MTS Assay
We used the HepG2 cell line from human hepatocellular carcinoma in this study. It was crucial to confirm that aaptamine did not exhibit cytotoxic activity toward these cells. To this end, we employed the MTS assay to evaluate the cytotoxic effects of aaptamine on HepG2 cells. Figure 1a illustrates the percentage of cell growth across varying treatment concentrations. Cell viability was measured using the MTS assay, revealing that simvastatin led to a minimum growth of approximately 80% at a concentration of 0.5µM, while at 10µM, the growth rate increased to around 106%. The highest cell viability, 128%, was observed with lovastatin at a concentration of 6 µM. These findings indicate that none of the compounds tested, including simvastatin, lovastatin, and aaptamine, exhibited cytotoxicity in a dose-dependent manner up to a concentration of 10 µM. Then, we co-treated simvastatin 10µM with a serial dilution of aaptamine (3.125 µg/mL to 25µg/mL). The percentage of cell growth for cotreatment at all concentrations was above 80% (Fig. 1b). The single treatment of aaptamine (25µg/mL) also showed no cytotoxicity on HepG2 cells when treated for 24 hours. Moreover, aaptamine showed cytotoxicity on the CEM-SS cell line with the IC50 value (IC50 15.03µg/mL) (Shaari et al. 2009). However, our results are like Habsah Mohamad et al. (2017), reported that aaptamine did not show cytotoxicity on HepG2. Similarly, Mullen et al. (2010) treated cell with simvastatin at 10µM with no cytotoxicity observed in the HepG2 cells.
Aaptamine suppresses the expression of the PCSK9 gene in HepG 2 cells.
As shown in Fig. 2a, aaptamine significantly reduced the PCSK9 mRNA expression at all concentrations as compared to that of untreated control. At the concentration of 3.125 µg/mL, aaptamine produced the maximum level of reduction at 99% of control. By contrast, when the cells were treated with 10 µM simvastatin, the mRNA expression of PCSK9 was increased significantly by 2.9-fold than that of untreated control. Interestingly, when the cells were cotreated with simvastatin and aaptamine (at concentrations of 3.125- 25µg/mL), the mRNA expression of PCSK9 was significantly decreased than that of untreated control with 12.5µM aaptamine produced the lowest levels of PCSK9 mRNA at 94% to that of control. The results indicate that aaptamine attenuated the inhibitory effect of statin on the gene expression of PCSK9.
Aaptamine attenuates the effect of statin on the protein expression of the PCSK9 in HepG 2 cells.
Treatment with 20 µM of berberine sulfate (BBR) followed a notable decline in the relative protein levels of both premature and mature PCSK9 compared to the control group that did not receive any treatment. 10 µM Simvastatin did not produce any significant change in premature PCSK9 protein expression. In contrast, It was demonstrated that when the cells were treated with simvastatin 2.5 µM and 5.0 µM, the level premature PCSK9 protein expression was significantly increased than that of untreated control between 68% and 50%. (Fig. 2b). However, the mature protein expression of PCSK9 was significantly downregulated between 40–56% when treated with aaptamine. Interestingly, there was a 4-fold increase in mature PCSK9 protein expression as compared to the untreated control. However, 10 µM Simvastatin did not produce any significant change in premature PCSK9 protein expression. When HepG2 cells were treated with a combination of simvastatin and aaptamine, the protein expression of both premature and mature PCSK9 was significantly downregulated as compared to the respective controls. Specifically, co-treatment with simvastatin and aaptamine significantly decreased the PCSK9 mature protein expression between 84% and 51% than that of untreated control with co-treatment with 6.25 µg/mL aaptamine produced the lowest levels of PCSK9. Aaptamine at 12.5 µg/mL and 25 µg/mL reduced to 81% and 80% of control, respectively. Premature PCSK9 protein expression was downregulated dose-dependently during the cotreatment, ranging from 28–53%. Aaptamine alone significantly downregulated the protein expression of both premature and mature PCSK9 (Fig. 2c) as compared to the untreated control. The premature protein expression of PCSK9 was drastically decreased than that of untreated control between 94% and 82%, with aaptamine 6.25 µg/mL and 12.5 µg/mL producing the lowest levels at 94%whereas aaptamine at 3.125 µg/mL and 25 µg/mL reduced premature PCSK9 protein level to 82% and 87%, respectively.
