1. Gudsnuk, K. & Champagne, F. A. Epigenetic influence of stress and the social environment. ILAR J. 53, 279–88 (2012).
2. Brown, G. R. & Spencer, K. A. Steroid hormones, stress and the adolescent brain: A comparative perspective. Neuroscience (2013) doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.12.016.
3. Aiken, C. E. & Ozanne, S. E. Transgenerational developmental programming. Hum. Reprod. Update 20, 63–75 (2014).
4. De Gasperin, O., Duarte, A., English, S., Attisano, A. & Kilner, R. M. The early-life environment and individual plasticity in life-history traits. Ecol. Evol. 9, 339–351 (2019).
5. Sheriff, M. J. et al. Integrating Ecological and Evolutionary Context in the Study of Maternal Stress. Integr. Comp. Biol. 57, 437–449 (2017).
6. Broom, L. J. & Kogut, M. H. The role of the gut microbiome in shaping the immune system of chickens. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 204, 44–51 (2018).
7. Dixon, L. M., Sparks, N. H. C. & Rutherford, K. M. D. Early experiences matter: A review of the effects of prenatal environment on offspring characteristics in poultry. Poult. Sci. 95, 489–499 (2016).
8. Nettle, D. & Bateson, M. Adaptive developmental plasticity: What is it, how can we recognize it and when can it evolve? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (2015) doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.1005.
9. Gomez-Mestre, I. & Jovani, R. A heuristic model on the role of plasticity in adaptive evolution: plasticity increases adaptation, population viability and genetic variation. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 280, 20131869–20131869 (2013).
10. Bateson, P., Gluckman, P. & Hanson, M. The biology of developmental plasticity and the Predictive Adaptive Response hypothesis. J. Physiol. 592, 2357–2368 (2014).
11. Rubin, C. J. et al. Whole-genome resequencing reveals loci under selection during chicken domestication. Nature 464, 587–591 (2010).
12. Mirkena, T. et al. Genetics of adaptation in domestic farm animals: A review. Livestock Science vol. 132 (2010).
13. Lindqvist, C. & Jensen, P. Domestication and stress effects on contrafreeloading and spatial learning performance in red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus) and White Leghorn layers. Behav. Processes 81, 80–84 (2009).
14. Rauw, W. M., Johnson, A. K., Gomez-Raya, L. & Dekkers, J. C. M. A hypothesis and review of the relationship between selection for improved production efficiency, coping behavior, and domestication. Front. Genet. 8, (2017).
15. Soleimani, A. F., Zulkifli, I., Omar, A. R. & Raha, A. R. Physiological responses of 3 chicken breeds to acute heat stress. Poult. Sci. 90, 1435–40 (2011).
16. Ericsson, M., Fallahsharoudi, A., Bergquist, J., Kushnir, M. M. & Jensen, P. Domestication effects on behavioural and hormonal responses to acute stress in chickens. Physiol. Behav. 133, 161–9 (2014).
17. Miller, K. A. & Mench, J. A. Differential effects of 4 types of environmental enrichment on aggressive pecking, feather pecking, feather loss, food wastage and productivity in Japanese quail. Br. Poult. Sci. 47, 646–658 (2006).
18. Campbell, D. L. M., De Haas, E. N. & Lee, C. A review of environmental enrichment for laying hens during rearing in relation to their behavioral and physiological development. Poult. Sci. 98, 9–28 (2019).
19. Collias, N. & Collias, E. Social organization of a red junglefowl, Gallus gallus, population related to evolution theory. Anim. Behav. 51, 1337–1354 (1996).
20. Cheng, H. W. Breeding of tomorrow’s chickens to improve well-being. Poult. Sci. 89, 805–813 (2010).
21. Pettersson, I. C., Weeks, C. A., Norman, K. I., Knowles, T. G. & Nicol, C. J. Internal roosting location is associated with differential use of the outdoor range by free-range laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 59, 135–140 (2018).
22. Gunnarsson, S., Yngvesson, J., Keeling, L. J. & Forkman, B. Rearing without early access to perches impairs the spatial skills of laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 67, (2000).
23. Kogut, M. H. The effect of microbiome modulation on the intestinal health of poultry. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 250, 32–40 (2019).
24. Tahamtani, F. M., Nordgreen, J., Nordquist, R. E. & Janczak, A. M. Early life in a barren environment adversely affects spatial cognition in laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus). Front. Vet. Sci. 2, 1–12 (2015).
