This study which includes SCD populations across three countries presents a unique framework to look at similarities and differences across SCD populations in sub-Saharan Africa(SSA). SSA bears more than 70% of the global SCD burden 4 and requires targeted interventions to reduce its impact in this low-resource setting.
Generally most of the participants were children. This may be reflecting the low survival rates of individuals with SCD on the continent 4. The high proportion of paediatric participants in the Ghana sample highlights the success of the country’s longstanding newborn screening program, which is the longest-running in Africa. This goes a long way reflecting in the statistically significant differences in all the complications assessed, except for priapism and convulsions. The proportion of males in the various countries is comparable to reported registry numbers alluding to a representative sample of the population in these countries based on sex18–20. Blood transfusion, pain crises and febrile illnesses continue to be the biggest bane of patients with SCD as several studies have shown. This calls for more efforts to improve availability and accessibility of blood products in many health facilities and pain management across the continent.
This study uniquely involved a systematic comparison of haematological parameters focusing on HbF levels and HbF/F cells in relation to SCD clinical manifestation in three SSA countries. The haematological differences among the countries based on the age categorizations were found to be statistically significant for WBC, RBC, MCH and MCHC. Such differences may reflect underlying differences in the genetic background across the three populations including those influencing HbF parameters.
In Ghana where the highest levels of HbF were recorded, self-reported occurrence of complications was also lowest across all the complications assessed, except Acute Chest syndrome which was unexpected.The paediatric dominance in the Ghanaian participants could also have been a factor as children would have lived shorter lives with SCD compared to older cohorts. This phenomenon could be largely due to the protective tendencies of the foetal haemoglobin in persons with SCD as described by some studies 13–15,21–23, even in this sample who are hydroxyurea naive. The levels of HbF are known to decrease by about 5% per week from birth until 6 months 24. There is also a variation in HbF levels in children compared with adults living with sickle cell disease 13,16.
The Nigerian cohort had higher HbF and a lower F cells compared to the Tanzanian cohort, irrespective of their similarities in terms of ratio of children to adults. This indicates that high HbF does not imply high F cells and that the discrete quantity of HbF per cell may be a more important laboratory variable in assessing the overall impact of foetal haemoglobin in ameliorating features of sickle cell disease. Consequently, an increase in both parameters was found to lead to a reduction in febrile illnesses and transfusion needs. These are events that increase the financial burden as well as mortality of people living with sickle cell. This will imply that use of interventions like HU which has been found in several studies to improve HbF levels will definitely improve disease outcome and reduce the burden of care as has been proposed by previous studies 23,25–30.
The observation made here indicates that the HbF and F cell parameters had significant association with some disease features of importance like transfusion rates,frequency of painful crises and episodes of febrile illness. However the HbF/F cell ratio seemed to discriminate more and showed significant association with only frequency of painful crisis and febrile illness. This may explain the variation in clinical response seen in HU therapy whose mode of action includes increasing HbF and F cell levels, among others. This observation may indicate the use of personalised treatment strategies or HU-based combination in some individuals who show sub-optimal responses to HU alone.
The importance of monitoring of HbF levels which has been known to play a major role as a disease modifier and in deciphering disease severity, cannot be overemphasised. The findings of this study presents an opportunity for the targeting of interventions which are not only aimed at modifying the HbF levels but also increasing the F cell percentage. These interventions must also consider the statistically significant differences in the samples across the three sampled countries which could be evident in other countries. The statistically significant differences in the countries could also be due to healthcare seeking behaviours and accessibility to care differences in the countries.
In SSA, HbF modulating therapies such as hydroxyurea might be of greater importance as they have been found to be cheaper and several studies have found it feasible in sub-Saharan Africa across all age groups 31–33. This is further strengthened by the findings of this study in hydroxyurea-naive individuals, where higher HbF and F cells were associated with fewer incidence of transfusions and episodes of febrile illness irrespective of haemoglobin concentration. A study by Willen et al reported that initiating hydroxyurea at younger ages when HbF levels of > 20% ensures persistence of HbF production, improvement in haematological efficacy34 and by extension better quality of life. This provides a great opportunity and challenge in the assessed countries where the median HbF levels are below 10%. Sub-Saharan countries could therefore identify this threshold in their patients and initiate hydroxyurea, overcoming the age barrier. Though several reports have indicated low uptake of HU in Nigeria 35–37, overcoming the barriers would provide the most benefit as their HbF levels were lowest and spur on the perception of impact. In Ghana where a fairly higher proportion have been initiated on hydroxyurea and HbF levels were found to be high, focus should be shifted towards initiating when HbF level is > 20% at younger ages for optimal benefit. On the other hand, the higher HbF levels in Ghana might be due to their predominant paediatric sample population and not necessarily a marked variation from what was observed in the other countries.
Our study also revealed that majority of the paediatric patients had higher HbF levels especially in the Ghanaian cohort.This might necessitate the need to further explore the criteria for use of HU especially in children with a high baseline HbF level as they may be inadvertently omitted from several clinical trials as well as delay initiation of HUT. There may be a need for an expanded study to obtain baselines HbF reference values from a wider group of people living with sickle cell with varying haplotypes. This will further standardise practice and help to predict outcomes across all populations.
It is recommended that community screening programs should target newborns and younger ages and inculcate measurement of HbF levels and F cell count, where possible, to help determine the disease severity and serve as guide to the timing of the initiation of hydroxyurea.The screening programs should also encompass education on prophylactic therapies and disease modifying therapies like hydroxyurea. It also recommended that access to therapies which modulate HbF levels of SCD patients is increased as well as the diagnostic capacities for HbF levels. This will ensure that severity of SCD in affected patients can be reduced to the barest minimum.