Our study demonstrates that customized TOETVA, combining preoperative SETA, TOETVA, and RFA, can be effectively tailored for thyroid gland resection as our previous report [6]. Each technique offers distinct advantages and challenges. Several key points emerge from our findings.
Efficacy and Recurrence
Both TT and Dh demonstrated superior outcomes compared to ST in preventing recurrent hyperthyroidism. This finding aligns with previous studies that report higher recurrence rates associated with ST [3]. The increased recurrence observed in the ST group may be attributed to the larger volume of residual thyroid tissue, which allows for the potential reactivation of the autoimmune process.
As anticipated, the TT group consistently required lifelong thyroid hormone replacement. The Dh group exhibited a high rate of postoperative hypothyroidism, indicating that the remnant tissue from this procedure may often be insufficient to maintain euthyroidism. Although the ST group had the highest rate of euthyroidism, this came at the cost of an increased risk of recurrence. Nonetheless, hypothyroidism is generally considered preferable to hyperthyroidism, as it is easier to manage, while hyperthyroidism is associated with significant morbidities, including cardiovascular diseases and osteopenia [7]. One female patient in the ST group was initially euthyroid six months post-surgery; however, she experienced a relapse of hyperthyroidism following Trastuzumab-associated chemotherapy for breast cancer. The incidence of such relapses has been reported to range from 0.3–18% [8–10]. She ultimately achieved remission after three months of antithyroid drug (ATD) treatment, receiving 5 mg of methimazole daily.
Surgical Complications
The higher rate of temporary hypoparathyroidism in the TT group is consistent with the more extensive dissection required in this procedure. However, the absence of permanent hypoparathyroidism and recurrent laryngeal nerve injuries across all groups suggests that TOETVA, when performed by experienced surgeons, can achieve complication rates comparable to conventional thyroidectomy[11].
Our combined approach of SETA and RFA proved effective in managing IOBL, particularly in patients with hypervascular thyroid glands[6]. This strategy addresses one of the primary challenges in thyroidectomy for patients with GD, where the hypervascular nature of the thyroid gland complicates hemostasis[12]. It is advisable to prepare for blood transfusions in GD patients with large goiters [12]. Given that TOETVA is a minimally invasive procedure performed in a confined space, any bleeding can obstruct and obscure the operative field. Thus, maintaining a clear surgical view is essential in this endoscopic technique. Our combination of SETA, aimed at reducing blood flow, and RFA, used for hemostasis and tissue destruction, addresses these concerns.
The objective of SETA is to occlude most of the blood supply to the thyroid gland. Anatomically, the thyroid gland receives blood from two bilateral superior and two bilateral inferior arteries, with over 70% of its blood supply coming from the bilateral superior arteries. Therefore, we embolized two to three of these thyroid arteries, effectively diminishing blood supply and IOBL during surgical resection. Some reports have utilized SETA solely for the treatment of GD [13, 14]. However, SETA differs significantly from surgical techniques such as ST or Dh, where tissue is excised and removed, leaving only a small portion of the thyroid to maintain function. In contrast, when using SETA alone, the embolized thyroid tissue is not removed from the body and can continue to interact with surrounding tissues, potentially leading to autoimmune responses mediated by circulating autoantibodies. This may explain the higher recurrence rates of hyperthyroidism and the lack of long-term follow-up in these cases.
Initially, we did not employ SETA to reduce blood flow; instead, we adhered to traditional methods using ATD to maintain euthyroidism for at least one month, alongside iodine solutions administered 14 days before surgery. In the ST group, two patients who did not receive SETA experienced significant blood loss, with one case reaching up to 800 ml. We subsequently revised our strategy by utilizing Doppler ultrasonography to assess vascularity of the thyroid gland. If hypervascularity was detected, pre-operative SETA was arranged; if no hypervascularity and euthyroid status were observed, pre-operative SETA was not performed.
The higher rate of temporary hypoparathyroidism in the TT group is consistent with the more extensive dissection required in this procedure. However, the absence of permanent hypoparathyroidism and recurrent laryngeal nerve injuries across all groups suggests that TOETVA, when performed by experienced surgeons, can achieve complication rates comparable to conventional thyroidectomy [15].
Recent reports have also discussed the use of RFA for GD [16]. However, the long-term efficacy and outcomes in patients with smaller volumes of thyroid gland remain questionable [16]. In our approach, we utilized RFA primarily for hemostasis and tissue destruction during our combined approach of TOETVA, rather than as the main treatment modality.
Surgery first after ATD control of thyroid function
Less than 30% of young patients achieve lasting remission after at least two years of ATD[7]. Radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy for patients with Graves' disease (GD) has a success rate of only 70.9%, and for patients with grade 3 goiter, the success rate drops to 55% [4]. Furthermore, the success rates at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years are 37.1%, 48.6%, 55.6%, and 65.0%, respectively [4]. Achieving a 50% remission rate with RAI typically requires a duration of at least 3 to 5 years. Another downside of RAI therapy is its potential to induce primary hyperparathyroidism, exacerbate Graves' ophthalmopathy (GO), and lead to reproductive dysfunction or malignancy in a dose-dependent manner [17, 18]. Both ATD and RAI require prolonged treatment for hyperthyroidism, which can negatively impact working ability, socioeconomic status, and contribute to agoraphobia in adults [19]. In children and teenagers, hyperthyroidism can lead to cardiovascular disorders, psychomotor disabilities, osteopenia, or growth retardation [7].
We recommended 7 mCi of low-dose RAI as an adjunct treatment for 4 patients in the ST group due to persistent hyperthyroidism three months after TOETVA surgery. All 4 patients achieved either euthyroidism or hypothyroidism within six months. Employing RAI as an adjuvant treatment post-surgery is a valuable alternative for preventing complications associated with a second operation[20].
Common indications for thyroidectomy include patient preference, noncompliance with medication or RAI regimens, suspicious nodules or known cancer, larger glands causing obstructive or compressive symptoms, or GO. Surgery should be recommended as the first-line or definitive treatment for GD after ATD control of thyroid function due to its rapid recovery and low recurrence rate. RAI can serve as an adjunct to prevent the need for a second operation. Additionally, TOETVA offers a minimally invasive, scar-free surgical option, which is particularly beneficial for the predominantly young or female patient population affected by GD[21].
Customized Approach
* Our findings support a customized approach to surgical management of GD:
-
For patients prioritizing definitive control of hyperthyroidism, TT is recommended due to its lower recurrence rate, minimal risk of malignant transformation in residual tissue and less chance of worsening GO [1, 3].
-
For younger patients or those prioritizing the possibility of avoiding lifelong thyroid hormone replacement, the Dh technique with a thyroid remnant of 2-4g may be considered[20].
-
ST should be approached with caution due to higher recurrence rates and longer hospital stays. It may be considered in cases of incomplete preoperative SETA to minimize the risk of massive IOBL. If hyperthyroidism persisted or recurred following surgery, the RAI could be a salvage postoperatively.
Limitations and Future
Our study has several limitations:
-
The retrospective design and relatively small sample size limit the generalizability of our findings.
-
The non-randomized allocation of patients to different surgical techniques introduces potential selection bias.
-
The follow-up period may not capture very late recurrences or long-term quality of life outcomes.
Future research directions should include:
-
Prospective, randomized studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up periods.
-
Investigation into techniques to further reduce IOBL and hospital stay, particularly in ST cases.
-
Long-term quality of life assessments comparing different surgical approaches.