Characteristics of the cohort
Of 3,059 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in Wuhan Huoshenshan Hospital, mild and moderate cases, critically ill cases upon admission, and cases with unknown disease were excluded. In brief, 1,417 patients were identified as severely ill but 25 were excluded owing to previous treatment with prednisone acetate. Hence, 1,392 severely ill patients with COVID-19 were enrolled in this study for further analysis (Figure 1).
Among all selected patients, the median age was 63 years (IQR, 53–71), including 688 (49.4%) men and 704 (50.6%) women, indicating that there was no gender difference in the infection rate. Many patients had preexisting medical conditions, including hypertension (497 [35.7%]), diabetes (221 [15.9%]), and cardiovascular disease (211 [15.2%]). The most common symptoms were fever (951 [68.3%]), cough (829 [59.6%]), and fatigue (544 [39.1%]). Dyspnea (159 [11.4%]) and chest pain (172 [12.4%]) were also observed in some patients, whereas diarrhea (35 [2.5%]), ache (8 [0.6%]), and emesis (13 [0.9%]) were fewer common symptoms (Table 1).
Severely ill patients with COVID-19 receive CsT upon admission
According to the severity degree of the disease progress during treatment, 166 patients (11.9%) who received methylprednisolone intravenously as recommended by the Guidance were defined as the CsT group, whereas 1,226 patients who did not were defined as the non-CsT group. More patients in the CsT group had hypertension (42.2% vs. 34.8%, P = 0.07), immunodeficiencies (1.8% vs. 0.2%, P = 0.01), and acute respiratory distress (4.8% vs 0.2%, P < 0.001), as well as other symptoms, including fatigue (48.2% vs. 37.9%, P = 0.01), fever (76.5% vs. 67.2%, P = 0.02), and dyspnea (24.1% vs. 9.7%, P < 0.001) than in the non-CsT group (Table 1). Additionally, the first laboratory tests after admission showed differences between the groups (Supplementary Table S1). The percentage of neutrophil (NEUT) (69.75 [62.0–80.2] % vs. 63 [56.6–70.5] %, P < 0.001) was significantly higher, whereas the percentage of lymphocyte (LYM) (18.5 [11.8–27.1] % vs. 25.9 [19.3–32.0] %, P < 0.001) was significantly lower, in the CsT group than in the non-CsT group before treatment. These results indicate the wide spectrum of disease severity and support the use of methylprednisolone in severely ill patients with COVID-19.
To reduce bias caused by comorbidities, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed (Supplementary Table S2). In brief, 166 patients from the non-CsT group were selected for subsequent analysis after matching and the results of laboratory tests before CsT treatment were compared (Supplementary Table S3). There were significant differences in laboratory indicators, including C-reactive protein (CRP), NEUT, and LYM (P all < 0.01) and glucose (GLU), D-dimer, total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, uric acid, and LDH (P all < 0.05). However, there were no differences in the levels of mean platelet volume, platelet count (PLT), BNP, ALT, AST, and Cre between the groups. Additionally, more patients were admitted into the intensive care unit in the CsT group than in the non-CsT group. These data indicate that patients who received CsT had more serious medical conditions than those who did not receive CsT, even after PSM.
Comparison of outcomes in CsT and non-CsT patients
Although patients in the CsT group had more serious medical conditions, they recovered at a rate comparable with non-CsT patients (95.8% vs. 95.2%, P > 0.99) and there was no difference in viral clearance time between the CsT and non-CsT groups (44.5 [38.5–47.3] days vs. 46.0 [28.3–67.3] days, P = 0.48). Additionally, there was no difference in the mortality rate between the CsT and non-CsT groups (1.8% vs. 1.2%, respectively, P > 0.99) but the hospitalization time was longer in the CsT group than in the non-CsT group (21 [17–28] days vs. 12 [7–20] days, P < 0.001) (Supplementary Table S4). The recovery rate of patients in the non-CsT group after PSM (158/166 [95.2%]) was similar to that before PSM (1196/1226 [97.6%]) and there were no differences in serum indicators and outcomes between the groups regarding the final test results before discharge (Supplementary Table S5). These data suggest that CsT had significant clinical benefits for severely ill patients with COVID-19.
CsT elicits an anti-inflammatory effect and may cause secondary infections
To assess the anti-inflammatory effects of CsT, the levels of a variety of inflammatory indicators in patients before, during, and after CsT were compared. The CRP level decreased significantly after CsT (3.1 [1.2–8.2] mg/L vs. 9.5 [2.8–40.6] mg/L, after and before CsT, respectively, P < 0.001) but there was no significant difference in the CRP level in patients during CsT compared with before CsT (Table 2, Figure 2A). The proportion of NEUT was higher in patients during CsT than in patients before CsT (77.1 [68.9–84.3] % vs. 69.8 [62.0–80.2] %, during and before CsT, respectively, P < 0.001), whereas the proportion of LYM decreased significantly during treatment (14.7 [9.9–22.2] % vs. 18.5 [11.8–27.1] %, during and before CsT, respectively, P = 0.01) (Table 2, Figure 2B-C). Four cases that presented this trend for CRP, NEUT and LYM are shown in Figure 3A-C. This analysis demonstrates the anti-inflammatory effects of intravenously administered methylprednisolone, with the associated compromise in immune function.
CsT is associated with increased risk of metabolic, cardiac, hepatic, and kidney abnormalities
To estimate the side effects of CsT, we compared laboratory indexes of patients before, during, and after CsT. To evaluate glucose metabolism, we compared the GLU level; 48.7% of patients were outside the normal range during treatment, whereas only 24.8% of patients were outside the normal range before treatment but most patients gradually returned to normal levels after CsT (5.1 [4.7–6.6] mmol/L vs. 5.9 [5.0–8.0] mmol/L, after and during CsT, respectively, P < 0.001) (Figure 2D, Figure 3D).
We also investigated potential side effects of CsT that adversely affected heart, liver, and kidney function. The level of ALT, an indicator of hepatic function, increased significantly during CsT (32.8 [19.6–56.5] IU/L vs. 26.1 [17.2–44.1] IU/L, during and before CsT, respectively, P = 0.03) (Table 2). The level of BNP, an indicator of cardiac function, also increased significantly during CsT (42.2 [0.0–100.0] pg/mL vs. 19.4 [0.0–35.1] pg/mL, during and before CsT, respectively, P = 0.05). The PLT, an indicator of infection, also increased during CsT (240.0 [188.0–309.0] × 109/L vs. 219 [161.3–284.0] × 109/L, during and before CsT, respectively, P = 0.01).
To identify the patients most likely to suffer from cardiac, hepatic, and kidney abnormalities during CsT, we compared biochemical indicators between the injured and unaffected groups. In patients with hepatic abnormalities during CsT, the levels of ALT and GGT before CsT were significantly higher than those in unaffected patients during CsT (Table 3). Similarly, the levels of BNP, α-HBDH, and LDH before CsT were significantly higher in patients with cardiac abnormalities than in unaffected patients during CsT (Table 4). The levels of most biochemical indicators before CsT in patients with kidney abnormalities did not change significantly; only α-HBDH and LDH levels were higher than in unaffected patients, with an increase of CRP level and decrease of the proportion of LYM (Supplementary Table S6).
For patients with a common underlying disease, we conducted further research on the effect of CsT. Patients with hypertension had significantly increased PLT and ALT values during CsT (Supplementary Table S7) and patients with cardiovascular disease showed a continuous elevation in D-dimer level (Supplementary Table S8), whereas patients who had diabetes did not show excessive side effects during or after CsT (Supplementary Table S9).