Linearity of glucose
A calibration graph for glucose was constructed for HRP and all V2O5 NZs, using fixed-time assay method. Absorbance of the reaction mixture contains optimum concentration of all the reagents [as mentioned in table (1)] and 17.5 units of GOD with varying concentrations of glucose (0.0144 to 3.7mM) was recorded at 470nm with respect to blank reagent mixture after the incubation period of 10 minutes. The result shows good linearity between 0.0289 to 0.925mM for HRP, VNShs VNFws, and 0.0528 to 0.925mM for VNSps. The linearity of glucose with respect to HRP and all NZs is showing in the Fig. 4.
Linearity of HO
A calibration graph for H2O2 was constructed for HRP and three V2O5 NZs using both rate and fixed-time assay methods. In the rate method, the absorbance was recorded with respect to the control blank for 5 minutes with a time interval of 1 minute at 470nm. In fixed time assay method, the reaction mixture was incubated for 10 minutes and the absorbance was recorded with respect to the control blank at 470nm. The linearity for the assay of H2O2 was investigated in 3 mL of the reaction mixture and the concentration of reagents used are tabulated in Table (1) for HRP and all NZs.
With respect to rate method, HRP and VNFws showed a limited linearity range between 0.0242-0.3877mM. VNSps and VNShs showed a very good response towards H2O2 with a large linearity range between 0.0606-0.9692mM and 0.0969-1.5507mM respectively. This avoids the dilution of real samples for its application studies. Due to the different linearity range of H2O2 for enzyme and NZs, depending on the sample, selectivity of NZs can be done for the quantification of H2O2.
In fixed time method, HRP showed linearity between 0.0030-0.3877mM, linearity in very lesser concentration of H2O2, whereas in NZs, VNSps showed a linearity in lower concentration of H2O2 between 0.0076-0.9692mM. VNShs and VNFws showed a linearity upto same lower concentration i.e. between 0.0121-0.7753mM and 0.0121–0.3877 mM respectively. The linearity of H2O2 with respect to HRP and all NZs bye rate and fixed time method are showing in the Fig. 5a & Fig. 5b respectively.
Reagents | HRP | VNShs | VNFws | VNSps |
PAP (mM) | 2.413 | 1.206 | 1.206 | 1.609 |
NEDA (mM) | 0.193 | 0.257 | 0.129 | 0.129 |
Buffer (mM) | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.33 |
HRP or NZs | 0.0185 units | 0.3299mM | 0.1099mM | 0.2199mM |
Linearity of H2O2 (mM) | Rate method | 0.0242–0.3877 | 0.0969–1.5507 | 0.0242–0.3877 | 0.0606–0.9692 |
Fixed time method | 0.0030–0.3877 | 0.0121–0.7753 | 0.0121–0.3877 | 0.0076–0.9692 |
Regression equation (Y=) | Rate method | 0.2504x + 0.0063 | 0.0823x − 0.0004 | 0.3027x − 0.0013 | 0.072x − 0.0011 |
Fixed time method | 1.8423x + 0.0374 | 1.1963x + 0.0113 | 1.5118x − 0.0077 | 0.389x + 0.0272 |
Regression coefficient (R2) | Rate method | 0.9954 | 0.9957 | 0.9978 | 0.9993 |
Fixed time method | 0.9973 | 0.9992 | 0.9991 | 0.9991 |
Table (1): linearity range of H2O2 and concentrations of reagents used.
Effect of concentration of analytical reagents on the rate of reaction
The effect of varying concentrations of analytical reagents (PAP, NEDA, and H2O2) on the rate of the reaction was investigated under experimental settings with 3mL solution by varying the concentration of one reagent at a time. The results show an increase in the absorbance with an increase in the concentration of analytical reagents up to optimized concentration afterward, there is no significant change in the rate of the reaction or the rate of the reaction decreases slightly. As a result, the final optimal concentration was fixed at the same level for all further experiments. Optimized concentrations of all analytical reagents are tabulated below (Table 2). The graphs of rate versus concentration of PAP, NEDA, and H2O2 are shown in Fig. S1, S2, S3. & S4.
Therefore, the concentrations of reagents needed by NZs are far lower than those needed by HRP enzyme. The PAP concentration needed by VNShs and VNFws are same and lower than that of VNSps, which is lower than that of HRP. NEDA required by the VNFws and VNSps are same, and greater than the HRP, which is greater than VNShs. H2O2 required by the HRP and VNFws is same and lesser than the VNSps and which is lesser then the VNShs.