Aaptamine enhances the LDL-C uptake and upregulates LDLR expression while downregulating PCSK9 expression.
Aaptamine attenuates the action of statin in inducing the uptake of LDL-C. Aaptamine attenuates the action of statin in inducing the uptake of LDL-C. To determine the effects of co-treatment of aaptamine and statin on the levels of LDL receptor (LDLR) protein, HepG2 cells were treated either with a single treatment of simvastatin (10 µM), aaptamine (3.125- 25µg/mL), and co-treatment of simvastatin with different concentrations of aaptamine.
As shown in Fig. 3a, immunohistochemistry staining with an antibody against LDLR demonstrated the intensity of FITC-stained HepG2 cells was higher in cells treated with aaptamine as compared to untreated control indicating the amount of LDLR presence on the cell surface was increased in aaptamine-treated cells. Specifically, aaptamine increased the level of LDLR protein by 1.84-fold at 3.125 µg/ml and gradually decreased, however, still higher than to that of control by 1.25-fold at the highest concentration used (25 µg/ml). Interestingly, the level of LDLR protein presence on the cell surface of HepG2 cells was slightly increased as compared to control by 1.16-fold When treated with statin which was still lower than to that of aaptamine-treated cells. When the cells were treated in combination with statin and aaptamine, it was found that co-treatment significantly increased the amount of LDLR protein on cell surface at all concentrations. The highest level of LDLR protein was found when 3.125 µg/ml of aaptamine was used in the co-treatment with 2.36-fold increase relative to control, followed by 6.28 µg/ml with 2.28-fold increase, 12.5 µg/ml at with 2.17-fold increase, and 25 µg/ml with 1.52-fold increase as compared to untreated control. As expected, the intensity of FITC-stained HepG2 cells shows that there was a significant dose-dependent decrease in the amount of PCSK9 protein on the surface of HepG2 cells treated with aaptamine with the lowest level of 39% to that of untreated control at 12.5 µg/ml. Simvastatin significantly increased the PCSK9 protein level by 1.48-fold which corresponds to the levels of mRNA and total protein content. Interestingly, in the co-treated cells, aaptamine attenuated an inducible effect of statin of the amount of cell surface PCSK9 (Fig. 3b). The lowest amount of PCSK9 protein was found when the cells were co-treated with statin and 25 µg/ml aaptamine of which the level of PCSK9 protein was reduced by 43% as compared to untreated control. However, it was still relatively higher than to that of aaptamine alone.
The As shown in Figs. 3a and 3c, there was a strong corresponding change of LDLR expression with the uptake of LDLC. There was a significant increase on LDLC uptake when the cells were treated individually with either aaptamine and statin with the inducible effect of statin was still lower than to that of aaptamine. Co-administration of simvastatin combined with aaptamine and statin resulted an increase in the uptake of LDLC, higher than to that of either with aaptamine or statin alone, reaching the highest rate of 3.21-fold increase when cells were exposed to statin and 6.25 µg/ml aaptamine. in the most pronounced cellular staining with LDL-DyLight™ 550, as evidenced by the maximum intensity of yellow fluorescence observed after 24 hours. A single administration of aaptamine resulted in a greater intensity of stained cells compared to the untreated control, but a lower intensity compared to cells that were co-treated. ImageJ analysis revealed that the levels of LDL-C absorption reached a peak of 221% (3.21 folds) when the cells were exposed to SA 6.25. On the other hand, the application of At the highest rate of LDLC uptake was 1.73-fold and XX-fold increase as compared to untreated control when cells were treated with aptamine 25 µg/mL aapatmine and 10 mM statin, respectively. treatments resulted in a 73.84% increase (1.73 folds) in LDL-C uptake compared to the untreated control. The BBR treatment resulted in a 52.06% increase in LDL-C uptake, which corresponds to a 1.52-fold increase, as shown in Fig. 3c. The qualitative and quantitative analysis revealed that in treatment with aaptamine, the appearance of a yellow signal in the treated cells was more vivid and intense compared to the untreated control. This suggests an augmentation in the uptake of LDL-C by HepG2 cells.