549 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS (ExCell Bio) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (100 U/ml, 100 µg/ml; Gibco). Cells were maintained at 37°C in a humidified incubator with 5% carbon dioxide. Cells were authenticated by short tandem repeat (STR) profiling and were negative for mycoplasma contamination.

siRNA infection and shRNA lentiviral transduction

The shRNA lentivirus was produced in HEK293T cells by co-transfection with PLKO.1-shRNA, the viral envelope plasmid pMD2. G, and the viral packaging plasmid psPAX2 using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The scrambled (Scr) sequence was used as the negative control. At 48 h after infection, the viral supernatants were harvested and used to infect cells or stored at -80°C. To obtain stable cell lines, the cells were selected using 1 µg/mL puromycin (Yeasen, 60209ES100). The Scr and shRNA sequences used were as follows.

Scr: 5’-CCTAAGGTTAAGTCGCCCTCG-3’

human NONO shRNA-1: 5’-CAGGCGAAGTCTTCATTCATA-3’

human NONO shRNA-2: 5’-TCCAGAGAAGCTGGTTATAAA-3’;

human PKM2 shRNA-1: 5’-CTACCACTTGCAATTATTTGA-3’

human PKM2 shRNA-2: 5’-CCACTTGCAATTATTTGAGGA-3’

Negative control (NC) and specific siRNAs against NONO, PKM2, and TIP60 were synthesized by GenePharma (Suzhou, China). Cells were transiently transfected with 25 nM siRNA using the Lipofectamine 3000 transfection reagent. The siRNA sequences used were as follows:

NC: 5’-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGU-3’

human NONO siRNA-1: 5’-CCUUACAGUUCGAAACCUU-3’;

human NONO siRNA-2: 5’-GGAAGGCACUCAUUGAGAU-3’;

human PKM2 siRNA-1: 5’-CCAUAAUCGUCCUCACCAA-3’

human PKM2 siRNA-2: 5’-GCCAUAAUCGUCCUCACCA-3’;

human TIP60 siRNA-1: 5’-GGACAGCUCUGAUGGAAUA-3’;

human TIP60 siRNA-2: 5’-GAUCGAGUUCAGCUAUGAA-3’;

To overexpress PAI-1, human SERPINE1 cDNA was cloned and inserted into the lentiviral vector pLVX-IRES-mCherry at EcoRI and XbaI sites. Human KAT5 cDNA was cloned and inserted into the pcDNA3.1(+) vector at BamHI and XhoI sites for TIP60 overexpression.

Cell proliferation, migration and invasion assays

For the CCK-8 assay, cells were plated in 96-well plates at a concentration of 1.5 × 10³ cells per well. After the addition of CCK-8 reagent (Vazyme Biotech, A311-01), the cells were incubated for 1.5 h at 37°C, after which absorbance at a wavelength of 450 nm was detected to construct a growth curve.

For the colony formation assay, cells were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 1 × 10³ cells/well and cultured for 10 days. The cloned cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 30 min and stained with 0.1% crystal violet solution for 30 min. Finally, colonies were washed with distilled water, dried, and photographed.

For cell migration assays, 3.5 × 10⁴ cells were seeded on the chamber inserts of the Transwell apparatus (Corning, 3422) in serum-free medium, and medium supplemented with 10% FBS was added to the bottom chamber. After 12 h, the uninvaded cells on the upper surface of the Transwell chamber were removed using a moistened cotton swab. The migrated cells on the lower membrane surface were fixed with 4% PFA for 30 min and stained with a 0.1% crystal violet solution for 30 min. Imaging was performed using a fluorescence microscope at ×100 magnification, and images (six fields per membrane) were acquired using ImageJ software. The invasion assay was performed as described for the migration assay, except that the upper chamber was precoated with 50 µl of Matrigel solution.

Western blot analysis

Total cell proteins were extracted using a cell lysis buffer (Beyotime, P0013) for western blotting and immunoprecipitation. Histone proteins were extracted using a standard protocol for acid extraction of histones from chromatin as previously reported [24]. Proteins were separated using 10% or 15% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The membranes were blocked for 1 h at room temperature in either 5% nonfat milk or BSA (Sigma) and then incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. After incubation with secondary antibodies, the protein bands were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence (Tanon). All the primary antibodies used in this study are listed in Additional file 2: Table S4.

Quantitative real-time PCR analysis (RT‒qPCR)

Total RNA was prepared using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and assessed using a Nanodrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Complementary DNAs (cDNAs) was produced using a HiScript II 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Vazyme Biotech, R212-01). Quantitative real-time PCR analysis was performed using the AceQ qPCR SYBR Green Master Mix (Vazyme Biotech, R121-02) in a StepOnePlus RT‒PCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). GAPDH was used as a loading control. The primers used for qRT-PCR are listed in Additional file 2: Table S5.

BioID2 pull-down and mass spectrometry analysis

BioID2 pull-down experiments were performed as previously described with minor modifications [25]. Briefly, MDA-MB-231 cells transduced with the NONO-BioID2 fusion protein or BioID2-only control were seeded in 10-cm dishes. When the cells reached 80% confluence, the medium was replaced with complete medium containing 50 µM biotin (Sigma, B4501) and the cells were cultured for 16–18 h. The cells were subsequently lysed in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris HCl (pH 7.4), 500 mM NaCl, 0.2% SDS, 1 mM DTT, and 1× protease inhibitors), 0.1 µl of Pierce universal nuclease (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 88701) was added to each sample, and the mixture was incubated for 10 min at room temperature. After sonication and streptavidin affinity purification, the precipitates were washed with a wash buffer (8 M urea in 50 mM Tris, pH 7.4). Finally, the levels of biotinylated proteins were determined by mass spectrometry in collaboration with the BioProfile (Shanghai, China).

GST pull-down assay

The GST pull-down assay was performed as previously described [26]. Briefly, the pGEX-6P-1 plasmid encoding GST, full-length GST-NONO and fragments, full-length GST-PKM2, fragments, and mutants, as well as the pET28a plasmid encoding His-NONO and His-PKM2, were expressed in E. coli BL21 and purified using glutathione S-transferase beads (GenScript, L00206) or nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid beads (GenScript, L00206) according to standard protocols. The His-PKM2 protein was mixed with purified GST, full-length GST-NONO, or fragments for 4 h at 4°C. Similarly, His-NONO proteins were incubated with GST, GST-PKM2 full-length or fragments or mutants at 4°C for 4 h. The beads were washed five times, and the results were analyzed by western blotting.