Reagents | HRP | VNShs | VNFws | VNSps |
PAP (mM) | 2.413 | 1.206 | 1.206 | 1.609 |
NEDA (mM) | 0.193 | 0.257 | 0.129 | 0.129 |
H2O2(mM) | 0.3877 | 1.551 | 0.3877 | 0.9692 |
NZs | 0.0185 units | 0.3299mM | 0.1099mM | 0.2199mM |
Table (2): Optimized values of analytical reagents.
Evaluation of analytical characteristics of the proposed assay
The Michaelis–Menten constant (Km) for PAP, NEDA & H2O2 was determined by Lineweaver–Burk plot, keeping all the reagents at optimized condition & by varying one reagent concentration (PAP, NEDA & H2O2) at a time. The Km values for PAP, and NEDA are 1.0867 and 0.3142mM for HRP, 0.3179 and 0.0327mM for VNShs, 0.2108 and 0.07499mM for VNFws, 0.4625 and 0.3085mM for VNSps and the Lineweaver–Burk plots are showed in Fig. S5, S6, S7, & S8. Km values with respect to H2O2, Vmax, Kcat, and Keff are tabulated (Table 3). Lineweaver–Burk plots for the determination of Km values with respect to H2O2 were showed in the Fig. 6.
Km values for all NZs is lesser than that of the HRP enzyme in the increasing order of VNSps, VNFws, VNShs and HRP which indicates the large affinity of NZs towards substrate (H2O2) than HRP enzyme. Vmax is maximum for VNShs is greater than the HRP followed by VNFws and VNSps. Kcat and Keff of HRP is much greater than all NZs which is in the increasing order of VNShs, VNSps and VNFws. Comparison of catalytic parameters are showen in Table (4) indicates that the synthesised NZs have higher affinity towards substrates than some reported NZs.
Reagents | Km for H2O2 (mM) | Vmax (mM/sec) | Kcat (sec− 1) | Keff (mM− 1sec− 1) |
HRP | 0.8051 | 0.3042 | 16.4166 | 20.3908 |
VNShs | 0.7843 | 0.3369 | 1.0212 | 1.3021 |
VNFws | 0.6514 | 0.2508 | 2.2817 | 3.5034 |
VNSps | 0.6398 | 0.2133 | 1.9408 | 3.0334 |
Table (3): Catalytic parameters.
Sl. No. | Nanozyme | H2O2 linearity, LOD | Km | Reference |
1 | Nickel metal-organic framework 2D NShs | 0.04–160µM LOD-8 nM | TMB-0.365mM H2O2-2.49mM | [40] |
2 | porous PtCu dendrites | 0.3–325µM LOD-0.1 µM | TMB- 0.08 mM H2O2- 0.26 mM | [41] |
3 | Pt NPs | 1–50µM LOD-1µM | TMB-0.091 mM H2O2-80.25 mM | [42] |
4 | rhodium nanoparticles | 1-100µM LOD- 0.20 µM | TMB-0.198 mM H2O2- 0.38 mM | [43] |
5 | VNShs | 0.0969-1.5507mM LOD-0.066mM | H2O2- 0.7843mM PAP- 0.3179 and NEDA-0.0327mM | Present work |
VNFws | 0.0242-0.3877mM LOD-0.0425mM | H2O2- 0.6514mM PAP- 0.2108 and NEDA- 0.0749mM |
VNSps | 0.0606-0.9692mM LOD-0.1474mM | H2O2- 0.6398mM PAP- 0.4625 and NEDA- 0.3085mM |
Table (4): comparison of catalytic parameters.
Characterization of vanadium oxide Nano crystals.
SEM and EDS analysis
FE-SEM images of vanadium oxide NPs synthesized by different methods were showed in Fig. 7 & S9, S10, S11. Based on the type of the morphology, the NPs were named as VNShs, VNFws and VNSps. During heat treatment of hydrogen diperoxodioxovanadate (III) complex to form brownish gel (V2O5.nH2O), sheet like NPs is formed. When brown solution of hydrogen diperoxodioxovanadate (III) complex was treated with sodium dihydrogen orthophosphate followed by hydrothermal process, flower like NPs were formed. When the yellow transparent solution of ammonium metavanadate and HCl was treated with reducing agent like hydrazine hydrate forms spheres like NPs. Elemental composition of the NPs was showing the presence of 41.97% of vanadium and 58.03% of oxygen in VNShs, 51.56% vanadium and 48.44% of oxygen in VNFws, 36.2% of vanadium and 63.8% of oxygen in VNSps, which indicates the formation of pure vanadium oxide NPs. EDS spectres with percentage compositions were showed in Fig. 8.
