1.Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA. 1983;250(6):777–81.
2.Van de Ridder J, Stokking KM, McGaghie WC, Ten Cate OTJ. What is feedback in clinical education? Medical education. 2008;42(2):189–97.
3.Rowntree D. Assessing students: How shall we know them?: Taylor & Francis; 1987.
4.Burch VC, Seggie JL, Gary NE. Formative assessment promotes learning in undergraduate clinical clerkships. South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde. 2006;96(5):430–3.
5.Anders Ericsson K. Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: a general overview. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2008;15(11):988–94.
6.Donnon T, Al Ansari A, Al Alawi S, Violato C. The reliability, validity, and feasibility of multisource feedback physician assessment: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2014;89(3):511–6.
7.Norcini JJ, Blank LL, Arnold GK, Kimball HR. The mini-CEX (clinical evaluation exercise): a preliminary investigation. Annals of internal medicine. 1995;123(10):795–9.
8.Wragg A, Wade W, Fuller G, Cowan G, Mills P. Assessing the performance of specialist registrars. Clinical medicine (London, England). 2003;3(2):131–4.
9.Frank JR, Danoff D. The CanMEDS initiative: implementing an outcomes-based framework of physician competencies. Medical teacher. 2007;29(7):642–7.
10.Boursicot K, Etheridge L, Setna Z, Sturrock A, Ker J, Smee S, et al. Performance in assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa conference. Medical teacher. 2011;33(5):370–83.
11.Norcini J, Burch V. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31. Medical teacher. 2007;29(9):855–71.
12.Lockyer J. Multisource feedback in the assessment of physician competencies. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2003;23(1):4–12.
13.Al Khalifa K, Al Ansari A, Violato C, Donnon T. Multisource Feedback to Assess Surgical Practice: A Systematic Review. Journal of Surgical Education. 2013;70(4):475–86.
14.Mackillop L, Parker-Swift J, Crossley J. Getting the questions right: non-compound questions are more reliable than compound questions on matched multi-source feedback instruments. Medical Education. 2011;45(8):843–8.
15.Wood L, Hassell A, Whitehouse A, Bullock A, Wall D. A literature review of multi-source feedback systems within and without health services, leading to 10 tips for their successful design. Medical teacher. 2006;28(7):e185–91.
16.Ferguson J, Wakeling J, Bowie P. Factors influencing the effectiveness of multisource feedback in improving the professional practice of medical doctors: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education. 2014;14(1):76.
17.Archer J, Norcini J, Southgate L, Heard S, Davies H. mini-PAT (Peer Assessment Tool): a valid component of a national assessment programme in the UK? Advances in health sciences education: theory and practice. 2008;13(2):181–92.
18.Archer J, Davies H. Sheffield peer review assessment tool for consultants (SPRAT): screening for poorly performing doctors. Bern, Switzerland: Association of Medical Education of Europe. 2003.
19.Archer JC, Norcini J, Davies HA. Use of SPRAT for peer review of paediatricians in training. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2005;330(7502):1251–3.
20.Hall W, Violato C, Lewkonia R, Lockyer J, Fidler H, Toews J, et al. Assessment of physician performance in Alberta: the physician achievement review. Cmaj. 1999;161(1):52–7.
21.Violato C, Lockyer J, Fidler H. Multisource feedback: a method of assessing surgical practice. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2003;326(7388):546–8.
22.Rekman J, Hamstra SJ, Dudek N, Wood T, Seabrook C, Gofton W. A new instrument for assessing resident competence in surgical clinic: the Ottawa clinic assessment tool. Journal of surgical education. 2016;73(4):575–82.
23.van der Meulen MW, Boerebach BC, Smirnova A, Heeneman S, oude Egbrink MG, van der Vleuten CP, et al. Validation of the INCEPT: a multisource feedback tool for capturing different perspectives on physicians’ professional performance. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 2017;37(1):9–18.
24.Campbell J, Narayanan A, Burford B, Greco M. Validation of a multi-source feedback tool for use in general practice. Education for Primary Care. 2010;21(3):165–79.
25.Behling O, Law KS. Translating questionnaires and other research instruments: Problems and solutions: Sage; 2000.
26.Cook DA, Beckman TJ. Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. The American journal of medicine. 2006;119(2):166. e7-. e16.
27.Downing SM. Validity: on the meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Medical education. 2003;37(9):830–7.
28.Messick S. Standards of validity and the validity of standards in performance asessment. Educational measurement: Issues and practice. 1995;14(4):5–8.
29.Crossley J, Humphris G, Jolly B. Assessing health professionals. Medical education. 2002;36(9):800–4.
30.Violato C, Lockyer J, Fidler H. Changes in performance: a 5year longitudinal study of participants in a multisource feedback programme. Medical education. 2008;42:1007 - 13.
31.Overeem K, Wollersheim H, Driessen E, Lombarts K, Van De Ven G, Grol R, et al. Doctors’ perceptions of why 360‐degree feedback does (not) work: a qualitative study. Medical education. 2009;43(9):874–82.
32.Overeem K, Lombarts M, Arah O, Klazinga N, Grol R, Wollersheim H. Three methods of multi-source feedback compared: a plea for narrative comments and coworkers’ perspectives. Medical teacher. 2010;32:141 - 7.
33.Overeem K, Wollersheimh H, Arah O, Cruijsberg J, Grol R, Lombarts K. Factors predicting doctors’ reporting of performance change in response to multisource feedback. BMC Med Educ. 2012;12:52.
34.Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, Van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. Challenges in multisource feedback: intended and unintended outcomes. Medical education. 2007;41:583 - 91.
35.Sargeant J, McNaughton E, Mercer S, Murphy D, Sullivan P, Bruce DA. Providing feedback: Exploring a model (emotion, content, outcomes) for facilitating multisource feedback. Medical teacher. 2011;33(9):744–9.
36.Mackillop L, Parker-Swift J, Crossley J. Getting the questions right: non-compound questions are more reliable than compound questions on matched multi-source feedback instruments. Medical education. 2011;45(8):843–8.
37.Bracken DW, Timmreck CW, Church AH. The handbook of multisource feedback: John Wiley & Sons; 2001.
38.Brinkman WB, Geraghty SR, Lanphear BP, Khoury JC, del Rey JAG, DeWitt TG, et al. Effect of multisource feedback on resident communication skills and professionalism: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine. 2007;161(1):44–9.
39.Fink A. The survey handbook: Sage; 2003.
40.Shavelson RJ, Webb NM, Rowley GL. Generalizability theory. American Psychologist. 1989;44(6):922.
41.Shavelson RJ, Webb NM. Generalizability theory: A primer: Sage; 1991.
42.Brennan RL. Generalizability theory. Journal of Educational Measurement. 2003;40(1):105–7.
43.G_String A Windows Wrapper for urGENOVA [cited 2019 12 September]. Available from: http://fhsperd.mcmaster.ca/g_string/index.html.
44.Mackillop LH, Crossley J, Vivekananda-Schmidt P, Wade W, Armitage M. A single generic multi-source feedback tool for revalidation of all UK career-grade doctors: does one size fit all? Medical teacher. 2011;33(2):e75-e83.
45.Jarvis-Selinger S, Pratt DD, Regehr G. Competency is not enough: integrating identity formation into the medical education discourse. Academic Medicine. 2012;87(9):1185–90.
46.Moonen–van Loon JM, Overeem K, Govaerts MJ, Verhoeven BH, van der Vleuten CP, Driessen EW. The reliability of multisource feedback in competency-based assessment programs: the effects of multiple occasions and assessor groups. Academic Medicine. 2015;90(8):1093–9.