Immunofluorescence staining

The cells were cultured overnight on glass coverslips, fixed with 4% PFA for 20 min, and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 for 20 min. After blocking with 5% BSA for 30 min, cells were incubated with primary antibodies against NONO (HUABIO, ET7108-81) and PKM2 (Proteintech, 60268-1-lg) overnight at 4°C, followed by incubation with fluorescence-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. The cells were then gently washed with PBS and the nuclei were stained with DAPI for 5 min at room temperature. Images were acquired using a confocal laser scanning microscope (Olympus).

RNA-seq and data analysis

Total RNA was isolated from the NC, NONO-knockdown, and PKM2-knockdown MDA-MB-231 cells. RNA purification, reverse transcription, library construction, and sequencing were performed in collaboration with Majorbio Biotechnology (Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). To identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs), gene expression was calculated as transcripts per million reads (TPM). A fold change > 2.0, and a P value < 0.05 were used as the cutoff values and were considered to indicate significantly differentially expressed genes.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay

ChIP assays were performed using MDA-MB-231 cells in accordance with previously described methods [26]. Normal rabbit IgG (ab172730; Abcam) was used as the control. ChIP DNAs was analyzed by quantitative PCR using Rotor-Gene 6000 (Corbett Research). Primer sequences used for ChIP are listed in Additional file 2: Table S6.

CUT&Tag

CUT&Tag was processed according to a previously reported protocol [27]. This experiment was performed in MDA-MB-231 cells, and antibodies against NONO (Abcam, ab70335), H3T11ph (Active motif, 39151), and H3K27ac (Abcam, ab4729) were used in this study. DNA libraries were sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform (DIATRE Biotechnology, Shanghai, China).

Tissue microarrays and IHC staining

Human TNBC tissue microarrays (no. TNBC1202), and clinicopathological data were obtained from Shanghai Superbiotek (Shanghai, China). IHC staining was performed according to the standard protocol of the Cell Signaling Technology. Tissue slides were incubated with primary antibodies specific for NONO (HUABIO, ET7108-81), PKM2 (Proteintech, 15822-1-AP), PAI-1 (Abcam, ab125687), and Ki-67 (Abcam, ab15580), followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies. The staining of NONO, PKM2, and PAI-1 in human TNBC tissues was independently assessed using a semi-quantitative H-score system by two experienced pathologists blinded to the clinical data [28].

Animal studies

Mice were maintained in a specific pathogen-free (SPF) facility on a 12 h light/dark cycle at a controlled temperature (20–23°C) and humidity (45–65%). The sample size was chosen with adequate power based on the literature and our previous experience [28]. For each experiment, it is indicated in the figure legend. Prior to the experiment, the mice were randomly assigned to different treatment groups. MMTV-PyMT mice on the FVB background were purchased from GemPharmatech (Nanjing, China). For NONO or PKM2 knockdown in MMTV-PyMT (FVB) mice, pAAV-U6-EGFP plasmids were transformed with shRNAs and AAVs were obtained from Syngentech (Beijing, China). AAVs were intraductally injected into the mammary glands of 5-week-old female MMTV-PyMT (FVB) mice as previously described [29]. After 2 weeks, tumor size was determined once a week, and tumor volumes were calculated using the following formula: volume (mm³) = 1/2 × length × width². All mice were euthanized at 12 weeks of age, and tumor and lung samples were collected, weighed, photographed, and stained with H&E. The Scr sequence was used as the negative control. The shRNA sequences used were as follows:

Scr: 5’-CCTAAGGTTAAGTCGCCCTCGC-3’

Mouse NONO shRNA-1: 5’-GCTGCAACAATGGAAGGAATT-3’

Mouse NONO shRNA-2: 5’-ACACGAACCCTAGCGGAAATT-3’

Mouse PKM2 shRNA-1: 5’-CTACCACTTGCAGCTATTCGA-3’

Mouse PKM2 shRNA-1: 5’-CCACTTGCAGCTATTCGAGGA-3’

For xenograft models, 6-week-old female BALB/c nude mice were purchased from GemPharmatech (Nanjing, China). MDA-MB-231 cells were infected individually with Scr, NONO-KD, or NONO-KD + PAI-1 lentivirus to establish stable cell lines. Subsequently, each mouse was injected subcutaneously with 5 × 10⁶ cells (suspended in 100 µl of PBS with 100 µl of Matrigel). Tumor size was measured every 3 days with a caliper, and the average tumor volume reached 100 mm³. After 21 days, all nude mice were sacrificed, and subcutaneous tumors were harvested, weighed, and photographed.

To establish mammary-specific NONO or PKM2 knockout models in spontaneous mammary tumor mice, MMTV-Cre and NONO-floxed mice on a C57BL/6 strain background were obtained from GemPharmatech (Nanjing, China). MMTV-PyMT mice and PKM2-floxed mice on a C57BL/6 background were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (New York, USA). To obtain NONO knockout (MMTV-Cre^+/−::MMTV-PyMT⁺::NONO^fl/fl) female mice, MMTV-Cre^+/−::NONO^fl/fl female mice were crossed with the male MMTV-PyMT⁺::NONO^fl/Y mice. Female littermates (MMTV-Cre^−/−::MMTV-PyMT⁺::NONO^fl/fl) were used as controls. Similarly, to obtain PKM2 knockout (MMTV-Cre^+/−::MMTV-PyMT⁺::PKM2^fl/fl) female mice, MMTV-Cre^+/−::PKM2^fl/fl female mice were crossed with MMTV-PyMT⁺::PKM2^fl/fl male mice. Female littermates (MMTV-Cre^−/−::MMTV-PyMT⁺::PKM2^fl/fl) were used as controls. The overall tumor burden was measured once a week using a digital caliper beginning at week 16, and the mice were humanely euthanized at 24 weeks of age. Mammary tumors were harvested for histology, flash-frozen for protein and RNA isolation, and subjected to IHC staining with the indicated antibodies, whereas the lungs were extracted for H&E staining. A blinding strategy was used whenever possible when assessing outcomes. The sequences of the PCR primers used for genotyping transgenic mice are listed in Additional file 2: Table S7.

Statistical analysis

All data are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated. GraphPad Prism software (version 7.0) was used to assess significant differences between groups. Comparisons between two groups were performed using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. Multiple comparisons were performed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). P < 0.05. One, two, three, and four asterisks indicate P < 0.05, P < 0.01, P < 0.001, and P < 0.0001, respectively.

