This study synthesised the qualitative findings of nine studies to understand Sub-Saharan African women’s views and experiences of risk factors for obstetric fistula. Five analytical themes were identified: ‘Cultural beliefs and practices impeding safe childbirth, lack of woman’s autonomy to choices of place to birth safely, lack of accessibility and social support to safe childbirth, inexperienced birth attendant and delayed emergency maternal care services in childbirth; all these themes represent what is currently known about what women’s views are and their experiences of risk factors underlying the causes of obstetric fistula in Sub-Saharan African.
Our findings highlighted how cultural beliefs and practices impede women from seeking skilled childbirth attendants. The fact that some women do give birth successfully in the context of such beliefs at home with a traditional birth attendant (TBA) has reinforced this approach in the community; however, the focus on spiritual and magical drivers of labour and birth put reproductive women at risk of obstetric fistula and/or stillbirth [33]. As J Changole, V Combs Thorsen and U Kafulafula [36] asserted, TBAs’ lack of understanding of birth physiology and the nature, meaning and impact of prolonged or obstructed labour is crucial in the development of VVF. The result is that women are kept at home for an extended period before referral to the hospital; in some cases, they are never referred to the hospital even when complications are evident [38]. However a contrast to this pattern was reported in the Ethiopian health care system, where TBAs’ role was acknowledged as that of a volunteer worker, attending to women under the supervision of health extension workers; although the role and relationship has not been clearly defined [39]. This approach could seem to be a safer approach that TBAs who lack knowledge of anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology education leading women’s intrapartum care. Programmes that incorporate a participatory approach such as that outlined by Shiferaw and team (2013) seem to offer a model of care for women in labour where TBAs are given well-defined roles such as birth companions or interpreters for women in labour [40]. Midwives currently working in communities can be a useful resource for training TBAs to a competent level with a well-defined role this will improve health care services to meet the needs of rural women and family needs [40]. However, it is essential that provision of childbirth care, preferences and needs including having a companion of choices in labour be considered by midwives and other skilled birth attendants to reduce risk of VVF in the community [40–42]
Our review also elucidates limited decision-making power on the part of women regarding where to give birth. This choice is primarily made by the woman’s husband, mother, the TBAs, her mother-in-law, grandmothers, or other relations instead of the women [31, 33–35]. The data in the articles we reviewed concurs with a study undertaken at Sokoto Northern Nigeria [43] in which it was found that low patronage of modern maternal health facilities by women in labour was associated with limitations placed on women’s freedom to choose the health care centre as a place to birth safely. In this study, women could not access healthcare services without the permission of their husbands [43]. In Malawi, women’s lack of access to financial resources are implicated in this issue as this leads directly to women having limited autonomy on health care utilisation during labour and birth, which in turn increases their risk of developing VVF [34]. In Northern Nigeria, the factors underlying lack of decision making power is similar: it is related to the practice of ‘’Purdah”, which involves wife seclusion whereby women are not allowed to go out to earn a living [14].
We also found issues of lack of accessibility and social support for safe childbirth environments, as few women have either available means of transportation, support from husbands and relations in accompanying them to health institutions when they are in active labour, or the ability to afford medical supplies required by hospitals [16, 31, 32, 36]. Transportation is costly and unaffordable, or it is non-existent [38, 44, 45]. This finding is in line with that of HM Degge, M Laurenson, EW Dumbili and M Hayter [32], who described lack of transportation for women in labour as structural violence against women. L Barbi, M Cham, E Ame-Bruce and M Lazzerini [46] also implicated cost as a barrier to safe birthing environment and another reason for why women seek traditional birth attendants’ services rather than birth in a health facility, is because women are asked to bring medical supplies or consumables that they cannot afford; in contrast TBAs require nothing but a white piece of cloth. Pregnancy and childbirth issues in African countries are perceived to be ‘’women’s issues’’, and most men are culturally excluded from participating in maternal care or in accompanying their partner to clinic [36, 47]. However, FK Ongolly and SA Bukachi [47] study mirrored that, even though men are culturally excluded in maternal care, some men still want to be involved in healthcare issues of their spouses at critical times such as decision making but were given little or no attention by the midwives at the clinic, therefore some men thought it to be time wasting accompanying their spouse in labour to the clinic.
Another factor we identified in women developing obstetric fistula in this review, is women’s reluctance to attend dedicated maternity care facilities secondary to a lack of trust in those facilities’ care givers’ and inexperienced encountered at places of parturition [48, 49]. Women’s choice of place to birth was shaped by their negative past experiences with health care facility during childbirth and their recall of health care providers as incompetent in handling their labour [36, 39, 44, 50, 51]. A Philibert, V Ridde, A Bado and P Fournier [52] suggests that a shortage of skilled experienced staff in the maternity units, or limited professional development might be reasons for skilled birth attendants’ limited exposure to (and therefore limited competence in managing) the array of complications they might be presented with, as well as increased workload or deteriorating staff morale. In contrast to our finding, S Mocumbi, U Högberg, E Lampa, C Sacoor, A Valá, A Bergström, P von Dadelszen, K Munguambe, C Hanson, E Sevene, et al. [53] reported increased satisfaction of care received during childbirth among women in a dedicated maternity care facility. The researchers related the women’s satisfaction to the availability of qualified human resources including highly qualified midwives in the facility.
Finally, this review also highlighted delayed emergency maternal care services as an indirect cause of VVF. Lack of essential emergency services associated with shortage of staff or equipment, including delay in referring women to health care facility with emergency services such as emergency caesarean section was experienced at healthcare facility [16, 35, 37]. This is in agreement with a study conducted in Uganda which report lack of essential emergency obstetric services in the cases of emergency including a lack of functional referral system [50]. Women attribute lack of essential emergency services as an indirect cause of VVF including delay in referring women to health care facility with emergency services.
Strengths and limitations of the review.
The objective of this review, which was to report what is currently known about “Sub-Saharan African women’s views and experiences of risk factors for obstetric fistula”, and to highlight gaps in knowledge about this topic, was fulfilled. One of the limitations is that the period of inclusion (2011–2021) may mean that earlier publications that might have yielded useful insights were not included. Secondly, the search was limited to articles published in English language, and the omission of studies reported in other languages, particularly African languages, might have excluded useful data. Thirdly, grey literature, which may have provided additional insights into this topic, were excluded.
Implications for practice and Policy
-
Future policies and initiatives should focus on culturally sensitive care which will corporate participatory approach for women in labour where TBAs will be given well- defined roles such as birth companions or interpreters for women in labour.
-
There is need to develop compressive strategies that is inclusive such as building more maternity to cater for women within the community to meet the needs of women in labour.
-
Policy that encourages male involvement during labour are potential interventions to increase male involvement in pregnancy and childbirth issues.
-
There is need to train more midwifes with the necessary skills required to prevent VVF through continuous midwifery programmes.