3.1. Aerogel characterization
SEM analysis
The microstructure and surface morphology of composite aerogels were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), as shown in Fig. 3. Under the combined action of GO and PEI, the materials showed the good porous structure. It can be seen that the material is composed of a large number of pores, which contributes to the ultra-light performance of the aerogels and also provides lots of adsorption sites for Dy(III) adsorption. The pores on the surface of PEI-CNCS aerogels, GCPA and IGCPA all have good periodicity, indicating that the composite aerogels can effectively replicate the structure of CNCs, the subsequent modification and the elution of imprinted ions have no effect on the structure of aerogels, which effectively maintain the periodicity template of the materials. In addition, in Fig. 3 (b) and Fig. 3 (c), PEI and GO are uniformly distributed on the porous network of CNCs, indicating that the cross-linking between PEI and GO and CNCs is stable. The adhesion of GO to CNCs not only added additional adsorption sites, but also prevented the agglomeration of CNCs to a certain extent, which contributed to the efficient adsorption of Dy(III) by the adsorbent.
TEM analysis
TEM images (Fig. 4) shows that the three aerogels all exhibit uniformly arranged pore structures, which match the size in SEM images, confirming the successful preservation of periodic structures. Compared with PEI-CNCs, GCPA and IGCPA increased the flake morphology of GO, indicating that GO can successfully adhere to CNCs and maintain the original structure. Compared with non-imprinted aerogels, the eluted imprinted aerogels also have better pore structure and show good stability. All these are consistent with the SEM results mentioned above. In addition, the elemental composition of IGCPA was analyzed by EDS, as shown in Fig. 4 (d). The elemental analysis results are consistent with the expected C, N, and O elements. The cross-linking reaction of PEI increased the intensity of N signal, and dysprosium was not detected, which further confirmed that the cross-linking reaction was an effective method for preparing amine-rich porous aerogels.
BET analysis
The N2 adsorption-desorption analysis isotherm was shown in Fig. 5 and Table 1. It can be seen from the isotherm fitting curve that the three kinds of aerogels adsorption processes all belong to type IV. When the relative pressure is in the low-pressure region (0.0-0.3 P/P0), the upward curve is a monolayer adsorption process. When the monolayer adsorption reaches saturation, the multilayer adsorption begins. As the pressure increases, the pore size of the aggregate expands, resulting in the subsequent phenomenon. The curves of adsorption return line adsorption and desorption formed are very steep, and the relative pressure of condensation and evaporation is in the middle. Therefore, the surface of IGCPA is a cylindrical hole with openings at both ends, which is consistent with the results of SEM images. In addition, the SBET of PEI-CNC, GCPA and IGCPA were 4.175, 10.832 and 14.372 m2 g− 1, respectively. With the further functionalization of CNCs by PEI and GO, the SBET of the material increased and the pore size became smaller, this may be due to the new pores generated on the surface of the CNCs. The small pores in the eluted IGCPA collapsed to form large pores, which caused the SBET of the aerogel to become larger and the pore size also increased. In addition, the specific surface area of composite aerogels is generally smaller, most likely due to the formation of large aggregates or aggregates during drying (Brinkmann et al. 2016; Peng et al. 2011; Zheng et al. 2020).
Table 1
The pore structure parameters of four aerogels.
Sample
|
Surface Area (cm2/g)
|
Pore Size (nm)
|
PEI-CNCs
|
4.1750
|
24.836
|
GCPA
|
10.832
|
12.589
|
IGCPA
|
14.372
|
19.779
|
FT-IR analysis: Infrared spectra were measured, and FT-IR spectra of TEMPO-CNCs after freeze drying and three aerogels were shown in Fig. 6. It is worth noting that the spectrum of TEMPO-CNCs have a strong peak at 1627 cm− 1, which is a characteristic peak of the carbonyl of the carboxylic acid groups. There were three strong peaks in PEI-CNCs spectrum at 1644, 1567 and 1461 cm− 1, indicating the characteristic peaks of amide bond and an amino group. In addition, PEI-CNCs showed a strong spectral band in the range of 3100–3550 cm− 1, which was due to the stretching vibration of O-H and N-H at 3100–3500 cm− 1. Therefore, it can be proved that the amino group has been successfully introduced in the cross-linking process of PEI. The peaks of GCPA and IGCPA at 2904 cm− 1 were observed to change, which was attributed to the stretching vibration of -CH2 due to defects in the graphite structure. It can be concluded that GO was successfully introduced into GCPA and IGCPA. In addition, the peaks of eluted IGCPA were consistent with that of GCPA, indicating that imprinted ions in IGCPA were completely washed and other groups remained stable, which proved that the modified material had good stability.
