Literature searches and selections
In the initial search, 1642 records were found from the electronic databases. The databases searched and the records found were from MEDLINE (1059), Scopus (175), Google Scholar (236), HINARI (110), and grey literatures (62). The grey literatures considered in this review were Google Search, Research Gate, Google Scholar, and institutional repository. Of the 1642 papers, only 828 papers remained for further evaluation after removing duplicates. Upon the examination and screening of the titles and abstracts, 323 records were excluded. There were 58 full text articles that were eligible for data extraction. However, 18 records were further excluded for not fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Finally, 40 articles remained for this review and meta-analysis (21, 22, 38, 51-86). Of these 40 studies, 35 of the studies were used in assessing the pooled prevalence of stunting(21, 22, 38, 51-58, 60, 61, 63-77, 79, 80, 82, 84-87), and 16 of the studies were used to estimate the effect of wealth index on stunting (51, 52, 57, 61, 66, 69, 72, 73, 75, 76, 78, 79, 81-84)(Figure1).Of the 16 papers that used to estimate the effect of wealth index on stunting, four were not used in calculating the pooled prevalence of stunting (78, 79, 81, 83).
Characteristics of the studies
The pooled magnitude of stunting was computed using 35 studies that considered 51,452 children aged birth to 5 years old. The sample size ranged from 214 to 9893 under-five children. Of the sample children for the review, 24,107 had the outcome of stunting, or and wealth index (21, 22, 38, 51-58, 60, 61, 63-77, 79, 80, 82, 84-87). Only one study was conducted at a health facility(22), whereas the remaining 34 studies were conducted in the community. All the studies considered in the pooled magnitude of stunting were studied using a cross-sectional design. Eight of the papers were published from 2010 to 2014 (56, 61-63, 69, 72, 73, 75), and the remaining 31 papers were published from 2015 to 2019. Three of the studies were conducted from EDHS data (58, 81, 87), and two of the papers were studied using secondary data(22, 56). Five of the studies considered children aged 6-24 months (51, 52, 63, 66, 78) and one study considered children aged 24 to 59 months old (54). However, all the other studies were conducted on children aged 6 to 59 months old. Nine studies were from Amhara (21, 38, 61, 72, 75, 76, 80, 82, 85) and SNNPR regions (53, 55, 57, 63, 69, 71, 74, 78, 79). Studies in other regions included from Oromia (n=7) (22, 51, 54, 62, 67, 73, 83), Tigray (n=3) (60, 65, 66), Somalia(n=2) (52, 70), Benishangul-Gumz(n=1) (84), and Afar(n=2) (64, 77), and six studies were nation-based (56, 58, 68, 81, 86, 87)(Table1).
Table 1: The summary of included studies on computing pooled magnitude of stunting and its association with wealth index in Ethiopia, 2010-2019
Author
|
P/year
|
Region
|
Study setting
|
Study design
|
Data source
|
Sample size
|
Outcome
|
Kalkidan and Tefera
|
2017**
|
Oromia
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
Primary
|
584
|
Wasting and stunting
|
Yirgu et al.
|
2015**
|
Somalia
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
Primary
|
210
|
Nutritional status
|
Lamrot et al.
|
2018
|
SNNP
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
Primary
|
398
|
Stunting
|
Ahmed et al.
|
2015
|
Oromia
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
Primary
|
453
|
Underweight and wasting
|
Bealu et al.
|
2017
|
SNNP
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
Primary
|
508
|
Nutritional status
|
Disha et al.
|
2013
|
NA
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
Secondary
|
3422
|
Under nutrition
|
Seifu et al
|
2017**
|
SNNP
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
Primary
|
3975
|
Stunting
|
Demewoz et al.
|
2016
|
NA
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
EDHS
|
11,872
|
Stunting
|
Kasahun et al.
|
2019
|
NA
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
EDHS
|
8743
|
Stunting
|
Araya et al.
|
2017
|
Tigray
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
Primary
|
610
|
Malnutrition
|
Selamawitetal.
|
2015
|
Amhara
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
Primary
|
1287
|
Stunting
|
Wagayeetal.
|
2014**
|
Amhara
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
Primary
|
610
|
Under nutrition
|
HiwotY. et al.
|
2012
|
Oromia
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
Primary
|
791
|
Under nutrition
|
Masreshaetal.
|
2011
|
SNNP
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
Primary
|
575
|
Stunting
|
Abel etal.
|
2017
|
Afar
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
Primary
|
840
|
Malnutrition
|
Tesfayeetal.
