Based on the ages obtained here, we can identify the following phases in the evolution of the Torrevieja-La Mata landscape:
1.-LMB was active during MIS 7, protecting pre-existing brackish pond deposits, as attested by the back-barrier deposits at the bottom of the LML cores, which were also dated at MIS 7. These deposits consisted of a series of foreshore dipping bioclastic sand cosets.
2.-During MIS 5 (probably MIS 5e) a new bar stacked on the former one, as Somoza et al. (1986) and Zazo et al. (1990) observed, showing a strongly marked erosive unconformity. This bar consisted of bioclastic sands forming foreshore dipping cosets (Fig. 6). As occurred in MIS 7, lagoonal deposits (LML) also appeared. According to Somoza et al. (1986), an erosive cliff (now covered by concrete) was visible at the back-bar, with fallen boulders present at its foot.
3.-During MIS 5, an earthquake with epicenter at the foreshore took place and was responsible for a tsunami of unknown energy that hit the unconsolidated MIS 5 bar, deeply reworking wave-transported and previously eroded P. latus shells, as well as angular boulders of bioclastic sandstones. Moreover, this tsunami wiped the seafloor, where a paucispeciphic thanatocoenosis made of disarticulated Glycymeris and Acanthocardia shells occurred, that were quickly transported to the shore, building a tabular coquina bed with randomly orientated shells (see Sect. 5.1).
4.-Associated with the general lowering of the sea level at the end of MIS 5 (Cawthra et al. 2018), the emerged former shoreface deposits were the sand and bioclast source of the CCC dunes. Indeed, some samples of small Glycymeris shells were dated at the end of MIS 5.
5. Samples from the top of short boreholes in LML revealed deposition during MIS 1. Thus, La Mata Lagoon also persisted during the Holocene, probably linked to the eustatic rise in the level of the Mediterranean sea at ca. 7.5-7.0 ka cal BP (Somoza et al. 1998; Zazo 1999, 2006; Zazo et al. 2003, 2008).
6.-Uplifts at the CCC footwall were responsible for stepped abrasion platforms and accumulation of fallen boulders. Moreover, the D/L values obtained in Vermetidae samples from a large boulder in CCC point to the occurrence of a large storm/tsunami in recent times.
Thus, the major known effect of fault activity in this area was the destructive Torrevieja earthquake of 1829, although low-intensity earthquakes are continuously recorded. Our interpretation of CMG and CCG as tsunami deposits linked to TF, BSF or a set of marine faults implies that this geo-hazard has been present since at least the Upper Pleistocene times.
5.1 Tsunami vs. storm deposits
LMB deposits offer little doubt about their origin and have been widely described as sandy bars that protected and isolated the lagoonal deposits of LML (Somoza et al. 1986; Zazo et al. 1990). Likewise, the sandy deposits of CCC were previously interpreted to be of aeolian origin (Almela et al. 1978; Silva et al. 2019). In this regard, we dated the Glycymeris fragments of these deposits at MIS 5. These fragments accumulated to form a giant dune, covering La Mata anticline when the platform was exposed after regression.
The origins of CCG and TOG need prior considerations. It should be noted that Glycymeris species burrow to colonize wave-protected areas, with an average density of 1.6 individuals/m2, have a life span of about 20 years, and are associated with a small number of other pelecypods (Peharda et al. 2010, 2012; Crncevic et al. 2013; Royer et al. 2013). Despite being protected from the normal wave regimen, Glycymeris shells can be moved towards the down-beach zone and later to the up-beach zone (transfer environment) during storms, finally reaching the beach-berm (sedimentary environment). Under “normal wave” conditions, some shells can be transported towards the shoreline, forming narrow rills at the bottom, which appear as lenticular bodies in the geological record (Muñoz and Udias 1991; Reinhard et al. 2006), and are abraded/broken at the surf zone.
The taphonomy of El Alquián beach, a resedimented entity, matched very well with the abovementioned characteristics: diversity of mollusc species with dominance of Glycymeris ssp. (pristine diversity), most shells being eroded and/or broken. The shells were horizontally arranged, with no differences between those positioned convex-up or convex-down. In this regard, LMB-1 and LMB-2 deposits showed these characteristics and were considered beach deposits.
In contrast, in CCG and TOG, species diversity was very low (95% Glycymeris) and showed little fragmentation, chaotic arrangement of shells with elements oriented in a stepped manner (> 60°) with respect to the stratification, and sharp shell fragments (not smoothly eroded by continuous wave abrasion). These findings are consistent with the criteria of Puga-Bernabeu and Aguirre (2017) for tsunamites.
It is unlikely that the Glycymeris shells of CCG and TOG broke during the rapid short transport over a sandy bottom, which deposited its load in a chaotic arrangement where shells did not present preferential orientation. The presence of “alien boulders” pulled from preexisting deposits reinforces this interpretation. The lack of bioerosion and encrustation support this hypothesis. The singularity of these deposits is reinforced by the absence of other marine sediments above and below them.
