Ajzen, I. (1985). From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior (pp. 11–39). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
Alegría, D. A. H., Boscardin, C., Poncelet, A., Mayfield, C., & Wamsley, M. (2014). Using tablets to support self-regulated learning in a longitudinal integrated clerkship. Medical Education Online, 19, 23638. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v19.23638
Bransen, D., Govaerts, M. J. B., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., & Driessen, E. W. (2020). Beyond the self: The role of co-regulation in medical students’ self-regulated learning. Medical Education, 54(3), 234–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14018
Brydges, R., & Butler, D. (2012). A reflective analysis of medical education research on self-regulation in learning and practice. Medical Education, 46(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04100.x
Brydges, R., Carnahan, H., Safir, O., & Dubrowski, A. (2009). How effective is self-guided learning of clinical technical skills? It’s all about process. Medical Education, 43(6), 507–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03329.x
Brydges, R., Manzone, J., Shanks, D., Hatala, R., Hamstra, S. J., Zendejas, B., & Cook, D. A. (2015). Self-regulated learning in simulation-based training: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical Education, 49(4), 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12649
Burk-Rafel, J., Santen, S. A., & Purkiss, J. (2017). Study Behaviors and USMLE Step 1 Performance: Implications of a Student Self-Directed Parallel Curriculum. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 92(11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Research in Medical Education Sessions), S67–S74. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001916
Chen, D. R., Priest, K. C., Batten, J. N., Fragoso, L. E., Reinfeld, B. I., & Laitman, B. M. (2019). Student Perspectives on the “Step 1 Climate” in Preclinical Medical Education. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 94(3), 302–304. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002565
Chen, J.-L. (2011a). The effects of education compatibility and technological expectancy on e-learning acceptance. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1501–1511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.009
Chen, J.-L. (2011b). The effects of education compatibility and technological expectancy on e-learning acceptance. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1501–1511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.009
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Delen, E., Liew, J., & Willson, V. (2014). Effects of interactivity and instructional scaffolding on learning: Self-regulation in online video-based environments. Computers & Education, 78, 312–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.018
Durning, S. J., Cleary, T. J., Sandars, J., Hemmer, P., Kokotailo, P., & Artino, A. R. (2011). Perspective: Viewing “strugglers” through a different lens: how a self-regulated learning perspective can help medical educators with assessment and remediation. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 86(4), 488–495. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31820dc384
Echenique, E. E. G., Molías, L. M., & Bullen, M. (2015). Students in higher education: Social and academic uses of digital technology. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 12(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v12i1.2078
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Gale, N. K., Heath, G., Cameron, E., Rashid, S., & Redwood, S. (2013). Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
Gray, K., Annabell, L., & Kennedy, G. (2010). Medical students’ use of Facebook to support learning: Insights from four case studies. Medical Teacher, 32(12), 971–976. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2010.497826
Hadwin, A. F., & Winne, P. H. (2001). CoNoteS2: A Software Tool for Promoting Self-Regulation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 7(2–3), 313–334. https://doi.org/10.1076/edre.7.2.313.3868
Khalil, M. K., Wright, W. S., Spearman, K. A., & Gaspard, A. C. (2019). Relationship between students’ perceptions of the adequacy of M1 and M2 curricula and their performance on USMLE step 1 examination. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 358. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1796-3
Lai, C. (2013). A Framework for Developing Self-Directed Technology Use for Language Learning. Language Learning & Technology, 17(2), 100–122.
Lai, C. (2015). Modeling teachers’ influence on learners’ self-directed use of technology for language learning outside the classroom. Computers & Education, 82, 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.005
Lai, C., Wang, Q., & Lei, J. (2012). What factors predict undergraduate students’ use of technology for learning? A case from Hong Kong. Computers & Education, 59(2), 569–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.006
Lucey, C. R., Thibault, G. E., & Ten Cate, O. (2018). Competency-Based, Time-Variable Education in the Health Professions: Crossroads. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 93(3S Competency-Based, Time-Variable Education in the Health Professions), S1–S5. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002080
Petty, J. (2013). Interactive, technology-enhanced self-regulated learning tools in healthcare education: A literature review. Nurse Education Today, 33(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.06.008
Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407.
Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2007). Student Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning in the College Classroom. In R. P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: An Evidence-Based Perspective (pp. 731–810). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5742-3_16
Sawang, S., Sun, Y., & Salim, S. A. (2014). It’s not only what I think but what they think! The moderating effect of social norms. Computers & Education, 76, 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.017
Schwan, S., & Riempp, R. (2004). The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: Learning to tie nautical knots. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.005
Werner, L. S., & Bull, B. S. (2003). The effect of three commercial coaching courses on Step One USMLE performance. Medical Education, 37(6), 527–531. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01534.x
White, C. B. (2007). Smoothing Out Transitions: How Pedagogy Influences Medical Students’ Achievement of Self-regulated Learning Goals. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 12(3), 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9000-z
White, C. B., Gruppen, L. D., & Fantone, J. C. (2013). Self-regulated learning in medical education. In S. Tim (Ed.), Understanding Medical Education (pp. 201–211). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118472361.ch15
Yot-Domínguez, C., & Marcelo, C. (2017). University students’ self-regulated learning using digital technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0076-8
Yousafzai, S. Y., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. G. (2007). Technology acceptance: A meta‐analysis of the TAM: Part 1. Journal of Modelling in Management, 2(3), 251–280. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465660710834453
Zheng, B., Ward, A., & Stanulis, R. (2020). Self-regulated learning in a competency-based and flipped learning environment: Learning strategies across achievement levels and years. Medical Education Online, 25(1), 1686949. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1686949
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating Self-Regulation and Motivation: Historical Background, Methodological Developments, and Future Prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909