XRD
The XRD pattern of the NPs were shown in the Fig. 9. The XRD peaks of VNFws and VNSps, the different peaks were exactly matched with standard card JCPDS no. 41-1426, representing vanadium pentoxide NPs in orthorhombic phase. whereas VNShs were matched with [44], which correspondence to rhombohedral structure of the V2O5. The average crystalline size of the synthesised NPs was calculated using Scherrer’s and W-H equations and was found to be 45.42, 45.7nm for VNShs, 29.14, 32.5nm for VNFws, and 39.83, 38.7nm for VNSps. The degree of crystallinity index was calculated and was found to be 0.7978 for VNShs, 0.7856 For VNFws and 0.8570for VNSps. Therefore, in VNShs 79.78% is in crystalline and 20.22% is in amorphous form, in VNFws 78.57% is in crystalline and 21.43% is in amorphous form, and in VNSps, 85.70% is in crystalline and 14.30% is in amorphous form. Raw XRD patterns were showed in Fig. S15, S16 & S17.
DLS
The variations in the intensity of scattered light resulting from Brownian motion in synthesized NPs, size, and size distribution can be predicted with the help of the distribution curve in DLS spectra. The resultant DLS spectrums and size distribution of different morphological vanadium oxide NPs are shown below in Table (5). It showed that the size distribution by the analysis of DLS are in good agreement with histogram plot data which is showed in Table S1, S2 & S3. Zeta potential is a stability indicator of NPs, which is influenced by the surface charge and is measured by analysing particles' electrophilic mobility in an electric field. The Zeta potential of VNShs is 4.0mv, VNFws is -4.5mv and VNSps is 4.6mv which are almost neutral[45]. The Polydispersity index (PDI) is a parameter used to measure the size distribution, specifying the uniformity of NPs. International standards organizations have established that PDI values of 0.1 to 0.25 indicate a small size distribution (monodisperse samples) and values greater than 0.5 are common to broad distribution (polydisperse samples)[46, 47]. PDI values of VNShs is 1.144, VNFws is 1.834 and VNSps is 1.896 which indicates polydispersity with multiple-sized particles, which might be due to the rapid agglomeration of the NPs due to low zeta potentials[48]. Size distribution spectres as obtained by DLS analysis is showed in the Fig. 10. DLS result on Surface charge measurements are showed in Fig. S12, S13, & S14.
NZs | Volume % | Diameter(nm) |
VNShs | 100 | 349 |
VNFws | 44.7 | 390 |
55.3 | 180.8 |
VNSps | 100 | 254.1 |
Table (5): size distribution of different shaped vanadium oxide NZs.
FT-IR Spectra analysis
To study the nature of binding between vanadium and oxygen in V2O5 NPs, FT-IR was recorded in the range of 400 to 4000cm− 1 wave number, which identifies the chemical bonds as well as functional groups in the compound. FTIR spectra of V2O5 NPs exhibited three characteristic vibration modes. The peaks near 470 cm− 1 are due to the V-O-V bond symmetric stretch, 800cm− 1 is due to the V-O-V asymmetric stretch and the peak around 1000cm− 1 can be assigned to the V = O stretching, the peaks around 600 to 700cm− 1 is potentially originate from the V − O bond, and the peaks from 1950 to 2350cm− 1 are due to δ(HOH) and ט γ(OH) in water. FRIR spectres of V2O5 NPs were showed in Fig. 11.
Influence of interfering species
To study the effect of interfering species, optimized experimental conditions were used by taking several cations, anions and amino acids using hydrogen peroxide concentration of 0.0969mM for HRP, 0.1938mM for both VNShs and VNFws and 0.4845mM for VNSps. Influence of interfering species is tabulated in Table (6) as tolerant ratio. It is the ratio of limit of interfering species concentration to that of the concentration of hydrogen peroxide. The result shows high interference for Fe2+, Fe3+, and FAS (iron-containing salts) with HRP and all NZs. Zr4+, Na2CO3, Glycine, Glucose, and Alanine show average interference, whereas NH4Cl, Na+, Mg2+, Zn2+, Zr4+, KNO3, and Urea show less interference to a large extent.