Therefore, the characteristics of CCG are similar to the sedimentological and paleobiological features of tsunami deposits rather than surge deposits (Dawson and Stewart 2007; Becker-Heiman et al. 2007; Donato et al. 2008; Engel and Brückner 2011; Smedile et al. 2011; Marriner et al. 2017; Mathes-Schmid et al. 2013; Puga-Bernabéu and Aguirre 2017). Thus, we tentatively interpret CCG and TOG deposits to be linked to a tsunami that occurred near the end of MIS 5, although we are also aware that this differentiation is a major challenge (Dawson and Stewart 2007; Engel and Brückner 2011) because of the influence of the boundary conditions.
In this case, the waves were generated not far from the coast and they swept the platform - the biosediment factory - transporting the shells and sand together. As occurs on dry land, a tabular coquina bed with randomly orientated shells built up. During the ebb, the shells on the bed were oriented and highly eroded older P. latus shells and rock fragments (angular boulders) from the pre-existing MIS 5 bar were reworked. In fact, this interpretation matches well with the opinion of Perea et al. (2012), who used marine geophysics to define a large number of faults affecting platform sediments of Pleistocene age in offshore area of La Mata-Torrevieja or even the present-day seafloor.
An important question is the location of the epicenter of the 1829 earthquake. Some authors place it in a distant area. Álvarez-Gómez et al. (2010) modelled that processes generated on the coast of Algeria would produce 30 m high tsunami waves in La Mata area, and Álvarez Gómez et al. (2011) modelled that earthquakes originating in the Alboran Sea would cause 0.5 m of maximum wave elevation in Torrevieja.
In contrast, Muñoz et al. (1991) and García-Mayordomo and Martínez-Días (2006) situate the epicenter of the Torrevieja earthquake in a foreshore location. In this regard, TF, which extends 12 km on land and 12 km offshore (Fig. 2) (García Mayordomo and Martínez-Díaz 2006), has a strong seismogenic character (Rodríguez de la Torre 1984; Muñoz and Udías 1991; Albini and Rodríguez de la Torre 2001; Martínez Solares and Mézcua 2002). Similarly, BSF has an offshore prolongation (Alfaro et al. 2012; Silva et al. 2017) and a number of faults affect the platform sediments (Perea et al. 2012). In this regard, a coseismic regional rise linked to the Torrevieja earthquake has been described to have produced a 20 cm elevation in CCC (Silva et al. 2014, 2017, 2019).
We consider that a local source for the accumulation of CCG is more likely, probably associated with the activity of TF, as the low species diversity observed seemed to exclude a remote source such as Northern Algeria (Álvarez-Gómez et al. 2010), the Alboran Sea (Álvarez-Gómez et al. 2011) or the Ibero-Maghrebian region (Muñoz et al. 1991). This tsunami swept the ramp where pelecypod (Glycymeris) shells accumulated and reached the previous MIS 5e bar, leaving a shell bed inland after eroding the red alluvial muddy deposits (Sucina Formation) that appear on the waterline. The erosion of the MIS 5e bar released some deeply abraded “alien” elements, which appeared at the top of the strata where the ebb arranged the shells in a normal position. Our interpretation of tsunami deposits linked to normal fault activity was supported by the recent work of Ott et al. (2011): after a modeling of an area with a scenario of plate collision, where reverse and normal faults coexist, the latter were responsible of a historical strong earthquake/tsunami event that affected the Crete island coast at 365 AD.
Thus, our observations support the notion that local sources of seismicity or the collision of the African and Iberian plates cause tsunami surges, which pose a serious threat to lowland tourist resorts and salt mining. Indeed, in the context of a recently approved ambitious resort project (at least 18 high rise buildings of 29 floors) for a wide area to the south of Cervera Cape, the seismic hazard should be taken into consideration.
5.2 Other geological hazards
In the Cervera Cape area, the evident interplay between coastal structure, sea-level changes and vertical motion of the land will complicate any coastal prospective study of geological hazards (Anzidei et al. 2014).
The ancient raised marine deposits observed in this area, located 1 to 4 m above sea level, attested past episodes of climate warming. Given the expected rise in sea level caused by human activity, which will alter the natural trend of a rise in the level of the Mediterranean during the Holocene (Vacchi et al. 2018), the whole area will be affected by associated geological hazards. In this regard, salt mining in Torrevieja Lagoon and the Natural Park of La Mata Lagoon, which are slightly below sea level, will be particularly affected.
At the uplifted Torrevieja Cliff (TOC), waves will cut back the cliff and notches in the cliff foot will favor gravitational processes, affecting the top-cliff shelter made of thick caliche deposits. At Cervera Cape Cliff (CCC), the rise in sea level would probably be reflected in the relative sinking of the recently elevated abrasion platforms, which will, in turn, allow surge waves to reach the foot of the cliff, thus accelerating rockfall and cliff retreat. In La Mata Bar (LMB) beach, the sand stripe is wider than in the southern part, although it can be considered to be in a starvation regime because the flow of the Segura River is almost negligible at its mouth and is unable to re-supply former sand deposits that have been washed seaward.
Given that this coastal area is densely covered by housing developments, resorts, hotels and related services, as in many other Mediterranean areas, the local economy of the communities there could be severely damaged by seismic activity, increase in sea level and cliff retreat.