TG/DTG analysis
The thermal stability of the material was investigated by increasing the temperature from 30℃ to 800℃ in N2 atmosphere. The thermogravimetric results are shown in Fig. 7. When the temperature reaches 250℃, decomposition is obvious and the mass decreases by 15–25%, which is mainly due to water loss. The total mass loss between 250–400℃ can be explained by the decomposition of the nanofiber network structure. Above 400℃, entering the final carbonization stage, the mass loss gradually stops, the TGA curve flattens out, and the residue is mainly composed of carbon left by calcination. The above results show that the addition of GO, PEI and other materials improves the thermal stability of the materials. The total mass loss rate of IGCPA was less than that of GCPA, indicating that the imprinted aerogels had better thermal stability.
3.2. Analysis of adsorption results
Effect of pH on adsorption
The pH value affects the presence of cations in the solution and the surface charge of the adsorbent. In order to avoid Dy3+ from forming dysprosium hydroxide precipitation under alkaline conditions, the adsorption properties in the pH range of 2.0–7.0 were studied. As can be seen from Fig. 8, with the increase of pH value, the adsorption amount of each adsorbent gradually increases. The adsorption capacity increased rapidly in the pH 1.0–5.0 range. When the pH value was higher than 5.0, the adsorption capacity gradually stabilized, which could be attributed to the low degree of dissociation of the -COOH group. In addition, the adsorption capacity of non-imprinted aerogels is much lower than that of non-imprinted aerogels. The imprinted factor (IF) defines the adsorption capacity ratio of imprinted and non-imprinted aerogels and shows the separation capacity of the aerogels. When pH = 5.0, the maximum value is 1.420, and the imprinted aerogel can achieve the highest adsorption capacity. Therefore, in subsequent adsorption experiments, we set the pH = 5.0.
Adsorption dynamics
The relationship between the adsorption quantity (Qt) and contact time (t) was discussed by adsorption dynamics experiments. As can be seen from Fig. 9, the adsorption curve of aerogels grew rapidly at the beginning and reached 80% of the maximum adsorption capacity within 200 minutes. Then, the adsorption curve grew slowly and finally reached an adsorption equilibrium within 6 hours, at which time the blot sites on the aerogels became saturated. The adsorption capacity of GCPA and IGCPA introduced with GO was significantly higher than that of PEI-CNCs, and IGCPA had higher adsorption equilibrium than GCPA due to its unique imprinted hole. The PFOKM and PSOKM were fit the kinetic data to investigate the adsorption rate constant and adsorption mechanism. The relevant calculation parameters of the adsorption kinetics model are shown in Table 2. Obviously, the PSOKM model (R2 ≥ 0.990) and the kinetic data fit well, indicating that the main adsorption process is chemical adsorption.
Table 2
Kinetic constants for the Pseudo-first-order and Pseudo-second-order models.
Sorbents
|
Pseudo-first-order kinetic model
|
Pseudo-second-order kinetic model
|
Qe (mg g− 1)
|
k1 × 10− 2
(min− 1)
|
R2
|
Qe (mg g− 1)
|
k2 × 10− 2
(g mg− 1 min− 1)
|
R2
|
PEI-CNCs
|
15.429
|
2.809
|
0.981
|
16.372
|
0.250
|
0.993
|
GCPA
|
25.878
|
3.357
|
0.970
|
27.391
|
0.179
|
0.990
|
IGCPA
|
33.771
|
3.760
|
0.984
|
35.601
|
0.157
|
0.990
|
Adsorption isotherm: By contacting Dy(III) solution with different initial concentration (0-200 mg L− 1), the differences of Dy(III) adsorption by different aerogels were analyzed, as well as the equilibrium data and adsorption curves. Langmuir isothermal model and Freundlich isothermal model were used to fit the experimental data of aerogels. As shown in Fig. 10, the adsorption capacity increased synchronously with the increase of the initial Dy(III) concentration. The maximum adsorption capacities of GCPA and IGCPA were 26.678 and 36.495 mg g− 1, respectively. Its high adsorption capacity was attributed to the functionalization of CNCs by GO and PEI, which provided more binding sites for Dy(III). Table 3 summarizes the relevant isothermal constants. The larger R2 value (0.991–0.999) indicated that the Langmuir isothermal adsorption model could fit the experimental data well, and the adsorption process by aerogels proved to be monolayer adsorption. The lower value of 1/n indicates that IGCPA has better adsorption conditions for Dy(III) than GCPA.
Table 3
Adsorption equilibrium constants for Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm equations.
Sorbents
|
Langmuir
|
Freundlich
|
Qm (mg g− 1)
|
KL (L mg− 1)
|
R2
|
KF (mg g− 1)
|
1/n
|
R2
|
PEI-CNCs
|
18.972
|
0.0869
|
0.999
|
6.157
|
0.217
|
0.894
|
GCPA
|
26.678
|
0.119
|
0.991
|
10.243
|
0.188
|
0.871
|
IGCPA
|
36.495
|
0.397
|
0.994
|
22.557
|
0.100
|
0.744
|
Adsorption thermodynamics: The effects of three kinds of aerogels on the adsorption at different temperatures (288.15 K, 298.15 K and 308.15 K) were studied. ΔG° was calculated according to the Gibb's free energy change equation (Fig. 11), and ΔH° and ΔS° are obtained by the relation between lnK° and 1/T (Fig. 12). Table 4 lists three aerogels thermodynamics related parameters. ΔG° is negative between − 5.363 and − 6.742 kJ mol− 1, indicating that the adsorption of Dy(III) is spontaneous, and the higher the temperature, the more favorable the adsorption process. ΔH° is positive, indicating that the adsorption process is endothermic, which proves again that the increase of temperature is conducive to adsorption. ΔS° is positive, indicating that the adsorption process is an entropy increase process. In summary, the adsorption of Dy(III) by aerogels is spontaneous, endothermic and entropy-enhancing.
