1. Fetzer, G.B., J.J. Callaghan, J.E. Templeton, D.D. Goetz, P.M. Sullivan, and S.S. Kelley, Posterior cruciate-retaining modular total knee arthroplasty: a 9- to 12-year follow-up investigation. J Arthroplasty, 2002. 17(8): p. 961-6, http://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2002.34824.
2. Essaouini, H., L. El Bakkali, and P. Capodanno, Analysis of small oscillations of a heavy almost-homogeneous liquid–gas system. Mechanics Research Communications, 2010. 37(3): p. 337-340, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2010.01.003.
3. Ho, J.C., R.N. Stitzlein, C.J. Green, T. Stoner, and M.I. Froimson, Return to Sports Activity following UKA and TKA. J Knee Surg, 2016. 29(3): p. 254-9, http://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1551835.
4. Sun, P.F. and Y.H. Jia, Mobile bearing UKA compared to fixed bearing TKA: a randomized prospective study. Knee, 2012. 19(2): p. 103-6, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2011.01.006.
5. Nwachukwu, B.U., F.M. McCormick, W.W. Schairer, R.M. Frank, M.T. Provencher, and M.W. Roche, Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus high tibial osteotomy: United States practice patterns for the surgical treatment of unicompartmental arthritis. J Arthroplasty, 2014. 29(8): p. 1586-9, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.04.002.
6. Zuiderbaan, H.A., J.P. van der List, L.J. Kleeblad, P. Appelboom, N.P. Kort, A.D. Pearle, and M.V. Rademakers, Modern Indications, Results, and Global Trends in the Use of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty and High Tibial Osteotomy in the Treatment of Isolated Medial Compartment Osteoarthritis. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), 2016. 45(6): p. E355-e361,
7. Emerson, R.H., O. Alnachoukati, J. Barrington, and K. Ennin, The results of Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the United States: a mean ten-year survival analysis. Bone Joint J, 2016. 98-b(10 Supple B): p. 34-40, http://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.98b10.Bjj-2016-0480.R1.
8. Hollinghurst, D., J. Stoney, T. Ward, H.S. Gill, J.H. Newman, D.W. Murray, and D.J. Beard, No deterioration of kinematics and cruciate function 10 years after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Knee, 2006. 13(6): p. 440-4, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2006.07.001.
9. Heyse, T.J., B.F. El-Zayat, R. De Corte, Y. Chevalier, L. Scheys, B. Innocenti, S. Fuchs-Winkelmann, and L. Labey, UKA closely preserves natural knee kinematics in vitro. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2014. 22(8): p. 1902-10, http://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2752-0.
10. Jean-Noel A. Argenson, M., P. Richard D. Komistek, t, M. Jean-Manuel Aubaniac, M. Douglas A. Dennis, t, M. Eric J. Northcut, t , Dylan T. Anderson, and M. Serge Agostini, In Vivo Determination of Knee Kinematics for Subjects Implanted With a Unicompartmental Arthr oplas ty. The Journal of Arthroplasty Vol., 2002. 17: p. No. 8, http://doi.org/10.1054/a1th.2002.34527.
11. Friesenbichler, B., J.F. Item-Glatthorn, V. Wellauer, F. von Knoch, N.C. Casartelli, and N.A. Maffiuletti, Short-term functional advantages after medial unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty. Knee, 2018. 25(4): p. 638-643, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2018.04.009.
12. Burn, E., M.T. Sanchez-Santos, H.G. Pandit, T.W. Hamilton, A.D. Liddle, D.W. Murray, and R. Pinedo-Villanueva, Ten-year patient-reported outcomes following total and minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a propensity score-matched cohort analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2018. 26(5): p. 1455-1464, http://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4404-7.
13. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. Annual Report 2011. http://www.knee.nko.se/english/online/uploadedFiles/115_SKAR2011_Eng1.0.pdf. 2011 Accessed June 2019.
14. Riaz Ahmed Agha, Mimi R. Borrelli , Martinique Vella-Baldacchino , Rachel Thavayogan , and D.P. Orgill, The STROCSS statement: Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery. Int J Surg, 2017. 46: p. 198-202, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.08.586.
15. Roger H. Emerson, J., MD; , B. Thomas Hansborough, M. Richard D. Reitman, B. Wolfgang Rosenfeldt, and P. Linda L. Higgins, Comparison of a Mobile With a FixedBearing Unicompartmental Knee Implant. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2002. 404: p. 62–70, http://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000036525.46246.b7.
16. Neufeld, M.E., A. Albers, N.V. Greidanus, D.S. Garbuz, and B.A. Masri, A Comparison of Mobile and Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty at a Minimum 10-Year Follow-up. J Arthroplasty, 2018. 33(6): p. 1713-1718, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.01.001.
17. G. G. Jones, M. Kotti, A. V. Wiik, R. Collins, M. J. Brevadt, R. K. Strachan, and J.P. Cobb, Gait comparison of unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasties with healthy controls. Bone Joint J, 2016. 10 Suppl B: p. 16–21, http://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B10.