25. Ericsson, M. & Jensen, P. Domestication and ontogeny effects on the stress response in young chickens (Gallus gallus). Sci. Rep. 6, 35818 (2016).
26. Monaghan, P. Early growth conditions, phenotypic development and environmental change. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 363, 1635–1645 (2008).
27. Pigeon, G. et al. Silver spoon effects are constrained under extreme adult environmental conditions. Ecology 100, 1–10 (2019).
28. Zidar, J. et al. Environmental complexity buffers against stress-induced negative judgement bias in female chickens. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–14 (2018).
29. Matur, E. et al. The effect of furnished cages on the immune response of laying hens under social stress. Poult. Sci. 94, 2853–2862 (2015).
30. Campderrich, I. et al. Environmental complexity: A buffer against stress in the domestic chick. PLoS One 14, e0210270 (2019).
31. Aerni, V., Brinkhof, M. W. G., Wechsler, B., Oester, H. & Fröhlich, E. Productivity and mortality of laying hens in aviaries: A systematic review. in World’s Poultry Science Journal vol. 61 (2005).
32. Gilani, A. M., Knowles, T. G. & Nicol, C. J. The effect of rearing environment on feather pecking in young and adult laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 148, (2013).
33. Johnsen, P. F., Vestergaard, K. S. & Nørgaard-Nielsen, G. Influence of early rearing conditions on the development of feather pecking and cannibalism in domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 60, (1998).
34. Blokhuis, H. J. & Van Der Haar, J. W. Effects of floor type during rearing and of beak trimming on ground pecking and feather pecking in laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 22, (1989).
35. Gunnarsson, S., Keeling, L. J. & Svedberg, J. Effect of rearing factors on the prevalence of floor eggs, cloacal cannibalism and feather pecking in commercial flocks of loose housed laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 40, (1999).
36. Leotti, L. A., Iyengar, S. S. & Ochsner, K. N. Born to choose: The origins and value of the need for control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences vol. 14 457–463 (2010).
37. Janczak, A. M. & Riber, A. B. Review of rearing-related factors affecting the welfare of laying hens. Poultry Science vol. 94 (2015).
38. Skånberg, L., Kjærsgaard Nielsen, C. B. & Keeling, L. J. Litter and perch type matter already from the start: exploring preferences and perch balance in laying hen chicks. Poult. Sci. 100, (2021).
39. Nazar, F. N. & Marin, R. H. Chronic stress and environmental enrichment as opposite factors affecting the immune response in Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Stress 14, 166–73 (2011).
40. Nazar, F. N., Estevez, I., Correa, S. G. & Marin, R. H. Stress Induced Polarization of Immune-Neuroendocrine Phenotypes in Gallus gallus. Sci. Rep. 7, 8102 (2017).
41. Vinkler, M., Bainova, H., Bainová, H. & Albrecht, T. Functional analysis of the skin-swelling response to phytohaemagglutinin. Funct. Ecol. 24, 1081–1086 (2010).
42. Nazar, F. N., Marin, R. H., Liste, G., Campderrich, I. & Estevez, I. Manipulation of the phenotypic appearance of individuals in groups of laying hens: Effects on stress and immune-related variables. Stress 18, 710–717 (2015).
43. Matson, K. D., Ricklefs, R. E. & Klasing, K. C. A hemolysis-hemagglutination assay for characterizing constitutive innate humoral immunity in wild and domestic birds. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 29, 275–286 (2005).
44. Shini, S., Shini, A. & Huff, G. R. Effects of chronic and repeated corticosterone administration in rearing chickens on physiology, the onset of lay and egg production of hens. Physiol. Behav. 98, 73–7 (2009).
45. Forkman, B., Boissy, A., Meunier-Salaün, M. C., Canali, E. & Jones, R. B. A critical review of fear tests used on cattle, pigs, sheep, poultry and horses. Physiol. Behav. 92, (2007).
46. du Sert, N. P. et al. The arrive guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 18, (2020).
47. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M. & Walker, S. C. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, (2015).
48. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B. & Christensen, R. H. B. lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models . J. Stat. Softw. 82, (2017).
49. Lay, D. C. et al. Hen welfare in different housing systems. Poult. Sci. 90, 278–94 (2011).
50. Bach, M. H., Tahamtani, F. M., Pedersen, I. J. & Riber, A. B. Effects of environmental complexity on behaviour in fast-growing broiler chickens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 219, 104840 (2019).