Table 4
Thermodynamic parameters of three aerogels.
Sorbents
|
ΔH° (kJ mol− 1)
|
ΔS° (J mol− 1)
|
T (K)
|
K°
|
ΔG° (kJ mol− 1)
|
R2
|
PEI-CNCs
|
4.011
|
32.547
|
288.15
|
9.382
|
-5.363
|
0.993
|
298.15
|
9.979
|
-5.702
|
308.15
|
10.457
|
-6.014
|
GCPA
|
4.313
|
35.023
|
288.15
|
11.188
|
-5.785
|
0.990
|
298.15
|
11.789
|
-6.116
|
308.15
|
12.577
|
-6.487
|
IGCPA
|
5.228
|
38.869
|
288.15
|
12.064
|
-5.966
|
0.991
|
298.15
|
13.086
|
-6.374
|
308.15
|
13.897
|
-6.742
|
Selective tests: In order to prove that IGCPA has good adsorption selectivity, a competitive adsorption experiment was carried out. The aerogels adsorbed Dy(III) as well as Pr(III) and Nd(III). The result is shown in Fig. 13 and Table 5. The Kd value reflects adsorption selectivity of adsorbents for Dy(III). The Kd value of IGCPA for Dy(III) is higher than that of GCPA, the maximum Kd value is 1909.2 mL g− 1 of IGCPA. It can be seen that the unique imprinted hole on IGCPA has a specific adsorption on Dy(III), and this site cannot adsorb other rare earth ions. Compared with other adsorption experiments, the total adsorption capacity of IGCPA for the three rare earth ions is higher than that of single dysprosium ion, which indicates that IGCPA can also adsorb Nd(III) and Pr(III). In this experiment, the adsorption capacity of IGCPA for Dy(III) decreased, indicating that other rare earth ions would interfere with the adsorption of Dy(III). According to Pearson's law, this is because Dy(III), Nd(III) and Pr(III) are all hard Lewis acids, and the strongest ion competition often occurs between the same type of metals. In addition, the results show that the order of adsorption capacity is Dy(III) > Nd(III) > Pr(III). We speculate that this is related to the ion radius. The smaller the radius, the stronger the chelating ability of the metal ion to the carboxyl group. In summary, IGCPA can preferentially separate Dy(III) from the multi-ion coexistence system.
Table 5
The Kd value of Dy(III) adsorbed by aerogels in mixed solution.
Cation
|
PEI-CNCs
|
GCPA
|
IGCPA
|
Cf (mg L− 1)
|
Kd (mL g− 1)
|
Cf (mg L− 1)
|
Kd (mL g− 1)
|
Cf (mg L− 1)
|
Kd (mL g− 1)
|
Pr(III)
|
35.874
|
393.77
|
31.707
|
597.09
|
31.718
|
576.39
|
Nd(III)
|
35.779
|
397.47
|
31.121
|
606.63
|
31.379
|
593.42
|
Dy(III)
|
35.456
|
410.20
|
31.003
|
612.75
|
17.187
|
1909.2
|
Regeneration: The reuse of adsorbents will minimize industrial production costs. As can be seen from Fig. 14, five adsorption cycles were performed to test the reliability of the aerogel. After 5 cycles, the adsorption capacity decreased to 67.97–79.75% of the initial adsorption capacity, which was mainly due to the loss of adsorption sites caused by eluent elution, and the SEM image of IGCPA was basically the same as before the test. In conclusion, IGCPA has reliable repeatability and is expected to be a commercially available adsorption material. Further, some other adsorbents are listed to compare adsorption capacities for REEs in Table 6 (Zhao et al. 2017; Zheng et al. 2016; Zheng et al. 2019; Zheng et al. 2020).
Table 6
Comparison of IGCPA with those described in other literature
Sorbents
|
Cation
|
pH
|
Adsorption capacity (mg g− 1)
|
References
|
IGCPA
|
Dy(III)
|
5.0
|
36.495
|
This study
|
o-CNCs/GO-IIPs
|
Dy(III)
|
4.0
|
41.790
|
(Zheng et al. 2020)
|
Imprinted mesoporous silica materials
|
Dy(III)
|
2.0
|
22.330
|
(Zheng et al. 2016)
|
Imprinted mesoporous cellulose films
|
Nd(III)
|
4.0
|
22.610
|
(Zheng et al. 2019)
|
PEI-cross-linked CNC (PEI-CNC)
|
Er(III)
|
5.4
|
120.29
|
(Zhao et al. 2017)
|