NONO directly interacts with nuclear PKM2 in TNBC cells

The paraspeckle protein NONO plays a critical role in TNBC, although its direct downstream transcriptional target genes are unknown [13–15]. To identify potential proteins that interact with NONO, we used a proximity-dependent biotinylation identification approach known as BioID2 [25], in which NONO is fused to the N-terminus of the BioID2 vector and transduced into human MDA-MB-231 cells. An empty vector containing only BirA biotin ligase was used as the control. After biotin-streptavidin affinity purification, proteins associated with NONO were analyzed using quantitative mass spectrometry. Among the proteins that were specifically enriched in NONO-BioID2-expressing cells, PKM2 was identified as an NONO-interacting protein in the top 10 list (Fig. 1A, Additional file 2: Table S1). In addition, we found that SFPQ, PSPC1, and MSN [12–14], which are NONO-binding proteins, are also present. To confirm the interaction between NONO and PKM2, we performed co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) experiments and found that NONO interacted with PKM2 in both MDA-MB-231 and BT-549 cells (Fig. 1B and C). Furthermore, immunofluorescence staining revealed that NONO co-localized with PKM2 in the nuclei of MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 1D). These results agree with previous observations that PKM2 is present in the nucleus [20, 21, 30].

Next, we found that NONO directly interacted with PKM2 in the GST pull-down experiments (Fig. 1E). To further characterize the determinants mediating the association between NONO and PKM2, we mapped NONO protein domains using GST pull-down experiments and demonstrated that the NOPS and coiled-coil domains of NONO were sufficient for their interaction (Fig. 1F). Similarly, we demonstrated that the A and C domains of PKM2 were responsible for its interaction with NONO (Fig. 1G), indicating that NONO interacts with PKM2 through multiple domains. Taken together, these data indicate that PKM2 is a novel protein that interacts with NONO in the TNBC cell nuclei.

NONO expression is associated with the prognosis of TNBC patients, and NONO is required for TNBC cell metastasis

To investigate the clinical significance of NONO expression in patients with TNBC, we first analyzed NONO expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using tissue microarrays containing 60 TNBC samples and matched adjacent normal tissues. We observed that NONO expression was significantly upregulated in TNBC tissues compared to that in the adjacent normal tissues (Fig. 2A and B). Notably, NONO expression correlated with tumor size and higher-grade lymph node status in patients with TNBC (Fig. 2C; Additional file 2: Table S2). Importantly, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that TNBC patients with high NONO expression had a shorter overall survival (Fig. 2D). The expression levels of NONO in TNBC tissues were significantly higher than those in non-TNBC tissues (Additional file 1: Fig. S1A). These results indicate that NONO is upregulated in human TNBC tissues and correlates with poor prognosis in patients with TNBC, suggesting that NONO may promote cancer cell invasion during malignant progression.

To determine the effect of NONO on cell growth and invasion, two independent short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) targeting NONO were used to silence NONO expression. The knockdown efficiency of NONO in human MDA-MB-231 and BT-549 TNBC cell lines was determined by western blot analysis (Fig. 2E). CCK-8 and colony formation assays indicated that the proliferation of MDA-MB-231 and BT-549 cells was significantly inhibited upon NONO knockdown compared with that of scrambled control (Scr) cells (Fig. 2F and G). Transwell assays revealed that the migratory and invasive abilities of TNBC cells were significantly lower in the NONO knockdown group than in the Scr group (Fig. 2H). In addition, the well-established MMTV-PyMT (FVB background) transgenic murine model of spontaneous mammary tumors [31] was used to determine whether NONO directly regulated tumorigenesis. Remarkably, adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated NONO depletion in mouse breast tissue was sufficient to attenuate tumor growth (Fig. 2I, J, and K). More importantly, NONO depletion substantially reduced the number of metastatic lung nodules (Fig. 2L and M). These results indicated that NONO is crucial for TNBC growth and metastasis.

PKM2 expression is upregulated in TNBC, and knockdown of PKM2 inhibits TNBC cell metastasis

Similarly, we investigated the clinical significance of PKM2 expression in TNBC patients and found that PKM2 expression was upregulated in human TNBC tissues and correlated with poor prognosis in TNBC patients (Fig. 3A, B, and C; Additional file 1: Fig. S1B and Table S3), which is consistent with previous results [30] and further suggests that PKM2 may promote cancer cell invasion during malignant progression. Furthermore, our in vitro knockdown experiments (Fig. 3D, E, F, and G) and in vivo animal study results (Fig. 3H, I, J, K, and L) indicated that PKM2 is crucial for TNBC growth and metastasis.

SERPINE1 is a key transcriptional target of NONO and PKM2 in TNBC cells

Next, we sought to understand how NONO and PKM2 regulate the migration and invasion of TNBC cells. To identify potential transcriptional targets of the NONO/PKM2 complex, we performed RNA-seq analysis to profile co-regulated target genes. Through integrated analysis of RNA-seq results following NONO and PKM2 knockdown in MDA-MB-231 cells, we found that nearly half of the differentially expressed genes DEGs (451/999) following NONO knockdown were also regulated by PKM2 (Fig. 4A, GSE266177). Further analysis revealed that SERPINE1 (encoding the PAI-1 protein) [22, 23, 32] was the gene whose expression was most downregulated by either NONO or PKM2 knockdown (Fig. 4B, GSE266177). In the top 10 heatmaps, IL11, CCN2, RCN1, VDAC1, CDKN1A (P21), ADAMTSL4, MATN2, FERMT2, and MCAM, which play key roles in cell growth, adhesion, migration, and differentiation [33–40], were significantly downregulated when either NONO or PKM2 was knocked down. Given that PAI-1 facilitates tumor cell detachment from the matrix and promotes tumor dissemination and metastasis, which has been recommended as a promising biomarker for poor prognosis in primary breast cancer patients by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) clinical operation guidelines [22, 23], we selected SERPINE1 as a primary target for further study. We confirmed that NONO knockdown in MDA-MB-231 cells significantly reduced the expression of SERPINE1 at both the transcriptional and protein level (Fig. 4C and D). Subsequently, we examined whether the enforced expression of PAI-1 would compensate for NONO knockdown. We first overexpressed exogenous PAI-1 in NONO-depleted MAD-MB-231 cells (Fig. 4E). We then performed CCK-8, colony formation, and Transwell assays using these cells. We found that the overexpression of PAI-1 significantly rescued the reduced proliferation, migration, and invasion of NONO-depleted cells (Fig. 4F, G, and H). To further support the in vitro results, we performed in vivo analysis using xenograft models in nude mice. We showed that overexpression of PAI-1 significantly reversed the growth defects in NONO-depleted MDA-MB-231 xenograft tumors (Fig. 4I, J, and K).