|
2019
|
Tigray
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
Primary
|
394
|
Stunting
|
Kidanemariam et al.
|
2016**
|
Tigray
|
Community based
|
Case control
|
Primary
|
330
|
Stunting
|
JalaneMekonen
|
2019
|
Oromia
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
Primary
|
616
|
Chronic under nutrition
|
Hiwot D. et al.
|
2017
|
SNNP
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
Primary
|
834
|
Under nutrition
|
Behailu T. et al.
|
2014**
|
Amhara
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
Primary
|
620
|
Malnutrition
|
Behailu T et al.
|
2014**
|
Amhara
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
Primary
|
367
|
Malnutrition
|
Kebede et al.
|
2013**
|
Oromia
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
Primary
|
820
|
Malnutrition
|
Birara et al.
|
2014**
|
Amhara
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
Primary
|
844
|
Stunting
|
Amare T et al.
|
2017**
|
Amhara
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
Primary
|
1295
|
Stunting
|
Shiferaw et al.
|
2018
|
Amhara
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
Primary
|
410
|
Stunting
|
Misgan et al.
|
2016
|
Afar
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
Primary
|
401
|
Stunting
|
EDHS
|
2019
|
Ethiopia
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
Primary
|
4989
|
Stunting
|
Abay et al.
|
2019
|
Ethiopia
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
Primary
|
9495
|
Stunting
|
Amare D. et al.
|
2010**
|
SNNP
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
Primary
|
2410
|
Stunting
|
Abdibari et al.
|
2016
|
Somalia
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
Primary
|
694
|
Stunting
|
Eskeziaw et al.
|
2015
|
SNNP
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
Primary
|
567
|
Stunting
|
Zemenu et al.
|
2017
|
Oromia
|
Facility based
|
Cross sectional
|
Secondary
|
384
|
Malnutrition
|
Atanaw G. et.al.
|
2018**
|
Amhara
|
Community based
|
Cross-sectional
|
Primary
|
593
|
Under nutrition
|
Zufan et al.
|
2019*
|
Ethiopia
|
Community based
|
Cross-sectional
|
EDHS
|
7452
|
nutritional status
|
Terefe et al.
|
2017*
|
SNNP
|
Community based
|
Case control
|
Primary
|
587
|
Stunting, and wasting
|
Samson et al.
|
2019*
|
SNNP
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
Primary
|
342
|
stunting
|
Taye et al.
|
2018*
|
Oromia
|
Community based
|
Cohort
|
Primary
|
4468
|
Stunting
|
DilanoAbdisa
|
2018**
|
Benishangul
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
Primary
|
564
|
Stunting
|
Amare T. et al
|
2016
|
Amhara
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
Primary
|
681
|
Stunting
|
YeshalemMulugeta
|
2017
|
Amhara
|
Community based
|
Cross sectional
|
Primary
|
480
|
Under nutrition
|
Three of the studies did not report sex of the study population, children (62, 63, 82), but all the other studies reported the sex of the children. Accordingly, boys contributed to 65.2% (33,533) (Table1) of the population. Most papers were published in internationally reputable journals, but only one study (84), and one mini EDHS report (86) fulfilled the criteria during the critical appraisal process and were included for this systematic review and meta-analysis. Regarding to the associations between wealth index and stunting, the sample size of the studies included was 22,183 children aged birth to 5 years. With regard to the effect estimation of the associations, the sample size ranged from 214 to 7452 participants. The response rate of the studies used for effect estimation in assessing the associations was 91.9%, and all the studies were conducted in the community (51, 52, 57, 61, 66, 69, 72, 73, 75, 76, 78, 79, 81-84). Considering this associations between stunting and wealth index, one of the papers studied used a cohort design(83), two of the papers studied used a case control design (66, 78), and the remaining 13 studies used cross-sectional design. Six of the studies(61, 72, 75, 76, 78, 82) were from Amhara region, three were from SNNPR region(57, 69, 79), three from Oromia region(51, 73, 83), one from Tigray region (66), one from Somalia region (52), and one from Benishangul-Gumuz region (84), while one study was a nation-based (Ethiopia) (81)(Table1, and Table2).
