1 Landheer, M. L., Therasse, P. & van de Velde, C. J. The importance of quality assurance in surgical oncology. Eur J Surg Oncol 28, 571-602, doi:10.1053/ejso.2002.1255 (2002).
2 Butterworth, J. W. et al. Challenges to quality assurance of surgical interventions in clinical oncology trials: A systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol, doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2020.10.002 (2020).
3 Kim, W. et al. Decreased Morbidity of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy Compared With Open Distal Gastrectomy for Stage I Gastric Cancer: Short-term Outcomes From a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (KLASS-01). Annals of surgery 263, 28-35, doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000001346 (2016).
4 Baiocchi, G. L. et al. International consensus on a complications list after gastrectomy for cancer. Gastric Cancer 22, 172-189, doi:10.1007/s10120-018-0839-5 (2019).
5 Lee, H. J. et al. Short-term Outcomes of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy With D2 Lymphadenectomy to Open Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer (KLASS-02-RCT). Annals of surgery 270, 983-991, doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000003217 (2019).
6 Busweiler, L. A. et al. Textbook outcome as a composite measure in oesophagogastric cancer surgery. Br J Surg 104, 742-750, doi:10.1002/bjs.10486 (2017).
7 Salet, N. et al. Is Textbook Outcome a valuable composite measure for short-term outcomes of gastrointestinal treatments in the Netherlands using hospital information system data? A retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 8, e019405, doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019405 (2018).
8 van der Kaaij, R. T. et al. Using textbook outcome as a measure of quality of care in oesophagogastric cancer surgery. Br J Surg 105, 561-569, doi:10.1002/bjs.10729 (2018).
9 Levy, J. et al. Textbook Outcome and Survival in Patients With Gastric Cancer: An Analysis of the Population Registry of Esophageal and Stomach Tumours in Ontario (PRESTO). Annals of surgery, doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000003849 (2020).
10 Kulshrestha, S. et al. Textbook oncologic outcome is associated with increased overall survival after esophagectomy. Surgery 168, 953-961, doi:10.1016/j.surg.2020.05.038 (2020).
11 Karthaus, E. G. et al. Textbook Outcome: A Composite Measure for Quality of Elective Aneurysm Surgery. Annals of surgery 266, 898-904, doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002388 (2017).
12 Ten Berge, M. G. et al. Textbook outcome as a composite outcome measure in non-small-cell lung cancer surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezaa265 (2020).
13 van Roessel, S. et al. Textbook Outcome: Nationwide Analysis of a Novel Quality Measure in Pancreatic Surgery. Annals of surgery 271, 155-162, doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000003451 (2020).
14 Uyama, I. et al. Clinical advantages of robotic gastrectomy for clinical stage I/II gastric cancer: a multi-institutional prospective single-arm study. Gastric Cancer 22, 377-385, doi:10.1007/s10120-018-00906-8 (2019).
15 Liao, G., Zhao, Z., Khan, M., Yuan, Y. & Li, X. Comparative analysis of robotic gastrectomy and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in terms of their long-term oncological outcomes: a meta-analysis of 3410 gastric cancer patients. World J Surg Oncol 17, 86, doi:10.1186/s12957-019-1628-2 (2019).
16 Roh, C. K. et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes between integrated robotic and conventional laparoscopic surgery for distal gastrectomy: a propensity score matching analysis. Sci Rep 10, 485, doi:10.1038/s41598-020-57413-z (2020).
17 Seo, W. J. et al. Reduced-port totally robotic distal subtotal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: 100 consecutive cases in comparison with conventional robotic and laparoscopic distal subtotal gastrectomy. Sci Rep 10, 16015, doi:10.1038/s41598-020-73118-9 (2020).
18 Shin, H. J. et al. Long-term Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-weighted Analysis of 2084 Consecutive Patients. Annals of surgery, doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000003845 (2020).
19 Lu, J. et al. Assessment of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Annals of surgery, doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000004466 (2020).