Similarly, we found that knockdown of PKM2 significantly reduced SERPINE1 transcription in MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 4L and M). The proliferative, migratory, and invasive capabilities of PKM2-depleted MDA-MB-231 cells could be rescued by ectopic expression of PAI-1 (Fig. 4N, O, P, and Q). Consistent experimental results were obtained regarding the roles of NONO and PKM2 in human BT-549 TNBC cells (Additional file 1: Fig. S2A-L).

To further investigate the clinical relevance of PAI-1 expression in patients with TNBC, we examined its expression using IHC on tissue microarrays containing 60 pairs of TNBC samples and their matched adjacent normal tissues. We demonstrated that PAI-1 was notably upregulated in TNBC tissues compared to adjacent normal tissues (Additional file 1: Fig. S2M and N). Importantly, the expression levels of NONO and PAI-1, as well as those of PKM2 and PAI-1, were significantly positively correlated in human TNBC samples according to Pearson correlation analysis (Fig. 4R), further confirming that SERPINE1 is the downstream target gene of NONO/PKM2 in TNBC cells. Collectively, these data suggest that NONO/PKM2 promotes TNBC progression by activating SERPINE1 transcription.

NONO-dependent PKM2 and its nuclear protein kinase activity are critical for SERPINE1 transcription and TNBC progression

Given that NONO and PKM2 positively regulate SERPINE1 transcription in TNBC cells, and that they directly interact in the nucleus, we investigated how they regulate SERPINE1 expression. As expected, enforced the overexpression of PKM2 enhanced SERPINE1 expression. However, this increase in expression was abolished by NONO knockdown (Fig. 5A and B). Next, we examined whether PKM2-mediated H3T11ph modifications at the SERPINE1 promoter were enriched in a NONO-dependent manner. ChIP‒qPCR revealed a significant reduction in H3T11ph enrichment at the SERPINE1 promoter in the NONO knockdown group compared to that in the negative control (NC) group (Fig. 5C). Previous studies have demonstrated that PKM2 exhibits pyruvate kinase or protein kinase activity, which depends on its cytosolic tetramer or nuclear dimer state [19, 41, 42]. To further explore whether the protein kinase of PKM2 is crucial for SERPINE1 transcriptional activation, we utilized two well-established PKM2 mutants, PKM2-Y105F (predominant tetramer form harboring pyruvate kinase activity) [42] and PKM2-R399E (predominant dimer form harboring protein kinase activity) [19] to examine their effects on SERPINE1 expression. We overexpressed PKM2-WT, PKM2-Y105F, or PKM2-R399E in PKM2-depleted MDA-MB-231 cells. We found that the PKM2-Y105F mutant did not activate SERPINE1 expression, whereas the PKM2-R399E mutant had an activating effect on SERPINE1 expression similar to that of PKM2-WT (Fig. 6D and E). These results suggest that the protein kinase activity of PKM2 is key to activating SERPINE1 expression in the nucleus.

To identify the potential key residues of PKM2 responsible for NONO interactions, we used the ZDOCK server (https://zdock.umassmed.edu/) for molecular docking analyses. Molecular docking confirmed good and stable binding of NONO to PKM2 (Additional file 1: Fig. S3A) and revealed seven positions of PKM2 that may play important roles in the interaction between PKM2 and NONO (Additional file 1: Fig. S3B). GST pull-down assays demonstrated that the PKM2-S406A mutant (Ser to Ala at aa 406) significantly reduced this interaction, whereas the interactions of PKM2-R400A, T412A, D476A, D487A, W515A, and R526A mutants with NONO were similar to those of wild-type PKM2 (PKM2-WT, Fig. 5F). To explore the effect of the S406A mutation of PKM2 on TNBC progression, we overexpressed PKM2-WT or the PKM2-S406A mutant in MDA-MB-231 cells. Consistently, the PKM2-S406A mutant immunoprecipitated significantly less NONO in the MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 5G). Notably, the PKM2-S406A mutant exhibited the same subcellular distribution as that of PKM2-WT (Fig. 5H). However, compared with PKM2-WT, PKM2-S406A overexpression in MDA-MB-231 cells failed to activate SERPINE1 expression (Fig. 5I and J). In addition, we found that compared to PKM2-WT, PKM2-S406A overexpression in MDA-MB-231 cells significantly inhibited cell growth, migration, and invasion (Fig. 5K, L, and M). Taken together, these results demonstrated that NONO-dependent PKM2 and its nuclear protein kinase activity are crucial for SERPINE1 expression and TNBC cell invasion.

PKM2-mediated H3T11ph cooperates with TIP60-mediated H3K27ac to promote SERPINE1 expression

A previous study has revealed that PKM2 mediates H3T11ph, which is involved in transcriptional regulation [21]. To explore the effect of PKM2 on other histone modifications, we examined global changes in other key histone H3 modifications upon PKM2 knockdown in MDA-MB-231 cells. As expected, the levels of H3T11ph were markedly decreased upon PKM2 knockdown (Fig. 6A). Interestingly, we found that the levels of H3K27ac, a promoter and enhancer marker [43–45], were markedly lower in PKM2-knockdown cells than in NC cells (Fig. 6A). Additionally, we observed that the levels of the histone markers H3K4me1 and H3K9ac, which have been previously described [21], decreased upon PKM2 knockdown (Fig. 6A). There were no obvious changes in the levels of H3T3ph, H3K4me2/3, H3K4ac, H3K9me3, H3S10ph, H3K14ac, H3K14la, H3R17me2s, H3K18ac, or H3K27me2/3 modifications between PKM2 knockdown cells and NC cells (Fig. 6A). These data suggested that PKM2-mediated H3T11ph cooperates with H3K27ac to regulate gene transcription in TNBC cells.