Table 2: The main findings, and quality assessment results of the included studies for the systematic review and meta-analysis on stunting, and wealth index associations with stunting in Ethiopia, 2010-2019
No
|
Author
|
P/year
|
Male
|
Age in months
|
Anthropometric analysis
|
Confounding adjusted
|
Main findings
|
Risk (JBI)
|
|
Kalkidan and Tefera
|
2017**
|
289
|
6-24
|
WHO ENA smart
|
Age, residence, complementary feeding initiation, breast feeding, dietary diversity, family size, food insecurity, educational status, meal frequency, wealth index, diarrhea, and farming land size
|
Child caring practices are independent predictors of nutritional status than wealth or economic indicators
|
Low
|
|
Yirgu et al.
|
2015**
|
109
|
6-24
|
WHO Anthro
|
Maternal education, food security, age at complementary feeding, meal frequency, bottle feeding, breast feeding in the first 24 hours, dietary diversity, and wealth index
|
Low dietary diversity scores, inappropriate age of complementary feeding initiation and bottle-feeding were predictors of stunting.
|
Low
|
|
Lamrot et al.
|
2018
|
171
|
6-59
|
WHO Anthro
|
Age, sex, birth order, maternal education, latrine availability, hand washing using soap, and ANC follow up
|
41.7% of child was stunted. Age, sex, birth order, mother education, having toilet facility, washing hand with soap, and ANC follow up were associated factors of stunting
|
Low
|
|
Ahmed et al.
|
2015
|
422
|
24-59
|
WHO ENA
|
Confounding not adjusted
|
In this study, 61.1% of children were stunted
|
High
|
|
Bealu et al.
|
2017
|
447
|
6-59
|
WHO Anthro
|
Food security, child sex, child age, initiation of complementary feeding, maternal education, and breastfeeding status
|
Of the included children, 45.6% were stunted. Household food insecurity, child age and initiation of complementary feeding were associated factors of stunting.
|
Low
|
|
Disha et al.
|
2013
|
1783
|
6-59
|
NAv
|
Food insecurity
|
Of the included children, 50.7% of children were stunted. Household food insecurity was associated with stunting.
|
High
|
|
Seifu et al
|
2017**
|
1969
|
6-59
|
WHO Anthro
|
Age of the child, sex of the child, morbidity, place of delivery, maternal education, ethnicity/race, household food insecurity, and household wealth index
|
Of the included children, 43.7% of children were stunted. Age and sex were positively associated factors of stunting. Advanced maternal education and house hold food security were protective factors of stunting
|
Low
|
|
Demewoz et al.
|
2016
|
6168
|
6-59
|
NAv
|
Child age, sex, immunization, anemia, maternal age, maternal education, birth interval, number of children, sex of household head, father’s educational status, family size, wealth index, place of residency, poverty rate, region, improved latrine facility, and source of drinking water
|
Of the included children, 44.4 % of children were stunted. Birth interval, sex of the child, sex of household head, anemia, maternal education, father’s education, poverty, and maternal nutritional status
|
Low
|
|
Kasahun et al.
|
2019
|
4455
|
6-59
|
NAv
|
Child age, birth interval, wealth index, maternal education, type of toilet, source of drinking water, mothers body mass index, and child sex
|
Children from undernourished mothers, not breastfeeding children, children from poor households, households that have no toilet facilities, male children, being in between 12 and 59 months, unable to read and write mothers, and short birth spacing were associated with stunting.
|
Low
|
|
Araya et al.
|
2017
|
326
|
6-59
|
WHO Anthro
|
Mothers hand washing, cleaning material used to wash hands, source of drinking water, latrine availability, and age of child,
|
Of the included children, 36.1% of children were stunted. Age is the only factor associated with stunting
|
Low
|
|
Selamawit et al.
|
2015
|
622
|
6-59
|
ENA smart
|
Morbidity, age of child, number of family size, marital status, father’s education, and occupational status of house hold head
|
Of the included children, 49.4% of children were stunted. Age of the child, number of family size, and father’s educational status were associated factors of stunting
|
Low
|
|
Wagaye et al.
|
2014**
|
399
|
6-59
|
WHO ENA smart
|
Child age, monthly income, ANC follow up, family size, pre lacteal feeding, and maternal age at first birth
|
Of the included children, 57.7% of children were stunted. Pre lacteal feeding and age at first birth were associated factors of stunting. Monthly family income was inversely associated with stunting
|
High
|
|
Hiwot Y. et al.
|
2012
|
NAv
|
6-59
|
WHO Anthro
|
Residence, number children, age of child, birth order, mothers BMI, and source of drinking water
|
Of the included children, 45.8% of children were stunted. Residence, number of children, age of the child, birth order, and mothers BMI were associated factors of stunting
|
Low
|
|
Masresha et al.
|
2011
|
NAv
|
6-24
|
WHO Anthro
|
Time of complementary food started, frequency of breast feeding, extra food during pregnancy and lactation, pre lacteal feeding, bottle-feeding, meal frequency, and dietary diversity.
