[1] OECD (2015) Health at a Glance 2015: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing, Paris
[2] Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography-an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357: 2277-2284
[3] Geyer LL, Schoepf UJ, Meinel FG et al. (2015) State of the Art: Iterative CT Reconstruction Techniques. Radiology 276:339-357. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015132766
[4] Löve A, Olsson M, Siemund R (2013) Six iterative reconstruction algorithms in brain CT: a phantom study on image quality at different radiation dose levels. Br J Radiol 86(1031):20130388. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20130388
[5] McCollough CH, Yu L, Kofler JM et al (2015) Degradation of CT Low-Contrast Spatial Resolution Due to the Use of Iterative Reconstruction and Reduced Dose Levels. Radiology 276(2):499-506. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.15142047
[6] Mileto A, Guimaraes LS, McCollough CH et al (2019) State of the Art in Abdominal CT: The Limits of Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms. Radiology 293(3):491-503. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019191422
[7] Urikura A, Hara T, Ichikawa K et al (2016) Objective assessment of low-contrast computed tomography images with iterative reconstruction. Phys Med 32(8):992-998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.07.003
[8] Greffier J, Hamard A, Pereira F et al (2020) Image quality and dose reduction opportunity of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for CT: a phantom study. Eur Radiol 30:3951-3959.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06724-w
[9] Hsieh J, Liu E, Nett B, Tang J, Thibault JB, Sahney S (2019) A new era of image reconstruction: TrueFidelity™. Technical white paper on deep learning image reconstruction. GE Healthcare
[10] Racine D, Becce F, Viry A et al (2020) Task-based characterization of a deep learning image reconstruction and comparison with filtered back-projection and a partial model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: A phantom study. Phys Med 76:28-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.06.004
[11] Benz DC, Benetos G, Rampidis G et al (2020) Validation of deep-learning image reconstruction for coronary computed tomography angiography: Impact on noise, image quality and diagnostic accuracy. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 14(5):444-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2020.01.002
[12] Higaki T, Nakamura Y, Zhou J, et al (2020) Deep Learning Reconstruction at CT: Phantom Study of the Image Characteristics. Acad Radiol 27(1):82-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2019.09.008
[13] Solomon JB, Li X, Samei E (2013) Relating noise to image quality indicators in CT examinations with tube current modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:592-600. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.8580
[14] Solomon J, Lyu P, Marin D, Samei E (2020) Noise and spatial resolution properties of a commercially available deep learning-based CT reconstruction algorithm. Med Phys 47(9):3961-3971. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14319
[15] Ria F, Solomon JB, Wilson JM, Samei E (2020) Technical Note: Validation of TG 233 phantom methodology to characterize noise and dose in patient CT data. Med Phys 47(4):1633-1639. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14089
[16] Takata T, Ichikawa K, Mitsui W et al (2017) Object shape dependency of in-plane resolution for iterative reconstruction of computed tomography. Phys Med 33:146-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.01.001
[17] Furlan A, Marin D, Vanzulli A et al (2011) Hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients at multidetector CT: hepatic venous phase versus delayed phase for the detection of tumour washout. Br J Radiol 84(1001):403-412. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/18329080
[18] Cham MD, Yankelevitz DF, Shaham D et al (2000) Deep venous thrombosis: detection by using indirect CT venography. The Pulmonary Angiography-Indirect CT Venography Cooperative Group. Radiology 226(3):744–751. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.216.3.r00se44744
[19] Urikura A, Ichikawa K, Hara T et al (2014). Spatial resolution measurement for iterative reconstruction by use of image-averaging techniques in computed tomography. Radiol Phys Technol 7:358–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-014-0273-2
[20] Ria F, Solomon JB, Wilson JM et al (2020) Technical Note: Validation of TG 233 phantom methodology to characterize noise and dose in patient CT data. Med Phys 47(4):1633-1639. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14089
[21] Samei E, Bakalyar D, Boedeker KL et al (2019) Performance evaluation of computed tomography systems: Summary of AAPM Task Group 233. Med Phys 46(11):e735-e756. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13763
[22] Gies M, Kalender WA, Wolf H, Suess C (1999) Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. I. Simulation studies. Med Phys 26 (11), 2235–2247. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.598779
[23] IAEA (1994) IAEA Safety Series No. 1154, International Basic Safety Standards for Protection of Radiation Sources. IAEA, Vienna
[24] Richard S, Husarik DB, Yadava G et al (2012) Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms. Med Phys; 39(7):4115-4122
[25] Yu L, Vrieze TJ, Leng S et al (2015) Technical Note: Measuring contrast- and noise-dependent spatial resolution of an iterative reconstruction method in CT using ensemble averaging. Med Phys 42(5):2261-2267. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4916802
[26] Solomon J, Samei E (2016) Correlation between human detection accuracy and observer model-based image quality metrics in computed tomography. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 3(3):035506. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.Jmi.3.3.035506
[27] Chen YL, Ko CJ, Chien SY et al (2011) Tumor size as a prognostic factor in resected small hepatocellular carcinoma: a controversy revisited. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 26(5):851-857.
[28] Gomez-Cardona D, Cruz-Bastida JP, Li K, Budde A et al (2016) Impact of bowtie filter and object position on the two-dimensional noise power spectrum of a clinical MDCT system. Med Phys 43(8):4495-4506. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4954848
[29] Grimes J, Duan X, Yu L et al (2015) The influence of focal spot blooming on high-contrast spatial resolution in CT imaging. Med Phys 42(10):6011-6020. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4931053
[30] Hara T, Ichikawa K, Sanada S, Ida Y (2010) Image quality dependence on in-plane positions and directions for MDCT images. Eur J Radiol 75(1):114-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.03.060