To understand how NONO, H3T11ph, and H3K27ac collaborate to regulate gene transcription, we performed cleavage under targets and tagmentation (CUT&Tag) experiments in MDA-MB-231 cells to determine the enrichment profiles of NONO, H3T11ph, and H3K27ac in the whole genome. Interestingly, we found that NONO, H3T11ph, and H3K27ac signals were significantly enriched at transcription start sites (TSSs), implying that they may perform transcriptional regulatory functions (Fig. 6B, GSE266179). In addition, H3T11ph and H3K27ac signals were markedly reduced in PKM2-KD cells compared to their respective NC cells (Fig. 6B), which was in good agreement with our western blot analysis results (Fig. 6A). In fact, we found that NONO, H3T11ph, and H3K27ac were co-enriched in the promoter, TSS, and 3’-end regions of SERPINE1 (Fig. 6C). These results were further confirmed by ChIP‒qPCR in MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 6D). Notably, NONO enrichment largely overlapped with H3T11ph peaks genome-wide in MDA-MB-231 cells (Additional file 1: Fig. S4A, GSE266179). Moreover, through bioinformatics analysis, we found that the genome-wide occupancy of NONO and H3T11ph, H3T11ph, and H3K27ac was highly correlated, although there was no significant correlation between NONO and H3K27ac (Additional file 1: Fig. S4B). These results further suggest that PKM2-mediated H3T11ph could be enriched in promoters through NONO recruitment of PKM2, where H3T11ph cooperates with H3K27ac to activate SERPINE1 transcription.

Next, we explored the possible link between H3T11ph and H3K27ac. We searched the RNA-seq data obtained upon PKM2 knockdown (GSE266177) and examined changes in the expression levels of histone acetyltransferases KAT5 (encoding TIP60), KAT3B (encoding PCAF), CREBBP (encoding CBP), and EP300 (encoding P300), which are associated with histone acetylation. We then performed western blot analyses and found that PKM2 knockdown significantly reduced the expression of TIP60 but upregulated P300 expression in MDA-MB-231 cells, whereas the expression of PCAF and CBP remained unchanged compared with that in NC controls (Additional file 1: Fig. S5A). Therefore, we selected KAT5/TIP60 for further study. RT-qPCR assays confirmed that KAT5 mRNA levels significantly decreased following PKM2 knockdown (Additional file 1: Fig. S5B). Similar results were obtained for the BT-549 cells (Additional file 1: Fig. S6A and B). In addition, our CUT&Tag data demonstrated that H3T11ph modifications were enriched in the KAT5 promoter and that H3T11ph enrichment was significantly reduced in the promoter upon PKM2 knockdown (Additional file 1: Fig. S5C). Consistent results were obtained by ChIP‒qPCR in MDA-MB-231 cells (Additional file 1: Fig. S5D). These data indicated that PKM2 directly activates KAT5 transcription.

To determine whether TIP60 regulates SERPINE1 expression, we knocked down KAT5 expression in MDA-MB-231 cells. KAT5 knockdown significantly reduced SERPINE1 expression in MDA-MB-231 cells compared to that in NC control cells (Additional file 1: Fig. S5E and F). As expected, the levels of H3K27ac were markedly reduced following KAT5 knockdown (Additional file 1: Fig. S5F). Importantly, the levels of PAI-1 and H3K27ac in PKM2-depleted MDA-MB-231 cells were partially restored by ectopic TIP60 expression (Additional file 1: Fig. S5G). These results were also observed in BT-549 cells (Additional file 1: Fig. S6C, D and E). In addition, we analyzed the expression profiles extracted from GEO datasets (GSE76275) and found that the expression of PKM2 and KAT5 was positively correlated in human TNBC samples (Additional file 1: Fig. S6F). Taken together, these results suggest that PKM2 can also transcriptionally regulate KAT5 expression and that TIP60-mediated H3K27ac cooperates with PKM2-mediated H3T11ph to activate SERPINE1 expression.

NONO or PKM2 deficiency reduces PAI-1 expression and inhibits the malignant progression of spontaneous mammary tumors in mice

The nuclear protein NONO is highly conserved in humans and mice, and shares 98% amino acid sequence similarity [7, 8]. To further assess the role of NONO in regulating mammary tumor progression in vivo, we constructed a spontaneous mammary tumor mouse line in which NONO was specifically knocked out in the breast tissue (Fig. 7A). Consistent with our previous results, conditional loss of NONO in mammary tissue significantly inhibited tumor growth (Fig. 7B and C; Additional file 1: Fig. S7A). In addition, knockout of NONO markedly reduced the lung metastatic capacity and suppressed the formation of larger metastatic nodules in spontaneous mammary tumor model mice (Fig. 7D). The intratumoral levels of NONO, PAI-1, and Ki67 were analyzed using western blotting and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. Conditional mammary NONO depletion significantly reduced PAI-1 and Ki67 expression (Fig. 7E and F; Additional file 1: Fig. S7B).

We also generated a mouse model of spontaneous breast cancer with mammary-specific PKM2 knockout (Fig. 7G). Similarly, tumor growth and lung metastatic capacity were significantly inhibited by conditional PKM2 knockout in breast tissue (Fig. 7H, I, and J; Additional file 1: Fig. S7C). The intratumoral levels of PKM2, PAI-1, and Ki67 were analyzed using western blotting and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. Conditional mammary PKM2 depletion significantly reduced PAI-1 and Ki67 expression (Fig. 7K and L; Additional file 1: Fig. S7D). Taken together, these in vivo data reinforce the notion that NONO and PKM2 are critical for the malignant progression of breast tumors via SERPINE1 transcriptional activation.

The prognosis of patients with TNBC remains poor because of the lack of specific biomarkers for effective interventions [2, 46]. Therefore, elucidating novel molecular mechanisms and developing effective therapeutic targets for TNBC is highly important. In this study, we found that NONO specifically interacts with nuclear PKM2 to transcriptionally activate SERPINE1 expression and promote TNBC cell metastasis. In addition, we found that PKM2-mediated H3T11ph cooperates with TIP60-mediated H3K27ac to regulate gene transcription in an NONO-dependent manner. These results revealed a novel mechanism by which PKM2, a protein kinase, directly regulates gene transcription and promotes TNBC metastasis.

As a multifunctional nuclear protein, NONO has diverse functions in tumorigenesis, through which it may interact with distinct protein partners [12]. Previous studies have shown that NONO interacts with the Hippo pathway effector TAZ to undergo liquid–liquid phase separation, which promotes TAZ-mediated oncogenic transcription [47]. In addition, a recent study demonstrated that NONO is important for transactivation of EGFR by stabilizing nuclear EGFR expression and recruiting other transcriptional coactivators [14]. However, how the NONO-driven transcriptional program facilitates malignant development of cancer remains unclear. In this study, we found that PKM2 directly interacted with NONO and executed its protein kinase function to facilitate TNBC metastasis. Our data showed that NONO enrichment was strongly correlated with nuclear PKM2-mediated H3T11ph marks along genomic loci, including SERPINE1. Interestingly, we observed that approximately 45% of the NONO-targeting genes were also regulated by PKM2 in TNBC cells. These findings suggested that nuclear PKM2 is important for NONO-mediated gene expression in TNBC cells.