|
Of the included children, 37.2 %of children were stunted. Time of complementary food started and extra food during pregnancy and lactation are associated factors of stunting.
|
Low
|
|
Abel et al.
|
2017
|
476
|
6-59
|
WHO Anthro
|
Sex of child, age of child, time of complementary food started, child immunization status, diarrheal disease in the last 2 weeks, fever in last 2 weeks, and presence of latrine in the house
|
Of the included children, 43.1% of children were stunted. Sex of child, age of the child, diarrhea in the last two weeks, and fever in the last two weeks were associated factors of stunting
|
High
|
|
Tesfaye et al.
|
2018
|
172
|
6-59
|
ENA smart
|
Sex of the child, marital status, mother education, mother occupation, fever last 2 weeks, extra food during lactation, and hand washing facility near to toilet
|
Of the included children, 49.2% of children were stunted. Sex of the child and hand washing facility near to toilet were associated factors of stunting
|
Low
|
|
Kidanemariam et al.
|
2016**
|
164
|
6-24
|
NAv
|
Maternal education, mother height, birth weight, number of children under five, dietary diversity, mother BMI, repeated previous illness, father education, duration of exclusive breast feeding, age at complementary feeding, and household income.
|
Maternal education, mother height, birth weight, number of children, dietary diversity, mother BMI, and repeated previous illness were associated factors of stunting
|
High
|
|
Jalane Mekonen
|
2019
|
306
|
6-59
|
WHO Anthro
|
Fever in the last 2 weeks, diarrhea in the last 2 weeks, age at complementary food started, additional foods in the past 48 hr., pre-lacteal foods/fluids, duration of exclusive breast feeding, decision making on the use of money, mother educational status, and number of children
|
Stunting was associated with mother educational status, number of children in the house hold, decision making on the use of money, age of complementary foods started, and presence of diarrhea in the last two weeks
|
Low
|
|
Hiwot D. et al.
|
2017
|
432
|
6-59
|
ENA smart
|
Age of mothers, colostrums feeding, exclusive BF in the first six months, cessation of breast-feeding status, frequency of complementary feeding, diarrheal morbidity in the past 12 months, and sex of the child
|
Of the included children, 39.3%, 15.8% and 6.3% of children were stunted, underweighted and wasted respectively. Male sex of the child, mothers older than 35 years, not fed on colostrums, cessation of breastfeeding before two years of age, frequency of complementary feeding per day, and diarrheal morbidity in the last 12 months were associated with stunting.
|
Low
|
|
Behailu T. et al.
|
2014**
|
330
|
6-59
|
ENA smart
|
Sex of Head of HH, family size, ANC visits, child sex, domestic animals, colostrums feeding, immunization status, EBF, measles sickness, latrine, protected water, deworming, birth order, knowledge about malnutrition, presence of bed, child diarrhea, and monthly income
|
The prevalence of stunting, underweight and wasting were 60.6%, 31.1%, 12.6% in the community-based nutrition program implementing districts, respectively
|
High
|
|
Behailu T et al.
|
2014**
|
192
|
6-59
|
ENA smart
|
Sex of Head of HH, family size, ANC visits, child sex, domestic animals, colostrums feeding, immunization status, EBF, measles sickness, latrine, protected water, deworming, birth order, knowledge about malnutrition, presence of bed, child diarrhea, and monthly income
|
The prevalence of stunting, underweight and wasting were 39.0%, 27.5%, 14.7% in none-community based nutrition program implementing districts, respectively.
|
High
|
|
Kebede et al.
|
2013**
|
410
|
6-59
|
ENA smart
|
Sex, age, educational status of mothers, family monthly income, ownership of farm land, gestational age, use of family planning, Pre-lactation foods/fluids, and time to obtain drinking water
|
Of the included children, 47.6%, 30.9% and 16.7% of children were stunted, underweight and wasted, respectively. The associated factors of stunting were child age, family monthly income, pre-lacteal feeding and family planning. Underweight was associated with number of children and pre-lacteal feeding. Treatment of water was the only variable associated with wasting.
|
Low
|
|
Birara et al.
|
2014**
|
435
|
6-59
|
ENA smart
|
Sex of child, deworming, Age of child in months, breast feeding status, and Wealth quintile
|
The prevalence of stunting, underweight and wasting were 47.3% 25.6%, and 8.9% (95%CI: 6.9-10.2), respectively. Age of the child 11-23 months, deworming status, sex of the child, and breastfeed status associated with stunting.
|
Low
|
|
Amare T
et al.
