Study participants
This study enrolled 183 women who received assisted reproductive treatment at the Reproductive Medicine Center of Zhongshan Hospital between June 2023 and April 2024. Eligible women were aged from 25 to 45 years old, undergoing ICSI cycles with an indication of tubal, male, or unexplained infertility, after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist. Exclusion criteria were diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome, premature ovarian failure, chromosomal abnormalities, thyroid disease, or other endocrine disorders. Additionally, women were excluded if their partners were diagnosed with severe oligozoospermia (sperm concentration < 5 × 10⁶ sperm per mL) or asthenozoospermia (sperm progressive motility < 10%). The study has received approval from the Ethics Committee of Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University (B2024-185R), and all participants have provided informed consent.
Cumulus cells collection and culture
Cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) were obtained through follicle puncture. Only COCs from follicles with diameters exceeding 15 mm were included to ensure that all CC samples were derived from mature oocytes. After oocyte retrieval, CCs were denudated from the oocyte using hyaluronidase (Vitrolife, Sweden). Discarded CCs were subsequently collected in a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube and centrifuged at 400g for 5 minutes. The cell pellet was then resuspended in culture medium for further culture or otherwise was washed by PBS for molecular biological analyses. For primary CCs culture, the cell pellet was resuspended in the IVM medium and cultured on a 35 mm glass-bottom dish (Cellvis, CA, USA) in a 37°C incubator with 5% CO2. The IVM medium contained tissue culture medium 199 supplemented with 0.22 mM pyruvic acid, 0.075 IU/ml FSH, 0.5 IU/ml hCG, 0.1 mg/ml 17β-estradiol, 0.6 g/l penicillin and streptomycin, in addition to 20% (v/v) FBS. All utilized reagents were procured from Sigma Chemical Co.
Embryo quality assessment
For every participant, their embryos were evaluated at the cleavage stage on Day 3 and at the blastocyst stage on Day 5/6. Since not all embryos underwent blastocyst culture, the Day 3 embryo grading was primarily used for assessing embryonic quality. A team of experienced embryologists evaluated each embryo based on the morphological criteria proposed by Veeck [21]. The evaluation goes as follows. Grade I: Blastomeres of equal size with no cytoplasmic fragmentation; Grade II: Blastomeres of equal size with minor cytoplasmic fragmentation or blebs; Grade III: Blastomeres of distinctly unequal size with little to no cytoplasmic fragmentation; Grade IV: Blastomeres of equal or unequal size with significant cytoplasmic fragmentation; Grade V: Few blastomeres of any size with severe or complete fragmentation. Good-quality embryos were defined as those containing 7–9 cells and classified as Grade I or II. For every participant, their individual GQER was defined as the number of good-quality embryos divided by the number of cleavage stage embryos.
MitoTracker staining
To perform live cell tracing, MitoTracker™ Red FM Dye (Invitrogen, CA, USA) and NucBlue™ Live ReadyProbes™ (Invitrogen) were diluted into aforementioned complete culture medium at ratio of 1:2000 and 1:1000, respectively, for mitochondrial staining and nucleus labelling. Culture medium of CCs was then replaced with the staining solution and incubated for 20 minutes at 37°C with 5% CO2. Subsequently, staining solution was washed off twice with fresh complete culture medium, and the cells were further cultured for an additional 30 minutes to remove any residual dye.
Live cell imaging
After MitoTracker staining, CCs were transferred to a temperature-controlled cage incubator (Okolab, Italy) set to 37℃ with 5% CO2. Images were acquired by confocal microscopy and super-resolution imaging. For confocal microscopy, we employed a Nikon C2 Si Confocal Microscope (Nikon, Japan). Super-resolution imaging was performed using High Intelligent and Sensitivity Structured Illumination Microscopy (HIS-SIM), a technology provided by Guangzhou Computational Super-resolution Biotech Co. For morphological observations, three random fields of view were captured for each sample using the 60× Nikon CFI Apo TIRF Oil objective (Nikon). To track mitochondrial motion, 10 random fields of view were selected within each sample and recorded as time-lapse images at 5-second intervals in a total duration of 5 minutes.