In addition to its glycolytic function, PKM2 has non-metabolic functions that are critical for gene expression. Within the nucleus, PKM2 is a transcriptional coactivator that confers malignant potential to cancer cells through its association with various transcription factors including Oct-4, HIF-1α, β-catenin, and STAT3 [19, 20, 48, 49]. However, the regulatory processes associated with non-metabolic PKM2 involve non-histone phosphorylation (H3T11ph)-mediated transcription of downstream target genes. Intriguingly, upon EGF receptor activation, PKM2 binds histone H3 and phosphorylates histone H3 at T11, resulting in the acetylation of histone H3 at K9 to activate CCND1 and MYC expression in glioblastoma cells [21]. In addition, a recent study reported that PKM2 interacts with the histone methyltransferase EZH2 to regulate the metabolic switch from glycolysis to fatty acid βoxidation in TNBC [30]. However, there was no indication of how PKM2/EZH2 was recruited to the target genes in this study [30]. In contrast, we did not observe any change in H3K27me3 levels upon PKM2 knockdown compared with the NC control in MDA-MB-231 cells in our study. This discrepancy could be due to different cell sources and manipulations. Interestingly, in the current study, we found that PKM2 phosphorylated histone H3 at T11 in a NONO-dependent manner, and this phosphorylation coincided with the acetylation of histone H3 at K27 to activate SERPINE1 expression in TNBC. These results revealed more precise genome-wide enrichment of PKM2-mediated H3T11ph and demonstrated a novel crosslink between histone marks. H3K27ac is an active enhancer mark [43–45]. Thus, our data suggests that PKM2-mediated H3T11ph may also be associated with active enhancers. NONO can bind to enhancer regions in human glioblastoma cells and mouse retina [47, 50]. Therefore, the mechanism by which PKM2-mediated H3T11ph modification is linked to the NONO-mediated regulation of enhancer activity warrants further investigation. Nevertheless, the specific role of PKM2 makes it an attractive therapeutic target in cancer treatment. However, the complexity of PKM2 regulation and signaling has led researchers to face the following dilemma: whether to use PKM2 activators or inhibitors for cancer treatment [17]. The current study provides an alternative intervention strategy for treating TNBC by inhibiting or interfering with the interaction between NONO and PKM2.

PAI-1 is a major member of the serine protease inhibitor (serpin) superfamily and functions as an inhibitor of tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) and urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) [51]. tPA/uPA is mainly involved in the conversion of plasminogen to active plasmin, leading to fibrin clot hydrolysis [51]. Therefore, PAI-1 plays an important role in various vascular disorders such as thrombosis, atherosclerosis, and myocardial infarction [52]. Interestingly, accumulating evidence has demonstrated that PAI-1 plays a pro-tumorigenic role in cancer, although it was originally hypothesized to have antitumor effects [53]. Owing to the strong correlation between PAI-1 levels and prognosis in patients with breast cancer, PAI-1 has been recommended as a biomarker for therapeutic decisions in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer [54]. Several studies have shown that PAI-1 is critical for TNBC cell growth and metastasis [32, 55, 56]. In the present study, we demonstrated that NONO can recruit nuclear PKM2, which triggers the phosphorylation of histone H3 at T11 to directly activate SERPINE1 expression and mediate cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in TNBC cells. More importantly, NONO and PKM2 expression strongly correlated with the expression of PAI-1 in TNBC tissues. These findings identified a novel transcriptional regulatory pathway for SERPINE1 expression and support the function of the NONO-PKM2 interaction in the malignant progression of TNBC.

Taken together, our findings demonstrate that NONO interacts with nuclear PKM2 and directs histone H3 phosphorylation to promote tumor metastasis, highlighting the potential of disrupting the association between NONO and PKM2 for the targeted therapy of malignant TNBC.

NONO

Non-POU domain-containing octamer-binding protein

PKM2

Pyruvate kinase isozyme type M2

H3T11ph

Phosphorylation of histone H3 at threonine 11

H3K27ac

Acetylation of histone H3 at lysine 27

SERPINE1

Serine protease inhibitor family E member 1

PAI-1

Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor 1

TNBC

Triple-negative breast cancer

ChIP

Chromatin immunoprecipitation

CUT&Tag

Cleavage under targets and tagmentation

TSS

transcription start sites

IHC

immunohistochemical staining. DEG:Differentially expressed genes. TIP60:HIV-tat interacting protein 60kD.

Acknowledgments

We thank the members of the Zhao Laboratory for their helpful discussions.

Authors’ contributions

Q.L., H.C., P.Z., D.Y., Y.Z., P.C., D.W., W.S., W.L., X.M., M.X., and Y.C. performed biochemical experiments and bioinformatics analysis. Q.L., H.C., P.Z., Y.C., B.C., and Z.J. performed animal experiments and provided pathology expertise. M.Z., L.K., K.Z., and D.C.S.H. provided critical reagents and expertise. Q.L., Z.J. and Q.Z. designed the project and wrote the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC #32270619 and #31970615), Fundamental Research Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology (#LNSN-202403), Key Project of Natural Science Research for the University of Anhui Province (No. 2023AH051989), and Natural Science Foundation of Bengbu Medical College (2021byzd141, 2023bypy013).

Availability of data and materials

All relevant data are available within the article and additional files or from the authors upon request. Raw mass spectrometry proteomics data were deposited in the ProteomeXchange consortium under the accession number PXD051842. The RNA-Seq and CUT&Tag data generated for this study were deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE266177, GSE266179).

