Study design and sample
A cross-sectional survey was carried out in September and October 2014 in five refugee camps near Tindouf, Algeria. The sample size was chosen based on an estimated prevalence of an inadequate PA level (i.e., not meeting the WHO recommendations of at least 150 min of moderate-intensity PA throughout the week, or at least 75 min of vigorous-intensity PA throughout the week, or an equivalent combination of moderate- and vigorous-intensity activity (MVPA) [19]) of 50% and an absolute precision of 5% for the 80% confidence interval [20] Assuming incomplete sampling from 10% of the participants, we calculated a final desired sample size of 180 men and 180 women, as determined with Open Source Epidemiologic Statistics for Public Health (OpenEpi). Due to the unequal number of inhabitants in the five camps, a probability proportional to size (PPS) method was used to select participants from each camp. For more information on sampling and recruitment, see Morseth et al. (2017) [21]. During the study period, 52 participants withdrew mainly due to work obligations or personal or family illness, and two participants were excluded. Forty-nine additional participants were randomly recruited, so that the final sample consisted of 355 participants: 175 men and 180 women. Three hundred three participants reported some form of PA and are thus included in the PA analysis.
Measurements
Physical activity
The short, self-administered international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ-SF) [22] was used to assess PA. The IPAQ focuses on the amount of PA performed over the past 7-day period. The IPAQ includes questions about the time spent engaging in vigorous PA, moderate PA and walking in 10-min bouts or longer. Within these domains, participants are asked to consider all types of physical activities, including activities performed during leisure time, domestic and gardening activities, work-related activities and transport-related activities. Relevant examples of activity performed at the different intensities were mentioned in the items. The data obtained from the IPAQ were used to estimate the total amount of PA completed in a 7-day period by weighting the reported min per week in each domain by a metabolic equivalent (MET) energy expenditure estimate. The weighted MET minutes per week were then calculated by multiplying the duration (minutes), frequency (days) and MET intensity and then summing the three domains, namely, vigorous (8 METs), moderate (4 METs) and walking (3.3 METs), to produce a weighted estimate of total PA per week (min∙week–1) [22]. The participants were categorised into three PA levels according to the IPAQ scoring criteria: Low (category 1): meets neither moderate nor high criterion. Moderate (category 2): meets any of the following three criteria: (a) three or more days of vigorous-intensity activity of at least 20 min∙day–1, (b) five or more days of moderate-intensity activity and/or walking of at least 30 min∙day–1, and (c) five or more days of any combination of walking, moderate-intensity, or vigorous-intensity activities achieving a minimum of at least 600 MET∙min∙week–1. High (category 3): meets any one of the following two criteria: (a) vigorous-intensity activity on at least three days and accumulating at least 1500 MET∙min∙week–1 and (b) seven or more days of any combination of walking, moderate intensity, or vigorous-intensity activities accumulating at least 3000 MET∙min∙week–1. Those categorised as having moderate or high activity were classified as being sufficiently active according to the WHO PA guidelines [19]. Data cleaning and processing were carried out in accordance with the guidelines published by the IPAQ Research Committee, and the methods used to score the IPAQ are described in the IPAQ scoring protocol [23]. Additional questions, including views of one’s own PA level on a 5-point scale (0=far too low, 1=slightly too low, 2=satisfying, 3=slightly too high and 4=far too high), views regarding engaging in PA on a 3-point scale (e.g. 0=silly, 1=neutral, 2=wisely), what activities they usually engaged in, what they liked to do, and organised physical activities they would like to be arranged in the camps, were included in the questionnaire.
Anthropometric measures
Weight was measured with the participants in light clothing using digital Tara scales produced for UNICEF (SECA 890; SECA, Hamburg, Germany). Participants’ height, without shoes, was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using an ultrasonic metre from Soehnle Professional (Backnang, Germany) or a UNICEF portable stadiometer if the participant had a similar or taller height than the field worker performing the measurements. Waist circumference was measured by trained personnel midway between the hipbone and lowest rib using an ergonomic measuring tape from SECA (SECA 201; SECA). BMI was calculated as body weight divided by squared body height (kg.m-2).
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences for Windows, version 26, IBM, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous variables are presented as medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) since they were not normally distributed, and categorical variable are presented as percentages. Differences between groups were assessed by the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and Pearson’s chi-squared test for categorical variables. Associations between sociodemographic (gender, age, education, marital status, work status) and anthropometric (BMI) factors and low (category 1 in IPAQ) PA level were assessed with multivariable logistic regression, with low PA level as the dependent variable. All significance tests were two-sided.
Ethics
Ethics approval for the survey was given by the Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics in Norway (ref. 2014/1155) and by the Saharawi Ministry of Public Health. Informed consent was obtained from all participants both orally and in writing. It was emphasised that refusal to participate or withdrawal from the survey would not have any negative consequences for the participants. The study was conducted according to the guidelines provided in the Declaration of Helsinki.