The present study is the first community based study to describe the HPV prevalence among men in Sri Lanka. The non-response rate was assumed to be 10% and did not exceed this limit during the data collection. The basic sociodemographic characteristics of non-responders were similar to those of responders, serving to minimize selection bias. The urban-to-rural population, male-to-female sex ratio and distribution of age categories among study subjects were closely comparable to the overall country enabling generalizability(12). The use of PCR with the consensus primer GP5+/GP6+, which is the most employed sensitive method for HPV detection allows the comparison of findings of the present study with those of other countries(13).
The mean age of the study participants was 39.7 years (± SD = 12.5). The mean age of sexual debut was 22.3 years (± SD = 5), 76.3% was legally or customarily married; 99.1% was heterosexual and 0.9% was bisexual. Other factors for HPV acquisition and persistence such as; anogenital warts (3.1%), phimosis (5.2%), and history of anogenital injury (5.7%) were identified in low proportions among clinically healthy people. However, having more than one lifetime sexual female partner (35.8%) was reported as a considerable proportion, with the majority practicing penovaginal sex (66.5%). It is noteworthy that 53.2% of participants had never used condoms during sexual practices. The overall HPV prevalence among clinically normal men in the community was 5.7% (95% CI: 3.96–7.91), with a high-risk HPV prevalence of genotype HPV16 and HPV 59, 1.7% (95% CI:0.8–3.1). Significant factors for HPV prevalence among clinically normal men after adjusting for confounding factors were, having multiple female sex partners (adjusted OR of 2.4 ,95% CI: 1.1–4.9) compared to those with a single or no female sex partner and engaged in sexual relationships being unmarried (adjusted OR of 3.5 ,95% CI: 1.04–12.1) compared to those who are married.
This community prevalence rate was relatively high compared to the figure of 1.3% (95% CI:0.01,7.2) reported in Japan in 2003 (14). There were a limited number of studies conducted in the Asian region with relatively small sample sizes that examined penile HPV prevalence among male partners of women participating in cervical cancer research with findings varying from 26.7% in India (2006) (15),4.7% in the Philippines (2004) and 17.3% in Thailand (2002)(16). The overall prevalence of any HPV infection estimated in a community-based study in China was 10.5% (17), and a cohort study in China in 2015 recorded it as 16.9%(n = 2228) (5). A cross-sectional study in Malaysia (2014–2016) among 503 males aged 18–60 found a genital HPV prevalence of 29.6%(18). The high prevalence may be attributed to increased high-risk sexual behaviours compared to Sri Lanka. Differences in results could also be due to the Malaysian study's use of non-specific site specimens and convenient sampling of clinic attendees' companions, compared to the present study's use of penile samples and community cluster sampling, which reduce selection bias. The HPV In Men(HIM), study combined genital samples of 1,160 clinically normal men from Brazil, Mexico, and the United States revealing an estimated overall HPV prevalence among heterosexual men of 65.2%, with individual countries Brazil, United States Mexico revealing 72.3%, 61.3% and 61.9% respectively (19). Additionally, a systematic review conducted among Brazilian men revealed that the prevalence was 36.21% (95% CI 23.40, 51.33) in the penile specimen (20). A study among sexually active adolescents and young adults estimated male HPV prevalence for any HPV type was 29.2%(21). Remarkably, the community prevalence rates observed in Western countries significantly surpassed those recorded in the current community-based prevalence study, in the Sri Lanka.
In the present community prevalence study, the most frequent HR HPV types detected were 59,16,45 and 31 LR HPV types were 81,90,7,42,6,62,73, 89. A study done in Sri Lanka in 2008 among females revealed common HR HPV genotypes 16 and 18 was 1.2% (95% CI:1.15–1.2) (Gamage, 2017). A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published between 1995 and 2022 included population-based surveys in men aged 15 years or older. It identified 65 studies (n = 44769 men) from 35 countries and reported a global pooled prevalence of 21% (95%CI:18.0,24.0) for HR-HPV. HPV-16 was the most prevalent HPV genotype with a prevalence of 5%, (95% CI, 4.0-7.2) followed by the HPV-6 genotype being 4% (95% CI, 3.3–5.1). In this present study, it was 30.3% (10/33) of HPV types were HR types in a community-based study and the most prevalent type was HPV 59 followed by HPV 16,31 and 45. The high prevalence of HPV genotype 59 highlights the need to include this strain in future vaccine development, as recognized by Mexico to combat HPV-related cancers. (22).