|
2017**
|
656
|
6-59
|
WHO Anthro
|
Number of under five children, wealth status, source of family food, maternal education, maternal employment status, paternal education, health care access, source of drinking water, availability of latrine, maternal vitamin A supplementation, breastfeeding initiation, exclusive breastfeeding status, complementary feeding initiation, and dietary diversity score
|
Of the included children, 37.7% and 26.8% were moderately andseverely stunted, respectively. Farming occupation of mother, lack of postnatal vitamin-A supplementation, poorer household wealth status and accessing family food from farms were determinants of severe stunting
|
Low
|
|
Shiferaw et al.
|
2018
|
228
|
6-59
|
ENA smart
|
Birth order, sex of the child, educational status of mothers, birth interval, birth weight, PNC, recurrent episode of diarrhea, immunization status, diarrhea, colostrums feed, method of feeding, age of child, duration of BF, and complementary food started
|
Low weight at birth, female sex of the child., older age, mistimed initiation of complimentary feeding, and mothers’ lack of ANC visit were associated with chronic malnutrition
|
Low
|
|
Misgan et al.
|
2016
|
178
|
6-59
|
WHO Anthro
|
Sex of household head, Sex of the child, ANC visit, minimum dietary diversity, household hunger scale, Pre-lacteal feeding, colostrum feeding, Postnatal care visit, maternal age, and Monthly household income
|
Of the included children, 32.2%, 23.5% and 13.8% of them were stunted, underweight and wasted, respectively.
|
Low
|
|
EDHS
|
2019
|
1298
|
6-59
|
NAv
|
Confounding not adjusted
|
9,150 households were selected. Of the included children, 37% of children were stunted. The prevalence of stunting was 22% among children 6-8 months and 44% on children aged 48-59 months.
|
Low
|
|
Abay et al.
|
2019
|
3637
|
6-59
|
NAv
|
Age of the child, region, mother’s education, mother’s BMI, wealth index, sex, size of child, and number of children
|
Child age, maternal education, region, wealth status, religion, sex of child, number of children, child size, water access, and toilet facility were influencing factors of stunting
|
High
|
|
Amare D et al
|
2010**
|
974
|
6-59
|
NAv
|
Age of mother, sex, birth order, and family income
|
There is no association between malaria and undernutrition
|
Low
|
|
Abdibari et al.
|
2016
|
232
|
6-59
|
ENA smart
|
Family size, educational status of mothers, occupations of mothers, income, child sex, and availability of latrine in the house
|
Factors contributing to malnutrition were immunization status, family size, child sex, monthly income, maternal education, and total duration of breast-feeding.
|
Low
|
|
Eskeziaw et al.
|
2015
|
273
|
6-59
|
WHO Anthro
|
Residence, sex, age of mother, maternal education, occupational status, media exposure, place of delivery, ANC follow up, PNC follow up, and maternal illness
|
Stunting was significantly associated with child sex, ANC follow up, maternal illness after delivery, maternal literacy and occupation.
|
Low
|
|
Zemenu et al
|
2017
|
80
|
6-59
|
NAv
|
Child age, sex, and maternal education
|
Of the included children, 38.3% of children were stunted. Only maternal education was associated with stunting
|
High
|
|
Atanaw G. et.al.
|
2018**
|
NAv
|
6-59
|
WHO Anthro
|
Mothers occupation, number of under five children, decision making, age of children, and wealth index
|
The prevalence of stunting and wasting were 42.3% and 7.3%, respectively. Poor wealth status and age of child were independently associated with stunting. Similarly, presence of fever in the previous 2 weeks and paternal control over resources were associated factors of wasting.
|
Low
|
|
Zufan et al.
|
2019*
|
3816
|
6-59
|
NAv
|
Sex of the child, age of the child, residence, region, family size, maternal educational status, source of drinking water, type of toilet facility, wealth index, size of child at birth, birth order, maternal BMI, maternal anemia status, and place of delivery
|
Maternal education and maternal nutritional status were associated factors of stunting. Similarly, maternal nutritional status, place of delivery, and birth interval were associated factors of wasting
|
Low
|
|
Terefe et al.
|
2017*
|
569
|
6-24
|
WHO Anthro plus
|
Maternal education, maternal occupation, father education, wealth status, main source of family food, source of drinking water, availability of latrine, maternal vitamin A supplementation, dietary diversity, and child age
|
The prevalence of stunting and wasting among children aged 6–24 months were 58.1 and 17.0%, respectively. Poor wealth status, unavailability of latrine, child age: 12–24 months, not receiving maternal postnatal vitamin-A supplementation, and source of family food: own food production was associated with higher odds of stunting. However, only history of diarrheal morbidity was associated with wasting.
