We conducted a nationwide survey of IEI for the second time in 10 years. The prevalence of IEI was 2.2 per 100,000 inhabitants, which was comparable to the previous nationwide study (2.3/100,000) [6]. We observed a marked increase in the percentage of patients with autoinflammatory disorders, which was the most prevalent disease category in this study. This increase possibly reflects advances in genetic testing and a better understanding for this disease group, since autoinflammatory disease was introduced into the spectrum of IEI rather recently [14]. The relative decrease in ‘classical’ IEI such as CID or antibody deficiencies compared to the previous study may be due to a difference in the selection rate of pediatric departments. We set the selection rate to 20% for all medical departments following the epidemiological survey manual [15], which likely shifted our cohort to an older age compared with previous studies which mainly selected pediatric patients [6,16,17]. This is supported by the fact that the proportion of patients reported from pediatric departments was 77% (table 1), compared with 92% from the previous study [6]. The older age of our cohort may also be due to advances in diagnoses and management, as more patients with IEI grow into adulthood and more adults are newly diagnosed with IEI [18].
A genetic diagnosis was made in 74% of patients, which is relatively high compared to other studies [19], and is again attributable to advances in diagnostic methods, such as the use of next-generation sequencing. We observed a difference in diagnostic age between disease groups (Fig. 1), which is in line with previous studies [20,21]. Another interesting finding was the disease distribution within antibody deficiencies; compared with the previous study, we observed an increase in CVID which outnumbered XLA. Although CVID is a heterogenous disease and many patients lack a genetic diagnosis, our results may reflect a growing recognition of IEI among non-pediatric physicians, since many patients with CVID are diagnosed in adulthood [22].
One of the objectives of this survey was to understand the current status of vaccination in patients with IEI in Japan. We observed that a significant percentage of patients received a contraindicated vaccine, presumably before diagnosis of the disease. For example, 26% of SCID and 54% of CID patients had received a live vaccine (Fig. 2), which is contraindicated in this setting. We should assume that these patients may have developed serious adverse events, because patients with these diseases are known to have an increased risk when receiving live vaccines [23]. Likewise, the proportion of patients with SCID, CGD, and MSMD patients who received BCG was 23%, 48%, and 82%, respectively.
Regarding the issue of BCG vaccination, physicians were asked to report any history of BCG related infections since they could be important signs of IEI. We saw that within the 195 patients who received an ‘undesirable’ BCG, 27 patients suffered from BCG related infections, which may be fatal in patients with IEI [24,25] (Fig. 3). When focusing on individual diseases, we saw that most of the reported BCG infections were from patients with CGD or MSMD, and that there were no reports from patients with SCID or CID. This is in contrast with a previously published review of BCG vaccination in SCID patients, where 51% of patients developed BCG complications [25]. However, most of the patients described in the review received BCG during the first month of life, whereas Japanese patients typically receive BCG during 5 to 7 months of age [8]. Since most SCID patients receive SCT, the patients from our cohort may have cured before any severe manifestations of BCG infection. Another interesting finding was the report of BCG infection in XLP (Table 3), since there have been no previous reports of BCG infection with this disease, and XLP is rather known for overproduction of interferon gamma, which is important for the eradication of mycobacterium species.
The role of BCG vaccines in preventing tuberculosis is unquestionable, especially for the prevention of meningitis and miliary tuberculosis in infants [26]. However, like other vaccines, the policy of vaccination depends on the prevalence of the pathogen. In western Europe or USA, where the prevalence of tuberculosis is low, BCG vaccination is reserved for special high risk groups [2]. The incidence of tuberculosis in Japan has decreased greatly since the 1950’s [27]. However, the incidence among young-aged people shows a slight increase during the recent period [28], and Japan is still considered a moderately tuberculosis endemic country. This suggests the continuous need for universal BCG vaccination in Japan, along with the need of diagnosing at-risk patients before BCG.
Newborn screening (NBS) for SCID has proven efficacy in detecting immunodeficient patients before clinical manifestation, and is adopted as a universal program in several countries such as USA [29], Israel [30], and Spain [31]. Although SCID-NBS is only available in limited areas in Japan [32], if it can be applied on a national scale, it may become one solution to the problem of inappropriate vaccination in pre-diagnosed patients. In addition, efforts should be focused on screening patients with CGD and MSMD at the site of vaccination, until novel NBS methods become available [12,33]. For example, physicians, especially pediatricians, should ask specific questions about the patient’s condition and family history; asking about any family history of IEI may be insufficient, and a more specific interview regarding a family history of severe BCG-I or childhood disseminated tuberculosis infection may be necessary [34,35].
One limitation of this study is that it was based on physician directed questionnaires making it subject to reporting bias; an absence of documented adverse events may not necessarily mean there were no actual events. Another important fact is that this was a cross-sectional study, and included patients diagnosed at various ages, some of whom were diagnosed more than 50 years ago. Although we assessed vaccine indications using present guidelines for this study, evidence surrounding IEI has obviously changed over the past years. For example, patients with chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis (CMC) were generally thought to have immunity against pathogens other than candida species, but there is emerging evidence that patients with STAT1 GOF mutations, the most common form of CMC, display susceptibility against various pathogens including the BCG strain [36]. Therefore, patients who received seemingly inappropriate vaccines in the past according to present guidelines, may have been vaccinated following up-to-date evidence at that time. Nevertheless, no registry concerning vaccination status and diagnosis exists in Japan, so we believe the results of this study serves as valuable evidence in this field currently available.
For this study, we categorized patients according to recent classifications [5], but one must note that immunological profiles may differ even among patients with the same disease. For example, defects in the IL2RG gene typically leads to T + B-SCID, but there are increasing reports of hypomorphic IL2RG mutations leading to a less severe or ‘leaky’ phenotype, making early diagnosis difficult [37]. Therefore, a thorough immunological survey of each patient is important, and physicians are recommended to consult a clinical immunologist before considering immunization for atypical cases [38].