Image processing and analysis
Morphological characterization of mitochondria was performed on the Mitochondria-Analyzer plugin in ImageJ software [22]. For each sample, three images were processed through binarization to distinguish the true fluorescent signal from the background signal. The binarized images were then analyzed to extract the morphological characteristics of individual mitochondria. One measure taken to assess the mitochondrial shape was the Form Factor, with size calculated as \(\:{p}^{2}/\left(4\pi\:a\right)\) where \(\:p\) represents the length of mitochondrial boundary and \(\:a\) represents the total surface area. A Form Factor value of 1 indicates a round shape, while higher values indicate more elongated and irregular shapes. Mitochondria were categorized based on their Form Factor values: spheres (1-1.45), short tubules (1.46-2.0), and elongated tubules (> 2.0).
Mitochondrial tracking and determination of fission and fusion events based on time-lapse images were performed by the Mitometer tool in MATLAB R2020a [23]. Firstly, background removal was applied to obtain segregated images. Subsequently, the software visualized all mitochondrial tracks where confident tracks were selected for further analysis. Fission and fusion events were then calculated based on the identified tracks. For each CC sample, time-lapse images from 10 fields of view were processed by the Mitometer. The average fission and fusion events from these fields were calculated for subsequent statistical analysis.
RNA extraction and qRT-PCR analysis
Total RNA was extracted from isolated CCs using Direct-zol™ RNA Microprep Kit (Zymo Research, CA, USA). Concentration of RNA was determined using the Nanodrop (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA). Reverse transcription was performed on 500 ng of total RNA with the PrimeScript™ RT Master Mix kit (Takara Bio, Japan). qRT-PCR was carried out on a LightCycler 480 II instrument (Roche, Switzerland) using forward and reverse primers at a final concentration of 0.2 µM mixed with the Hieff qPCR SYBR Green Master Mix kit (Yeasen Biotechnology, China). The primer sequences are provided in Supplemental Table 1. The expression of target gene was normalized to the expression level of gapdh and calculated by the 2−ΔΔCT method.
Western blotting
Western blotting
CCs were lysed by ice-cold RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime, China) supplemented with Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Bimake, USA) for 10 minutes. Protein concentration was determined using the BCA Protein Assay Kit (Beyotime), and the loading volume of each sample was adjusted accordingly. The protein samples were then mixed with SDS-PAGE loading buffer (Fude Bio, China) and heated at 99℃ for 10 minutes. Subsequently, the proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto a PVDF membrane (Millipore, USA).
After blocked with 5% milk at room temperature for 60 minutes, the PVDF membrane was then incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies diluted in 5% milk. The primary antibodies used were anti-MFF (84580, CST, MA, USA), anti-FIS1 (HPA017430, Sigma), anti-DRP1 (8570, CST), anti-MFN1 (14739, CST), anti-MFN2 (9482, CST), anti-OPA1 (157457, Abcam, MA, USA) and anti-β-actin (81115-1-RR, Proteintech, China). After three washes with TBST (Tris-buffered saline with Tween 20), each lasting for 15 minutes, the membrane was incubated with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary anti-rabbit antibody (7074, CST) (diluted 1:3000 in TBST) at room temperature for one hour. Following three washes with TBST, the membrane was incubated with Tanon™ ECL substrate (Tanon, China) for two minutes, and the chemiluminescent signal was captured using an e-Blot chemiluminescence imager. The gray value of the immunoblotting strips was analyzed by ImageJ software.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analysis were conducted using GraphPad Prism 9. The two-sided Student's t-test was employed to compare continuous variables between two groups that were subject to a normal distribution. For variables that were not normal distributed, the Mann-Whitney U test was utilized to compare the two independent groups. Pearson test or Spearmen test was used to analyze the correlation between the two variables according to data distribution. Fisher's exact test was employed to compare proportions between two groups. Statistical significance was defined as P values < 0.05.