| Tolerant ratio |
HRP | VNShs | VNSps | VNFws |
Cl− 1 | 360 | 715 | 1429 | 360 |
Na+, Mg2+ | 280 | 550 | 1100 | 270 |
Zn2+ | 55 | 210 | 395 | 90 |
Se4+ | 20 | 163 | 325 | 90 |
Ni2+ | 20 | 210 | 430 | 50 |
Zr4+ | 40 | 70 | 250 | 20 |
Co2+ | 55 | 15 | 20 | 5 |
Cu2+ | 10 | 10 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
Na2CO3 | 60 | 10 | 250 | 35 |
KNO3 | 165 | 330 | 660 | 165 |
Urea | 430 | 210 | 430 | 105 |
Glycine | 80 | 85 | 170 | 50 |
Glucose | 40 | 70 | 140 | 35 |
EDTA | 20 | 10 | 85 | 5 |
Alanine | 80 | 70 | 85 | 20 |
Leucine, Isoleucine | 55 | 50 | 50 | 10 |
L-Histidine | 45 | 40 | 85 | 10 |
cysteine | 10 | 25 | 110 | 10 |
Methionine | 45 | 50 | 85 | 50 |
Cetric acid | 40 | 15 | 140 | 5 |
D-Valine | 55 | 55 | 110 | 25 |
glutamic acid | 10 | 50 | 50 | 25 |
L-ornithine HCl | 40 | 40 | 20 | 20 |
Fe3+ | 0.0282 | 0.0029 | 0.0058 | 0.0283 |
Fe2+ | 0.2861 | 0.2887 | 0.0231 | 0.0014 |
FAS | 0.2861 | 0.0029 | 0.0058 | 0.0282 |
Table (6): Interference study of different metal ions, organic and organic compounds.
Precision study
Precision studies were performed at optimized conditions of all the reagents along with four different concentrations of H2O2 within the linearity range. The study included 10 runs in a day with a time interval of 1 h for within-day precision and 10 days run for day-to-day precision with one day interval. All solutions were prepared freshly every day(n = 10). The standard deviation (SD) and percentage standard deviation (%SD) were showed in Table (7). The results show Intraday %SD is greater than the Inter-day %SD in all cases and VNSps has highest %SD when compared to other NZs and HRP. The Limit of detection (LOD), and Limit of quantification (LOQ) were determined by taking the readings of blank regent versus blank reagent. LOD and LOQs were found to be 0.0548 mM and 0.1662 mM for HRP, 0.066 mM and 0.2002 mM for VNShs, 0.0425 mM and 0.1287 mM for VNFws and 0.1474 mM and 0.4465 mM for VNSps.
HRP | VNShs |
[H2O2] in mM | SD | %SD | [H2O2] in mM | SD | %SD |
Intraday | Inter-day | Intraday | Inter-day | Intraday | Inter-day | Intraday | Inter-day |
0.3877 | 0.022 | 0.0252 | 1.7933 | 2.0629 | 0.1938 | 0.0066 | 0.0106 | 0.8221 | 1.3616 |
0.1938 | 0.0043 | 0.0078 | 0.7192 | 1.3288 | 0.0485 | 0.0072 | 0.0081 | 1.0815 | 1.1883 |
0.0969 | 0.0037 | 0.0038 | 1.584 | 1.6163 | 0.0242 | 0.004 | 0.0055 | 0.8156 | 1.0317 |
0.0484 | 0.0016 | 0.0021 | 1.4266 | 1.8851 | 0.0121 | 0.0048 | 0.0060 | 1.1507 | 1.4792 |
VNFws | VNSps |
[H2O2] in mM | SD | %SD | [H2O2] in mM | SD | %SD |
Intraday | Inter-day | Intraday | Inter-day | Intraday | Inter-day | Intraday | Inter-day |
0.3877 | 0.005 | 0.0054 | 0.865 | 0.9475 | 0.2423 | 0.0169 | 0.0253 | 1.7465 | 2.652 |
0.1938 | 0.0043 | 0.0052 | 1.301 | 1.5629 | 0.1211 | 0.0187 | 0.0207 | 2.088 | 2.3316 |
0.0969 | 0.0014 | 0.0016 | 1.048 | 1.1694 | 0.0606 | 0.0182 | 0.0195 | 2.264 | 2.4247 |
0.0485 | 0.0005 | 0.0012 | 0.908 | 1.8965 | 0.0151 | 0.0131 | 0.0134 | 2.614 | 2.6942 |
Table (7): Inter & Intraday precision study of the proposed method. (n = 10) |
Recovery and applicability
With glucose
Recovery studies were conducted by inoculating the standard glucose to serum sample in the proposed method. The serum sample has been analysed by spiking 10µL directly to the reaction mixture. The result shows recovery rate ranging between 71.51 and 96.8% for HRP, 74.58 and 97.65% for VNShs, 75.29 and 97.28% for VNFws, 76.89 and 97.79% for VNSps. The recovery percentage is high with higher concentration of glucose, decreases with decrease in concentration and the percentage recovery is almost similar for HRP and NZs. The results are showen in the Table (8).