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All experiments involving animals were conducted according to the ethical policies and procedures approved by the Animal Ethical and Welfare Committee of Nanjing University (Nanjing, China) under protocol IACUC-2112006.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung HYA, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024; 74:229-63.
Gluz O, Liedtke C, Gottschalk N, Pusztai L, Nitz U, Harbeck N. Triple-negative breast cancer--current status and future directions. Ann Oncol. 2009; 20:1913-27.
Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, Hanna WM, Kahn HK, Sawka CA, Lickley LA, Rawlinson E, Sun P, Narod SA. Triple-negative breast cancer: Clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res. 2007; 13:4429-34.
Bradner JE, Hnisz D, Young RA. Transcriptional Addiction in Cancer. Cell. 2017; 168:629-43.
Bushweller JH. Targeting transcription factors in cancer - from undruggable to reality. Nat Rev Cancer. 2019; 19:611-24.
Cramer P. Organization and regulation of gene transcription. Nature. 2019; 573:45-54.
Dong B, Horowitz DS, Kobayashi R, Krainer AR. Purification and cDNA cloning of HeLa cell p54nrb, a nuclear protein with two RNA recognition motifs and extensive homology to human splicing factor PSF and Drosophila NONA/BJ6. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993; 21:4085-92.
Yang YS, Hanke JH, Carayannopoulos L, Craft CM, Capra JD, Tucker PW. NonO, a non-POU-domain-containing, octamer-binding protein, is the mammalian homolog of Drosophila nonAdiss. Mol Cell Biol. 1993; 13:5593-603.
Feng P, Li L, Deng T, Liu Y, Ling N, Qiu S, Zhang L, Peng B, Xiong W, Cao L, et al. NONO and tumorigenesis: More than splicing. J Cell Mol Med. 2020; 24:4368-76.
Li XY, Chen MX, Liu BR, Lu PF, Lv X, Zhao X, Cui SY, Xu PP, Nakamura Y, Kurita R, et al. Transcriptional silencing of fetal hemoglobin expression by NonO. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021; 49:9711-23.
Fox AH, Lamond AI. Paraspeckles. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010; 2:a000687.
Knott GJ, Bond CS, Fox AH. The DBHS proteins SFPQ, NONO and PSPC1: a multipurpose molecular scaffold. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016; 44:3989-4004.
Qin Y, Chen W, Jiang G, Zhou L, Yang X, Li H, He X, Wang HL, Zhou YB, Huang S, Liu S. Interfering MSN-NONO complex-activated CREB signaling serves as a therapeutic strategy for triple-negative breast cancer. Sci Adv. 2020; 6:eaaw9960.
Shen M, Zhang R, Jia W, Zhu Z, Zhao L, Huang G, Liu J. RNA-binding protein p54(nrb)/NONO potentiates nuclear EGFR-mediated tumorigenesis of triple-negative breast cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2022; 13:42.
de Silva HC, Lin MZ, Phillips L, Martin JL, Baxter RC. IGFBP-3 interacts with NONO and SFPQ in PARP-dependent DNA damage repair in triple-negative breast cancer. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2019; 76:2015-30.
Altenberg B, Greulich KO. Genes of glycolysis are ubiquitously overexpressed in 24 cancer classes. Genomics. 2004; 84:1014-20.
Dayton TL, Jacks T, Vander Heiden MG. PKM2, cancer metabolism, and the road ahead. EMBO Rep. 2016; 17:1721-30.
Christofk HR, Vander Heiden MG, Harris MH, Ramanathan A, Gerszten RE, Wei R, Fleming MD, Schreiber SL, Cantley LC. The M2 splice isoform of pyruvate kinase is important for cancer metabolism and tumour growth. Nature. 2008; 452:230-3.
Gao X, Wang H, Yang JJ, Liu X, Liu ZR. Pyruvate kinase M2 regulates gene transcription by acting as a protein kinase. Mol Cell. 2012; 45:598-609.
Yang W, Xia Y, Ji H, Zheng Y, Liang J, Huang W, Gao X, Aldape K, Lu Z. Nuclear PKM2 regulates beta-catenin transactivation upon EGFR activation. Nature. 2011; 480:118-22.
Yang W, Xia Y, Hawke D, Li X, Liang J, Xing D, Aldape K, Hunter T, Alfred Yung WK, Lu Z. PKM2 phosphorylates histone H3 and promotes gene transcription and tumorigenesis. Cell. 2012; 150:685-96.
Kubala MH, DeClerck YA. The plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 paradox in cancer: a mechanistic understanding. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2019; 38:483-92.
Kwaan HC, Mazar AP, McMahon BJ. The Apparent uPA/PAI-1 Paradox in Cancer: More than Meets the Eye. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2013; 39:382-91.
Shechter D, Dormann HL, Allis CD, Hake SB. Extraction, purification and analysis of histones. Nat Protoc. 2007; 2:1445-57.
Branon TC, Bosch JA, Sanchez AD, Udeshi ND, Svinkina T, Carr SA, Feldman JL, Perrimon N, Ting AY. Efficient proximity labeling in living cells and organisms with TurboID. Nat Biotechnol. 2018; 36:880-87.
Zhao Q, Rank G, Tan YT, Li H, Moritz RL, Simpson RJ, Cerruti L, Curtis DJ, Patel DJ, Allis CD, et al. PRMT5-mediated methylation of histone H4R3 recruits DNMT3A, coupling histone and DNA methylation in gene silencing. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009; 16:304-11.
Kaya-Okur HS, Janssens DH, Henikoff JG, Ahmad K, Henikoff S. Efficient low-cost chromatin profiling with CUT&Tag. Nat Protoc. 2020; 15:3264-83.
Ju JY, Chen AP, Deng YX, Liu M, Wang Y, Wang YD, Nie M, Wang C, Ding H, Yao B, et al. NatD promotes lung cancer progression by preventing histone H4 serine phosphorylation to activate Slug expression. Nat Commun. 2017; 8:928.
Wagner KU, Wall RJ, StOnge L, Gruss P, WynshawBoris A, Garrett L, Li ML, Furth PA, Hennighausen L. Cre-mediated gene deletion in the mammary gland. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997; 25:4323-30.
Zhang Y, Wu MJ, Lu WC, Li YC, Chang CJ, Yang JY. Metabolic switch regulates lineage plasticity and induces synthetic lethality in triple-negative breast cancer. Cell Metab. 2024; 36:193-208 e8.
Guy CT, Cardiff RD, Muller WJ. Induction of mammary tumors by expression of polyomavirus middle T oncogene: a transgenic mouse model for metastatic disease. Mol Cell Biol. 1992; 12:954-61.
Humphries BA, Buschhaus JM, Chen YC, Haley HR, Qyli T, Chiang B, Shen N, Rajendran S, Cutter A, Cheng YH, et al. Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor 1 (PAI1) Promotes Actin Cytoskeleton Reorganization and Glycolytic Metabolism in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Mol Cancer Res. 2019; 17:1142-54.