|
Low
|
|
Samson et al.
|
2019*
|
164
|
6-59
|
WHO Anthro
|
Child sex, child age, maternal educational status, monthly income, gestational age at birth, use of family planning, distance to obtain drinking water, diarrheal morbidity in the last 2 weeks, family size, and pre-lacteal feeding
|
The prevalence of stunting was 24.9% with 7.9% of severely stunted. Being female, children aged 12–23months old, mother ’s who do not use family planning, children with diarrheal morbidity, income of 750–1500 ETB and>1500, and children who received pre-lacteal feeding were predictors for stunting.
|
Low
|
|
Taye et al.
|
2018*
|
1419
|
6-59
|
ENA for SMART
|
Sex of child, age of child, malaria infection, height for age, wealth status, and maternal education
|
The prevalence of stunting was 44.9%. The observed case was 103 with 118 episodes of malaria. In addition, there were 684 new stunting and 239 new wasting cases. Children with malaria infection, and younger age were more likely to be stunted. Furthermore, children with malaria infection, and young age group were more likely to be wasted. But, stunting and wasting were not risk factors of malaria illness.
|
Low
|
|
Dilano Abdisa
|
2018**
|
311
|
6-59
|
WHO Anthro plus
|
Sex of child, duration of breastfeeding, head of household, family size, paternal education, and paternal occupation
|
The prevalence of stunting was 32.8%. Family size, low dietarydiversity score, duration of breast feeding, child who have no feed animal food source, and sex of children were associated with stunting
|
High
|
|
Amare T. et al
|
2016
|
365
|
6-59
|
ENA/SMART software
|
Colostrums, family size, source of household food, complementary food initiation, mothers age at first birth, child age, latrine availability, and dietary diversity
|
The overall prevalence of stunting was 46 %. Latrine facility, and family size were associated with stunting
|
Low
|
|
Yeshalem Mulugeta
|
2017
|
248
|
6-59
|
ENA for SMART
|
Marital status, occupation, educational status, television possession, possession of radio, child’s living situation, number of children, illness, decision makers, pre-lacteal feeding, and initiation of complimentary feeding
|
The prevalence of stunting, underweight, and wasting was 42%, 22.1%, and 6.4%, respectively. Illness in the preceding two weeks, having two children under three years old, taking pre-lacteal feeding, and early or late initiation of complementary feeding were associated with stunting.
|
Low
|
More important descriptions for this review came from a study by Behailu et al. that used a comparative cross-sectional design and reported two prevalence values and two odds ratio (OR) values. Thus, we considered this paper as two papers in the meta-analysis section, but it was cited only once. Therefore, the data on the pooled magnitude of stunting was generated from 36 (72) studies, and the pooled estimate of the wealth index was produced using 17 studies (72), but, the number of citations were indicated as 35 and 16 for the pooled prevalence and effect estimate, respectively.
Systematic review
The prevalence of stunting varies from 18.7% to 64.5% (Figure2). The studies included representative data from seven regions of Ethiopia (33 studies) and at the country level (six studies) (56, 58, 68, 81, 86, 87). The highest number of studies was reported from the Amhara region, covering nine of the prevalence studies (21, 38, 61, 72, 75, 76, 80, 82, 85), and six of the wealth index studies(61, 72, 75, 76, 78, 82), while the lowest number of studies was from the Benishangul-Gumuz region, with only one study included in the prevalence section(84). With regard to the association between the wealth index and stunting, Tigray (66), Somalia(52), Benishangul-Gumz (84), and Ethiopia (country-wide) (81)contributed only one study each. The highest prevalence of stunting were reported from the Amhara region (64.5% (76) and 60.6%(72), followed by the Oromia region (61.1%) (54). Whereas, the lowest prevalence was from the SNNPR region (18.7%) (74), followed by the Somalia region (22.9%) (52) (Table1).The highest odds of stunting because of having a poor wealth index were reported from Tigray (AOR 6.0)(66), and Oromia (AOR 4.5 and 3.3) (51, 73). Similarly, the highest odds of stunting because of having a medium wealth index were from SNNP (AOR 2.5) (79), Tigray (AOR 2.4)(66), and Oromia (AOR 2.3)(73).
