3.1 Characterization of sulfonated solid acid catalyst
The formation of C-SO3H catalyst was conducted through two steps reaction. First, fibre of PEFB was carbonized to produce black carbon. Second step is sulfonation of carbon by hydrothermal treatment. The all preparation steps of C-SO3H generated from PEFB are presented in Figure 1.
Material changes of morphology structures were observed by SEM (Figure 2); it can be seen that the original structure of PEFB fibre was fibrous and smooth surface. The PEFB consisted of cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin that still bind to each other (Figure 2a). The PEFB started to be pyrolyzed, continued by dehydration and dissociation process of -C-O-C-; then last step is polycyclic aromatic carbon rings formation at 350 oC and finally form carbon structure (24, 25). After carbonization, surface structure was coarse and porous. This was possible due to the heating process during carbonization causing the cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin compounds to break into 3 main components of carbon, tar and gas (volatile matter) (Figure 2 b). The sulfonation process by hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) treatment has led to the surface of carbon becoming more porous with diameters of 3-6 µm (Figure 2c); this contained of sulfonate and carboxylic group.
HTC system is spontaneous process and an exothermic reaction with vast majority of the carbon. A low temperature of HTC operated at over 100 °C is widely found in nature because many minerals formed under these circumstances. The process to form carbon materials via hydrothermal condition led to the increased solubility, facilitating the physical and chemical interaction between reagents and solvent and also ionic and acid reaction to form structure of carbonaceous (26). The HTC process enhanced the acidity level of the C-SO3H up to 7.3-fold than its level of C. Compared to C, the surface area of C-SO3H was also significantly increased from 11.5 to 239.65 m2 g-1. The nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms for C and C-SO3H was illustrated in Figure 3. The carbon material exhibited type IV isotherm with H3-type hysteresis loop, which was indicating the mesoporous structure of the C-SO3H. Besides, the C-SO3H more stable and water-tolerant in hydrothermal conditions than other solid acid catalyst (23).
The sulfonic acid group was reached through a reaction of sulfonating agent and aromatic rings resulting in a structure of carbon with the electrophilic substitution (27, 28). It was reported that the surface functionalization by sulfonate group on polycyclic aromatic carbon rings would generate a large amount of acid sites with form of thermally stable; furthermore, the sulfonic groups was stacked at the edge of carbon ring (29). The XRF analysis detected the sulphur content on carbon about 40.2%. The sulfonated carbon solid acid catalyst was successfully to form amorphous structure; this type of structure was composed of polycyclic aromatic carbon sheets with sulfonate and carboxylic group. The detail result of characterization of PEFB, C, and C-SO3H are presented in Table 1.
Table 1. The characterization of PFEB fiber, C, and C-SO3H
Sample
|
Component (%)
|
Acidity
(mmol g-1)
|
Surface area
(m2 g-1)
|
Ca
|
K
|
Si
|
S
|
PEFB fiber
|
36.0
|
46.9
|
6.5
|
-
|
-
|
0.171
|
C
|
30.1
|
53.9
|
4.8
|
-
|
0.21
|
11.55
|
C-SO3H
|
13.3
|
7.16
|
10.0
|
40.2
|
1.75
|
239.65
|
The crystalline index is the level of regularity of the crystal structure of a material; the breaking structure of PEFB was also proven by a decrease of crystalline index of 63.8% (Figure 4). The XRD pattern shows the changes of intensity on amorph area at 2θ = 17 ° and cellulose crystals at 2θ = 22.8° (30). The decrease in the CrI number because the crystal structure has been lost and converted into carbon structure during carbonization process. The high intensity of cellulose crystal area was only found for PEFB. The similar results in the carbon and sulfonated solid acid catalyst were observed indicating no structure change during sulfonation treatment.
Figure 5 presents the spectra of FT-IR for PEFB, C, and C-SO3H. After sulfonation process, the appearance of bands at 1207 cm-1 and 1720 cm-1 were recorded due to sulfonic group; the presence of sulfonation was also confirmed elsewhere (31). The band observed at 3400 cm-1 was attributed to -OH in carboxylic acids; this indicated that the sulfonation process not only created sulfonic groups but also formed other functional groups because of oxidizing reaction (32). The C=C bond in polyaromatic compounds was observed at 1608 cm-1 that was assigned as carbonized material.