Blood sample in µL | HRP | VNShs |
Glucose (mM) | Added (mM) | Found (mM) | Recovered*(%) | Glucose (mM) | Added (mM) | Found (mM) | Recovered*(%) |
10 | 0.4625 | 0.4742 | 0.4591 | 96.8 | 0.4625 | 0.462 | 0.4512 | 97.65 |
0.2312 | 0.2079 | 0.1927 | 92.71 | 0.2312 | 0.236 | 0.2252 | 95.39 |
0.0578 | 0.0532 | 0.038 | 71.51 | 0.0578 | 0.0427 | 0.0319 | 74.58 |
VNFws | VNSps |
Glucose (mM) | Added (mM) | Found (mM) | Recovered*(%) | Glucose (mM) | Added (mM) | Found (mM) | Recovered*(%) |
0.4625 | 0.47 | 0.4572 | 97.28 | 0.4625 | 0.4353 | 0.4257 | 97.79 |
0.2312 | 0.2188 | 0.2059 | 94.16 | 0.2312 | 0.3242 | 0.3146 | 97.03 |
0.0578 | 0.0516 | 0.0389 | 75.29 | 0.1156 | 0.0417 | 0.03205 | 76.89 |
Table (8): recovery study of glucose in blood sample.
With H 2 O 2
Recovery studies were conducted by inoculating the standard H2O2 to serum sample in the proposed method. The experiment demonstrated repeatability and minimal interference from inhibitory species, resulting in a recovery rate ranging from 99.72–99.93% for HRP, 94.99–98.92% for VNShs, 95.70–99.16% for VNFws and 98.13–99.55% for VNSps as shown in the Table (9). The results show the recovery percentage is maximum when the added H2O2 concentration was maximum, minimum when added H2O2 concentration was minimum and highest recovery percentage with HRP and least with VNShs.
Blood sample in µL | HRP | VNShs |
H2O2 (mM) | Added (mM) | Found (mM) | Recovered*(%) | H2O2 (mM) | Added (mM) | Found (mM) | Recovered*(%) |
10 | 0.1938 | 0.1952 | 0.1951 | 99.93 | 0.7753 | 0.7702 | 0.7618 | 98.92 |
0.0969 | 0.0929 | 0.0928 | 99.85 | 0.3877 | 0.4118 | 0.4034 | 97.98 |
0.0484 | 0.0509 | 0.0508 | 99.72 | 0.1938 | 0.1666 | 0.1583 | 94.99 |
VNFws | VNSps |
H2O2 (mM) | Added (mM) | Found (mM) | Recovered*(%) | H2O2 (mM) | Added (mM) | Found (mM) | Recovered*(%) |
0.1938 | 0.1898 | 0.18824 | 99.16 | 0.4845 | 0.4841 | 0.4819 | 99.55 |
0.0969 | 0.1095 | 0.1079 | 98.54 | 0.2422 | 0.2495 | 0.2438 | 99.11 |
0.0484 | 0.0371 | 0.0355 | 95.70 | 0.121 | 0.1167 | 0.1145 | 98.13 |
Table (9): recovery study of H2O2 in blood sample.
Probable reaction mechanism
V2O5 [V(V)] NZs oxidises P-amino phenol to 4-iminocyclohexa-2, 5-dien-1-one (oxidized P-amino phenol) and converted into V(IV). V(IV) donates electron to H2O2 and convert them to H2O. Oxidized P-amino phenol coupled with NEDA to form 4-((4-((2-aminoethyl) amino) naphthalen-1-yl)imino)cyclohexa-2,5-dien-1-one which is an orange-red coloured product with maximum absorbance at 470nm.