Meta-analysis
Thirty five studies were included to assess the pooled prevalence of stunting (21, 22, 38, 51-58, 60, 61, 63-77, 79, 80, 82, 84-87). On the other hand, 16 studies were used to estimate the pooled effect of wealth index on stunting (51, 52, 57, 61, 66, 69, 72, 73, 75, 76, 78, 79, 81-84).The procedure we followed while including, excluding, appraising, and extracting papers presented in Figure1 (88).
Prevalence of stunting in Ethiopia
The pooled prevalence of stunting in Ethiopia was 41.5% (95% CI: 38.65, 44.34), despite a considerable heterogeneity (I2=97.6% and p<0.001). Cochran’s Q-test and I2 statistics, as well as forest plot and Galbraith plot, were considered to deal with this high degree of heterogeneity. The Galbraith plot indicated that more than 26 of the points or studies were outside of the 95% CI, and the CIs were not overlapping on the forest plot (Figure2).
Heterogeneity deal
The heterogeneity among studies in assessing prevalence among 35 studies by region while using subgroup analysis was very high. The I2 statistics varied from 89.4% from Somalia region to 98.6% at the country-based studies. The prevalence of stunting (from the lowest to the highest magnitude of stunting) was 28.4% from Somalia region, 32.8% (single study prevalence) from Benishangul-Gumuz region, 36.45% from SNNPR region of Ethiopia, 37.78% from Afar region, 40.12% at the country-based study (Ethiopia), 42.55% from Tigray region, 43.53% from Oromia region, and 48.21% from Amhara region, with considerable high heterogeneity. The heterogeneity of the prevalence estimates among the subgroups of 35 studies on stunting by population of the study was also very high. The I2statistics for children ≤ 2 years old (6 to 24 months) was 93.0%, while it was 97.6% for children less than 5 years old (6 to 59 months old). The prevalence of stunting among children ≤ 2 years old (6 to 24 months) was 28.16% (95% CI: 18.83, 37.48), while it was 42.68% (95% CI: 39.78, 45.59) among children < 5 years old.
Sensitivity: Sensitivity analysis was done on 26 studies by removing data from the meta-analytic model in order to examine the influence of studies with low quality and high bias on the pooled prevalence of stunting. After 10 prevalence studies removed due to being highly biased, the prevalence became 43.19% (95% CI: 42.62, 43.76, I2=97.3%, and Cochran’s Q=927.85). This sensitivity analysis prevalence put in within the 95%CI of the pooled magnitude of stunting, 41.5% (95% CI: 38.65, 44.34, I2=97.6%, and Cochran’s Q=1461.93). Thus, the sensitivity analysis assured that quality of studies did not significantly affect the pooled random prevalence of stunting (Supplementary figure1).
Cumulative meta-analysis: The cumulative meta-analyses indicated a stabilized trend of stunting prevalence among under-five children in the last 10 years, 2010 to 2019. The prevalence of stunting in 2010 and 2012 were lower than studies reported more recently from 2016 to 2019. Although the difference was irrelevant, there were upward and downward trends of stunting in the last 10 years. The prevalence of stunting was downward for the period 2010–2012, 2014–2015, and 2015–2016. However, the trend of stunting from late 2016 to 2019 was standing at 41% and 42% in down and up trends, with a slight difference in each year. For all years, a significant upward trend of stunting occurred in the period from 2012 to 2014 (Figure3).
Publication bias
The publication biases in this meta-analysis were examined using the subjective method, funnel plot by visual checking for asymmetry, and objectively using Egger’s test and Begg’s test. In the funnel plot, all studies were distributed symmetrically. Both small- and large-scale studies were distributed on the bottom and top of the graph, assuring the absence of publication bias (Supplementary figure2). The visual inspection of Begg’s funnel plot did not identify substantial asymmetry, as nearly all of the studies laid within the 95% CI. Both Egger’s and Begg’s objective tests also confirmed the absence of publication bias. According to Egger’s test, the estimated bias coefficient (intercept) was 2.4, with a standard error of 2.07 and a p-value of 0.26. Thus, the test provided evidence for the absence of small study effects. Similarly, the p-value for Begg’s test was 0.87 that assured the absence of statistical evidence for publication bias.
Wealth index and stunting in Ethiopia
Sixteen studies were included to estimate the associations between the wealth index and stunting. The AOR of stunting varied from 0.83 (72) to 2.46 (66) from medium wealth index households and from 0.83(72) to 6.05 (66) from low/poor wealth index households as the primary studies indicated. The AOR assured that the wealth index of households was associated with the prevalence of stunting in under-five children in Ethiopia from studies conducted between 20 January 2010 and 15 November 2019(76, 78, 82). In this meta-analysis, the odds of stunting increased at medium wealth index households compared to high/rich wealth index households (AOR 1.33, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.65) (Figure4).