Thermal gravimetric analysis was conducted to study the thermal degradation type of material and impact of sulfonation on C-SO3H. Figure 6 showed the thermal gravimitric of materials carbonized up to 600 oC. The dehydration of water for PEFB sample was started at 74.4 oC, continued by decomposition of hemicellulose and lignin at 332.5 oC. For both materials, the reduction of mass was due to the decomposition of carbon and thermal process also enhanched the oxidized structure thus thermal stability was reduced (24). TGA curve also shows the mass loss trend of C-SO3H about more 8% than that of C. At higher temperature, the material was rapidly degradated especially for C-SO3H; this is possible related to the amount of sulfonate group on carbon. As reported, the C-SO3H sulfonated by sulfonate group have a weak structure and unstable condition on range of temperature compared to original carbon (33).
3.2. Hydrolysis of cassava peel starch over sulfonated carbon solid acid catalyst
One of potential material for glucose production is carbohydrate; it could be converted to glucose by hydrolysis reaction using heterogeneous or homogeneous catalyst and enzymatic reaction. The cassava peel starch which was used in this research consists of 80.2% of carbohydrate. The hydrolysis performance with variation of catalyst concentration was presented in Figure 6. The TRS as hydrolysis product was increased when C-SO3H weight increased up to 5% with TRS of 4.139 mg mL-1. The presence of C-SO3H as catalyst on cassava peel starch hydrolysis significantly increased the product about 316.7% compared than hydrolysis without catalyst. It means that the catalytic performance of C-SO3H increased due to modified surface functionalization. The concentration of TRS regularly decreased at higher C-SO3H concentration (>5%); it was because the formed sugar compounds was degraded become to furfural compounds (34). The performance of C-SO3H in hydrolysis was observed to be higher TRS compared with those sulfonated catalyst about 0.639 mg mL-1 (35). The TRS produced was also indicated by color intensity; the DNS assay was used to evaluate the intensity. The color of solution was obtained to more orange and higher color intensity showed higher concentration of TRS detected (Figure 7, inset).
The highest TRS concentration was obtained because catalyst have access and easily to attach the carbohydrate linkage. Furthermore, concentration of cassava peel starch as substrate also has optimum condition at 5% to produce TRS (Figure 8). Higher concentration of starch would lead to more viscous solution due to swelling and gelatinization of starch in the presence of water. Thus, this condition caused the C-SO3H more difficult to access the carbohydrate linkage; hence, lower TRS was produced. Based on energy efficiency and consumption cost for hydrolysis reaction, the concentration 5% of cassava peel starch using 5% of C-SO3H was selected as optimum condition.
In order to know the reactivity of C-SO3H, it is interesting to investigate the C and H2SO4 performance as heterogeneous and homogeneous catalyst, respectively. The C was used as a control; whereas, the H+ ions concentration on H2SO4 used was the same concentration with the H+ ion content on C-SO3H. As shown in Figure 9, the TRS about 2.05 mg/mL and 3.18 mg/mL were obtained when using C dan H2SO4 as catalyst, respectively. The process using C-SO3H catalyst had higher value of TSR about 1.02-fold than that using C. On the other hand, the common liquid catalyst (H2SO4) showed lower performance (TRS value of 3.18 mg/mL) compared to C-SO3H. It is probably due to presence of –SO3H and -COOH groups that were functionalized on carbon. Furthermore, the H2SO4 only have H+ ions in homogenous phase and the catalyst accessibility should be easier to attach carbohydrate linkage.
Table 2 shows that the sulfonated carbon solid acid catalyst prepared in this work is more efficient and had higher hydrolysis activity than other sulfonated solid catalysts; even, they used difficult method of ionic liquid or water with HTC and microwave method.
Table 2. Sulfonated solid acid on hydrolysis catalytic activity
Catalyst
|
Acidity (mmol g-1)
|
Solvent
|
Method
|
Temp (K)/Time (h)
|
TRS yield (%)
|
Ref.
|
30-CCSA
|
0.86
|
H2O
|
HTC
|
423/6
|
44.52
|
(36)
|
PCPs-SO3H
|
1.80
|
H2O
|
-
|
393/3
|
5.30
|
(37)
|
CM-SO3H
|
4.22
|
[BMIM][Cl]
|
-
|
303/3
|
59.4
|
(38)
|
CSA-SO3H
|
1.76
|
H2O
|
Microwave
|
403/1
|
34.6
|
(39)
|
C-SO3H
|
1.75
|
H2O
|
-
|
373/1
|
64.0
|
This work
|
In order to investigate the activity of catalyst in repeated uses, the recovered C-SO3H was rinsed 3rd times with DI water by stirred for 45 min and collected after separation with liquid and then dried. The recovered catalyst performance was observed to be slight lower than that was obtained in the 1st reaction. TRS decrease was observed only 6% after 4th repeated uses (Figure 10). This proves that the C-SO3H provide effectively to hydrolyze the starch into glucose. This result also shows that the prepared C-SO3H not only provide non-toxic materials, green process and easy handling, but also has good catalytic performance for hydrolysis reaction.