51. Moe, R. O. et al. Effects of housing conditions during the rearing and laying period on adrenal reactivity, immune response and heterophil to lymphocyte (H/L) ratios in laying hens. Animal 4, 1709–1715 (2010).
52. Hamal, K. R., Burgess, S. C., Pevzner, I. Y. & Erf, G. F. Maternal antibody transfer from dams to their egg yolks, egg whites, and chicks in meat lines of chickens. Poult. Sci. 85, 1364–72 (2006).
53. Bar-Shira, E., Cohen, I., Elad, O. & Friedman, A. Role of goblet cells and mucin layer in protecting maternal IgA in precocious birds. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 44, 186–194 (2014).
54. Davison, F., Kaspers, B., Schat, K. & Kaiser, P. Avian immunology. (Academic Press, 2011).
55. Cecchini, S., Rossetti, M., Tomaso, F. Di & Caputo, A. R. Evaluation of the effects of dexamethasone-induced stress on levels of natural antibodies in immunized laying hens. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 177, 35–41 (2016).
56. Parmentier, H. K. et al. Different levels of natural antibodies in chickens divergently selected for specific antibody responses. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 28, 39–49 (2004).
57. Hofmann, T., Schmucker, S. S., Bessei, W., Grashorn, M. & Stefanski, V. Impact of housing environment on the immune system in chickens: A review. Animals 10, 1–26 (2020).
58. Star, L., Frankena, K., Kemp, B., Nieuwland, M. G. B. & Parmentier, H. K. Natural humoral immune competence and survival in layers. Poult. Sci. 86, 1090–1099 (2007).
59. Adriaansen-Tennekes, R., Decuypere, E., Parmentier, H. K. & Savelkoul, H. F. J. Chicken lines selected for their primary antibody response to sheep red blood cells show differential hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis responsiveness to mild stressors. Poult. Sci. 88, 1879–82 (2009).
60. Baxter, M., Bailie, C. L. & O’Connell, N. E. Play behaviour, fear responses and activity levels in commercial broiler chickens provided with preferred environmental enrichments. Animal 13, (2019).
61. Brantsæter, M. et al. Exposure to increased environmental complexity during rearing reduces fearfulness and increases use of three-dimensional space in laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus). Front. Vet. Sci. 3, 1–10 (2016).
62. Bryan Jones, R. & Waddington, D. Modification of fear in domestic chicks, Gallus gallus domesticus, via regular handling and early environmental enrichment. Anim. Behav. 43, (1992).
63. de Haas, E. N., Kemp, B., Bolhuis, J. E., Groothuis, T. & Rodenburg, T. B. Fear, stress, and feather pecking in commercial white and brown laying hen parent-stock flocks and their relationships with production parameters. Poult. Sci. 92, 2259–2269 (2013).
64. Wechsler, B. & Lea, S. E. G. Adaptation by learning: Its significance for farm animal husbandry. Applied Animal Behaviour Science vol. 108 (2007).
65. Tulving, E. & Schacter, D. L. Priming and human memory systems. Science (80-. ). 247, (1990).
66. Marchewka, A. & Nowicka, A. Emotionally negative stimuli are resistant to repetition priming. Acta Neurobiol. Exp. (Wars). 67, (2007).
67. Calandreau, L. et al. Higher inherent fearfulness potentiates the effects of chronic stress in the Japanese quail. Behav. Brain Res. 225, 505–10 (2011).
68. Jones, R. B., Marin, R. H., Garcia, D. A. & Arce, A. T-maze behaviour in domestic chicks: a search for underlying variables. Anim. Behav. 58, 211–217 (1999).
69. Mumma, J. O., Thaxton, J. P., Vizzier-Thaxton, Y. & Dodson, W. L. Physiological stress in laying hens. Poult. Sci. 85, 761–9 (2006).
70. Lee, K. A. Linking immune defenses and life history at the levels of the individual and the species. Integr. Comp. Biol. 46, 1000–1015 (2006).
71. Hedlund, L., Whittle, R. & Jensen, P. Effects of commercial hatchery processing on short- and long-term stress responses in laying hens. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–10 (2019).
72. Blatchford, R. A., Fulton, R. M. & Mench, J. A. The utilization of the Welfare Quality® assessment for determining laying hen condition across three housing systems. Poult. Sci. 95, 154–163 (2016).