18. Hopper, G.P. and W.J. Leach, Participation in sporting activities following knee replacement: total versus unicompartmental. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2008. 16(10): p. 973-9, http://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-008-0596-9.
19. H. Pandit, T. W. Hamilton, S.J.M. C. Jenkins, C. A. F. Dodd, and D.W. Murray, The clinical outcome of minimally invasive Phase 3 Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Join Surgery, 2015. 97-B: p. No. 11, http://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.97B11.
20. Lisowski, L.A., L.I. Meijer, M.P. van den Bekerom, P. Pilot, and A.E. Lisowski, Ten- to 15-year results of the Oxford Phase III mobile unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective study from a non-designer group. Bone Joint J, 2016. 98 b(10 Supple B): p. 41-47, http://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.98b10.Bjj-2016-0474.R1.
21. Dyrhovden, G.S., S.H.L. Lygre, M. Badawy, O. Gothesen, and O. Furnes, Have the Causes of Revision for Total and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties Changed During the Past Two Decades? Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2017. 475(7): p. 1874-1886, http://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-017-5316-7.
22. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual report 2019. https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/en/annualreports-2019. 2019 Accessed November 2019.
23. National Joint Registry for England. Wales: Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. National Joint Replacement Center 2015. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/njrcentre/Reports,PublicationsandMinutes/Annualreports/tabid/86/Default.aspx. 2015 Accessed November 2019.
24. The New Zealand Joint Registry Sixteen Year Report, January 1999 to December 2014. New Zealand Orthopaedic Association. 2016. https://nzoa.org.nz/system/files/NZJR%2017%20year%20Report.pdf. 2016
25. Zambianchi, F., V. Digennaro, A. Giorgini, G. Grandi, F. Fiacchi, R. Mugnai, and F. Catani, Surgeon's experience influences UKA survivorship: a comparative study between all-poly and metal back designs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2015. 23(7): p. 2074-80, http://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-2958-9.
26. Beaupre, L.A., B. Sharifi, and D.W.C. Johnston, A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Posterior Cruciate-Stabilizing vs Posterior Cruciate-Retaining Prostheses in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: 10-Year Follow-Up. J Arthroplasty, 2017. 32(3): p. 818-823, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.030.
27. Chaudhary, R., L.A. Beaupre, and D.W. Johnston, Knee range of motion during the first two years after use of posterior cruciate-stabilizing or posterior cruciate-retaining total knee prostheses. A randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2008. 90(12): p. 2579-86, http://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.00995.
28. Conditt, M.A., P.C. Noble, R. Bertolusso, J. Woody, and B.S. Parsley, The PCL significantly affects the functional outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2004. 19(7 Suppl 2): p. 107-12, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2004.06.006.
29. Ritter, M.A., J.D. Lutgring, K.E. Davis, and M.E. Berend, The effect of postoperative range of motion on functional activities after posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2008. 90(4): p. 777-84, http://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.01022.
30. Swanik, C.B., S.M. Lephart, and H.E. Rubash, Proprioception, kinesthesia, and balance after total knee arthroplasty with cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2004. 86(2): p. 328-34, http://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200402000-00016.
31. Jones, G.G., M. Kotti, A.V. Wiik, R. Collins, M.J. Brevadt, R.K. Strachan, and J.P. Cobb, Gait comparison of unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasties with healthy controls. Bone Joint J, 2016. 98-b(10 Supple B): p. 16-21, http://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.98b10.Bjj.2016.0473.R1.
32. Zuiderbaan, H.A., J.P. van der List, S. Khamaisy, D.H. Nawabi, R. Thein, C. Ishmael, S. Paul, and A.D. Pearle, Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty: Which type of artificial joint do patients forget? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2017. 25(3): p. 681-686, http://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3868-1.
33. Fabre-Aubrespy, M., M. Ollivier, S. Pesenti, S. Parratte, and J.N. Argenson, Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Older Than 75 Results in Better Clinical Outcomes and Similar Survivorship Compared to Total Knee Arthroplasty. A Matched Controlled Study. J Arthroplasty, 2016. 31(12): p. 2668-2671, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.034.
34. Duchman, K.R., Y. Gao, A.J. Pugely, C.T. Martin, and J.J. Callaghan, Differences in short-term complications between unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a propensity score matched analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2014. 96(16): p. 1387-94, http://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.01048.
35. Qidong Zhang, Qian Zhang, Wanshou Guo, Zhaohui Liu, Liming Cheng, D. Yue, and N. Zhang, The learning curve for minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: cumulative summation test for learning curve (LC-CUSUM). Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 2014. 9: p. Page 2 of 9, http://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-014-0081-8.
36. Sanz-Ruiz, P., J.A. Matas-Diez, E. Carbo-Laso, R. Perez-Mananes, and J. Vaquero-Martin, Patient-Specific Instrument Can Improve Functional and Radiographic Results during Learning Curve for Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. J Knee Surg, 2019. 32(2): p. 180-185, http://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1636837.