Gastric perforation may be caused by trauma, malignant tumors, benign ulcers, and iatrogenic factors such as endoscopic procedures. Severe gastric injuries secondary to penetrating abdominal trauma occur in 7–20% of the cases, and are associated with several complications [8]. Injuries to other visceral organs can occur in 65–74% of the cases [9], and liver lacerations can co-exist with these injuries, especially diaphragmatic injury [10]. Physicians should be aware of delayed gastric perforation, because a superficial injury of the gastric wall can progress to free perforation [11]. In our case, the initial CT scan showed only splenic hemorrhage with diaphragmatic injury, but the patient developed free gastric perforation after 3 d; we believe that a thorough surgical exploration of the abdominal cavity during the first operation could have prevented delayed gastric perforation [9, 12]. Furthermore, we believe that the second delayed perforation of the stomach wall occurred due to perigastric fluid accumulation that may have interrupted stomach wall healing.
The treatment modality differs depending on the etiology and severity of the gastric perforation. Therapeutic endoscopy can promptly identify free perforation of the gastric wall, thereby allowing adequate and successful management. Accordingly, recent studies have demonstrated good results from on-site endoscopic closure of GI tract perforations [3, 13]. However, the immediate detection and management of free perforation may be difficult in gastric perforation from an external force, such as blunt or penetrating trauma. With delayed perforation, endoscopic closure of the perforation site may be challenging due to bowel edema, inflammation, and fibrosis of the surrounding tissues.
Our case suggests that when surgery is unfeasible due to unexpected patient conditions, such as delayed gastric re-perforation or leakage from the repair site, salvage treatment using endoscopy may be preferable to re-operation, which is associated with high morbidity and mortality [14]. Endoloops and endoscopic clips for the closure of GI tract perforation are effective treatment modalities [2, 3]. However, existing studies have only reported on the efficacy of on-site endoscopic closure for early GI perforation and have limited data for delayed GI tract perforation and anastomotic leakage after trauma. Our case offers a novel technique for these situations. Thus, for swollen and friable gastric mucosa (often observed in traumatic gastric perforation), using the modified purse-string technique (i.e., placing the “pillar clips” before the endoloop to retain a sufficient margin of the perforated lumen) over the conventional purse-string technique may be more appropriate. Regrettably, an extensive abdominal examination during the first surgery may have identified the gastric injury and prevented perforation and complications. Therefore, thorough surgical exploration of the abdominal cavity should be considered in cases of abdominal trauma, especially those with penetrating diaphragmatic injury.
In conclusion, endoscopic treatment using this novel modified purse-string technique can successfully manage delayed re-perforation of the stomach due to trauma, without complications or subsequent surgery. The successful implementation of the modified purse-string technique in this case merits further study for both safety and efficacy in large scale trials.