Similarly, the odds of stunting at low/poor wealth index households was greater compared with high/rich wealth index households, that was associated with stunting (AOR 1.92, 95% CI: 1.46, 2.54) (Figure5). The heterogeneity of pooled random effect size estimates among the 17 AOR reports using 16 studies on stunting and associations with low/poor or medium wealth index households was substantial (I2=63.8% and 78.3% and p<0.001 for both low/poor and medium wealth index households, respectively) (48).In addition to Cochran’s Q-test and I2 statistic, both the forest plot and Galbraith plot were considered to deal with this substantial degree of heterogeneity for both low/poor and medium wealth index households against the high/rich wealth index households. The Galbraith plot showed three studies that were out of the 95% CI, and the CIs were not overlapping on the forest plot (Figure4). Similarly, in the low/poor wealth index households, the Galbraith plot showed five points were out of the 95% CI, and the CIs were not overlapping on the forest plot (Figure5).
Heterogeneity deal
The pooled I2 statistic from medium wealth index households and associations with stunting indicated a substantial degree of heterogeneity (I2=63.8%) (48) (Figure4).The heterogeneity of the pooled random effect size estimates of low/poor wealth index households and associations with stunting had a discrepancy. The pooled I2statistic from low/poor wealth index households and associations with stunting indicated a considerable degree of heterogeneity (I2=78.3%) (48). From the subgroup analysis of medium wealth index households and associations with stunting by design, the individual I2 statistic ranged from 0% in the case control design to 52.5% in the cross- sectional design, which have a low and moderate degree of heterogeneity, respectively (Figure6).
The odds of stunting at medium wealth index households relative to high/rich wealth index households in case control studies were AOR 1.67 (95% CI: 1.41, 1.98) and in cross-sectional studies were AOR 1.19 (95% CI: 0.94, 1.52) (Figure6). Thus, the subgroup analysis by design in determining the associations between medium wealth index and stunting reported that cross-sectional studies were the more relevant heterogeneity moderators (I2=52.5 and p=0.01), but the case control studies were homogeneous (I2=0% and p=0.37). Similarly, there was no statistical associations of stunting and medium wealth index in cross-sectional studies (OR 1.19, 95% CI: 0.94, 1.52), but there was an associations between stunting and medium wealth index in case control studies (OR 1.67, 95% CI: 1.41, 1.98) (Figure6). The pooled random effect size estimates of medium wealth index and associations with stunting by region had no associations in the two regions. But, in the Oromia region, a significant association was reported. The odds of stunting from medium wealth index households in comparison with high/rich wealth index households were AOR 2.05 (95% CI: 1.17, 3.58) and I2=0%, although the regions considered in the subgroup analysis of medium wealth index and association with stunting were only SNNPR, Amhara, and Oromia. The other regions have only a single study and a single AOR was reported in the subgroup analysis of medium wealth index and associations with stunting by region (Figure7).
The pooled random effect size estimates of low/poor wealth index and associations with stunting by region had no association in the SNNPR region, but in both Amhara and Oromia regions, a significant associations were reported with a pooled estimate (AOR 1.66 (95% CI: 1.18, 2.34) in the Amhara region and AOR 4.04 (95% CI: 2.29, 7.11) in the Oromia region) (Figure8). In the subgroup analysis of low/poor wealth index and associations with stunting by design, the individual I2 statistics ranged from 73.3% in the case control design to 77.9% in the cross-sectional design, which had a substantial degree of heterogeneity (Figure9). The odds of stunting from low/poor wealth index households relative to high/rich wealth index households were AOR 2.69, (95% CI: 1.71, 4.23) in case control studies and AOR 1.69 (95% CI: 1.20, 2.38) in cross-sectional studies (Figure9). Thus, the subgroup analysis of low/poor wealth index and associations with stunting by design reported that both cross-sectional and case control studies were relevant heterogeneity moderators (I2=77.9% and 73.3% and p=0.01 for both, respectively). Both the case control and cross-sectional studies had statistically considerable associations with stunting and low/poor wealth index (Figure9).
Publication bias
This review assessed the risk of publication bias using funnel plots for symmetry by visual inspection for both the medium and poor household wealth index and associations with stunting. The plot appeared symmetrical and found no publication bias, with most studies concentrated on the top of the plot. The visual inspection of Begg’s funnel plot also did not identify substantial asymmetry. Egger’s linear regression test revealed evidence of no publication bias (p=0.68), and Begg’s rank correlation test again assured the absence of publication bias (p=0.09).