In order to verify the presence of AuNPs/PAMAM and their stability, UV-Vis and DLS techniques were used. UV-Vis spectra were collected right after synthesis and after 18 months storage in room temperature (Fig. 1). The specific band of UV-Vis spectra for the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) of gold nanoparticles occurred in broad range 500–550 nm [13]. The narrow absorbance peak at 525 nm suggested presence of spherical NPs of 4–50 nm diameter [22]. The absorbance intensity of the 1:18 sample remained unchanged, indicating high stability over 18 months of storage. In contrast, at ratios of 1:15 and 1:20, the intensity of the SPR peak increased after 18 months, suggesting an increase in the concentration of nanoparticles in the solutions over time [23].
The synthesized nanostructures should be considered as Au/PAMAM complexes, where the size and shape of nanostructures will be influenced by the size of both core of gold nanoparticles as well as shell of PAMAM dendrimers and sodium citrate as a stabilizer agents. The zeta potential values for colloids right after synthesis are very high, from 30.3 to 43.0 mV (Table 1). These results are consistent with the literature reports [24], where for AuNPs stabilized with PAMAM G4 dendrimers a value of about 41 (± 3) mV was obtained. Surprisingly, after 18 months the zeta potential values for the same colloids are 13.7, 15.7 and 18.6 mV, respectively, which indicates electrochemical changes for the produced nanoparticles and, consequently, may also affect their biological activity. From the DLS analysis (Fig. 2), it was determined that the apparent hydrodynamic radius of the gold nanoparticles of 1:18 sample, also after 18 months, was approximately 9 nm. For the 1:15 sample, we noticed main peak for radius of AuNPs of 9.7 nm and a second peak with an apparent radius of 2.2 nm, suggesting the presence of additional products such as stabilizers and synthesis by-products. Also for 1:20 sample, two populations of hydrodynamic radius were measured. The first peak had a size of about 1 nm, likely representing remaining products from the synthesis process, while the second peak likely corresponds to nanoparticles with a radius of 15 nm. In the case of all synthesis, stable colloids were obtained for up to 18 months, which is confirmed by DLS measurements. AFM imaging was performed for all samples. Spherical nanoparticles or their agglomerates below 100 nm were observed on the AFM images. However, the AFM technique has some disadvantages. AFM imaging is performed after drying the sample, firstly Au/PAMAM conjugates agglomerate with each other and also flatten (they increase their size in X and Y axes and decrease in Z axis) [25].
Based on the DLS results that the 1:18 sample is stable for up to 18 months, TEM imaging was performed for this case. Nanoparticles of about 10 nm (diameter) were observed on the TEM images. The size of the gold nanoparticles as measured from TEM images relates to the metallic core as low generation dendrimers are not visible in TEM. In literature we could found the TEM images showing that for the higher generation PAMAM dendrimers, like G8-G10, the metal nanoparticles are present inside the PAMAM structures [26]. The differences of nanostructures diameter values obtained by TEM and DLS techniques are due to possibility of observation of only gold core part of particles (TEM) and the whole complex of AuNPs/PAMAM (DLS)[20].
The FTIR spectra (Fig. 3) of AuNPs/PAMAM showed the presence of the dendrimers in all synthesised nanoparticles. The band at 3250 cm− 1 correspond to the N-H stretching vibration arising from the PAMAM stabilizing layer. The next peak at 3070 cm− 1 assign to the N–H bending vibration. The band at 2940 cm− 1 and 2840 cm− 1 indicated unsymmetrical and symmetrical stretching vibration of methylene [27]. The amide peaks at 1635 cm− 1 and 1545 cm− 1 (amide I and amide II, respectively) are characteristic of the dendrimer branches [28]. It confirm that PAMAM G4 is indeed formed on AuNPs.
Another aspect of our work was to investigate the toxicity of AuNPs/PAMAM on human breast adenocarcinoma cell line. The cytotoxicity of Au/PAMAM G4 on human breast cells was dose dependent [Figure 6]. Application of Au/PAMAM just after synthesis in a concentration of 10 µg/mL reduce cell viability to 90% in comparison to control (untreated) cells. After 18 months the AuNPs/PAMAM are less toxic, 90% of cell viability is achieved for 15 µg/mL.
Direct contact of AuNPs/PAMAM with cells in the medium as well as their penetration into the cells may influence the initiation of various processes leading to pathological changes as well as cell death. Metallic nanoparticles can accumulate on or just below the cell membrane [29–32]. The toxicity of the synthesized nanoparticles may be significantly influenced by PAMAM dendrimers. The cytotoxicity of dendrimers depends largely on the number and charge of surface functional groups. Cationic dendrimers are typically highly toxic, while anionic and uncharged dendrimers have little or no toxic effects. The cytotoxicity of cationic PAMAM dendrimers is thought to result from interactions between the positively charged dendrimers and the negatively charged cell surfaces [33, 34]. Based on the obtained results, after 18 months the AuNPs/PAMAM are less toxic (higher values of threshold concentrations EC10, EC25, EC50), which may be related to the lower activity of polycationic groups of dendrimers. Also, the reduced zeta potential values after 18 months (Table 1) may suggest temporal changes related to the functional groups of PAMAM dendrimers. Moreover, the cytotoxicity of synthesized complexes were compere to toxicity of commercially available nanoparticles stabilized with sodium citrate with diameters of 10 and 30 nm. Surprisingly, AuNPs/PAMAM right after synthesis, are as toxic as commercially available nanoparticles stabilized with sodium citrate with a diameter of 10 nm (Table 2). It is worth noting that AuNPs/PAMAM conjugates, after a different synthesis model but of similar size, are much more toxic on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) [20] than the tested conjugates on breast adenocarcinoma MCF-7 cell line. This indicates both, that cancer lines are more resistant to the action of nanostructures, and may also be related to differences in the synthesis process of these conjugates and, consequently, their chemical activity and toxicity.