This retrospective study received institutional review board approval; the requirement for written informed consent was waived.
Study population
This was a retrospective study of the clinical records of ACS patients who underwent cardiac CT at our institution between January 2017 and March 2018. In this study period, coronary CT angiography was performed on 3177 patients with suspected or confirmed coronary artery disease for clinical reasons, based on the guidance of the American College of Cardiology [15]. Among these patients, 46 patients were diagnosed with ACS by invasive coronary angiography, of which 13 patients were excluded because of different CT protocols (n=9) or poor image quality (n=4). The remaining 33 patients were enrolled in this study and included 22 men and 11 women with a mean age of 62 years (range: 42–91 years) and a mean body weight of 60.3 kg (range: 32–99 kg).
Cardiac CT image acquisition
All patients were scanned with a dual-layer spectral detector CT scanner (iQon Spectral CT; Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands). Individuals presenting with a baseline heart rate of >65 beats/min received an oral β-blocker (10–20 mg Inderal; AstraZeneca, Osaka, Japan) 60 min before the scan. Standard coronary CT angiography was performed with a 13 s intravenous infusion of Iopamiron 370 (240 mgI/mL; Bayer HealthCare, Osaka, Japan). The acquisition parameters for cardiac CT imaging were as follows (Table 1): detector collimation, 64 × 0.625 mm; tube rotation time, 270 ms; tube voltage, 120 kVp; tube current, 228.6 ± 57.5 mA (range, 100–370 mA); and volume CT dose index, 22.2 ± 5.5 mGy (range, 4.9–34.5 mGy).
CT Image Reconstruction
The spectral-based image data were post-processed at a workstation (Spectral Diagnostic Suite; Philips Healthcare) to generate VMIs at 17 different energy levels (40–200 keV) with a spectral level of 3 (manufacturer’s recommendation). We used conventional CT images reconstructed with IR (iDose level 3; Philips Healthcare) as controls. We also reconstructed the quantitative, iodine density, and effective atomic number images. The slice thickness of all CT images was 1 mm.
Quantitative image analysis
A radiology technologist with 15 years of experience with cardiac CT performed the quantitative analysis of the axial images. CT attenuation of normal myocardium (HUnormal) and hypo-perfused myocardium (HUhypo) was measured by placing circular region of interests in axial cardiac CT images. Normal and hypo-perfused areas were determined by invasive coronary angiography. We attempted to select a region of interest of 100 mm2 in the myocardium that excluded the vessels and perivascular fat. The image noise was defined as the standard deviation (SD) of the attenuation of the normal myocardium. The contrast and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated with the following formula:
We defined the optimized energy level as that which results in images with the highest CNR. We also measured the iodine concentration and effective Z in the normal and hypo-perfused areas.
Quantitative image analysis
The image quality obtained with the different sequences was evaluated by qualitative image analysis with a PACS viewer (View R, version 1.09.15, Yokogawa Electronic, Tokyo, Japan). Two board-certified radiologists with 20 and 13 years of experience with cardiac CT, respectively, independently graded the image contrast, noise, artifacts, sharpness, and overall image quality.
The CT datasets were randomized, and the readers were blinded to the acquisition parameters. Using a subjective four-point scale, they independently graded image contrast and overall quality (1 = unacceptable, 2 = acceptable, 3 = good, or 4 = excellent). Image noise and artifacts were similarly recorded as grade 1 (present and unacceptable), 2 (present and interfering with the depiction of adjacent structures), 3 (present without interfering with the depiction of adjacent structures), or 4 (no noise or artifacts). Image sharpness was determined by evaluating the aortic wall sharpness as grade 1 (blurry), 2 (poorer than average), 3 (better than average), and 4 (sharp). Any disagreement between the readers was settled by consensus.
Statistical analysis
We performed statistical analyses with the programing software Python (version 3.6.3). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was performed to determine the normality of the distributions. All numerical values were expressed as mean ± SD. For quantitative image analysis, we performed the paired t-test to compare the best CNR VMIs and conventional CT images and to compare the iodine concentration and the effective Z in the normal and hypo-perfused areas. For qualitative image analysis, we performed the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test to compare the best CNR VMIs and conventional CT images. Furthermore, the degree of agreement between two observers regarding the visual evaluation results was measured using kappa statistics: poor (<0.20), fair (0.21–0.40), moderate (0.41–0.60), substantial (0.61–0.80), and near-perfect (0.81–1.00). Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.