Harmegnies D, Wang XM, Vandenbussche P, Leon A, Vusio P, Grotzinger J, Jacques Y, Goormaghtigh E, Devreese B, Content J. Characterization of a potent human interleukin-11 agonist. Biochem J. 2003; 375:23-32.
Lee EW, Lee MS, Camus S, Ghim J, Yang MR, Oh W, Ha NC, Lane DP, Song J. Differential regulation of p53 and p21 by MKRN1 E3 ligase controls cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. EMBO J. 2009; 28:2100-13.
Ball DK, Rachfal AW, Kemper SA, Brigstock DR. The heparin-binding 10 kDa fragment of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) containing module 4 alone stimulates cell adhesion. J Endocrinol. 2003; 176:R1-7.
Solvie D, Baluapuri A, Uhl L, Fleischhauer D, Endres T, Papadopoulos D, Aziba A, Gaballa A, Mikicic I, Isaakova E, et al. MYC multimers shield stalled replication forks from RNA polymerase. Nature. 2022; 612:148-55.
Ham SJ, Lee D, Yoo H, Jun K, Shin H, Chung J. Decision between mitophagy and apoptosis by Parkin via VDAC1 ubiquitination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020; 117:4281-91.
Deak F, Piecha D, Bachrati C, Paulsson M, Kiss I. Primary structure and expression of matrilin-2, the closest relative of cartilage matrix protein within the von Willebrand factor type A-like module superfamily. J Biol Chem. 1997; 272:9268-74.
Ma YQ, Qin J, Wu CY, Plow EF. Kindlin-2 (Mig-2):: a co-activator of beta3 integrins. J Cell Biol. 2008; 181:439-46.
Anfosso F, Bardin N, Vivier E, Sabatier F, Sampol J, Dignat-George F. Outside-in signaling pathway linked to CD146 engagement in human endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276:1564-69.
Amin S, Yang P, Li Z. Pyruvate kinase M2: A multifarious enzyme in non-canonical localization to promote cancer progression. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2019; 1871:331-41.
Hitosugi T, Kang S, Vander Heiden MG, Chung TW, Elf S, Lythgoe K, Dong S, Lonial S, Wang X, Chen GZ, et al. Tyrosine phosphorylation inhibits PKM2 to promote the Warburg effect and tumor growth. Sci Signal. 2009; 2:ra73.
Kimura H. Histone modifications for human epigenome analysis. J Hum Genet. 2013; 58:439-45.
Boileau RM, Chen KX, Blelloch R. Loss of MLL3/4 decouples enhancer H3K4 monomethylation, H3K27 acetylation, and gene activation during embryonic stem cell differentiation. Genome Biol. 2023; 24:41.
Heintzman ND, Hon GC, Hawkins RD, Kheradpour P, Stark A, Harp LF, Ye Z, Lee LK, Stuart RK, Ching CW, et al. Histone modifications at human enhancers reflect global cell-type-specific gene expression. Nature. 2009; 459:108-12.
Li X, Yang J, Peng L, Sahin AA, Huo L, Ward KC, O'Regan R, Torres MA, Meisel JL. Triple-negative breast cancer has worse overall survival and cause-specific survival than non-triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017; 161:279-87.
Wei Y, Luo H, Yee PP, Zhang L, Liu Z, Zheng H, Zhang L, Anderson B, Tang M, Huang S, Li W. Paraspeckle Protein NONO Promotes TAZ Phase Separation in the Nucleus to Drive the Oncogenic Transcriptional Program. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2021; 8:e2102653.
Lee J, Kim HK, Han YM, Kim J. Pyruvate kinase isozyme type M2 (PKM2) interacts and cooperates with Oct-4 in regulating transcription. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2008; 40:1043-54.
Luo W, Hu H, Chang R, Zhong J, Knabel M, O'Meally R, Cole RN, Pandey A, Semenza GL. Pyruvate kinase M2 is a PHD3-stimulated coactivator for hypoxia-inducible factor 1. Cell. 2011; 145:732-44.
Yadav SP, Hao H, Yang HJ, Kautzmann MA, Brooks M, Nellissery J, Klocke B, Seifert M, Swaroop A. The transcription-splicing protein NonO/p54nrb and three NonO-interacting proteins bind to distal enhancer region and augment rhodopsin expression. Hum Mol Genet. 2014; 23:2132-44.
Vanmeijer M, Pannekoek H. Structure of Plasminogen-Activator Inhibitor-1 (Pai-1) and Its Function in Fibrinolysis - an Update. Fibrinolysis. 1995; 9:263-76.
Dellas C, Loskutoff DJ. Historical analysis of PAI-1 from its discovery to its potential role in cell motility and disease. Thromb Haemost. 2005; 93:631-40.
Placencio VR, DeClerck YA. Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 in Cancer: Rationale and Insight for Future Therapeutic Testing. Cancer Res. 2015; 75:2969-74.
Harbeck N, Schmitt M, Meisner C, Friedel C, Untch M, Schmidt M, Sweep CG, Lisboa BW, Lux MP, Beck T, et al. Ten-year analysis of the prospective multicentre Chemo-N0 trial validates American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)-recommended biomarkers uPA and PAI-1 for therapy decision making in node-negative breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2013; 49:1825-35.
Zhang W, Xu J, Fang H, Tang L, Chen W, Sun Q, Zhang Q, Yang F, Sun Z, Cao L, et al. Endothelial cells promote triple-negative breast cancer cell metastasis via PAI-1 and CCL5 signaling. FASEB J. 2018; 32:276-88.
Xu J, Zhang W, Tang L, Chen W, Guan X. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition induced PAI-1 is associated with prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer patients. Gene. 2018; 670:7-14.

No competing interests reported.

LiAddfiles.docx

Download PDF

Editor assigned by journal
22 Oct, 2024
Submission checks completed at journal
17 Oct, 2024
First submitted to journal
17 Oct, 2024

You are reading this latest preprint version

NONO directs PKM2-mediated H3T11ph to promote triple-negative breast cancer metastasis by activating SERPINE1 expression

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Figures

Background

Methods

Cell culture

siRNA infection and shRNA lentiviral transduction

NC: 5’-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGU-3’

Cell proliferation, migration and invasion assays

Western blot analysis

Quantitative real-time PCR analysis (RT‒qPCR)

BioID2 pull-down and mass spectrometry analysis

GST pull-down assay

Immunofluorescence staining

RNA-seq and data analysis

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay

CUT&Tag

Tissue microarrays and IHC staining

Animal studies

Statistical analysis

Results

NONO directly interacts with nuclear PKM2 in TNBC cells

PKM2 expression is upregulated in TNBC, and knockdown of PKM2 inhibits TNBC cell metastasis

Discussion

Conclusion

Abbreviations

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Supplementary Files

Status:

Version 1