20 Kang, B. H. et al. Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Robotic and Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: The Learning Curve of Robotic Surgery. J Gastric Cancer 12, 156-163, doi:10.5230/jgc.2012.12.3.156 (2012).
21 Japanese Gastric Cancer, A. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer 20, 1-19, doi:10.1007/s10120-016-0622-4 (2017).
22 Guideline Committee of the Korean Gastric Cancer A. Korean Practice Guideline for Gastric Cancer 2018: an Evidence-based, Multi-disciplinary Approach. J Gastric Cancer 19, 1-48, doi:10.5230/jgc.2019.19.e8 (2019).
23 Shibasaki, S., Suda, K., Obama, K., Yoshida, M. & Uyama, I. Should robotic gastrectomy become a standard surgical treatment option for gastric cancer? Surg Today 50, 955-965, doi:10.1007/s00595-019-01875-w (2020).
24 Wang, W. J. et al. Severity and incidence of complications assessed by the Clavien-Dindo classification following robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective and propensity score-matched study. Surg Endosc 33, 3341-3354, doi:10.1007/s00464-018-06624-7 (2019).
25 Suda, K. et al. Potential advantages of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with conventional laparoscopic approach: a single institutional retrospective comparative cohort study. Surg Endosc 29, 673-685, doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3718-0 (2015).
26 Kamei, T., Kitayama, J., Yamashita, H. & Nagawa, H. Intraoperative blood loss is a critical risk factor for peritoneal recurrence after curative resection of advanced gastric cancer. World J Surg 33, 1240-1246, doi:10.1007/s00268-009-9979-4 (2009).
27 Liang, Y. X. et al. Impact of intraoperative blood loss on survival after curative resection for gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 19, 5542-5550, doi:10.3748/wjg.v19.i33.5542 (2013).
28 Arita, T. et al. Increase in peritoneal recurrence induced by intraoperative hemorrhage in gastrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 22, 758-764, doi:10.1245/s10434-014-4060-4 (2015).
29 Kodera, Y. et al. Introducing laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer in general practice: a retrospective cohort study based on a nationwide registry database in Japan. Gastric Cancer 22, 202-213, doi:10.1007/s10120-018-0795-0 (2019).
30 Hyung, W. J. et al. A feasibility study of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for clinical stage I gastric cancer: a prospective multi-center phase II clinical trial, KLASS 03. Gastric Cancer 22, 214-222, doi:10.1007/s10120-018-0864-4 (2019).
31 Yang, K. et al. Robotic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymph node dissection during total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 33, 2357-2363, doi:10.1007/s00464-019-06772-4 (2019).
32 Lee, K. G. et al. Risk factors associated with complication following gastrectomy for gastric cancer: retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data based on the Clavien-Dindo system. J Gastrointest Surg 18, 1269-1277, doi:10.1007/s11605-014-2525-1 (2014).
33 Haverkamp, L. et al. Laparoscopic total gastrectomy versus open total gastrectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 27, 1509-1520, doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2661-1 (2013).
34 Sweigert, P. J. et al. Total gastrectomy in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma: Is there an advantage to the minimally invasive approach? Surgery 166, 623-631, doi:10.1016/j.surg.2019.05.041 (2019).
35 Sakamoto, T., Fujiogi, M., Matsui, H., Fushimi, K. & Yasunaga, H. Short-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Open Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 27, 518-526, doi:10.1245/s10434-019-07688-y (2020).
36 Yamada, T. et al. The survival difference between gastric cancer patients from the UK and Japan remains after weighted propensity score analysis considering all background factors. Gastric Cancer 19, 479-489, doi:10.1007/s10120-015-0480-5 (2016).
37 van der Wielen, N., Straatman, J., Cuesta, M. A., Daams, F. & van der Peet, D. L. Short-term outcomes in minimally invasive versus open gastrectomy: the differences between East and West. A systematic review of the literature. Gastric Cancer 21, 19-30, doi:10.1007/s10120-017-0747-0 (2018).