A statistically significant difference in prevalence rates was not observed among the age of age categories, ethnicity groups or religious groups in this study. It has been reported in global literature too that anogenital HPV prevalence does not vary across age groups (p = 0.952) and different races (p = 0.820) (18). In addition a significant difference in prevalence rates was not observed with current employment status, income of the respondent and level of education in the present study. However, this is in contrast to the high prevalence that was observed (77% in the penile shaft and 66% in the coronal sulcus) in Chille (23),and 8.7%n(n = 313) as reported in Korea among university students. However, in none of these studies, a significant association of the prevalence has been reported with the level of education.
Statistically significant associations of the prevalence were not observed with a history of phimosis, circumcision and anogenital injury among present study partners. These findings are on par with that of the HIM (HPV in Men) study the only prospective multi-center international cohort study with a large sample size, that reported phimosis and circumcision as not having significant associations with HPV infection. However, in contrast to the findings of the present community study, the HIM study found a significant association between a history of genital warts and HPV infection (19). Moderate alcohol consumption has been reported to be significantly associated with recurrence (OR, 1.59; 95% CI:1.01–2.53) compared with mild alcohol consumption in HPV-men-follow-up study (24). In the present study, tobacco (p = 0.05) and alcohol (p = 0.024) consumption were significantly associated with HPV infection in bivariable analysis, however, these associations were not observed following adjusting for confounders in logistic regression analysis as in Malaysian community-based study (25). In this present study, there was no significant difference observed based on sexual orientation, Notably, more than half (53.2%) of the participants, engage in sexual activities without using condoms implying the requirement of proper sex education and promoting safer sexual practices.
The Giuliano's study found that older age at sexual initiation is associated with a significantly reduced risk of HPV infection, indicating that early initiation may increase vulnerability (19).The mean age of sexual debut was 22.3 (SD ± 5) years with no statistically significant difference in HPV prevalence rates among the age of sexual debut < 18 years and > 18 years in this study, compared to 18.6 (SD ± 1.8) years in previous Sri Lankan surveys, (26). However results of this study revealed that having sex being unmarried carries a higher risk of getting HPV infection (adjusted OR of 3.5 ,95% CI: 1.04–12.1) compared to marital sex. Compatibly having a stable partner was linked to lower risks for HPV infection, with OR ranging from 0.55 to 0.58 reported in previous studies(27).In this study, 35.8% of community participants reported having more than one female sexual partner during their lifetime. In literature numerous studies have reported a strong association between HPV and promiscuous sex. A significant association (p = 0.002, adjusted OR of 2.4 ,95% CI: 1.1–4.9) was observed between having > 1 female partner and HPV infection compared to having 1 or no female partners. Similarly, in multi-country study reported having more than 3 sexual partners(p = 0.05,OR-3.87) and study in United State, having > 5 vaginal sexual partner(p = 0.0108) were significantly associated with HPV infection(16)(28).Notably, having over 50 lifetime sexual partners verses 1 sexual partner increased the risk, with an OR of 2.3, highlighting the strong link between multiple sexual partners and elevated HPV infection risk studies across world(29).
However, sex-related questions were sensitive and may have responded negatively even though all measures have been taken to collect correct information. These unavoidable reasons may have contributed to possible misclassification bias. HPV can infect various anatomical sites, including the penis, anus, and throat. In the study, only penile samples were collected it would have been better if all possible anatomical sites were sampled to understand factors contributing to the acquisition and persistence of HPV infection.